
AbaQulusi residents outraged by sharp electricity tariff hikes
The increases form part of the municipality's 2025/26 budget implementation, but residents say there was little to no meaningful public engagement during the IDP roadshows, when the tariff hikes were proposed. 'We always buy R800 and used to get 299 units. Today, however, we only got 186 units for R800. It's ridiculous!' exclaimed one affected resident on the Vryheid Herald's Facebook page.
These tariff hikes come after the National Energy Regulator of South Africa (NERSA) approved Eskom's price increases, which municipalities pass on to consumers. However, residents argue that AbaQulusi's service delivery failures – frequent outages, poor communication and ageing infrastructure – make the increases unacceptable. Another resident said, 'We would understand if they were charging us these exorbitant amounts for stable electricity supply, but they are charging us for electricity that is unstable.'
In the Adopted Annual Budget, the municipality refers to the major challenge they are facing, namely vandalism, which has a negative impact on electrical infrastructure. 'This not only affects service delivery, as services become unavailable immediately after infrastructure has been vandalised, but it's also expensive to repair and replace.'
Even though electricity is more expensive (according to the adopted municipal budget, which is available on their website), the real cost is much higher than consumers are being charged now.
The 2025/26 Adopted Annual Budget and Medium-Term Revenue & Expenditure Framework (MTREF) reveal that the municipality is under financial pressure to keep the Electricity Department running. Despite a price hike of 11.32% in bulk electricity from Eskom, AbaQulusi is still not charging enough to fully cover costs.
A 'Cost of Supply' study shows that to run the electricity section efficiently and keep up with Eskom's electricity increases, tariffs should ideally increase by 51%. But the municipality says that such an increase would be unaffordable for residents.
Instead, the municipality has implemented the following tariff increases:
• A 25% rise for residential users (prepaid and conventional)
• A 15% rise for other consumers like businesses
For the past three years, electricity sales have not brought in enough money to pay Eskom. As a result, other municipal funds have been used to subsidise the Electricity Department.
Making matters more difficult is the fact that municipalities owing Eskom money, including AbaQulusi, are now required to include repayment plans in their annual budgets.
NERSA has confirmed that it will only approve tariff applications based on 'Cost of Supply' studies that were submitted by municipalities. This means that tariffs are probably going to increase over the next few years.
The municipality also implemented a 'High Season' tariff in the winter months of June, July and August, since Eskom charges municipalities more during this period.
The current challenge is also that domestic consumers are being undercharged for electricity, while businesses and other consumers are being overcharged.
According to the adopted budget, for consumers who use a prepaid meter, electricity is now charged using two pricing blocks instead of the previous four. This means that if you buy up to 350kWh in a month, you'll pay a lower rate (Block 1). If you buy more than 350 kWh in total during that month, the extra units will cost more per unit (Block 2). The system will keep track of how many units you have bought in that same month. This means that even if you buy electricity in smaller amounts, the total for the month is the same. Once you go over 350 kWh, consumers will pay the higher rate.
Domestic prepaid electricity users (excluding the indigent) will have to pay a fixed monthly service fee, as well as higher rates during winter months.
According to the municipality's adopted 2025/26 budget, this applies to households with single-phase prepaid connections between 30 and 60 amps, which are common in most homes.
All prepaid consumers will pay a monthly service fee of R25.
Domestic consumers (excluding the indigent) will pay R2.55 per kwh for the first 350 kWh purchased and thereafter R2.72 per kWh. During the Eskom high season (June to August), electricity will cost more:
• R3.74 per unit for the first 350 kWh you use in a month.
• R4.16 per unit for any units above 350 kWh.
If you use a conventional (monthly billed) meter:
Conventional consumers will pay a monthly service charge of R224 (excluding three phase consumers, who will pay a service charge of R1300 a month).
• For the first 350 kWh used in the month, you'll pay R2.72 per unit.
• After that, every extra unit costs R3.79.
In Eskom's high season (June to August):
• The first 350 kWh will be R3.35 per unit;
• Over 350 kWh will be R4.12 per unit.
The Vryheid Herald has requested a proper breakdown of the new tariffs, since consumers are complaining and confused. Unfortunately, this information from the municipality had not been received at the time of going to print.
ALSO READ: Municipality warns residents to avoid scammer posing as disconnection official
The news provided to you in this link comes to you from the editorial staff of the Vryheid Herald, a sold newspaper distributed in the Vryheid area.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
37 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Sassa warns grant beneficiaries to comply or face suspension and repayment
The South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) has warned that failure to comply with the current review process may result in the suspension and possible permanent lapsing of grants. 'Continued non-compliance may lead to the permanent lapsing of their grants. Beneficiaries are advised that Sassa is also empowered by the Act [9 of 2004] to recoup any money that would have been paid to the beneficiary incorrectly. 'This means that, should we find out that you have been receiving social grants you were not eligible to receive, Sassa will institute a debt recovery process where you will have to pay back the money,' Sassa CEO Themba Matlou warned. Matlou's warning came during a media briefing on the current social grant review process held in Pretoria today. Over 140 000 notifications sent to beneficiaries Matlou announced that the review process has already seen over 140 000 SMS notifications sent to beneficiaries selected for review. However, he noted that non-responsiveness suggests some beneficiaries may have changed their contact details without informing Sassa. Matlou acknowledged that while Sassa communicated the changes through various media platforms and public announcements, some beneficiaries may have missed the communication. 'Sassa has in previous years noticed that many beneficiaries do not update their contact details and consequently do not receive the notices to come in and conduct a review. We have sent out bulk SMS messages and registered letters to the addresses we have in our possession. 'We are working on strengthening our communication approach, including more robust community-level engagement and increased visibility of information on official and public platforms. We will also increase the operating hours and employ additional capacity to address long queues recently experienced during this important review process,' Matlou said. He added that the agency is working hard to automate the review process by introducing self-service options using online platforms to make it easier for beneficiaries to complete their reviews and reduce queues at local offices. Matlou urged beneficiaries who have not received their payment or are uncertain about their payment status to contact Sassa on the toll-free number 0800 60 10 11 or visit Budget allocation conditions While Sassa is mandated by the Social Assistance Act 13 of 2004 to review social grants, Matlou said the agency is also operating under strict budgetary conditions set by the National Treasury. He explained that in February 2025, the National Treasury issued Sassa with a preliminary allocation letter for the 2025 Medium-Term Expenditure Framework, which contained compliance framework conditions that became binding and now form part of approved budget allocations for the financial year. 'These conditions direct Sassa to find mechanisms to save costs through its review process to ensure money is not paid to undeserving beneficiaries, to enhance fiscal accountability, improve operational efficiency, and ensure the integrity of the Social Assistance Programme. 'They cover critical areas such as income verification, biometric checks, inter-agency data cross-referencing, and quarterly reporting obligations. The conditions also reflect Treasury's intent to strengthen oversight and promote transparency in the administration of social grants,' Matlou said. Matlou reaffirmed Sassa's commitment to transparency, accountability and continuous improvement of the social grant system. 'We take our responsibility seriously to serve the most vulnerable in our society and will work harder to ensure no beneficiary is left confused or disadvantaged. Sassa remains committed to protecting the rights and dignity of each beneficiary by ensuring no one who qualifies is unfairly penalised. 'Our efforts are directed at preserving the social assistance system for those who genuinely need it. Sassa enforces a zero-tolerance policy towards fraud and corruption, both from beneficiaries and within its own ranks,' he said. He added that the agency is finalising the implementation of biometric identification infrastructure to enhance security and integrity in grant administration processes. – Breaking news at your fingertips… Follow Caxton Network News on Facebook and join our WhatsApp channel. Nuus wat saakmaak. Volg Caxton Netwerk-nuus op Facebook en sluit aan by ons WhatsApp-kanaal. Read original story on At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
R2. 5 billion bailout bonanza: SABC and Post Office get a lifeline
Communications and Digital Technologies Minister Solly Malatsi has announced that the SABC will receive over R700 million and the South African Post Office (SAPO) R1.8 billion Image: Solly Malatsi/X Communications and Digital Technologies Minister Solly Malatsi has announced that the SABC will receive over R700 million and the South African Post Office (SAPO) R1.8 billion over the Medium-Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF). Tabling the Department's 2025/26 Budget Vote in Parliament last week, Malatsi said the allocations were aimed at supporting the SABC's public broadcasting mandate and stabilising SAPO's declining services. "The SABC will receive R704 million over the MTEF. This includes R43 million for programme production, R464 million to support the core public broadcasting, R197 million for Channel Africa, which amplifies South Africa's voice across the continent," Malatsi said. Last month, IOL reported that SABC CEO Nomsa Chabeli raised concerns about the broadcaster's financial sustainability, highlighting that the cost of its public mandate remains unfunded and that the SABC depends heavily on commercial revenue to support these obligations. "It's important to note that when we have discussions about the SABC's financial sustainability, we remember the cost of the public mandate that is currently unfunded. The SABC, from a commercial perspective, takes commercial revenue to fund the public mandate that's our current model." Chabeli said. She also pointed out that less than 20% of households in South Africa are paying for TV licenses, a situation that has led to a steady decline in funding for the public broadcaster. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading The funding announcements come amid growing concerns about the long-term sustainability of both the SABC and SAPO. Many South Africans have criticised repeated government bailouts, questioning whether money alone can fix deep-rooted issues such as outdated business models and competition from digital alternatives. "The South African Post Office is allocated R8 billion over the MTEF to fulfil its universal service obligations, improve service delivery. This funding will support SAPO's efforts to diversify revenue, rebuild trust, and stabilise operations through strategic partnerships and good governance". Malatsi said. Last month, SAPO also received a R381 million wage subsidy from the government, aimed at covering employee salaries for the next six months as part of the ongoing business rescue process. IOL News Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel


The Citizen
5 hours ago
- The Citizen
Nersa's mistakes will hit you hard
Eskom gave a presentation to Nersa, proposing the number of tariffs be reduced from 10 to three. The courts have ruled in favour of Eskom in almost all of its applications against Nersa, and the trend looks set to continue. Picture: Shutterstock Moneyweb has learnt that consumers will have to cough up at least R40 billion more for Eskom following a settlement between the utility and the energy regulator Nersa. This pertains to mistakes Nersa's made in several decisions regarding Eskom's revenue and tariffs. This amount may increase as Eskom has launched a fresh challenge to Nersa's latest decisions regarding the utility's revenue and tariffs for the current and the next two financial years. Eskom's court application is the latest in a string of challenges to Nersa decisions, almost all ruled in favour of Eskom. Moneyweb has learnt that several such applications were settled between the two parties in May. This was not widely communicated at the time. The settlement, which was made an order of the court, pertains to clawbacks spanning the financial years 2015 to 2021. ALSO READ: Ekurhuleni metro and Nersa lock horns over electricity tariff discrepancy Clawbacks The clawback mechanism is designed to retrospectively compensate either the utility or its customers for variations in the assumptions underlying the revenue determination, such as sales volumes. The compensation is done by adjusting electricity tariffs in following years. Eskom disputed the amount Nersa decided it was entitled to claw back in each year from 2015 to 2021. Following the settlement Eskom is entitled to recover in total R40 billion more from consumers for underrecovery over the period due to mistakes made by Nersa. In terms of the order, Nersa will decide on the timing of this recovery. ALSO READ: Nersa's municipal tariff process flawed, says Sapoa Nersa still making mistakes? Eskom now alleges that Nersa's latest revenue and tariff determination for the current and next two financial years is also flawed. This will be on the agenda of Nersa's electricity subcommittee during a special meeting on Wednesday (16 July). It follows an application by Eskom to the Gauteng Division of the High Court to have the decision reviewed and set aside. Nersa announced in January that it had approved revenues of R384.6 billion for Eskom for the current financial year, which translated to an average percentage increase of 12.74%. This took effect on 1 April. ALSO READ: The silent 77.5% rise of your electricity bill The allowable revenue approved for 2026/7 is R409.5 billion, which translates to an average increase of 5.36% and for 2027/8 it is R435.8 billion, which translates to an average increase of 6.19%. This is considerably lower than the amounts Eskom applied for, which would have meant increases of 36.15%, 11.81%, and 9.1% in the three consecutive years. Following Nersa's publication of the reason for its decision early last month, Eskom filed an application to have the decision reviewed and set aside specifically regarding Nersa's treatment of the Regulatory Asset Base (RAB). Moneyweb has reliably learnt that Nersa has not yet indicated whether it will oppose the application. Presumably the meeting on Wednesday will make a recommendation to the electricity regulator, which will then take a final decision. The formulation of the agenda point however indicates that Nersa may have accepted Eskom's argument and is open to settling the matter. It reads: 'Correction of error on the Eskom sixth multi-year price determination decision (MYPD6) Regulatory Asset Base section and proposed settlement.' ALSO READ: Nersa approves 12.7% electricity tariff hike for Eskom Eskom's arguments In an affidavit supporting its court application, Eskom CFO Calib Cassim sets out in detail – some of it quite technical – the mistakes that Eskom contends Nersa has made. This includes attaching a zero value to several operational power stations, including Koeberg. He shows that the value attached to the RAB is key to determining the returns Eskom is entitled to – and that Nersa's downward adjustments of the RAB in each of the three years dealt with in the tariff application cost the utility about R30 billion in total. Cassim says that Nersa, in taking the decision, exceeded its powers and acted inconsistently with its own methodology and with an earlier court order dealing with the same subject. ALSO READ: 30% electricity tariff increase is a reality, says Erasa He states that Nersa's decision is irrational and unreasonable. Cassim points out that Nersa's flawed approach to the RAB only applies to the application by Eskom's generation business. Those of the National Transmission Company of South Africa, a wholly owned subsidiary dealing with transmission, and the distribution business, were dealt with correctly, in Eskom's view. In addition, there are discrepancies between some of the numbers in the press release Nersa issued in January announcing its decision and those in the document issued in June setting out the reasons for its decision. ALSO READ: Eskom proposes further tariff restructuring to ensure 'transparency and fairness' Cassim further argues that the condition Nersa set for its approval of the utility's revenue – that it submit a revaluation of its RAB, with the first clawback application following the 2025/6 financial year – is unrealistic and impossible. Such a revaluation takes at least 30 months and is an expensive exercise, according to Cassim. Any adjustments in Eskom's favour will be reflected in future increases in electricity tariffs. This comes against the backdrop of widespread concern about the affordability of electricity, with Minister of Electricity and Energy Kgosientso Ramokgopa saying that South Africans must increasingly choose between buying food and buying electricity. He said even middle-class South Africans are battling to afford electricity. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.