Yankees Pitcher expected to return after concerning rehab start
Marcus Stroman's final rehab start didn't do much to quiet concerns about his return to the New York Yankees rotation. The veteran right-hander, who's been out since April with knee inflammation, gave up 10 hits and 5 earned runs over just 3.2 innings for Double-A Somerset on Tuesday night. He walked two, struck out one, and needed 65 pitches to get through it.
Advertisement
Yankees manager Aaron Boone had said earlier this week that Stroman would "be in the mix" for the open rotation spot after this start.
But is that really the best idea?
New York Yankees starting pitcher Marcus StromanVincent Carchietta-Imagn Images
Stroman had a rough start to the season before the injury—an 11.57 ERA through three starts—and this outing didn't exactly look like someone ready to turn the page. It was his third rehab start and easily his worst. The Yankees were hoping to see sharper command, fewer hard-hit balls, maybe a little late movement. Instead, they got base runners. A lot of them.
Stroman says he feels healthy. The pitch count is where it needs to be. With Ryan Yarbrough on the injured list, the Yankees have an opening for a starter on Sunday. Allan Winnans had a chance to win it on Monday night and his middling fastball wasn't exactly convincing.
Advertisement
So, are the Yankees really just going to plug him back in and hope for the best?
This team is already walking a tightrope with its pitching depth, and Stroman has been more of a question mark than a solution since Opening Day.
It's possible the Yankees try to ease him in with a soft matchup, which technically the Athletics could be. If they could get a few good starts out of him, maybe they could package him in a trade deal. While he's changed his tune about being a starter only, he would presumably accept a spot in the bullpen. Either way, Stroman's leash is going to be short. If his stuff doesn't play, they can't afford to wait around.
Related: Could the Yankees Target This Affordable Third Baseman at the Trade Deadline?
Related: With Hank Aaron Behind Him, Aaron Judge Sets Sights on A-Rod
This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 25, 2025, where it first appeared.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
12 minutes ago
- CNN
Supreme Court agrees to review bans on transgender athletes joining teams that align with their gender identity
Source: CNN The Supreme Court on Thursday agreed to decide whether states may ban transgender students from playing on sports teams that align with their gender identity, revisiting the issue of LGBTQ rights in a blockbuster case just days after upholding a ban on some health care for trans youth. The decision puts the issue of transgender rights on the Supreme Court's docket for the second year in a row and is by far the most significant matter the justices have agreed to hear in the term that will begin in October. The cases, one from West Virginia and the other from Idaho, involve transgender athletes who at least initially competed in track and field and cross country. The West Virginia case was filed by a then-middle school student who told the Supreme Court she was 'devastated at the prospect' of not being able to compete after the state passed a law banning trans women athletes' participation in public school sports. The court's decision landed as transgender advocates are still reeling from the 6-3 ruling in US v. Skrmetti, which upheld Tennessee's ban on trans youth from accessing puberty blockers and hormone therapy. Though the state law also bars surgeries, they were not at issue in the high court's case. But that decision was limited to questions of whether the state had the power to regulate medical treatments for minors, leaving unresolved challenges to other anti-trans laws. The justices agreed to review two cases challenging sports bans in Idaho and West Virginia. The court didn't act on a third appeal over a similar ban in Arizona and will likely hold that case until it decides the other two, probably by early next summer. The American Civil Liberties Union, which is part of the legal team representing the athletes in the cases, said school athletic programs should be accessible to everyone regardless of a student's sex or transgender status. 'Categorically excluding kids from school sports just because they are transgender will only make our schools less safe and more hurtful places for all youth,' said Joshua Block, senior counsel for the ACLU's LGBTQ & HIV Project. 'We believe the lower courts were right to block these discriminatory laws, and we will continue to defend the freedom of all kids to play.' West Virginia Attorney General JB McCuskey, a Republican, said that the state is 'confident the Supreme Court will uphold the Save Women's Sports Act because it complies with the US Constitution and complies with Title IX.' The Supreme Court will review the case at a time when Republican-led states and President Donald Trump have pushed for policies to curtail transgender rights. Trump ran for reelection in part on a campaign to push 'transgender insanity' out of public schools, mocking Democratic candidate Kamala Harris in advertising for supporting 'they/them,' the pronouns used by some transgender and nonbinary people. But even before that, states had passed laws banning transgender girls from playing on girls' sports teams. Roughly half of US states have enacted such laws. The Trump administration has actively supported policies that bar transgender athletes from competing on teams that match their gender identity. On Wednesday, the federal government released $175 million in previously frozen federal funding to the University of Pennsylvania after the school agreed to block transgender athletes from female sports teams and erase the records set by swimmer Lia Thomas. In West Virginia, former Gov. Jim Justice, a Republican, signed the 'Save Women's Sports Act' in 2021, banning transgender women and girls from participating on public school sports teams consistent with their gender identity. Becky Pepper-Jackson, a rising sixth grader at the time, who was 'looking forward to trying out for the girls' cross-country team,' filed a lawsuit alleging that the ban violated federal law and the Constitution. The Richmond-based 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last year that West Virginia's ban violated Pepper-Jackson's rights under Title IX, a federal law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex at schools that receive federal aid. The court also revived her constitutional challenge of the law. 'Her family, teachers, and classmates have all known B.P.J. as a girl for several years, and – beginning in elementary school – she has participated only on girls athletic teams,' US Circuit Judge Toby Heytens, who was nominated to the bench by President Joe Biden, wrote for the court. 'Given these facts, offering B.P.J. a 'choice' between not participating in sports and participating only on boys teams is no real choice at all.' Most of the appeals on the issue of transgender athletes question whether such bans are permitted under the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. The West Virginia case was different in that it also raised the question of whether such bans violated Title IX. The Supreme Court often prefers to settle a dispute under a law, rather than the Constitution, if it has the option because such a ruling technically allows Congress to change the law in response to the decision. West Virginia appealed to the Supreme Court last year, arguing that the appeal court decision 'renders sex-separated sports an illusion.' 'Schools will need to separate sports teams based on self-identification and personal choices that have nothing to do with athletic performance,' the state said. West Virginia initially brought the case to the Supreme Court last year on an emergency basis, seeking to enforce the law against Pepper-Jackson while the underlying legal challenge played out. In an unsigned order, the court declined that request. Conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito said they would have granted it. In Idaho, Republican Gov. Brad Little signed the state's sports ban in 2020, the first of its kind in the nation. Lindsay Hecox, then a freshman at Boise State University, sued days later, saying that she intended to try out for the women's track and cross-country teams and alleging that the law violated the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause. A federal district court blocked the law's enforcement against Hecox months later and the San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that decision last year. Idaho appealed to the Supreme Court in July. 'Idaho's women and girls deserve an equal playing field,' said Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador, a Republican. 'For too long, activists have worked to sideline women and girls in their own sports.' But Sasha Buchert, senior attorney and director of the Non-Binary and Transgender Rights Project at Lambda Legal, stressed the importance of team sports for all students. Lambda Legal is part of the team representing Pepper-Jackson in the West Virginia case. 'Our client just wants to play sports with her friends and peers,' said Buchert said. 'Everyone understands the value of participating in team athletics, for fitness, leadership, socialization, and myriad other benefits.' This story has been updated with additional information. See Full Web Article
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
MLB rumors: Paul Skenes trade suitors won't stop making ‘serious' trade offers to Pirates
The post MLB rumors: Paul Skenes trade suitors won't stop making 'serious' trade offers to Pirates appeared first on ClutchPoints. It doesn't really make a lot of sense for the Pittsburgh Pirates to trade Paul Skenes, but that isn't stopping teams from trying to pry the young pitcher away from Pittsburgh. Advertisement Skenes, who won the NL Rookie of the Year award and was named an All-Star and All-MLB First Team selection last season, has been the subject of trade rumors since he began dominating on the mound in the majors. And the rumors have only grown louder as the Pirates, who finished last in the NL Central last year, have fared even worse in 2025. At 28-41, Pittsburgh is 13.5 games back from the top of the division and seven games back from the Cincinnati Reds, the fourth-placed team in the NL Central. As a result, and with little confidence that the long-suffering Pirates organization will be able to effectively build around Skenes, fans and analysts have continued to theorize that a contending team will eventually put together a trade good enough for the Pirates to part with Skenes. Teams reportedly think that, too. 'As we've written many times, the Pirates have no interest in trading Paul Skenes as this year's deadline,' The Athletic's Jim Bowden wrote. 'However, multiple GMs have told me that won't stop them from making serious offers to acquire him. And, if you're the Pirates, you have to listen because you have so many needs to fill — on your big-league team and also in your farm system. The return for Skenes in a trade would have to be even more than the haul the Nationals got for Juan Soto at the 2022 deadline. However, he is the best pitcher in baseball, with four more years of team control, so it arguably would be worth paying that type of package. I learned long ago in baseball … never say never.' Advertisement As Bowden mentioned, the Pirates have a proverbial long runway in regards to Skenes' contract. He is in just his second year in MLB, meaning he has one more pre-arbitration season before three arbitration years. The earliest Skenes could become an unrestricted free agent and test the open market is after the 2029 season. In 14 starts this season, Skenes has a 1.88 ERA, NL-best 0.835 WHIP, and 92 strikeouts. He has a 4-6 record. Related: How Andrew McCutchen surpassed Roberto Clemente in Pirates record books Related: Pirates agree to contract with ex-Nationals pitcher
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jets rumors: New York begins Garrett Wilson, Sauce Gardner contract extension talks
The post Jets rumors: New York begins Garrett Wilson, Sauce Gardner contract extension talks appeared first on ClutchPoints. The New York Jets are rumored to be starting contract talks with two of their best players. Defensive back Sauce Gardner and wide receiver Garrett Wilson are engaging with the Jets in talks. ESPN insider Jeremy Fowler says the team is looking to get new deals done soon. Advertisement 'I'm told they have had some preliminary talks, exchanged some numbers, had all that fun stuff. So they have got five to six weeks to see if they can come to an agreement before training camp,' Fowler said on ESPN. Both Gardner and Wilson are considered to be key pieces to a New York team looking for some success. It's been more than a decade since the Jets made the NFL Playoffs, and fans are starving for a postseason appearance. Both players were drafted by the Jets in the first round of the 2022 NFL Draft. Gardner finished that rookie season as the NFL's Defensive Rookie of the Year. Wilson, meanwhile, won Offensive Rookie of the Year honors. Advertisement In 2024, Wilson posted 1,104 receiving yards and seven touchdowns. Gardner, meanwhile, picked up 49 total tackles and an interception for the team's defense. Jets have a new coach, and new hopes The Jets have a new head coach in Aaron Glenn, who has a tough task in front of him. Glenn takes over a franchise that had two coaches last season, as well as a different general manager. New York also parted ways with their quarterback Aaron Rodgers following a disappointing five win season. Glenn has a new quarterback to work with in Justin Fields, who signed a free agent contract this offseason with the Jets. Fields started some games last season for the Pittsburgh Steelers. He helped lead Pittsburgh to the playoffs, after throwing for 1,106 yards. Fields also had five touchdown passes. Advertisement Fields and the Jets take on his old team, the Pittsburgh Steelers, in Week 1 of the 2025 NFL season. The Steelers now have Aaron Rodgers, who will make history with Fields if the two QBs start Game 1. Related: New York Jets' riskiest move in 2025 NFL offseason Related: 3 New York Jets underrated sleepers who could break out in 2025 NFL season