logo
Kellie Pickler slammed as 'callous' by in-laws amid legal battle after husband's death

Kellie Pickler slammed as 'callous' by in-laws amid legal battle after husband's death

Daily Mail​17-05-2025
Kellie Pickler continues to have a contentious relationship with parents-in-law Sharon and Reed Jacobs two years after her husband Kyle Jacobs' death.
The trio have been embroiled in a battle over the late singer's property ever since he died by suicide at age 49 in February 2023.
'It is difficult to know how to respond once again to the latest vitriol in [Kellie's court filing],' the couple's attorney wrote in a court filing on Monday, May 12, per documents reviewed by Us Weekly.
In the wake of Kyle's death his parents were made administrators of his estate after Pickler declined the role. The lawyer claimed the 38-year-old widow has made it a challenge to get anything done since his passing.
The Jacobs filed a petition in August 2024 asking the court to intervene as they tried to get Kyle's remaining property from Pickler, with the former American Idol contestant claiming there was a 'dispute' over the property in question.
In the May 2025 filing, the Jacobs' attorney wrote, 'To suggest that his parents' actions here could be perceived as anything other than an effort to bring his sad chapter (the probate process) to a speedy close is shockingly callous and lacking in empathy.'
Furthermore, the lawyer asked the court to acknowledge Pickler's 'continued invective in suggesting that [Reed and Sharon] would utilize the judicial process in such a way that serves only to prolong their suffering and anguish.'
It was also stated, '[Kellie] has taken what should have been a simple matter and turned it into a highly personal crucible, painting herself as the tragic victim.'
In March 2025 Kellie's in-laws issued a subpoena to Harpeth Memorial Gardens Funeral Home & Cremation Center in order to gain more information on his funeral and cremation.
They also requested that the funeral home provide details regarding 'what items, if any, were cremated' with their late son as well as 'documents pertaining to the services provided on behalf of Kyle.'
However, they claimed the company neither comply nor objected to the subpoena.
The Jacobs family's conflict with Pickler started in May 2023 after she turned over inventory of Kyle's property but then allegedly stopped cooperating.
'Over the course of the ensuing twelve months, [Reed and Sharon] attempted informally to recover those items through discussions with [Kellie] and her counsel; those efforts, however, had limited success,' their lawyer explained in the latest documents.
Sharon and Reed also said Pickler 'agreed to turn over several items but had not done so. In addition, as to at least some of the items, [Kellie] admitted having them but subsequently maintained she could not find them.'
They later accused Pickler of forbidding them to enter the home she shared with their son prior to his death, noting that she let them in once after his death but subsequently kept them from coming on the premises.
'Instead, on two subsequent occasions, [Kellie] insisted she would have items of personal property moved to the home's garage, for subsequent pickup by [Reed and Sharon] under supervision arranged by [Kellie],' their attorney shared. 'On the first such occasion, [Kellie] forbade [Sharon] from being on the property.'
Sharon and Reed said that Pickler provided additional items after the subpoena was issued, but added that they have since come to an 'impasse.'
In May 2024 Pickler sold the marital home she and Kyle shared for $2.3 million.
And she recently requested that Reed and Sharon be removed as administrators of Kyle's estate.
Additionally, she asked to be named the sole heir and beneficiary of Kyle's estate by the court, although Sharon and Reed wish to remain administrators.
The court has yet to rule on the case.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More celebrities voice outrage at The Late Show axing
More celebrities voice outrage at The Late Show axing

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

More celebrities voice outrage at The Late Show axing

CBS has announced the cancellation of its long-running franchise The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, with its final season set to conclude in May 2026. The network stated the decision was a 'financial decision' and not related to the show's performance or content, despite describing Colbert as 'irreplaceable'. The announcement has sparked widespread outrage among the public and high-profile figures, including actors Adam Scott and Ben Stiller, and Senator Elizabeth Warren. Senator Warren and others have questioned CBS's motives, suggesting the cancellation might be linked to Colbert's recent on-air criticism of Paramount's $16 million settlement with Trump. Fellow late-night host Jimmy Kimmel, along with other celebrities and public figures, have expressed strong support for Colbert and dismay at the network's decision.

Discovery 'Shark Week' has breaching great whites, looks back at 'Jaws' and starts with some dancing
Discovery 'Shark Week' has breaching great whites, looks back at 'Jaws' and starts with some dancing

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Discovery 'Shark Week' has breaching great whites, looks back at 'Jaws' and starts with some dancing

Fifty years ago, 'Jaws' unlocked dread in millions about man-eating sharks. This summer, that fear may be somewhat reduced as they become contestants on a TV dance show. Former 'Dancing With the Stars' host Tom Bergeron steps up for a marketing masterstroke by Discovery Channel's 'Shark Week' — 'Dancing with Sharks,' where humans and 20-foot-long hammerhead sharks do a little mambo. 'I had a decade and a half experience of hosting a dance show, but this one was different,' Bergeron tells The Associated Press. 'I'd often thought on 'Dancing With the Stars,' wouldn't it be great if we could incorporate another species? And here I've finally got my dream come true.' In the show, five scuba-diving shark handlers use bait to twirl and guide various sharks into mini-waltzes, in what's being billed as 'the world's most dangerous dance competition.' One contestant wraps his arms around a nerf shark and spoons it. Another takes off her air tank and does a double backflip. A third — a hip-hop loving shark handler — does an old school head spin on the ocean floor as sharks swirl. 'These are some of the best shark handlers in the world. These are people who know the nuances of sharks, know how they move, know how to behave, know how to safely move with them, and they're guiding these sharks along as you would a partner,' says Kinga Philipps, a TV correspondent and one of the three judges. 'It is so fluid and beautiful, all they really had to do is put a little bit of music to it and they're actually dancing.' It's a shark-a-thon 'Dancing with Sharks' kicks off the week of programing, which includes shows on how to survive a shark attack, why New Smyrna Beach in Florida has earned the title of 'The Shark Attack Capital of the World' and whether a mysterious dark-skinned shark off the coast of California is a mako, mutant or possibly a mako-and-great white hybrid. The seven nights of new shows — and a related podcast — ends off the Mozambique coast with a once-a-year feeding frenzy that turns into a showdown between the sharks and their massive prey, the giant trevally. One highlight is Paul de Gelder's 'How to Survive a Shark Attack,' which he has intimate knowledge about. He lost his right hand and leg in 2009 during an attack by a bull shark in Sydney Harbor. 'If you're in the jaws of a shark, you want to fight for all of your life. You want to go for the soft parts. You want go for the eyeball. You want to go for the gills,' he says. 'But if you're not being attacked by a shark and you're just encountering a shark, then you just want to remain calm.' De Gelder debunks one myth: Punching a charging shark will stop its attack. 'If you really want to hurt your own hand, go ahead,' he says. A better approach is to not thrash about and gently redirect the animal. 'The secret I got taught many years ago was don't act like food and they won't treat you like food.' 'Shark Week' has become a key part of the summer holiday TV schedule, a place where humans safe on land can see ancient apex predators unnervingly glide into view and snap open their jaws. This year's highlights also include the hunt for a 20-foot great white that can leap into the air — 'Air Jaws: The Hunt for Colossus' — and a show about male and female great whites competing in a series of challenges to determine which sex is the superior predator, naturally called 'Great White Sex Battle.' Joseph Schneier, senior vice president of production and development at Discovery, says the shows are born from listening to what the diving and science community is seeing, like pro divers moving artistically with the sharks as they fed them, leading to 'Dancing With Sharks.' 'We realized, well, there's something here that we can go further with,' he says. 'We're lucky that sharks continue to surprise us. Which helps us get kind of new stories and new things to focus on. That's been the mantra for us — the sharks are the stars, not the humans.' As always, there is a deep respect for the creatures and strong science beneath the amusing titles, sharky puns, dramatic music and racy titles like 'Frankenshark' and 'Alien Sharks: Death Down Under.' 'It's like putting your vegetables in a dessert,' says Bergeron. 'You get all the allure of a 'Dancing With Sharks' or other specific shows, but in the midst of that you do learn a lot about sharks and ecology and the importance of sharks in the ecosystem. It's all in your strawberry sundae.' Discovery's 'Shark Week' has a rival — National Geographic's 'SharkFest,' which also has hours of sharky content. There's also the unconnected shark horror comedy 'Hot Spring Shark Attack' and a movie earlier this summer that added a serial killer to a shark movie — 'Dangerous Animals.' Born from 'Jaws' 'Shark Week' was born as a counterpoint for those who developed a fear of sharks after seeing 'Jaws.' It has emerged as a destination for scientists eager to protect an animal older than trees. ''Jaws' helped introduce this country and this world to a predator we're all fascinated with,' says Schneier. 'But we also feel 'Jaws' went too far. These are not creatures that are out to hurt humans by any means, but they have had 50-plus million years of evolution to get to this place where they are just excellent predators. It's fun to celebrate just how good they are at their job.' Kendyl Berna, who co-founded the ecology group Beyond the Reef, and is a veteran on 'Shark Week,' says studying the ancient beasts can teach humans about changes to the planet. 'So much of the programming this year speaks to what's happening with the rest of the world — climate change and how much that affects where sharks are and when they're there and what they're eating,' she says. 'As a keystone apex predator, sharks do set the tone for what's happening.' Bergeron says being a part of 'Shark Week' for the first time and meeting some of the divers who interact with sharks has actually made him braver. 'I don't think I'm at a point where I could go down there with them and have the sharks swirling around me without a cage. But with a cage, I think I am ready to do that,' he says. 'Just don't tell my wife.'

Trump's issues threat to Rupert Murdoch after WSJ Epstein birthday card report
Trump's issues threat to Rupert Murdoch after WSJ Epstein birthday card report

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump's issues threat to Rupert Murdoch after WSJ Epstein birthday card report

President Donald Trump is threatening legal action against media mogul Rupert Murdoch and The Wall Street Journal. The dispute stems from The Wall Street Journal's publication of an alleged 2003 birthday card from Trump to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Trump vehemently denies writing the card, which reportedly featured a sexually suggestive drawing and alluded to shared "secrets," labelling the story as "fake" and a "scam." Amidst his administration's efforts to dismiss "Epstein files" as a "hoax," Trump has instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek pertinent grand jury testimony regarding Epstein. This action aligns with Trump's history of threatening media outlets with lawsuits over unfavourable coverage, following previous settlements with other networks.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store