Royal Academy ‘displays anti-Semitic art' for a second time
Jewish visitors said they had been left upset by two pieces of artwork by Michael Sandle, a Royal Academy member, that were still on display at the Summer Exhibition as of Friday.
One £6,000 piece in the display titled 'Terrorist versus smiling mass murderer of innocents', shows what appears to be a Hamas member standing next to an Israeli air force pilot with a damaged building in the background.
A second work, titled 'Apropos terror – a pilot doesn't hear the screams of the women and children he is massacring with impunity', is a slightly larger version of the first piece and priced at £25,000.
Caroline Turner, the director of UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI), wrote to Natasha Mitchell, the Royal Academy's interim secretary and chief executive, calling for them to be removed.
Ms Turner wrote: 'The titles of both these drawings imply that Israel is purposely slaughtering women and children.'
'This is far from the truth, since the Israeli army does all it can to avoid harming women and children, while targeting Hamas terrorists, who unfortunately use women and children as human shields,' the letter added.
The letter was also sent to Batia Ofer, the chairwoman of the Royal Academy Trust and an Israeli-Canadian patroness and philanthropist.
Explaining why the artworks were anti-Semitic, the Ms Turner wrote that the pictures applied 'double standards by requiring of Israel a behaviour not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation which can be anti-Semitic according to example eight of the IHRA's [International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance] working definition of anti-Semitism'.
'The images use the symbols and images associated with classic anti-Semitism (eg claims of Jews killing children) to characterise Israel or Israelis; This is anti-Semitic according to example nine of the IHRA definition,' the letter says.
The letter, seen by The Telegraph, adds: 'Accusing Jews of killing babies/children is an old-fashioned blood libel. Sandle should be aware that Israel aims to kill terrorists, not innocent children and others.'
Mrs Turner also claimed the Royal Academy was breaching the 2010 Equality Act because Sandle's art was 'likely to create an intimidating, hostile and offensive environment for Jews and Israelis who visit the gallery'.
One Jewish visitor said: 'I just went to the Royal Academy's Summer Exhibition. And there is some disgusting anti-Semitic art hanging there by an artist called Sandle. Unsurprisingly, this isn't the first time.'
Last year, the Royal Academy apologised for displaying artwork likening Israel to Nazi Germany in an annual Summer Show competition.
One piece by a 16-year-old named as 'Andy', which was later removed, appeared to compare Israel's actions in Gaza to Nazism by featuring Arab women screaming under the shadow of a swastika and the looming figure of Buddha.
A note with the piece stated: 'Watching the conflict unravel in Gaza draws many parallels with the Nazis and Chinese oppression, hence the Buddha symbol and the swastika.'
A second piece, which was removed, was a photograph of a protester claiming Israel was committing genocide.
The photograph, taken by an 18-year-old named 'Kausar', featured a man holding a sign stating: 'Jews say stop genocide on Palestinians: not in our name.'
Ms Turner claimed the Royal Academy has 'failed to take the concerns of your Jewish visitors into account'.
She added: 'We are of course, in favour of freedom of artistic expression, but not freedom to express hateful anti-Semitic sentiments, which stoke up hatred against Jews and Israelis.'
In a statement, the Royal Academy said works in the exhibition 'often reflect current societal and political topics'.
It said that artworks in the Summer Exhibition 'should not be read as the Royal Academy supporting any particular artist's point of view'.
The Royal Academy added: 'We always take all concerns about artworks on display in the Summer Exhibition seriously; however, our role, as an artist and architect-led organisation, is to allow all artists the ability to express themselves.
'The Royal Academy is an organisation led by artists and architects and is committed to freedom of expression.'
In a further letter, Ms Mitchell insisted they were not breaching the Equality Act and added: 'It is simply untrue to state that we are ignoring the matter, or the concerns raised.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
36 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Scottish Deputy First Minister Forbes to Step Down Next Year
Scotland's deputy leader and economy minister, Kate Forbes, said she will step down at the next election. Once a key figure in the future of the pro-independence Scottish National Party, Forbes alluded to the pressure on her family for deciding not to seek re-election in May next year.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Crystal Palace: Woody Johnson completes purchase of John Textor's 43% stake in club
New York Jets co-owner Woody Johnson has completed the purchase of Eagle Football Holdings' 43% stake in Crystal Palace. The announcement brings to an end controversial former co-owner John Textor's four year association with the club. Textor is co-owner of Eagle Football Holdings, who owned stakes in both Lyon and Palace as part of a multi club ownership model. Upon Palace qualifying for the Europa League last season, UEFA ruled that Textor had decisive influence in the south London club, demoting them to the Conference League as a result of Lyon also qualifying for the Europa League. UEFA rules state that clubs owned, to a certain threshold of influence, by the same person or entity cannot compete in the same European competition in the same season. Textor also aimed several digs at Palace chairman Steve Parish in an interview with talkSPORT earlier this month. 78-year-old Johnson has now bought Textor's shares, signing the Premier League's Owners' Charter in the process. Johnson, former U.S. Ambassador to the UK under Donald Trump, joins Parish, Josh Harris, and David Blitzer on Palace's board. On completion of the deal Woody Johnson said: 'I am honoured and privileged to be joining the ownership group of Crystal Palace Football Club. "It is an organisation with a proud history, tradition, and deep roots in English football in South London, which I came to admire during my time as U.S. Ambassador to the United Kingdom. "Eagles fans have demonstrated extraordinary loyalty, passion, and unwavering dedication and I am excited to meet and get to know them. "I have great respect for Steve Parish and the leadership he has provided over the years. I look forward to working with him and the entire ownership group to build on the club's recent successes and help shape an exciting future for Crystal Palace. "This is more than an investment - it's a commitment to realising the vision for the club, the community, and the culture around Selhurst Park.' Chairman Steve Parish added: 'At this exciting time for Crystal Palace, we are delighted to be welcoming Woody to the ownership of the Football Club. "We very much look forward to working alongside him to build on our historic recent success moving forwards.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘I oppose genocide' : Meet the pensioners risking lengthy prison terms to support Palestine Action
In an interrogation room at just after 1am, 68-year-old grandmother-of-seven Marji Mansfield was sitting across from counterterrorism officers after being arrested at a pro-Palestine protest in central London. She had suffered days of poor sleep in anticipation of this eventuality. Now, an 'aggressive' man was asking her repeatedly if she sympathised with a terrorist organisation, leading her through an extensive list of questions about her politics and who she knew in Gaza. A few hours earlier, on the afternoon of 5 July, half a dozen officers had handcuffed the pensioner and hauled her off the ground and into a police van alongside her 73-year-old husband. The couple, who once described themselves as 'small-c conservatives', had travelled to the capital from near Chichester for the protest, declining to tell their children what they were about to do. It was only a day later that their son realised what had happened after he saw his mother on the news, suspended and flanked by the large group of officers. Mansfield had been following the conflict in the Middle East since the Israeli invasion of Gaza in 2014, but only became an active protester after former home secretary Suella Braverman described peaceful protests as 'hate marches' in October 2023. 'I have never been political or an activist. I was just an ordinary, middle-England person,' she says. 'But then I became outraged.' Mansfield says she was 'shocked' by the events of 7 October, when Hamas militants crossed the border into Israel and killed around 1,200 people, taking 251 more hostage. 'But the actions that subsequently followed, where entire families are being wiped out, I had to join those urging for a ceasefire now,' she adds. More than 60,000 Palestinians are believed to have been killed since Israel launched its retaliatory aerial and ground offensive in Gaza. Humanitarian organisations have warned that, with not nearly enough aid entering the territory, the 2.3 million residents of Gaza are now in effect being starved. Keir Starmer warned this week that Britain would recognise the Palestinian state if Israel did not end its 'appalling' war in Gaza. He urged Israel to work towards a ceasefire and a two-state solution. Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused Starmer of 'rewarding Hamas's monstrous terrorism'. Mansfield dismisses Starmer's move as having been 'performative rather than substantial'. Fighting her own battle for Gaza, the pensioner was arrested under Sections 12 and 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000 for holding up a placard that said: 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action'. Being charged under Section 12 carries a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison. The protest group Palestine Action had just been proscribed as a terrorist organisation, after it claimed responsibility for activists spraying red paint on fighter jets at RAF Brize Norton. The proscription means it is illegal to support the group. It puts Palestine Action in the same legal ranks as Isis, al-Qaeda and Hamas, leading critics to accuse the government of heavy-handedness. Mansfield knew it was possible she would be arrested, but had no idea how the police would actually react when she and dozens of others held up placards in support of Palestine Action outside the Houses of Parliament. It was the first of what would become weekly protests, all of which resulted in arrests. As the police interview with an exhausted Mansfield drew to a close at around 2am, after more than 60 questions had been asked, the counterterrorism officer made one final remark. 'Look, even if you get hundreds of people, thousands of people, we're 30,000 strong,' Mansfield recalls him saying. 'We'll put all our resources, and not just police forces, into arresting and interrogating you.' Then he let the 'traumatised' pensioner go free, hundreds of miles from home. She had not been charged with a crime. A total of 385 MPs voted in favour of the unprecedented move to criminalise Palestine Action. Only 26 dissented. Announcing the vote, home secretary Yvette Cooper said that while free speech and the right to protest form 'the cornerstone of our democracy', Palestine Action was guilty of 'violence and serious criminal damage' that does not constitute 'legitimate protest'. As a result, Palestine Action was proscribed alongside a white supremacist, neo-Nazi organisation called Maniacs Murder Cult and a pro-Kremlin ethno-nationalist organisation that seeks to create a new Russian imperial state. Critics and human rights activists quickly accused the government of infringing on people's right to protest following the proscription of Palestine Action. In a letter to Cooper, the Network for Police Monitoring said: 'Misusing terrorism legislation in this way against a protest group sets a dangerous precedent, threatens our democratic freedoms, and would be a terrifying blow to our civil liberties.' Several United Nations human rights experts, meanwhile, said that criminal damage that does not endanger life is not 'sufficiently serious to qualify as terrorism'. On Wednesday, a judge ruled that Palestine Action would be allowed to challenge the Home Office in court over its proscription, but it could be months until a result. The outrage over the move has increased as more protesters are arrested. Private Eye editor Ian Hislop branded the arrest in Leeds on 19 July of 67-year-old Jon Farley, for holding up a printout of the magazine's front page that questioned the proscription, as 'mind-boggling'. Farley has not been charged. The case was cited by Mr Justice Chamberlain on Wednesday as a reason to allow Palestine Action to fight the proscription. He said it was evidence of the 'chilling effect' the proscription was having 'on those wishing to express legitimate political views'. In total, more than 200 people have been detained since the ban. Not a single person in England or Wales has been charged. The large majority are over 60, according to Tim Crosland, a former government lawyer who now campaigns for Defend Our Juries, an organisation that is supporting many of the detainees. He says some of the protesters are 'well into their eighties'. The police are aware of these optics. Mansfield claims that her male counterterrorism interrogator even asked her at one stage: 'Was this a conspiracy to make the police look bad?' The reality, she says, is simpler: the seriousness of terrorism charges is a significant disincentive to younger protesters at the start of their careers; for pensioners determined to take a stance, it is the perfect opportunity to step up. Robert Lee, 61, another protester arrested on 5 July but not charged, who later went to support demonstrators in Bristol, says he remembers one 83-year-old woman gleefully telling him that police were afraid to arrest her 'because they are terrified I might die in custody'. But the crowds of pensioner protesters are nonetheless peppered with younger demonstrators, a reality they say nods to the broad spectrum of opposition to the proscription of Palestine Action. For Zara Ali, 18, who is among the youngest to have been arrested, her involvement felt especially high-stakes. She was already on bail for conspiracy to cause public nuisance after blocking a road in March. She has not been charged. 'I was told to prepare myself for prison,' she says, admitting that she was very 'anxious' when she arrived in Parliament Square for the protest on 19 July. 'But at the end of the day, I had it in my mind that this is not about me but about Palestine, and about every single political prisoner who is being held.' The Independent spoke to half a dozen protesters for this piece, all of whom said that their 'disgust' at Israel's war on Gaza was the primary motivation for their involvement. Claims that the proscription pointed to a 'dystopian' future in Britain were also commonly cited as a key motivation. The Home Office declined to comment.
