AIIMS says no link between covid jabs and sudden deaths among young adults
This comes in the backdrop of recent claims by Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah stating that covid vaccines were linked to sudden deaths due to cardiac arrest among young adults in the state's Hassan district.
The country's premier medical institution announced that its studies have found no such connection, instead attributing these tragic incidents primarily to lifestyle factors such as smoking, high blood pressure, and stress.
Senior AIIMS doctors emphasized the crucial role these vaccines played in saving lives during the pandemic, noting that the studies are ongoing to determine the causes of sudden unexplained deaths. Researchers at AIIMS's pathology department are currently undertaking genomic studies to find the unexplained causes of death in approximately 25% of cases involving young individuals, where no apparent cause was initially identified.
The pharmaceutical industry has also vouched for vaccine safety and debunked doubts over efficacy.
Dr. Abhishek Yadav, additional professor in the department of forensic medicine at AIIMS, detailed two studies conducted by his department. A retrospective analysis from 2018 to 2022, comparing pre- and post-Covid data, found "no surge in the sudden cardiac deaths in the cases which were reported in the department".
A second, ongoing study, initiated in 2023 in collaboration with the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and slated to continue for another year and a half, aims to gather more samples for scientifically validated results. This study has so far examined approximately 230 death cases, collecting family history, performing genomic and DNA level studies, and utilizing virtual autopsies.
Dr. Yadav stated that this second study has also 'not found any link between covid vaccine and sudden deaths.'
The research categorized cases into two age groups: 18-45 years and 45-65 years. Dr. Yadav said that coronary artery disease was identified as the most common historical factor, with over 50% of these cases linked to lifestyle factors and substance abuse, such as alcohol and smoking.
The pathology department of AIIMS is continuing genomic studies on the remaining 25% of unexplained cases.
Dr. Sudheer Arava, a professor in the department of pathology at AIIMS, explained that the study of 230 young individuals brought to the forensic department found heart attack to be the most common cause of death (50%), often linked to lifestyle risk indicators like high blood pressure, cholesterol, stress, and obesity. 'In 25% of cases, no identifiable cause of death was determined, and researchers are exploring potential molecular alterations. An interim report submitted to the ICMR indicates that nearly 50% of the deaths studied were due to heart attacks, with further research ongoing.'
Dr. Sanjay Rai, professor at the department of community medicine at AIIMS, stated that the Covishield vaccine (developed by Oxford–AstraZeneca) showed an efficacy of 62.1%. He highlighted that various regulatory authorities have approved 37 different Covid-19 vaccines, with the World Health Organization (WHO) approving approximately 12, utilizing diverse technologies. For instance, Bharat Biotech's Covaxin uses a traditional technology, while Covishield and Russian Sputnik V are based on an adenovirus vector.
Globally, over 13 billion vaccine doses have been administered, with countries like the United States completing fourth doses. The WHO now recommends vaccination for everyone aged six months and above, particularly with vaccines effective against newer variants.
Dr. Karan Madan, associate professor in the department of pulmonary medicine, affirmed that Covid-19 vaccines were "highly effective and instrumental in lowering mortality rates during the pandemic". He emphasized their role as the "sole possible measure to save lives" at the time, providing "immense advantages" in preventing excess deaths. Dr. Madan also referenced a study on sudden cardiac deaths that found "no clear association" with vaccine usage.
Sudarshan Jain, secretary general of the Indian Pharmaceutical Alliance (IPA), underscored India's role as a knowledge-driven sector, accounting for 60% of global vaccine production. He stated that Covid vaccines were "well documented and rigorously tested as per regulatory processes," warning that "misinformation and distortion of facts endanger public health and undermine the trust built on science and patient care globally".
The Indian Vaccine Manufacturers Association also said that all Covid-19 vaccines in India received Emergency Use Authorization based on extensive preclinical and human clinical trial evaluations, showing positive results for safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity.
Covid infections have been on a declining trend after showing a steady increase in the past few weeks. On Thursday, the country's active caseload dropped to 1,290 from 1,691 cases, with no deaths reported in the last 24 hours. The total number of Covid-19-related deaths this year stands at 146. The current spread is linked to Omicron sub-variants NB.1.8.1 and LF.7.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
No link between Covid vaccine and heart attacks, finds Karnataka study after Siddaramaiah raises concerns
A study commissioned by the Karnataka government to investigate sudden cardiovascular events, including heart attacks and cardiac deaths, and their possible links to the Covid vaccine, recently found no causal association between the two. The findings submitted to the state government on July 2 came days after Chief Minister Siddaramaiah suggested that Covid vaccine could also be a reason for the increase in heart attacks among young adults. The pilot study was carried out on 250 patients below 45 years of age by the Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research (JICSR). It gained significance after several deaths caused by cardiovascular diseases in the Hassan district. A committee, led by Dr C N Ravindranath, director of the Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research, found no connection between early-onset cardiovascular conditions and previous Covid-19 infection or vaccination. The study, in fact, found evidence that vaccines may offer long-term protection against cardiac events. Conventional risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and smoking remain prevalent in a majority of patients, the study said. 'There is no single cause behind the observed rise in sudden cardiac deaths. Rather, it appears to be a multifactorial issue, with behavioural, genetic, and environmental risks,' it said. The study, however, sought research funding for 'large-scale prospective case control clinical studies by a nodal agency like the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) to conduct a multi-disciplinary collaborative study to study the long-term effect of both Covid-19 infection and vaccination. A cardiac surveillance programme and national registry for sudden cardiac deaths among young adults are part of the recommendations of the study. Quoting the findings of various studies carried out in the United Kingdom, it said that those who had Covid-19 infection faced a two-fold increased risk of major cardiovascular events, while those who were hospitalised with Covid 19 had a four-fold increased risk. The JISCR assessed 12 patients below 30 years, 66 between 31 to 40 and 172 between 41 to 45 for the report. The effort was based on an order issued in February this year 'to conduct a thorough study on the reasons behind sudden deaths among young people in the state, and whether the Covid vaccines could have any adverse effects'. In a post on X, CM Siddaramaiah on June 1 said, 'It cannot be denied that the hasty approval and distribution of the Covid vaccine to the public could also be a reason for these deaths, as several studies worldwide have recently indicated that COVID vaccines could be a cause for the increasing number of heart attacks.' As Chief Minister, I have a duty to respond to the genuine concerns of people who have lost loved ones unexpectedly. When parents lose their young children or families lose breadwinners without warning, seeking clarity is not misinformation; it is an act of governance rooted in… — Siddaramaiah (@siddaramaiah) July 3, 2025 This was rebutted by pharma major Biocon chief Kiran Mazumdar Shaw, saying that to suggest that the 'vaccines were hastily approved is factually incorrect and contributes to public misinformation'. Siddaramaiah hit back, saying that seeking clarity about such issues was not misinformation but an act of governance, adding that scientific caution was not anti-science.
India Today
21 minutes ago
- India Today
Vaccine hesitancy - India hesitancy: Two sides of the same dangerous coin
Vaccine hesitancy has a long history. Initially, vaccines were opposed on religious grounds, viewed as interference with divine will. Later, in liberal societies, they were resisted as infringements on personal freedom, especially when made modern times, the anti-vaccine movement gained steam from 1998 through a widely publicised study by Dr. Andrew Wakefield that falsely linked the MMR (Measles, Mumps and Rubella) vaccine to autism. Wakefield overlooked the crucial fact that autism often manifests around the same age at which the MMR vaccine is administered. Driven by the distress and assumptions of some parents who misread the timing of autism's onset as being triggered by the vaccine, Wakefield arrived at a deeply flawed conclusion. The study was later debunked and retracted, and Wakefield was discredited; however, the damage was lasting, fuelling vaccine suspicion, lowering immunisation rates, and contributing to outbreaks of preventable diseases, such as recent decades, vaccine resistance was further inflamed by conspiracy theories that framed vaccines as mere tools of profiteering corporations. During COVID, these historical strands of vaccine hesitancy - religious conservatism, libertarianism, and conspiracism - merged into a potent blend of distrust, politicisation, and misinformation, stoking a global wave of vaccine resistance that led to preventable illness and death across a similar blend of scientific distortion and political opportunism is evident in Karnataka's Chief Minister Siddaramaiah's recent tweets. Without offering any credible evidence, he hinted at a connection between the COVID-19 vaccines and a rise in heart attacks. His language - posing questions rather than making claims outright - mirrors a now-familiar strategy: sow doubt while evading responsibility. Like Wakefield, Siddaramaiah appears driven not by science, but by a confluence of ideology, misperception, and political is both striking and encouraging is that, this time, several prominent Indian industrialists have pushed back decisively against such misinformation. In a landscape where business leaders often tread cautiously amid political currents, their clarity is commendable. Foremost among them is Biocon's Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw, a rare business voice known for calling a spade a spade. She has long advocated for constructive criticism in India's industry-government interface, even echoing Rahul Bajaj's concerns that government criticism is often mislabelled as 'anti-national.' Despite her history of critiquing the regulatory process on occasions, she came out strongly in defense of India's vaccine oversight. Countering Siddaramaiah's charge of hasty approval and distribution, she tweeted:'COVID-19 vaccines developed in India were approved under the Emergency Use Authorisation framework, following rigorous protocols aligned with global standards for safety and efficacy. To suggest that these vaccines were 'hastily' approved is factually incorrect and contributes to public misinformation.'Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw articulated her response with precision, crafting it to be nearly unassailable and preempting any credible counterattack. So did Pankaj Bhai Patel, Dilip Shanghvi, Satish Reddy, and Sudarshan Jain. AIIMS and other leading institutions also convincingly defended the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, citing large-scale clinical trials and real-world data collected over millions of doses. The broader scientific community has reinforced this by pointing out that India's vaccines have not only protected its own people but were also supplied to over 70 countries, helping bridge global vaccine what makes this moment more troubling is that Siddaramaiah's anti-science insinuations are not isolated. Internationally, figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr., US Secretary of Health and Human Sevices, continue to push vaccine skepticism - not as scientists, but as political actors. RFK Jr.'s crusade is rooted in libertarian distrust of federal institutions and often veers into conspiracy theory. More insidiously, Siddaramaiah's comments appear not only to undermine vaccines, but to subtly discredit the Indian scientific establishment, turning a global public health issue into a domestic political weapon. His sludge is thus not just anti-science - it edges toward being the establishment and Modi are near-synonymous today, attacking Indian institutions often doubles as an attack on Modi. Modi's opponents in India ask: why cut Modi slack when he's been ruthlessly below the belt with us? India is navigating a complex and competitive world where credibility, not partisanship, determines influence. Defending our institutions in this moment is not about giving anyone political cover - it's about protecting India's long-term standing and scientific supplies 60% of the world's vaccines and has done so reliably, safely, and at scale. At a time when the country is positioning itself as a trusted health partner to the world, amid shifting geopolitical and geo-commercial landscapes, ill-considered, uninformed criticism from within can do more damage than we realise. This is not the time to erode trust in one of India's most respected global contributions. It is time to defend must always be open to scrutiny, and governments must be held accountable. But there is a difference between honest inquiry and opportunistic delegitimisation. The former strengthens democracy and public health; the latter corrodes both. At a time when India is under external pressure and internal strain, spreading unsubstantiated fears erodes public trust and weakens our shared an age where trust is as critical as innovation, we must not only defend our science - we must stand behind those who uphold it, at home and on the world stage.(Pavan Choudary is the Chairman of the Medical Technology Association of India (MTaI) and a Public Intellectual)- Ends(Views expressed in this opinion piece are those of the author)Must Watch
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
AIIMS gastroenterologist rates 10 common sweeteners based on gut health impact: Brown sugar to raw honey
Popular healthy living sentiment states that sugar is the enemy. This leads to people looking for healthy alternatives, including common sweeteners like dates, brown sugar, coconut sugar, stevia, and more. But are they really good for your gut health? Gastroenterologist Dr Sethi warns not to fall for the 'sugar-free' trap without understanding what it's actually doing inside your gut. Also Read | Cardiologist suggests a rare sugar alternative that 'doesn't spike blood sugar, insulin levels and reduces body fat' In a post shared on July 4, Dr Saurabh Sethi, an AIIMS, Harvard and Stanford universities trained gastroenterologist, talked about 10 common sweeteners and rated them based on their gut health impact. Sharing the list, Dr Sethi wrote, 'Harvard and Stanford-trained gut doctor ranks 10 common sweeteners on a scale of 1-10 (10 is the best).' 10 common sweeteners rated by a gastroenterologist Talking about the sweeteners, the gastroenterologist highlighted that as a gut doctor, he has seen how artificial and natural sweeteners impact the gut microbiome, digestion, and even inflammation. 'In this short video, I'm ranking 10 of the most common sweeteners—from brown sugar and coconut sugar to stevia and whole dates—on a scale of 1 to 10 based on their gut health impact. Don't fall for the 'sugar-free' trap without understanding what it's actually doing inside your gut. Share this widely to spread awareness,' he added. Let's check out his rating: 1. Coconut sugar: 5 2. Brown sugar: 4 3. Raw honey: 6 4. Chickery root syrup: 8 5. Whole dates: 7 6. Aspartame: 3 7. High fructose corn syrup: 1 8. Pure stevia extract: 9 9. Refined white sugar: 2 10. Pure monk fruit extract: 10 A rare sugar alternative Now that you know how common sweeteners rate according to their impact on gut health, here's a rare sugar alternative as suggested by a cardiologist: Allulose. In an Instagram post shared on April 11, Dr Alok Chopra, cardiologist and functional medicine expert, suggested allulose as a rare alternative to sugar as it can be beneficial for those with spiked blood sugar or insulin levels. Per the cardiologist, allulose is low in calories, blood sugar friendly, boosts metabolism and burns fat, protects organs and fights inflammation, and supports energy and performance. Let's find out more about allulose here. Note to readers: This article is for informational purposes only and not a substitute for professional medical advice. Always seek the advice of your doctor with any questions about a medical condition.
