logo
Inspectors BLOCKED from nuke sites as Iran says they will never stop enriching uranium amid fears bomb is ‘months away'

Inspectors BLOCKED from nuke sites as Iran says they will never stop enriching uranium amid fears bomb is ‘months away'

Scottish Sun20 hours ago

It comes after Trump claimed the strikes went through Iran's nuclear bases "like butter"
NUKE FEARS Inspectors BLOCKED from nuke sites as Iran says they will never stop enriching uranium amid fears bomb is 'months away'
IRAN has blocked inspectors from entering its nuclear sites and pledged to never stop enriching uranium - amid fears the Ayatollah is months away from a bomb.
The mullahs could possess a nuclear weapon in "a matter of months", the UN's nuclear watchdog said, adding that US strikes caused severe but "not total" damage.
Advertisement
9
The Fordow plant before and after the the US bombed the site
Credit: Reuters
9
The moment the missile hit the earth in the test footage
9
The International Atomic Energy Agency's head Rafael Grossi made the bombshell revelation following Donald Trump's Operation Midnight Hammer.
The Don's blitz saw 12 30,000lb bunker busting bombs strike three of Tehran's nuclear facilities on June 22.
The US President hailed the strikes at the time and said they "obliterated" their targets as planned - despite some claiming the hits were less successful than first thought.
Speaking on the state of Iran's nuclear facilities after Trump's strikes, Grossi warned: "The capacities they have are there.
Advertisement
READ MORE WORLD NEWS
DON THE ATTACK Trump rips critics & insists 'bombs went through like butter' at Iran sites
"They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that."
He added: "But as I said, frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there."
And the watchdog head made the explosive claim that Iran still had "industrial and technological capabilities… so if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again".
It comes after a leaked preliminary Pentagon assessment found the US strikes only set the nuclear programme back by a few months.
Advertisement
On Wednesday, Iran's parliament agreed to suspend all cooperation with the IAEA.
The ban means blocking experts from assessing the true extent of the Israeli and US attacks on nuclear facilities.
Iran was building warheads 'capable of blitzing London' as twisted regime raced to have world's biggest missile arsenal
And it makes it more challenging to locate any highly enriched uranium Iran may possess which could help them make a nuke.
Iran's ambassador to the UN Amir-Saeid Iravani told CBS: "I think that enrichment will never stop.
Advertisement
"Our cooperation with IAEA will be suspended."
It comes after Trump told Fox News on Sunday morning that the US bombs on Iran went through enemy nuclear sites "like absolute butter".
Celebrating his blitz on the mullahs, he said: "It was obliterated like nobody's ever seen before.
"And that meant the end to their nuclear ambitions at least for a period of time."
Advertisement
The war in the Middle East lasted just 12 days as it quickly turned into a major conflict when Trump decided to strike the Iranian nuclear sites.
Iran responded to Trump's intervention by unsuccessfully striking a US army base in Doha, Qatar - before the Ayatollah claimed victory over America and Israel.
But Tehran contradicted Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei by admitting that Operation Midnight Hammer and the joint Israeli attacks did cause "excessive and serious" damage.
Israel struck Iranian nuclear and military sites on June 13, after Tel Aviv claimed Tehran was dangerously close to developing a nuclear weapon.
Advertisement
9
Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Rafael Grossi said Iran could be months away from a bomb
Credit: AFP
9
Trump had posted this Truth shortly after launching the strikes
Credit: Truth Social
9
Overview of the the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant one week after US strikes
Credit: AFP
The US attacks helped to end the war, according to Trump, with both Israel and Iran quickly declaring they had won the fight afterwards.
Advertisement
Tyrant Khamenei, 86, claimed victory over Israel and America despite his country being hammered for almost two weeks.
The Supreme Leader ludicrously claimed Iran had almost crushed Israel and the government in Tel Aviv was on the verge of collapse.
That's despite the IDF controlling the skies over Tehran, assassinating dozens of top generals and nuclear scientists, and destroying dozens of valuable missile batteries in just 12 days of fighting.
Even with a ceasefire being agreed upon, Trump made it clear he would "absolutely" consider bombing Iran again if it was ever needed.
Advertisement
He told reporters in the White House he would "without question" attack the country if US intelligence pointed towards Iran enriching uranium to concerning levels.
It comes as Iran held a funeral for the commanders wiped out in the war.
The event was severely plagued by "Death to America" chants and the burning of Israeli flags across the day.
9
The Ayatollah bizarrely claimed victory over the US and Israel
Credit: AFP
Advertisement
9
Trump sat in the Situation Room of the White House a day before the US strikes
Credit: AFP

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Indian tech hub state pushes jail terms for 'fake news', sparks worries
Indian tech hub state pushes jail terms for 'fake news', sparks worries

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Indian tech hub state pushes jail terms for 'fake news', sparks worries

BENGALURU, June 30 (Reuters) - Draft legislation by India's tech hub state of Karnataka that would impose jail terms of up to seven years for spreading "fake news" and other misinformation has stirred concerns among free speech activists that it could lead to censorship. With nearly 1 billion internet users, the stakes are high in a sprawling country of many ethnic and religious communities where fake news risks stirring deadly strife and AI deepfake videos have alarmed officials during elections. India's federal government already regulates social media content with legislation empowering it to order takedowns of disputed content. But some states such as Karnataka have begun taking their own measures. Karnataka's bill, the strictest of its kind yet, stipulates that those posting "fake news" and "anti-feminist" content, or "promoting superstition", would face imprisonment along with potential fines. The 11-page Karnataka Mis-Information And Fake News (Prohibition) Bill does not define such offences in practice, but said special courts and a regulatory committee would be set up to implement it. Free speech advocates have cited what they say would be the risk of selective enforcement arising from Karnataka's measure and flagged concerns that people posting memes or making honest mistakes online could be prosecuted. "Misinformation is fairly subjective and every person who uses the internet is susceptible to falling within the dragnet of this law," said Apar Gupta, founder of the Internet Freedom Foundation, a New Delhi-based digital advocacy group which first made the Karnataka draft legislation public. The state government of Karnataka, home to the city of Bengaluru that hosts the offices or branches of many Indian and foreign tech giants, has said the bill will be released for public consultation before implementation. Priyank Kharge, Karnataka's IT minister, said on Friday "there is a lot of misinformation on the proposed Misinformation Bill in public". He later added that the "sole objective is to address the growing digital information disorder" and the government's focus was to tackle misinformation and fake news, "and nothing beyond that". He did not immediately respond to Reuters calls seeking further comment on Monday. Karnataka's move could risk creating multiple regulations imposing conflicting obligations and regulatory challenges for companies, said Aman Taneja, partner at law and policy firm Ikigai. Some Indian media have sharply criticised the draft bill. The Deccan Herald newspaper on Monday titled an opinion piece "A remedy that's worse than the menace", saying the Karnataka government should "do away with the criminal provisions" in the legislation. India has over the years held talks with U.S. tech giants like Google it sees as having been slow to remove fake news posts, and New Delhi in 2019 set up a "Fact Check Unit" to debunk what it sees as misinformation.

Palestine Action to legally challenge proscription under anti-terror law
Palestine Action to legally challenge proscription under anti-terror law

Glasgow Times

timean hour ago

  • Glasgow Times

Palestine Action to legally challenge proscription under anti-terror law

An urgent hearing was held in the High Court on Monday related to an application for judicial review on behalf of one of the founders of the direct action group, Huda Ammori. A further hearing will be held on Friday to decide whether the Government can temporarily be blocked from banning the group, pending a hearing to decide whether Palestine Action can bring the legal challenge. A decision on whether the group will be given the green light to bring the legal challenge will be given at a further hearing expected to be held in the week of July 21. Supporting statements have also been submitted by Amnesty International, Liberty and European Legal Support Centre over concerns of unlawful misuse of anti-terror measures to criminalise dissent, a spokesperson said. It comes as a draft order was laid before Parliament on Monday to amend the Terrorism Act 2000 to include Palestine Action as a proscribed organisation, making membership and support for the direct action group illegal. If approved, it would become a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper unveiled the intention to ban the group on June 23 (James Manning/PA) Commenting on the hearing, Ms Ammori said: 'I have been left with no choice but to request this urgent hearing and to seek either an injunction or other form of interim relief because of the Home Secretary's decision to try to steamroll this through Parliament immediately, without proper opportunity for MPs and Peers to debate and scrutinise the proposal, or for legal and human rights experts and civil society organisations to make representations, or for those of us who would be denied fundamental rights as a result and criminalised as 'terrorists' overnight, including the many thousands of people who support Palestine Action.' The Government's move comes after two planes were vandalised at RAF Brize Norton on June 20 in an action claimed by Palestine Action. Five people have since been arrested on suspicion of a terror offence in relation to the incident. Unveiling the intention to ban the group following the incident on June 23, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said it was the latest in a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage committed by Palestine Action'. The group has staged a series of demonstrations in recent months, including spraying the London offices of Allianz Insurance with red paint over its alleged links to Israeli defence company Elbit, and vandalising US President Donald Trump's Turnberry golf course in South Ayrshire. Its website states the group uses disruptive tactics to target 'corporate enablers of the Israeli military-industrial complex' and seeks to make it 'impossible for these companies to profit from the oppression of Palestinians'. Ms Ammori added that causing disruption 'is not terrorism', while Ms Cooper has said proscribing the group is a 'legitimate response to the threat posed' by Palestine Action. The Home Secretary has the power to proscribe an organisation under the Terrorism Act of 2000 if she believes it is 'concerned in terrorism'. Some 81 organisations have been proscribed under the 2000 Act, including Islamist terrorist groups such as Hamas and al-Qaida, far-right groups such as National Action, and Russian private military company the Wagner Group.

Israeli settlers rampage at military base in the West Bank
Israeli settlers rampage at military base in the West Bank

Rhyl Journal

timean hour ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Israeli settlers rampage at military base in the West Bank

Sunday night's unrest came after several attacks in the West Bank carried out by Jewish settlers and anger at their arrests by security forces attempting to contain the violence over the past few days. More than 100 settlers on Wednesday evening entered the West Bank town of Kfar Malik, setting property ablaze and opening fire on Palestinians who tried to stop them, Najeb Rostom, head of the local council, said. Three Palestinians were killed after the military intervened. Israeli security forces arrested five settlers. 'No civilised country can tolerate violent and anarchic acts of burning a military facility, damaging IDF property and attacking security personnel by citizens of the country,' Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said. Footage on Israeli media showed dozens of young, religious men typically associated with 'hilltop youth', an extremist movement of Israeli settlers who occupy West Bank hilltops and have been accused of attacking Palestinians and their property. The footage showed security forces using stun grenades as dozens of settlers gathered around the military base just north of Ramallah. The Israeli military released photos of the infrastructure burned in the attack, which it said included 'systems that help thwart terrorist attacks and maintain security'. Far-right security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who has often defended Israelis accused of similar crimes, offered a rare condemnation of Sunday's violence. 'Attacking security forces, security facilities, and IDF soldiers who are our brothers, our protectors, is a red line, and must be dealt with in full severity. We are brothers,' he wrote on X. Opposition leader Yair Lapid told Israel's Army radio that the riots were carried out by 'Jewish terrorists, gangs of criminals, who feel backed by the (governing) coalition'. A hard-line supporter of Jewish settlements, Mr Ben-Gvir was previously convicted in Israel of racist incitement and support for terrorist groups, and has called for the deportation of all Arab citizens from Israel. Though once widely shunned by Israel's politicians, Mr Ben-Gvir's influence has grown and alongside a shift to the right in the country's electorate has further emboldened violence from extremist settlers in the West Bank. Defence minister Israel Katz vowed on Monday to 'eradicate this violence from the root' and implored the extremist settlers to remember that many of the security forces are exhausted reservists serving multiple rounds of duty. Over the past two years of the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza, Palestinian residents in the West Bank have reported a major increase in Israeli checkpoints and delays across the territory. Israel, meanwhile, says threats from the West Bank against its citizens are on the rise. Israel captured the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem in the 1967 Mideast war, and Palestinians want all three territories for their future state. The West Bank is home to some three million Palestinians live under seemingly open-ended Israeli military rule, and 500,000 Jewish settlers. The international community overwhelmingly considers settlements illegal.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store