Haryana Model's Throat Slit, Body Dumped In Canal In Sonipat
The body of a Haryana-based model with her throat slit was found in a canal in Sonipat, officials said on Monday.
The victim, identified as Sheetal, used to work as a model in the Haryanvi music industry.
The reason for the brutal murder is not yet known, with the accused currently on the run.
Officials said that Sheetal was living with her sister, Neha, in Panipat. On June 14, the model went for a shoot in the Ahar village. When she did not return home, the victim's sister filed a missing persons complaint at the Old Industrial Police Station.
Upon investigation, the police found her body in a canal near the Khanda village.
The body has been sent for post-mortem, and the search is on for the accused, officials said.
Last week, the body of a social media influencer, Kamal Kaur, was found in a car in the parking lot of a Punjab-based university - the Adesh Medical University on Bathinda-Chandigarh National Highway. The body, which was discovered on the back seat of a vehicle bearing Ludhiana registration plates, was initially unidentifiable. A foul smell emanating from the car prompted a complaint, following which officers reached the scene.
According to the police, Ms Kaur had left home on June 9, informing her family she was heading to Bathinda to attend a promotional event. There had been no contact since.
A CCTV footage shows a man driving the car in which Ms Kaur's body was found.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
US Fed judge blocks Trump's plan to end protection from deportation of over 60,000 citizens of Nepal and other nations
San Francisco-based US District Judge Trina Thompson agreed the plaintiffs had shown there was sufficient racial animus behind the decision and that the Trump administration had failed to undertake an "objective review of the country conditions" before ending protections. A migrant is detained by federal immigration officers at U.S. immigration court in Manhattan, New York City, U.S. (File Photo) Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A federal judge ruled against US President Donald Trump 's administration plans to end protections from deportation for citizens of Nepal Nicaragua and Honduras , barring their removal while the case continues, The Hill Francisco-based US District Judge Trina Thompson agreed the plaintiffs had shown there was sufficient racial animus behind the decision and that the Trump administration had failed to undertake an "objective review of the country conditions" before ending protections."The freedom to live fearlessly, the opportunity of liberty, and the American dream. That is all Plaintiffs seek. Instead, they are told to atone for their race, leave because of their names, and purify their blood," Thompson wrote. "The Court disagrees."The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) ended Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Nepal in June and for Nicaragua and Honduras in July. Each country was initially designated after natural disasters, but the protections can also be offered to people unable to be deported to their home country due to civil moves would require 51,000 Hondurans and nearly 3,000 Nicaraguans who have been in the country for roughly 25 years to leave the county by September. Some 7,000 Nepalese citizens were also set to lose protections in just days, as per The reviewed a number of prior comments from Trump as well as Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem, including comments from the secretary referring to migrants as criminals and gang members, and the president stating that migrants were "poisoning the blood of our country.""Indeed, code words may demonstrate discriminatory intent," she wrote, The Hill quoted. "Color is neither a poison nor a crime."Thompson said the DHS failed to do the fulsome review required to end TPS, determining the Trump administration did not consider conditions beyond recovery from the hurricanes that rocked the Central American countries and the earthquake that sparked the designation for Nepal, as per The Hill.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Ghislaine Maxwell shifted to lower-security prison in Texas as Trump govt faces backlash over Epstein files
Convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's confidante Ghislaine Maxwell has been transferred from federal prison in Florida to a lower-security facility in Texas read more Ghislaine Maxwell, the accomplice of convicted sex offender and British financier Jeffrey Epstein, has been transferred from a federal prison in Florida to a lower-security facility in Texas. The news was confirmed by the US Bureau of Prisons on Friday. Maxwell has been serving a 20-year prison sentence for sex-trafficking crimes. 'We can confirm, Ghislaine Maxwell is in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) at the Federal Prison Camp (FPC) Bryan in Bryan, Texas,' a spokesperson for the Bureau of Prisons said in a statement. Maxwell's attorney, David Oscar Markus, also confirmed the transfer but declined to share further details on the matter. It is pertinent to note that FPC Bryan is a 'minimum security federal prison camp' that houses 635 female inmates. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Interestingly, according to the Bureau of Prisons' inmate locator, the facility in Texas is also home to Elizabeth Holmes, the disgraced former CEO of the California-based blood-testing company Theranos. Holmes has been serving a life sentence for committing fraud. Not only this, the prison camp also houses Real Housewives of Salt Lake City TV star Jen Shah, who was jailed for committing fraud. The timing of it all Maxwell's move from FCI Tallahassee, a low-security prison, to the federal prison camp in Bryan came roughly a month after she was interviewed in Florida by the US attorney general, Todd Blanche, who is also one of Donald Trump's former lawyers. Maxwell was interviewed in two days about the Epstein case. Meanwhile, Blanche has maintained that he wanted to speak with Maxwell, who was sentenced in 2022 for sex trafficking and other related crimes, to see if she has 'information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims'. However, the details of the meeting have not been made public as of now. Maxwell's lawyer, on the other hand, described the meeting as ' very productive', adding that Maxwell answered the questions 'honestly, truthfully, to the best of her ability'. It is pertinent to note that the interview is taking place amid growing political and public pressure on the Trump administration to release the infamous Epstein files. The backlash started in July after the Department of Justice and FBI released a joint memo announcing that they would not be releasing any more documents from the investigation into the late Epstein, who died in prison in New York in 2019 while awaiting federal trial. The announcement came despite earlier pledges to release more files by the US president and the US attorney general, . Last week, the US House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform subpoenaed Maxwell to testify via deposition. In response to this, Maxwell's lawyer sent a letter this week, stating that she was willing to testify but only if certain conditions were met, including being granted immunity. In that same letter, Maxwell also made a plea for clemency. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, on Friday, the House indefinitely postponed that deposition. Amidst this, Maxwell has petitioned the US Supreme Court to overturn her conviction.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Italy fines Armani for 'misleading ethical' statements
Italy's competition watchdog said Friday it fined luxury goods giant Giorgio Armani 3.5 million euros ($4 million) for misleading consumers over dangerous conditions for workers making its bags and accessories. The watchdog sanctioned the Milan-based fashion group for "misleading ethical and social responsibility statements that were at odds with the actual working conditions found at suppliers and subcontractors". "The companies made untruthful ethical and social responsibility statements that were not presented in a clear, specific, accurate, and unambiguous manner," it added in a statement. It said Armani outsourced a "large part" of its leather bag and accessory production to suppliers who relied on subcontractors. The watchdog cited cases in which "safety devices had been removed from the machinery to increase production capacity, thereby posing a serious risk to the safety and health of workers." "Hygiene and sanitary conditions were inadequate, while workers were often employed totally or partially 'off the books'." The watchdog judged that "respect for workers' rights and health did not correspond to the ethical and social responsibility statements" issued by the company. It said the brand was aware of the situation "which seriously harmed the workers who produced Armani-branded leather bags and accessories". The watchdog did not say where the workers were based. Giorgio Armani slammed the ruling, expressing "disappointment and bitterness" in a statement. It said it would appeal the decision and vowed that it has "always operated with the utmost fairness and transparency towards consumers". oc/ams/rlp
