logo
Pay equity-affected support worker challenges van Velden to do her job for one week

Pay equity-affected support worker challenges van Velden to do her job for one week

RNZ News08-05-2025
Workplace Relations Minister Brooke van Velden has defended the pay equity law changes.
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
A disability support worker affected by the [https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/560368/national-briefed-its-mps-two-days-prior-to-pay-equity-overhaul-announcement
pay equity law change] is challenging ACT Minister Brooke van Velden to do her job for a week.
The Workplace Relations Minister's bill passed under urgency on Wednesday night and means 33 claims, representing thousands of workers, must be started again.
Workplace Relations Minister Brooke van Velden has defended the changes, saying she cares about and values the work of women, and this will make the process for claims clearer.
Jo-Chanelle Pouwhare is among the affected claimants and told
Checkpoint
she believes the Minister would change her mind about whether they are fairly paid if she undertook their roles.
"It's just really misogynistic, what they've decided to do. It's not just a huge slap in the face for women, but the impacts [on] families," she said.
"They're worrying more [about] the economy. Look after the workforce, the woman in your workforce."
She said being a care and support worker for the disability sector means she encompasses different roles.
"People might be out there saying 'well get another job don't be social worker'. Well, why when this can be paid, we can get valued, in society we're needed," Pouwhare said.
"Look at the pandemic crisis that we face. It's ironic that all these pay equity claims, the 33 of them, majority of them were the essential workers."
In the organisation she works for, two of the pay scales are below the living wage.
"We've got level one, level two, level three, level four. Two of those levels [are] below the living wage. It could even be three."
Workers must train to get to the next pay scale, she said Level 1 sits just above minimum wage.
"That's an atrocity in itself. You wonder why people may not want to go to work," Pouwhare said.
At the top of the pay scale, the pay sits at $29.10 an hour, she said.
"I've been with this organisation for five years. However, I was able to cross credit my Bachelors," Pouwhare said.
"Somebody that's fresh into the industry has to start on a maybe $0.20 or $0.40 more than the minimum wage, then they have to train and go study, it's not funded."
While she was studying, Pouwhare had to take out a student loan.
"I was still paying it off when I started working here and I think the third year I was working here, I managed to pay it off and it was a huge chunk of my wage," Pouwhare said.
She challenges van Velden to work in her role for at least one to two weeks.
"I guarantee she'll go back, and they might re-think because I can guarantee she probably wouldn't last two days," Pouwhare said.
"For a woman to do that to other women, who's come from a privileged background, wouldn't even probably know what a struggle looks like.
"I challenge you to give it a go sister. If you can handle it and you still believe that these women in the care and support sectors, do in any of these claims, give it a go. You tell us how you can come up with a resolution to say that this is still just."
The majority of the people being impacted by the pay equity law change are Māori and Pasifika, she said.
She feels the government is flushing women's and their families lives down the toilets.
"To take those 33 claims and the trees they wasted on [with] the paper that was printed out for those 33 claims, she just uses it for toilet paper," Pouwhare said.
Van Velden said
she still supported pay equity
but the current thresholds were "a bit too loose".
"I'm a woman and I support women who work," van Velden told
Midday Report.
"I also support removing gender based discriminations from our workforces but what I don't support are muddied laws and unclear laws.
"So these changes are better for all women who are working where we can genuinely say hand on heart that what they are finding with their claims is genuine gender based discrimination."
ACT leader David Seymour has congratulated van Velden, saying that she has saved the Budget for the government by billions of dollars through changing the law.
Pouwhare said Seymour's comments are another slap in the face.
"They've gone and given these landlords tax cuts, why can't they take the money from them?" Pouwhare said.
"This coalition government, they need to be renamed demolition, that's what they're doing to these women and their rights to a fair and just wage."
In this year's Budget, she said she wants the pay equity claims to be approved.
"It shouldn't have even gotten to this point where we have to fight. They should be recognising the significance of all these different female dominated employments [sic] out there."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Defence Force cuts 255 civilian roles to focus on front-line personnel
Defence Force cuts 255 civilian roles to focus on front-line personnel

RNZ News

time4 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Defence Force cuts 255 civilian roles to focus on front-line personnel

(File) NZDF is cutting 255 civilian roles to help it focus on front line personnel. Photo: Supplied / New Zealand Defence Force The Defence Force is cutting 255 civilan roles as part of a restructure. The agency said it is getting rid of 281 filled roles but establishing 276 new ones, meaning five currently filled positions will be axed. The remaining 250 jobs to be cut are currently vacant. The restructure was announced earlier this year , in March, when it was thought the net loss of roles would be about 370. In a statement, NZDF said the changes would help it focus on "maintaining combat readiness and delivering on core military activities". "In making decisions, the NZDF has consulted with staff and unions, and the feedback received has meant some changes that were initially proposed will not go ahead." Further consultation is still underway on alternative proposals, it said. "Throughout this process, the NZDF has ensured that as many staff as possible are placed into suitable alternative positions in the new structure." The Public Service Association said about 10 percent of the agency's civilian jobs were being cut and that the changes would increase already heavy workloads. This would lead to more stress and burnout, and force those in uniform to pick up the shortfall, it said. National Secretary Fleur Fitzsimons said the government was fooling itself if it thought cutting so many jobs was how to build a modern, combat-ready defence force, at a time of rising security risks. She was pleased the government was investing in military equipment and technology , but said it was blind to the fact that civilian defence workers - like engineers and IT specialists - were needed to support this. Fitzsimons said staff were told the tough fiscal environment has forced Defence to make deep cuts in a number of areas, including cancelling some training activities and major exercises; reducing flying hours, sea days and other training, and; pausing property maintenance. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Waitangi Tribunal pushes pause on seabed mine claim
Waitangi Tribunal pushes pause on seabed mine claim

RNZ News

time9 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Waitangi Tribunal pushes pause on seabed mine claim

The Tribunal parking the seabed mine claim is a rare setback for mana whenua who've resisted Trans-Tasman's plans since before the first application in 2013. Photo: Te Korimako o Taranaki The Waitangi Tribunal has rejected the application to halt a fast-track bid to mine the seabed off Pātea - but has left the door open if the process turns out to be unfair. Trans-Tasman Resources (TTR) has applied through the new Fast-Track Approvals Act (FTAA) to mine for iron, titanium and vanadium in the South Taranaki Bight. Multiple South Taranaki hapū and iwi sought a Tribunal injunction to block processing of the fast-track application, and an urgent hearing into alleged Crown Treaty breaches. But Tribunal deputy chair Judge Sarah Reeves agreed with the Crown that the fast-track needed a chance to be proven fair. The Crown argued a panel had not even been appointed - and that iwi will contribute to that selection and get a say once the decision-making panel is working. The Waitangi Tribunal grants urgent hearings in exceptional circumstances: applicants must be suffering - or likely to suffer - significant and irreversible prejudice from current or pending Crown actions. "I do not agree that the risk of significant and irreversible prejudice has crystallised, and the application is premature," said Judge Reeves. "The application does not yet meet the high threshold required to divert the resources and disrupt the Tribunal's inquiry programme that would result by granting an urgent inquiry," she ruled. "However, leave is reserved for the applicants to renew their application if circumstances change." Claimants said they had already suffered prejudice from their decade-long fight against TTR's mining application, right through to defeating the company in the Supreme Court. Mana whenua said government bias made the fast-track process unjust. Judge Reeves said the claimants believe "the Crown's vocal support of the [seabed mining] project and the FTAA appears to make meaningful engagement with the applicants or delay of the project to pursue alternative remedies 'highly unlikely'". On Friday in New Plymouth Shane Jones - the minister of oceans and fisheries, and of resources - called opponents a [ "belligerent, well-organised, rowdy] bunch of activists." He had previously dismissed mana whenua objectors as "pixie-like hapūs" - which many felt was an insult that still rankles in South Taranaki. Taranaki mana whenua claimants to the Tribunal are: Trans-Tasman Resources boss Alan Eggers says the seabed mine would bring jobs and riches without harming the environment. Photo: Te Korimako o Taranaki Other parties include Climate Justice Taranaki, Ngāruahine's school Te Kura o Ngāruahinerangi and from outside the region Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Porou ki Hauraki who also face an FTAA application. For the fast-track bid to be rejected the mine's negative impacts must significantly outweigh national and regional benefits - meaning environmental and cultural damage must be deemed greater than the money the mine makes for Taranaki and New Zealand. Last Thursday the organisers of the fast-track decision process ordered TTR to [ show where it had updated its evidence] since losing in the courts. "Almost all of the technical appendices are dated 2015 and were obviously prepared to support the 2016 application. Only a handful of those reports were updated in 2023 or 2024," noted panel convener Jennifer Caldwell. "The Cultural Values Assessment report, prepared by an independent consultant in 2017, was not updated despite what must have been new information as to the Māori concerns." A month earlier panel conveners ordered the Environmental Protection Authority to dig into the proposed seabed mine's [ environmental and economic impacts]. Every day of operation for at least 20 years the mining ship would discharge 180,000 tonnes of unwanted seabed sediment, a recognised pollutant, into the abundant waters of the Pātea Shoals. TTR claims region benefits of: A report for the miners predicted annual national gains of: LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ on Air.

'We're doing this for Auckland': Opponents of rich-listers' private helipad file appeal
'We're doing this for Auckland': Opponents of rich-listers' private helipad file appeal

RNZ News

time10 hours ago

  • RNZ News

'We're doing this for Auckland': Opponents of rich-listers' private helipad file appeal

The newly built house on Rawene Avenue. Photo: RNZ/Maia Ingoe A group trying to stop Auckland rich-listers Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams from flying a private helicopter from their multi-million-dollar Westmere property are taking legal action. Independent hearing commissioners appointed by Auckland Council approved the couple's controversial resource consent application for a private helipad in June. In a statement, Quiet Sky Waitematā, who oppose private helicopters in residential Auckland, said they filed an appeal against the decision to the Environment Court on Monday. Spokesperson Elena Keith said what they consider to be a "radical ruling" went against overwhelming opposition from the public. "We're not just doing this for Westmere. We're doing this for Auckland. If this decision isn't challenged, the floodgates for helicopters in backyards will open. We simply can't let this terrible decision stand. "The Independent Commissioners have decided that helicopters are 'inherently residential'. Therefore, they say that using a helicopter is a permitted activity - like using a bike or a car. In our opinion, that is absurd. "The decision could open the door for private helicopter operations in residential Auckland without the need for resource consent, putting the burden on neighbours to prove noise limit breaches. How is that fair?" She said communities shouldn't have to endure unnecessary noise and disruption for the benefit of a few individuals. "Auckland is already well-served by public heliports, all within a 15-minute drive." Councillor Mike Lee was expected to bring a Notice of Motion to ban helicopters in residential areas to the council's Policy and Planning Committee on Thursday, which councillors would vote on.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store