World's oldest fingerprint may be a clue that Neanderthals created art
Something in the shape of that quartz-rich stone – perhaps its odd resemblance to an elongated face – may have compelled him to pick it up, study it and, eventually, to dip one of his fingers in red pigment and press it against the pebble's edge, exactly where the nose on that face would have been.
In doing so, he left behind what is thought to be the world's oldest complete human fingerprint, on what would appear to be the oldest piece of European portable art.
The discovery, which could enrich our understanding of how Neanderthals saw and interpreted the world, has come to light after almost three years of research by a team of Spanish archaeologists, geologists and police forensic experts.
The dig team noticed there was something odd about the stone – which is just over 20cm in length – as soon as they found it while excavating the San Lázaro rock shelter on the outskirts of Segovia in July 2022. It did not look like something that had been used as a hammer or an anvil; it didn't look like a tool at all.
'The stone was oddly shaped and had a red ochre dot, which really caught our eye,' said David Álvarez Alonso, an archaeologist at Complutense University in Madrid.
'We were all thinking the same thing and looking at each other because of its shape: we were all thinking, 'This looks like a face'. But obviously that wasn't enough. As we carried on our research, we knew we needed information to be able to advance the hypothesis that there was some purposefulness here, this was a symbolic object and that one possible explanation – although we'll never know for sure – is that this was the symbolisation of a face.'
Determined to test their conviction that the red mark was a human fingerprint placed deliberately between the indentations that could have been the eyes and mouth of a face, the team enlisted the help of other experts. Further investigations confirmed that the pigment, which contained iron oxides and clay minerals, was not found elsewhere in or around the cave.
'We then got in touch with the scientific police to determine whether we were right that the dot had been applied using a fingertip,' said Álvarez Alonso. 'They confirmed that it had.' The print, they concluded, was human and could be that of an adult male.
'Once we had that and all the other pieces, context and information, we advanced the theory that this could be a pareidolia [catching sight of a face in an ordinary, inanimate object] which then led to a human intervention in the form of the red dot,' said the archaeologist. 'Without that red dot, you can't make any claims about the object.'
Álvarez Alonso argues that the dot's existence raises questions that all point in the same direction.
'It couldn't have been a coincidence that the dot is where it is – and there are no markings to indicate any other use,' he said. 'So why did they bring this pebble from the river to the inside of the cave? And, what's more, there's no ochre inside the cave or outside it. So they must have had to bring pigment from elsewhere.'
The team's findings, reported in the journal Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, reinforce the idea that Neanderthals – who died out some 40,000 years ago – were capable of acts of artistic and symbolic creation, meaning modern humans were not the first to use art as a means of expression.
'The fact that the pebble was selected because of its appearance and then marked with ochre shows that there was a human mind capable of symbolising, imagining, idealising and projecting his or her thoughts on an object,' the authors write.
'Furthermore, in this case, we can propose that three fundamental cognitive processes are involved in creating art: the mental conception of an image, deliberate communication, and the attribution of meaning. These are the basic elements characterising symbolism and, also prehistoric – non-figurative – art. Furthermore, this pebble could thus represent one of the oldest known abstractions of a human face in the prehistoric record.'
Álvarez Alonso and his colleagues are looking forward to the debate that their discovery will reignite over whether modern humans were the first artists.
'We've set out our interpretation in the article, but the debate goes on,' he said. 'And anything to do with Neanderthals always prompts a massive debate. If we had a pebble with a red dot on it that was done 5,000 years ago by Homo sapiens, no one would hesitate to call it portable art. But associating Neanderthals with art generates a lot of debate. I think there's sometimes an unintentional prejudice.'
Still, said the archaeologist, he and the rest of the team believed the most logical explanation was that someone, a very long time ago, 'saw something special in this pebble', picked it up and set about imbuing it with meaning.
'Why would a Neanderthal have seen it differently from the way we see it today?' he asked. 'They were human, too. The thing here is that we're dealing with an unparalleled object; there's nothing similar. It's not like art where, if you discover a cave painting, there are hundreds more you can use for context. But our assertion is that the Neanderthals had a similar capacity for symbolic thought to Homo sapiens – and we think this object reinforces that notion.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Scientists found cut marks on a 850,000-year-old human neck bone. Was it ... cannibalism?
A toddler's neck bone discovered with clear cut-marks dating to about 850,000 years ago may be evidence that an ancient hominin species, Homo antecessor, cannibalized a child, according to archaeologists in Spain. The researchers say the finding, announced July 24, is further indication of Paleolithic cannibalism at Gran Dolina cave in Spain's Sierra de Atapuerca, where signs of ancient humans butchering one another have been found for decades. "This is direct evidence that the child was processed like any other prey," says Palmira Saladié, an archaeologist with the Catalan Institute of Human Paleoecology and Social Evolution (IPHES-CERCA) and one of the leaders of the excavations where the neck bone was unearthed. Decapitation did not always mean meat from the dead individual was consumed, she says. But in the case of this child, who was between two and four years old, she believes it was almost certain the individual was also eaten. The toddler's vertebra was found along with bones from nine other individuals, in a layer of sediment within the cave dated to about 850,000 years ago. Many of the bones also had cut marks, as well as fractures the researchers say seem to have been made to reach the marrow inside. But not everyone agrees with the team's conclusions. Homo antecessor's cave Gran Dolina and the Atapuerca site near the northern Spanish city of Burgos were uncovered in the 1890s, when a route for a new railway was cut through nearby mountains. Excavations since the 1960s have revealed broadly accepted evidence of cannibalism among the Homo antecessor group that lived there from about 900,000 years ago until their species went extinct, possibly a little more than 100,000 years later. Scientists disagree on whether Homo antecessor was a direct ancestor of anatomically modern humans—Homo sapiens—or if it was a related species that died out. Regardless, evidence from prehistoric archaeological sites—including the Mesolithic Gough's Cave in the west of England and the Neolithic Herxheim site in Germany—indicates that early Homo sapiens, too, were sometimes cannibals. Signs of cannibalism among earlier human species, such as Neanderthals, have been found at archaeological sites all over the world, including some of the earliest evidence from Kenya. In a few cases, what was once thought to be evidence of hominin cannibalism might actually be something else: stripping flesh from bones for a "reburial" perhaps, which has been suggested for Neolithic remains in France. Cannibal controversy Some experts disagree if the newfound cut-marks are evidence the child was cannibalized. "Cannibalism is very rare," says Michael Pante a paleoanthropologist from Colorado State University, who was not involved in the discovery. "It's just not a common thing that we see." He says that although scientists claim to have found evidence of cannibalism from remains at several archaeological sites, and especially at Atapuerca, direct evidence of it is uncommon. "This decapitation doesn't mean they consumed that individual," says Pante. "They were obviously cutting up a child for some reason, but there are a number of reasons they may have done that." A funeral ritual is one possibility. Pante also disagrees with a suggestion made by the researchers that early humans at Atapuerca hunted rival humans as a food resource. "There is not a lot of evidence of that," he says. Cannibalism among humans—even very early humans like these—was unusual for nutritional purposes and may have only occurred in rituals, he adds. Other researchers are more convinced, however. James Cole, an archaeologist and expert in early human cannibalism who was also not involved in the work, says the first evidence for cannibalism at Atapuerca was found almost 30 years ago. "The new find in this respect is perhaps unsurprising,' he says, 'but it is absolutely fascinating and hints at the rich story about our evolutionary past that the site still has to tell.'


CNN
4 days ago
- CNN
Roman-era ‘church' in Spain may have been a synagogue
Archaeologists working at a site in Spain say they have uncovered evidence of what may have been a synagogue used by a hitherto unknown Jewish community. While excavating the site, previously believed to be a church dating from the 4th century, experts found materials and architectural evidence that led them to hypothesize that the building was, in fact, a synagogue, according to a study published earlier this month. Artifacts such as fragments of oil lamps and a piece of roof tile decorated with menorahs were found during excavations in Cástulo, a former Roman settlement in southern Spain, whereas no materials that have a clear association with the Christian faith have been found at the site. In contrast, archaeologists have found evidence of Christian worship at another site in the town, study author Bautista Ceprián, an archaeologist with the Cástulo Sefarad Primera Luz project, told CNN on Wednesday. The building also has a squarer shape than Christian churches, which tend to be more rectangular, and archaeologists found what could have been a hole for supporting a large menorah, as well as the foundations of a central raised platform, or bimah, which is common in synagogues but not in churches, he added. In addition, no tombs were discovered at the building, which was built near an abandoned Roman temple — something that would have been feared by Christian residents because of its association with paganism, he added. 'It's a hidden, discreet and isolated spot that would not have been visited often by the Christian majority,' Ceprián said. Taken together, this evidence points to the existence of a previously unknown Jewish community in the town, the study authors argue. 'The reinterpretation of the building from a church to possibly a synagogue followed a process of logical reasoning based on the historical and archaeological data in our possession,' Ceprián said. Nonetheless, the lack of written records of a Jewish community in Cástulo leaves room for some doubt, as the study authors acknowledged. Speculating about the daily life of the community would be 'a very dangerous exercise,' Ceprián said, but they would have lived alongside their fellow Roman citizens in the town. The population is then thought to have disappeared, as it is not named in the anti-Jewish law enacted by Visigoth King Sisebut, who ruled what is now Spain from 612 to 621, whereas the Jewish communities in other nearby towns are specifically named. As for what would have happened to them, 'it is difficult to know,' Ceprián said. One possible explanation is that the Christian clergy feared the local population would convert to Judaism, given the 'close and friendly relations' between the two groups in the region at the time, he said. This concern drove Christian leaders, who were becoming increasingly influential in the Roman Empire, to foment fear of and opposition to Jewish communities, said Ceprián. This culminated in episodes starting around the end of the 4th century in which Jewish citizens were pressured to convert to Christianity, with those who refused 'amicably invited' to leave their hometowns, he said, adding that this kind of incident could have plausibly occurred in Cástulo sometime between the end of the 5th century and the beginning of the 7th century. Now the team will work to protect the site and excavations will continue, Ceprián said. They aim to allow the public to visit at some point in the future, he added. 'We can't rule out the possibility of finding more definitive evidence that allows us to update our hypothesis of a possible synagogue to an actual synagogue,' he said. Sign up for CNN's Wonder Theory science newsletter. Explore the universe with news on fascinating discoveries, scientific advancements and more.


Newsweek
4 days ago
- Newsweek
Ancient Burial Discovery Might Redefine Our Past
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Archaeologists have uncovered what may be one of the world's oldest human burial sites, dating back around 100,000 years. The remains of five early humans—two complete skeletons and three skulls—were found deliberately arranged in burial pits deep inside Tinshemet Cave in central Israel. Researchers said the site provides rare and compelling evidence of organized funerary behavior during the Middle Paleolithic period, offering new insight into the early origins of ritual, custom, and possibly belief. Why It Matters The discovery significantly extends the timeline for intentional human burial, a behavior long viewed as a marker of symbolic thinking and social complexity. The careful positioning of bodies, combined with the presence of pigments and objects that served no practical function, suggests that early Homo sapiens may have developed ritual customs earlier than previously confirmed. Professor of Archaeology Yossi Zaidner works in Tinshemet Cave, where archaeologists are excavating one of the world's oldest known burial sites, dating back 100,000 years, near Shoam, Israel, on July 15, 2025. Professor of Archaeology Yossi Zaidner works in Tinshemet Cave, where archaeologists are excavating one of the world's oldest known burial sites, dating back 100,000 years, near Shoam, Israel, on July 15, 2025. Ariel Schalit/AP Photo What to Know Tinshemet Cave, excavated over the past decade, has revealed the remains of at least five individuals—Homo sapiens and Neanderthal-like hominins—each carefully laid to rest in shallow pits, curled in fetal positions and surrounded by hundreds of ceremonial objects. The consistent placement of the bodies suggests intentional burial, according to Yossi Zaidner, one of the site's excavation directors and a professor of archaeology at Hebrew University in Jerusalem. Early Discoveries Some of the most significant discoveries from Tinshemet Cave were published in March in Nature Human Behavior. Researchers identified the remains as early humans: two full skeletons and three isolated skulls, along with additional bones and teeth. They also documented over 500 fragments of red and orange ocher, each produced by heating iron-rich stones—a process thought to reflect early humans' capacity for symbolic or decorative creation. "Here we see a really complex set of behaviors, not related to just food and surviving," Zaidner told The Associated Press. Volunteers work in Tinshemet Cave near Shoam, Israel, on July 15, 2025. Volunteers work in Tinshemet Cave near Shoam, Israel, on July 15, 2025. Ariel Schalit/AP Photo Excavation 'Nails Down' Dates Tinshemet Cave is exceptionally important to archaeologists because the local climate preserved the bones, tools, and ornaments in good condition—unlike many other parts of the world where such items have been lost to time. Christian Tryon, a professor at the University of Connecticut and a research associate at the Human Origins Program at the Smithsonian Institution who was not involved in the study, said, "There were so many uncertainties with those sites, but this is confirming it's a pattern we know, and they're really nailing down the dates." Archaeologists said it will take many more years to fully excavate the site. Using hand chisels and pen-sized pneumatic drills resembling dental tools, researchers are proceeding with extreme care to protect the fragile finds. A volunteer scrapes away around remains in Tinshemet Cave near Shoam, Israel, on July 15, 2025. A volunteer scrapes away around remains in Tinshemet Cave near Shoam, Israel, on July 15, 2025. Ariel Schalit/AP Photo What People Are Saying Yossi Zaidner, an archaeologist and excavation co-director: "The skeletons were located in pits and arranged in a fetal position, recognized as a burial position." Christian Tryon, a professor at the University of Connecticut: "There were so many uncertainties with those sites, but this is confirming it's a pattern we know, and they're really nailing down the dates." What Happens Next With much of Tinshemet Cave still unexcavated, archaeologists expect many more years of fieldwork. As new discoveries emerge, researchers hope to deepen their understanding of how and when early humans began treating death with ritual, symbolism, and meaning.