What 5 Wall Street heavyweights expect for markets and the economy in the 2nd half of 2025
Investors entered 2025 wildly optimistic after two back-to-back years of 20% stock market gains, only to watch the S&P 500 plunge to the edge of a bear market in April and then rally back to record highs last week.
After an eventful first half of the year, Wall Street is buckling up for more volatility in the next six months
While recession risks have gone down, there's plenty of turbulence in store. The July 9 tariff deadline looms large, and President Donald Trump's " Big Beautiful Bill" is slowly taking shape. Meanwhile, the Trump-Powell feud continues, and geopolitical risks are still on the radar.
The second half of the year should offer more clarity on the impact of tariffs on the economy, as the data begins to fully reflect any inflation or consumer spending headwinds.
Here's what top strategists across Wall Street are expecting for stocks, inflation, tariffs, and other economic developments in the second half of 2025.
Morgan Stanley
After a tough first half, Mike Wilson, the bank's chief investment officer, is anticipating a smoother end to 2025.
"President Trump is like a new CEO coming into a situation with an opportunity for a strategic pivot. In that sense, he appears to have decided to 'kitchen sink' the first half of the year and blame the prior administration for soft economic results in the near term," Wilson wrote. "Following this analogy, the next step would be to shift to new, pro-growth strategies and take credit for the recovery next year when these policies take hold."
Lower tariff rates have significantly reduced the risk of a recession, and Morgan Stanley believes the market bottomed during the Liberation Day sell-off. One sign of rising optimism in the market is an increased number of upward earnings revisions, the bank said.
Markets are expecting two rate cuts in 2025, and Morgan Stanley economists are forecasting seven rate cuts in 2026, which could be a catalyst for higher-than-average valuations.
The bank's year-end target for the S&P 500 is 6,500, which would imply a gain of about 5% from current levels.
JPMorgan
According to Hussein Malik, the bank's head of global research, the economy is set to soften in the second half of the year, but a recession is unlikely as the deepest fears related to the trade war fade.
The bank expects rates to be higher for longer as inflation remains sticky, and sees the Fed cutting 100 basis points between December and the spring of 2026 — arriving at a terminal Fed funds rate of 3.5%.
While the AI trade remains in full swing and earnings continue to be strong, tariff and geopolitical concerns are persistent headwinds.
"Absent major policy and/or geopolitical surprises (i.e., tariff escalation, oil shock), we believe the path of least resistance to new highs will be supported by Tech/AI-led strong fundamentals, a steady bid from systematic strategies, and flows from active investors on dips," Malik wrote.
JPMorgan expects the S&P 500 to end the year at 6,000.
Wells Fargo
Multiple tailwinds can carry the stock market to new highs by year-end, according to the bank's chief investment officer Darrell Cronk.
Markets shouldn't over-worry about the economic outlook, the bank believes. Inflation is on a path to normalization, and deregulation will help companies, especially small businesses.
Cronk is confident that consumers and businesses will be able to adjust to tariff uncertainty. Household incomes are growing, and corporate earnings and balance sheets are strong.
Cronk also points out that US energy independence lessens the risk of an inflation surge from oil shocks.
The bank believes areas such as aerospace and defense, information technology, and financials will be top stock market performers going forward. As the AI trade progresses, investors should look beyond the US into international markets as well for opportunities.
Wells Fargo has a year-end S&P 500 target of 5,900-6,100.
Goldman Sachs Asset Management
Tariffs will likely continue to contribute to market volatility and the Fed's wait-and-see approach to rates, according to Greg Calnon, co-head of public investing.
"We anticipate a couple of rate cuts later this year if hard data weakens in the coming months, though risks are skewed towards fewer and later cuts," Calnon wrote.
Much of the economy's fate depends on the tax legislation passed by the Trump administration, which could counteract the negative impacts of tariffs. A push to build domestic manufacturing capabilities could also boost economic growth.
The bank expects the stock market to continue broadening beyond the Magnificent Seven, with opportunities for European stocks and small caps thanks to deregulation and friendly tax policy.
"A shift in US policy focus from tariffs, immigration controls, and federal government efficiency towards fiscal easing and regulatory relief has the potential to improve investor sentiment in the second half of the year," Calnon wrote.
Bank of America
"The economy is likely to muddle through," Claudio Irigoyen, head of the bank's Global Economics Research, wrote in his midyear review.
The bank is betting on the US economy to remain resilient throughout the rest of the year, as the trade war with China has de-escalated faster than anticipated. Although tariffs still pose a risk, Bank of America believes tariff revenue will help lower the national debt levels and calm the bond market.
The bank sees inflation peaking at lower-than-expected levels of 3.1% thanks to companies' frontloading activity earlier this year, although oil prices do pose a risk.
Irigoyen is betting on no rate cuts at all this year. With tariff effects taking longer than expected to show up in inflation prints, the Fed isn't in a hurry to cut unless there's a severe economic downturn.
He's not phased by Fed independence concerns. "The more political pressure is exerted on the Fed to lower government borrowing costs, the less likely we are to see a rate cut," Irigoyen wrote.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mark Zuckerberg overhauled Meta's entire AI org in a risky, multi-billion dollar bet on ‘superintelligence'
Mark Zuckerberg is stacking the deck in the AI race, betting that unlimited capital, top talent, and raw computing power will ensure victory. If the winning hand Zuckerberg is chasing—AI 'superintelligence'— is still very much a vague and theoretical concept, the Meta CEO's remarkable series of moves unveiled Monday instantly changed the reality for everyone else in the game, particularly the pioneering AI startups without Meta's resources. Zuckerberg announced a major revamp of its AI operations on Monday, putting the company's collection of AI businesses and projects under the umbrella of a newly created organization called Meta Superintelligence Labs, or MSL, and appointing Alexandr Wang, the former CEO of data-labeling startup Scale AI, as Meta's first ever Chief AI Officer. 'As the pace of AI progress accelerates, developing superintelligence is coming into sight,' Zuckerberg wrote in an internal memo obtained by Fortune. 'I believe this will be the beginning of a new era for humanity, and I am fully committed to doing what it takes for Meta to lead the way.' He added that the details he would share were about building towards a company vision of 'personal superintelligence for everyone.' The new superintelligence lab, Zuckerberg wrote, 'includes all of our foundations, product, and FAIR teams, as well as a new lab focused on developing the next generation of our models.' He also confirmed that former GitHub CEO and investor Nat Friedman has also joined Meta to partner with Wang to lead MSL, heading Meta's work on AI products and applied research. 'Nat has served on our Meta Advisory Group for the last year, so he already has a good sense of our roadmap and what we need to do,' Zuckerberg wrote. Fortune reported last week that Friedman is also connected with Wang and Scale – he is a longtime and active Scale investor and co-hosted the secretive Scale AI Security Summit in Utah in November 2023. Meta has embarked on an extraordinary hiring spree in recent weeks, bringing Wang on board as part of a $14.3 billion deal with Scale, and recruiting top researchers from OpenAI with rumored $100 million compensation offers. In Zuckerberg's internal memo on Monday, he named eleven top researchers who had joined Meta from OpenAI, Anthropic and Google. For OpenAI, which kicked off the generative AI craze with the release of ChatGPT in late 2022, Meta's aggressive hiring spree represents a critical threat. OpenAI's chief research officer Mark Chen described the situation as feeling like someone 'breaking into our home,' calling the talent loss 'theft.' OpenAI said it had begun recalibrating compensation and crafting 'creative' retention packages to stay competitive. While OpenAI has a longstanding partnership with Microsoft, which has invested more than $13 billion in OpenAI, the relationship between the two companies has reportedly grown strained over the past year. As Meta increasingly seeks to move into OpenAI's territory however, the Sam Altman led startup may need to find allies with deep pockets. OpenAI recently began using AI chips made by Google, according to media reports, signaling a growing bond between the two companies, even though Google's Gemini LLMs compete directly with OpenAI. With an internet advertising business that generates more than $40 billion every quarter, Meta can afford to bankroll a no-holds-barred AI batter even it doesn't immediately deliver a profit. Still, Meta's latest moves carry plenty of risks. In making Wang chief AI officer, Meta has chosen someone who is not a computer scientist to lead all of its AI efforts—a choice that may not go over well with Meta's deep bench of AI scientists and PhDs, many of whom have already decamped. Zuckerberg noted in his memo that he and Wang had worked together for several years and said 'I consider him to be the most impressive founder of his generation.' There is also no agreed-upon formal definition of 'superintelligence,' though it is typically refers to an intelligence that vastly surpasses human capabilities in virtually all domains, including scientific creativity, general wisdom, and social skills—exceeding human cognition across the board. Superintelligence is generally perceived as going beyond artificial general intelligence, or AGI, which, though also vague, typically refers to an AI system with human-level intelligence across a wide range of work-related tasks. That is, it can reason, plan, solve problems, understand language, and learn in a generalizable way, much like a human. Zuckerberg claimed that Meta is 'uniquely positioned to deliver superintelligence to the world,' pointing to its efforts to build out data centers supporting more computing power than smaller labs – it is currently spending tens of billions on data centers and is raising more. The Financial Times reported last week that Meta is seeking $29 billion from private capital firms for its all-in push to build AI data centers. Of course, Microsoft and Google are also spending tens of billions of dollars in cap ex to build out their AI infrastructure. And OpenAI has said it intends to invest $500 billion with partners including Softbank in the coming years to build out its Stargate network of AI datacenters. If the race to Superintelligence is a test of wills and capital, Zuckerberg seems to be betting that he can outlast the competition. This story was originally featured on


The Hill
36 minutes ago
- The Hill
Japanese manufacturers are slightly more optimistic despite Trump tariff worries
TOKYO (AP) — Business sentiment among large Japanese manufacturers has improved slightly, according to a survey by Japan's central bank released Tuesday, although worries persist over President Donald Trump's tariffs. The Bank of Japan's quarterly tankan survey said an index for large manufacturers rose to plus 13 from plus 12 in March, when it marked the first dip in a year. The survey is an indicator of companies foreseeing good conditions minus those feeling pessimistic. Major manufacturers include auto and electronics sectors, whose exports to the U.S. drive the Japanese economy. U.S. auto tariffs are a worry for major manufacturers like Toyota Motor Corp., but some analysts note global auto sales have held up relatively well in recent months. The U.S. has imposed 25% tariffs on auto imports. Japanese automakers have plants in Mexico, where Trump has announced a separate set of tariffs. The U.S. has also imposed 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum. Japanese officials have been talking frequently with the Trump administration, stressing that Japan is a key U.S. ally. Trump posted on his social media site Monday that Japan wasn't buying enough rice from the U.S. 'They won't take our RICE, and yet they have a massive rice shortage,' the president wrote, adding that a letter to Japan was coming. Also on Monday, National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett told reporters at the White House that Trump 'is going to finalize the frameworks we negotiated with a whole bunch of countries after the weekend.' The Bank of Japan, which has kept interest rates extremely low for years to encourage growth, is expected to continue to raise interest rates, but some analysts expect that to wait until next year. The central bank raised its benchmark rate to 0.5% from 0.1% at the start of this year and has maintained that rate. The next Bank of Japan monetary policy board meeting is at the end of this month. The tankan findings work as important data in weighing a decision. The weak yen has raised the cost of materials for Japan at a time when the U.S. dollar has been trading at around 140 yen, up considerably from about 110 yen five years ago. A weak yen is a boon for Japan's exporters by boosting the value of their earnings when converted into yen. The tankan showed sentiment for large non-manufacturers fell to plus 34 from plus 35. That was better than some forecasts, which projected a deeper decline. The Japanese government reported last week that the nation's unemployment rate in May stood at 2.5%, unchanged from the previous month. ___ Yuri Kageyama is on Threads:
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrats fail to overturn ruling that tax cuts in GOP megabill don't add to deficit
The Senate voted along party lines Monday that making the expiring 2017 tax cuts permanent as part of President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' could be scored as deficit neutral and therefore comply with the Byrd Rule, allowing the bill to pass with a simple-majority vote. Democrats failed to defeat the ruling by the Senate chair, which Republicans control, that the chamber's 940-page One Big, Beautiful Bill Act does not violate the 1974 Congressional Budget Act by using a controversial 'current policy' baseline to score the extension of President Trump's expiring tax cuts as not adding to the deficit. If the tax portion of the bill were scored on a 'current law' baseline, which assumes the 2017 Trump tax cuts would expire at the end of 2025, then it would add an estimated $3.5 trillion to federal deficits between 2025-34 and would add to deficits after 2034 — beyond the 10-year budget window allowed by the Byrd Rule. Scored this way, the Republican bill would fail the rule, which governs what legislation is eligible to pass the Senate with a simple-majority vote on the reconciliation fast track, and Republicans would be forced to rewrite large parts of the measure. But when scored with a 'current policy' baseline, the Congressional Budget Office projects the tax cuts in the Finance Committee's section of the bill would increase deficits by not more than $1.5 trillion between 2025-34 and would not increase on-budget deficits after 2034. Democrats argued a current policy baseline had never been used before in a budget reconciliation bill, and had never been used to score an extension of expiring tax cuts as not adding to future deficits, and therefore was not in compliance with the Senate's Byrd Rule. And Democrats highlighted over the weekend that most of the Republican reconciliation package uses a 'current law' baseline to project the cost of the legislation. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) accused Republicans of 'deploying fake math and budgetary hocus-pocus to make it seem like their billionaire giveaways don't cost anything.' Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) accused Republicans of 'going nuclear' to blow up the Senate rules so they can make Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent. 'This is the nuclear option. It's just hidden behind a whole lot of Washington, D.C., lingo,' Wyden said on the floor. Wyden pointed out through a parliamentary inquiry that the Finance portion of the bill used two different baselines, current policy and current law. Senate Democrats had tried to schedule a meeting with Republican Budget Committee staff and with the parliamentarian to discuss whether using a current policy baseline violated Senate precedent and the Byrd Rule, but Republicans 'flat-out refused' to participate in such a meeting, according to a person familiar with the conversations. Senate Budget Committee Chair Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said Monday morning that Republicans are not overruling the parliamentarian and asserted the parliamentarian has said it is up to him as Budget chair to set the baseline. And he argued Democrats in the past have supported the use of a current policy baseline to project the cost of legislation, although it hasn't been done before for a budget reconciliation package. He noted former Democratic Budget Committee Chair Kent Conrad (N.D.) used a current policy baseline for a past farm bill. Republicans also point out former President Obama's budget office supported using a current policy baseline to score the extension of the expiring tax cuts from the George W. Bush era at the end of 2012. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said on the floor Monday that former Obama Director of the Office of Management and Budget Jeff Zients supported using the current policy baseline for the 2012 fiscal cliff deal. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.