
Kamala Harris isn't running for California governor. Is Rick Caruso?
Now everyone is asking about Rick Caruso.
For months, the prospect of Harris' entry into the governor's race froze the 2026 contest as candidates and donors waited to see if she would seize the frontrunner's mantle. But if Harris was the largest domino still teetering, the Los Angeles billionaire and former mayoral candidate was widely seen as a close second — and Harris' pass has given him options.
'I do think he'd now be more likely to look to a possible gubernatorial race," said Donna Bojarsky, a Los Angeles civic leader and fundraiser. 'There's not only no obvious frontrunner — there's a very challenging path for every single person running.'
Caruso's political debut ended in failure when the Republican-turned-Democrat mall magnate lost his City Hall bid by seven points despite sinking more than $100 million of his own wealth into the campaign. But few political observers thought he was finished, and his path diverged into two obvious choices: challenge Bass again or shift his aim to the governor's office.
Without Harris, the governor's race looks like a wide open contest. And while Caruso has been circumspect about his next move — he did not release a statement about Harris bowing out and declined to comment for this story — behind the scenes, the wheels are turning.
Supporters lit up Caruso's phone after Harris made her announcement, according to a confidante, some urging him to run for governor, while others pushing the mayoral race.
Harris' decision gave Caruso a cleaner path in the governor's race, given that he would no longer have to contend with the former vice president's universal name ID and strong fundraising.
'The race has opened up a bit. Kamala had weaknesses and a ceiling, but she had support, too,' said the confidante, who was granted anonymity to discuss Caruso's view of the political playing field. 'Everything clicked up a notch, maybe two notches, as far as the excitement level. But in terms of a plan, it's going to be a while.'
The signals from Caruso world that suggest he is in no rush to declare reflects the billionaire's luxury of time, given his ability to self-fund.
So far, Caruso has taken a deliberate approach. He has polled both races and spent the last five or six months traversing California on a listening tour with prominent political donors, including tech entrepreneurs, gathering their input on key issues and their thoughts about outgoing Gov. Gavin Newsom.
Caruso has often acted and sounded like a man still running for mayor, lambasting Bass over her faltering response to the January wildfires, which ignited while she was out of the country. But in recent weeks, Bass has found some footing, rallying her base against the Trump administration's sweeping immigration raids and presiding over a steady reduction in homelessness.
'After the fires, the prevailing wisdom was Karen Bass was politically vulnerable and Caruso was a prime opponent to run against her — six months later she's seen as handling the ICE raids in LA very well and her political standing is much better than it was,' said Kevin Liao, a Los Angeles-based political consultant who has worked in the California statehouse. 'Governor appears like a path he'd have a more realistic chance of winning.'
In 2022, Caruso ran for mayor as a business-savvy outsider willing to defy an ossified political establishment. He sought to win over working-class and Latino voters disillusioned with the city's pervasive homelessness problem and spiraling cost of living.
It was not enough to win in deep-blue Los Angeles, where Bass enjoyed the backing of labor unions and was well known to voters and political power brokers after years in Congress. But some observers believe there is an audience for a similar message in the 2026 governor's race after California Democrats lost ground in 2024.
'Many Californians, including lifelong Democrats, are looking for change in California,' said Sam Yebri, a nonprofit executive and head of a centrist political group who supports Caruso. 'Voters in this moment want someone who will deliver real results for the average Californian, not someone who will just kick and scream and stomp around about the Trump administration.'
A governor's race would offer new insight into how Caruso defines his political identity. His past affiliation with the GOP has led many stalwart Democrats to view him skeptically and his party shape-shifting was used as a cudgel against him in the 2022 race against Bass.
But Caruso has since tried to shore up his bona fides as a Democrat, including donating to the party's House candidates last cycle and co-hosting a Joe Biden fundraiser. A visit to Caruso's office has also become a rite of passage for would-be 2028 Democratic presidential aspirants in Los Angeles to raise money and rub shoulders with Hollywood's elite.
Caruso would also hold an important asset in a prohibitively expensive statewide race. He could draw on his considerable fortune to counter the family wealth of Eleni Kounalakis and small-dollar appeal of former Rep. Katie Porter.
'Think of the governor's race as a congested freeway — Rick has the resources to at least clear a lane for himself,' said former Los Angeles Councilmember Mike Bonin, who now directs the Pat Brown Institute for Public Affairs.
He could also seize the moderate lane from contenders like former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, who would be vying for a similar base without being able to marshal Caruso's resources.
But money isn't everything, as Caruso's 2022 bid showed. In an overwhelmingly blue state where many Democratic base voters are itching for combat with a hostile Trump administration, Caruso may not have a message for the moment.
'The shoals of California politics are littered with the wrecks of rich centrists who try to run for higher office,' said Mike Shimpock, a Southern California political consultant. 'There's always this belief that there's some secret centrist path to the governorship. I find it akin to the yellow brick road: It doesn't really exist.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Philip Morris Stock Outlook: Is Wall Street Bullish or Bearish?
With a market cap of $253.7 billion, Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) is a global tobacco company focused on delivering a smoke-free future. Its product portfolio includes traditional cigarettes, smoke-free alternatives like IQOS and ZYN, and expanding offerings in wellness and healthcare. Shares of the Stamford, Connecticut-based company have outperformed the broader market over the past 52 weeks. PM stock has surged 38.3% over this time frame, while the broader S&P 500 Index ($SPX) has gained 18.4%. Moreover, shares of Philip Morris are up 35.4% on a YTD basis, compared to SPX's 7.6% increase. More News from Barchart Dear Nvidia Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for August 27 Options Traders Expected Palantir Stock's Tamest Earnings Reaction in a Year. Did They Get It Right? Tesla Gains on Elon Musk's New Pay Package. Is TSLA Stock a Buy? Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. Narrowing the focus, the tobacco giant stock has also outpaced the Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund's (XLP) 1.6% rise over the past 52 weeks. Despite reporting a better-than-expected Q2 2025 adjusted EPS of $1.91, shares of Philip Morris tumbled 8.4% on Jul. 22. Total sales rose 7.1% to $10.1 billion and ZYN shipments came in at 190 million cans, both missing analysts' estimates. For the fiscal year ending in December 2025, analysts expect PM's adjusted EPS to grow 14.3% year-over-year to $7.51. The company's earnings surprise history is promising. It beat the consensus estimates in the last four quarters. Among the 14 analysts covering the stock, the consensus rating is a 'Strong Buy.' That's based on nine 'Strong Buy' ratings, two 'Moderate Buys,' and three 'Holds.' On Jul. 14, UBS maintained its 'Neutral' rating on Philip Morris but raised its price target to $181, citing strong smoke-free margin growth driven by IQOS and ZYN, with robust U.S. volume projections and revised earnings estimates through 2027. As of writing, the stock is trading below the mean price target of $193.38. The Street-high price target of $220 implies a potential upside of nearly 35% from the current price. On the date of publication, Sohini Mondal did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Alcon Expands Vision Correction Portfolio With STAAR Surgical Acquisition
On Tuesday, the eye care company Alcon Plc (NYSE:ALC) agreed to acquire STAAR Surgical Company (NASDAQ:STAA), the manufacturer of the implantable collamer lens (ICL). The acquisition includes the EVO family of lenses (EVO ICL) for vision correction for patients with moderate to high myopia (nearsightedness), with or without astigmatism. Alcon will purchase all outstanding shares of STAAR common stock for $28 per share in cash, which represents approximately a 59% premium to STAAR's 90-day Volume Weighted Average Price (VWAP) and a 51% premium to the closing price of STAAR common stock on August 4, transaction represents a total equity value of approximately $1.5 billion. Alcon intends to finance the transaction by issuing short- and long-term credit facilities. The transaction is anticipated to close in approximately six to 12 months and is expected to be accretive to earnings in year two. 'With the number of high myopes rising globally, the acquisition of STAAR enhances our ability to offer a leading surgical vision correction solution for those who are not ideal candidates for other refractive surgeries such as LASIK,' said David Endicott, CEO of Alcon. An estimated 50% of the world will be myopic by 2050, and today, nearly 500 million people are considered high myopes. The EVO family of ICLs are implanted between the iris (the colored part of the eye) and the natural crystalline lens during a procedure that does not remove corneal tissue. This move follows Alcon's recent announcement in July regarding its intention to acquire LumiThera, Inc. and its Photobiomodulation (PBM) Device for dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Data from the LIGHTSITE I, II, and III clinical trials consistently showed that PBM treatments provide visual acuity improvement with no treatment-related serious adverse events reported. PBM received FDA de novo market authorization in November 2024 and CE Mark in November 2018. PBM is available in Europe, Latin America, Singapore, the U.K., and the U.S. The transaction does not include the acquisition of AdaptDx and Nova/Diopsys diagnostic devices, which will be separated and spun off to LumiThera's shareholders before Alcon's acquisition and will continue to be marketed and sold by the LumiThera spin-off. Alcon and LumiThera anticipate the acquisition to be completed in the third quarter of 2025. Price Action: ALC stock is trading lower by 1.17% to $86.79 premarket, and STAA stock is trading higher by 44.9% to $26.78 at last check Tuesday. Read Next:Photo via Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? STAAR SURGICAL (STAA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Alcon Expands Vision Correction Portfolio With STAAR Surgical Acquisition originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘We are at war': Democrats reach breaking point over Republican threats in political map arms race
Democrats have spent years issuing warnings over Republican threats to redraw the political maps that could determine the balance of power for years to come. Now, they're prepared for 'war.' After protracted legal battles to unwind Donald Trump's executive actions and unsuccessful attempts to derail the president's agenda in Congress, Democrats appear to have reached a breaking point and are ready to do some map-making of their own, reluctantly preparing to fight fire with fire. They have repeatedly stressed that the GOP's gerrymandering imperils American democracy. But Democratic officials across the country are now embracing the idea, reasoning that years-long legal challenges and public pressure over illegal voter suppression are no longer enough to keep up with the GOP's power trip. 'All's fair in love and war,' New York Governor Kathy Hochul said Monday as she signaled efforts to draw up new maps in her state 'as soon as possible.' 'This is a war. We are at war,' she added. 'And that's why the gloves are off, and I say, 'Bring it on.'' Trump is looking to avoid a repeat of his first term, when Democrats flipped the House at the midpoint and largely stalled his agenda from advancing through Congress. This time around he wants Republican-led states to redraw their congressional districts to ensure the GOP remains in power in 2026. Last month, the president commanded Texas Republicans to do a 'simple redrawing' of the state's congressional maps, the heavily-contested boundaries that establish districts for each member of the House of Representatives. Texas Governor Greg Abbott had summoned state lawmakers to the state capitol in Austin for an emergency session to do just that. Days after Trump's demands, Texas Republicans put together a map that gives them five more seats in the House. On August 1, the Texas House redistricting committee held the only public hearing on the proposal. Republicans voted it out of committee the next morning on a party-line vote, setting up a quick vote in the full state House of Representatives, which Republicans control. 'I'm not beating around the bush,' Texas state Rep. Todd Hunter told the committee. 'We have five new districts, and these five new districts are based on political performance.' Contra Abbott and the Justice Department, he admitted the map was being redrawn 'for partisan purposes.' Committee chair Cody Vasut also admitted the move was purely about 'improving political performance.' But by the time Texas Republicans were prepared to vote on the new maps on August 4, Texas Democrats had already left the state. Nearly 60 Democratic members of the state House have fled elsewhere, breaking quorum to derail a vote and promising to stay away from Texas for the duration of Abbott's 30-day session. Texas Republicans subsequently ordered arrest warrants and directed state marshals to haul Democrats back to the capitol — a largely symbolic maneuver confined by state lines. It's also expensive; missing members are racking up $500 in daily penalties for every day they miss work. But for Democrats, it's a high-profile act of obstruction that puts Republicans on notice. 'This is not a decision we make lightly, but it is one we make with absolute moral clarity,' Democratic state Rep. Gene Wu said from Illinois after leaving the state with several Texas Democrats. Wu, the state's Democratic caucus chair, said the GOP has put forward a 'racist, gerrymandered map' that 'seeks to use racial lines to divide hard-working communities that have spent decades building up their power and strengthening their voices.' Governor Abbott has done so 'in submission of Donald Trump, so Donald Trump can steal these communities' power and voice,' Wu continued. 'We will not be complicit in the destruction of our own communities.' The developing war over congressional maps follows a series of Supreme Court decisions that have gradually chipped away at the Voting Rights Act and constitutional guardrails to protect against racial gerrymandering, or carving up electoral maps to prevent racial minorities from electing their preferred candidates. Federal courts have generally blocked the creation of congressional districts that 'crack' or 'pack' communities of color to dilute their voting strength. After Texas redistricted in 2021, voting rights advocates challenged the new maps in court, arguing that state lawmakers drew up racially gerrymandered districts that discriminated against minority voters. Currently, Texas has nine districts where no one racial or ethnic group has a majority; in eight of them, Black, Hispanic and Asian voters combined create a so-called "coalition district' majority. Trump's Department of Justice claims that three of those districts are unconstitutional 'coalition districts' — which constitutional law scholars and voting rights advocates say is a deliberately bad-faith reading of the law. Trump's demands to redraw maps in the middle of the decade, largely to hold on to power to avoid any political blowback in 2026, could trigger what Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin has called 'a race to the bottom' nationwide. Former attorney general Eric Holder, who chairs the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, has spent the last several years fighting off partisan gerrymanders, including Democratic-led maps. But in the wake of Trump's threats, Holder is now telling Democratic officials to embrace what leverage they have and be 'unabashed in our desire to acquire power.' 'This midcycle redistricting ploy in Texas, and potentially in other states, is something that has to be met in the moment,' Holder told The New York Times. 'Our commitment to fairness didn't blind us to this new reality, and I think that we've got to take these extraordinary steps, with the hope that we can then save democracy and ultimately heal it. If you give Donald Trump unchecked power for two years beyond 2026, given what they've done in six months, I just wonder what kind of shape will the nation be in come Jan. 20, 2029.' The Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee has also called on Democratic state legislatures to 'pursue redistricting mid-cycle,' but Democrats don't hold 'enough legislative majorities to win an all-out, state-by-state battle.' Republican state legislatures oversee 55 Democratic congressional seats. Democratic state legislative majorities, meanwhile, oversee only 35 GOP districts. 'All options must be on the table — including Democratic state legislatures using their power to fight back and pursue redistricting mid-cycle in order to protect our democracy,' committee president Heather Williams said in a statement. Republicans are preemptively trying to stop Democratic states from joining the fight. Republican Rep. Kevin Kiley of California wants to 'stop a damaging redistricting war from breaking out across the country,' brushing up against demands from his party leaders for the by-any-means-necessary battle to preserve, and expand, the House majority next year. California Governor Gavin Newsom, whose state holds a whopping 52 House seats, has also planned retaliatory map-making to target vulnerable Republican seats in the state. Other Democratic-led states are expected to follow, potentially blowing past the guidance from independent redistricting commissions that are designed to prevent lawmakers from crafting partisan, racist and otherwise discriminatory maps. Hochul has considered disbanding New York's commission altogether. 'I'm tired of fighting this fight with my hands tied behind my back,' she said this week. 'When we say we cannot use that power to the fullest, we're abdicating the responsibility we all have. Republicans take over the legislature? They can have it. Until then, we're in charge, and we're sick and tired of being pushed around.' Republicans only have Trump to blame, she said. 'The playing field has changed dramatically, and shame on us if we ignore that fact and cling tight to the vestiges of the past,' she said. 'That era is over. Donald Trump eliminated that forever.'