Parking panic: Woman charged R110k for 2-hour parking at shopping mall
Yaditi Kava, a 39-year-old woman from Slough, England, received the shock of her life after being charged £4,586 (just over R110,000) for a two-hour visit to the Queensmere Observatory Shopping Centre.
But even our most expensive car parks can't compare to what happened to a woman in the UK, who was charged more than R110,000 for a two-hour stop at a shopping centre. Yes, you read that right - R110,000.
As a Capetonian living in Blouberg, I find it baffling that one of our nearby centres charges more than the V&A Waterfront. While I love its open design and spacious feel, the steep parking fees always leave a sour taste.
If you've ever grumbled about paying R20 for a quick visit to your local shopping mall, you're not alone.
The incident, reported by the BBC, has sparked global attention and has many of us side-eyeing those mall exit barriers even more.
Ms Kava had taken her two daughters shopping after work on a Friday evening and decided to have dinner before heading home. When they returned to the parking area, the payment machines inside the centre were closed, so she opted to pay at the exit gate.
In a rush and with tired children in tow, she tapped her card at the boom gate and was prompted to enter her PIN. She didn't think much of it as the large display read '4,5', which she assumed meant £4.50 (R108).
So, when Yaditi Kava thought she was paying £4.50 (R108) for parking, she was instead charged £4,586, which is around R110,000
The barrier lifted, but her phone buzzed almost instantly with a payment notification that made her heart stop.
The error, she later learned, was due to a faulty card machine. The centre's managing company, Savills, described the incident as 'an isolated anomaly' and assured her a refund was being processed. But getting that money back wasn't straightforward.
It took Ms Kava three full weeks to recover the funds. During that time, she was left without the savings she had put aside for legal fees amidst a divorce, and even considered cancelling her daughter's birthday celebration due to the stress and financial strain.
Feeling desperate and getting nowhere with mall management, she contacted a UK consumer rights programme. According to her, 'It was a godsend - one call from the programme's host and the next day the money was in my bank.'
Savills told the BBC they had remained in regular contact with Ms Kava throughout and were investigating the system to prevent future mishaps.
While the incident happened in the UK, it hits close to home for many South Africans frustrated with mall parking fees. Whether it's R20 for two hours or a five-figure blunder, it raises a broader question - why do we put up with such inflated costs just to do our shopping?
Parking should feel like a service, not a penalty. And while Ms Kava's case may be rare, it's a reminder of how quickly a simple errand can spiral when systems fail, and just how important it is to check that machine before you tap.
IOL Lifestyle
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Working from home? Discover which expenses you can claim as tax deductions
More than 50% of the duties of employees working from home duties must be performed in the home office that is clearly defined and an exclusive workspace. Image: Image: Unsplash With the 2025 tax filing season looming, many South Africans working from home are asking what home office expenses they can claim as tax-deductible items and how to do it correctly. This question is especially relevant for the growing number of South African employees working remotely for global companies who are increasingly turning to tax practitioners for guidance, says Thokozile Kumalo, Tax Consultant at Tax Consulting South Africa. 'While home office deductions may seem straightforward, the Income Tax Act includes specific provisions regulating these claims. Commission earners generally have more flexibility, but salaried employees working from home often face challenges because of the more restrictive rules applying to them,' Kumalo said. According to Fine & Country Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), what began as a temporary shift during the pandemic has evolved into a long-term lifestyle for millions, and the ripple effect was being felt across the real estate sector, where demand is growing for homes that seamlessly support this new way of living: flexible, tech-savvy, and lifestyle-enhancing. 'The future of work is hybrid, flexible, and mobile – and the homes we live in need to reflect that,' said John Herbst, the CEO of the luxury property for sale and expert service provider, earlier this year. 'We are seeing a clear shift in what buyers and renters are looking for – from built-in workspaces and tech to locations that offer not just beauty and tranquillity, but the infrastructure and services to support productive remote work,' Herbst said. She said that if you earn only a fixed salary, work from home full time, and use a dedicated space solely for work, there may be grounds for claiming home office expenses, provided you meet the strict requirements set out in law. The tax practice said the three key sections of the Income Tax Act that govern these deductions are: Section 11(a) – General deduction formula, Section 23(b) – Use of home for trade and Section 23(m) – Limitations for salaried employees. It said Section 11(a), often referred to as the 'general deduction formula,' allows a taxpayer who is "carrying on a trade" to deduct 'expenditure and losses incurred in the production of income, provided such expenses are not of a capital nature. In the context of a salaried employee, it said 'trade' includes employment. 'Therefore, an employee who earns remuneration is regarded as carrying on a trade in the form of employment. If a salaried employee incurs home office expenses in the production of employment income, those expenses will conceptually fall within the scope of Section 11(a). "It is important when claiming home office expenditure that Section 11(a) is applied in conjunction with the limitations imposed by Section 23.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The tax consultant said Section 23(b) imposes a specific prohibition against claiming deductions for expenses related to premises used for "domestic or private" purposes. She said there is, however, an exception where there is a dedicated area used for the purposes of employment, that area is specifically equipped for such employment and the area is regularly and exclusively used for employment. For salaried employees (not commission earners), Kumalo said it is required that more than 50% of their duties must be performed in the home office and the home office must be a clearly defined and exclusive workspace. She said for full-time remote workers with a defined, exclusive home office, this meant they may qualify-in theory. Many salaried employees meet the conditions under Section 11(a) and 23(b), which often raises hopes for a successful claim, Kumalo said. She added that the biggest hurdle comes in Section 23(m), which disallows most deductions under Section 11 for employees who earn remuneration (i.e., salary) and do not earn more than 50% of that income as commission or variable-based remuneration. Tax Consulting South Africa said that for taxpayers who earn a fixed salary only, Section 23(m) prohibits deductions for most expenditure, losses or allowances that would otherwise be allowable under Section 11(a). It said only expenses directly tied to the use of the premises, such as rent, electricity, and cleaning, may be considered and only under very specific conditions. In short, Kumalo said, while Section 11(a) allows the deduction of qualifying expenses, Section 23 (b) adds strict conditions for home office use, and Section 23(m) disallows most deductions for salaried earners. 'In practice, this means that even if the general and home-office-specific conditions are met, fixed-salary earners are still barred from deducting most business-related expenses, including internet and cell phone costs, accounting fees, and stationery.' Sharing a professional tip, the consultant said if one is a fixed-salary earner working from home full-time and wish to claim deductions, they must ensure that their employer provides a formal letter confirming remote work, they have a dedicated, exclusive workspace, more than 50% of the duties are performed in that space and the claim is limited to premises-related expenses. Even then, Kumalo said SARS may still challenge deductions beyond the narrow exemptions outlined above. She said that, therefore, the onus is on the taxpayer to prove that the deduction should be allowed. The firm said that in preparation for the 2025 Tax Filing Season, taxpayers must be reminded that SARS applies the rules around home office deductions strictly and conservatively, particularly for salaried employees. Taxpayers are advised to consult a qualified tax practitioner before submitting any home office-related claims to avoid audit risk, disputes, and potential penalties, it warned. In May, Nomie Nxumalo, the executive head for people and transformation at Miway, said the integration of workspaces into personal residences brings about certain dynamics to home usage. She said many homeowners have invested in expensive office equipment, increased their reliance on home internet, and even started running businesses from their residences. However, failing to inform insurers about these changes could lead to gaps in coverage or even rejected claims in some cases. 'Most standard home insurance covers are structured around personal use of the home. Whether you're running a business or working remotely, it's crucial to declare to your insurer if a portion of your home is being used for business purposes,' Nxumalo said. 'Not doing so could result in your claims being declined or certain losses not being covered.' Independent Media Property
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
HR manager jailed for stealing millions from special needs school
Ralton Christopher Fischer used the money to buy a Golf GTI and feed his chronic gambling habit. A 44-year-old former human resources manager at New Hope School has been sentenced to 12 years in jail for defrauding a school catering for learners with special educational needs to buy a Golf GTI and feed his chronic gambling habit. Ralton Christopher Fischer appeared in the Pretoria Specialised Commercial Crimes Court on Monday, where the sentence was handed down. Sentence Fischer was sentenced to 12 years' imprisonment, of which six years are suspended for five years, on condition that he is not convicted of fraud or theft during the period of suspension. He was convicted on eleven counts of fraud exceeding R6 million, committed between July 2018 and April 2022, while employed at the school. His duties included managing payments to staff members employed by the School Governing Body (SGB), and not by the Gauteng Department of Education. ALSO READ: Transnet executives Molefe, Gama and two others granted bail [VIDEO] Fraud During this period, the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) spokesperson, Lumka Mahanjana, reported that Fischer fraudulently made eleven payments into multiple bank accounts registered in his name, including accounts at ABSA, Standard Bank, Discovery Bank, Nedbank, Bidvest, FNB, and Capitec. 'The fraud came to light when Fischer scanned and sent documents to a colleague, requesting that they be forwarded to his personal email. The colleague noticed irregularities and raised the alarm. A preliminary investigation uncovered payments to non-existent (ghost) employees'. Mahanjana stated that the matter was reported to the police, and the HR manager was arrested on April 4, 2023. 'Fischer pleaded guilty, claiming he used the stolen funds to feed his gambling addiction and purchase a VW Golf GTI valued at R150,000. 'He further asked the court to impose a sentence of correctional supervision or a wholly suspended sentence, citing his responsibilities as a father to four minor children, two of whom live with disabilities,' Mahanjana said. Custodial sentence However, state advocate Abram Machitela argued for a custodial sentence, citing the seriousness of the offence, the abuse of a position of trust, and the lack of remorse shown by the HR manager. Mahanjana said Machitela emphasised that Fischer's actions directly prejudiced the school and its vulnerable learners, many of whom use wheelchairs and rely on specialised support. 'The school also suffered tax liabilities exceeding R500,000 due to Fischer's criminal conduct. Magistrate Du Preez agreed with the prosecution, finding that Fischer's crimes were not merely driven by addiction, but also by selfishness and greed. 'The court noted Fischer's lack of genuine remorse and that his guilty plea was primarily due to the strength of the state's case. The magistrate concluded that only a direct term of imprisonment was appropriate under the circumstances,' Mahanjana said. NPA 'committed' Mahanjana said the NPA remains unwavering in its commitment to protecting vulnerable communities, particularly children with special needs. 'This case highlights the organisation's zero tolerance for white-collar crime, especially when committed by individuals who abuse positions of trust. Stealing from a school that serves learners with disabilities is both morally and legally indefensible. 'The court's firm sentence affirms that such betrayal will be met with the full force of the law,' Mahanjana said. The NPA welcomed the outcome as a 'clear statement that those who exploit public institutions will be held accountable.' ALSO READ: Zimbabwean national sentenced to 50 years in jail for kidnapping
Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Former Transnet executives in court over multibillion-rand locomotive deal from 2011
Transnet's grand locomotive deal was meant to modernise South Africa's rail backbone. Instead, it opened a funding pipeline that flowed through Gupta-linked Trillian Capital Partners and followed Brian Molefe to Eskom. His most recent arrest shows how State Capture's roots still shadow the present. Transnet's grand locomotive deal was meant to modernise South Africa's rail backbone. Instead, it opened a funding pipeline that flowed through Gupta-linked Trillian Capital Partners and followed Brian Molefe all the way to Eskom. His most recent arrest shows how State Capture's roots still shadow the present. Molefe, Siyabonga Gama, Anoj Singh and Thamsanqa Jiyane — names synonymous with the systematic State Capture in the Zuma years, named and shamed in the Zondo Commission report — appeared in the Palm Ridge Specialised Commercial Crimes Court on Monday. They are charged with fraud, corruption and breaching procurement laws tied to Transnet's multibillion-rand locomotive procurement. They were each granted bail of R50,000 (a fraction of the billions embezzled from the public purse), and the matter was postponed to 6 October for further investigation. It is a long game, and they are all skilled players. Ambitious plan In 2011, Transnet unveiled the Market Demand Strategy (MDS), an ambitious plan to shift freight from road to rail and modernise ports and pipelines. The centrepiece: acquiring more than 1,200 new locomotives, sourced through the Chinese manufacturers CSR and CNR, alongside deals with the firms GE and Bombardier for locally built units. Initial cost estimate: about R38-billion for 1,064 locomotives, which ballooned to about R54-billion. Zondo found that procurement deviations, cost escalations and contract irregularities had created fertile ground for looting. The Gupta playbook Transnet, of which Molefe was then the CEO, signed advisory contracts with Regiments Capital, which then linked to Trillian Capital, a firm created by Salim Essa to bridge Regiments and Gupta networks. The R93-million payment at the heart of this week's arrest: Trillian invoiced Transnet for advisory fees on the 1,064 locomotives, signed off by Singh and Gama. Within days, about R74-million was siphoned onwards. Zondo flagged this as a classic laundering move, funnelling out public money under layers of transaction fees and project support. Transnet to Eskom In 2015, Molefe was parachuted to Eskom as CEO to tackle load shedding, and the same advisory pattern reappeared. Trillian became a key Eskom consultant, landing hundreds of millions of rands in payments despite lacking proper contracts or deliverables. Molefe's brief stint at Eskom ended in controversy over the Gupta-linked Optimum Coal Mine deal and his illegal pension payout, which the courts later forced him to repay. Zondo's final reports called Molefe's Transnet-Eskom arc one of the clearest examples of the rot that moved with the man. Why this matters The Investigating Directorate Against Corruption says the arrests show how persons in positions of trust turned state contracts into private cash channels. Molefe and Singh's arrest ties the original Transnet locomotive inflation directly to the Trillian web that also leached millions off Eskom. Nearly 12 years since the MDS was signed off, the court will test whether the State can successfully prosecute those involved in the scam that Zondo laid bare. South Africans still shoulder billions in repayments for the locomotive orders: major funding came from US Exim Bank, Export Development Canada, Barclays, Investec and other financiers. Local assembly promises were partly delivered — the Koedoespoort Plant in Pretoria built GE and Bombardier units — but many sit idle, unusable due to supply deadlocks of parts. Prasa has split its procurement from Transnet's freight vision entirely, as the rail corridor remains riddled with theft, underuse and ageing stock. Now it's up to the National Prosecuting Authority to show it can break the cycle of impunity Zondo warned about. DM
