How Claire Foy went from demonic horror film star to global TV legend
Best known to millions as the young Queen Elizabeth II in The Crown, Foy, 41, takes a break from portraying history to uncover her own.
In the episode, she traces both maternal and paternal lines, uncovering tales of loss, wartime sacrifice, and courtroom drama.
But long before the crown, before BAFTAs and Emmys, and even before Wolf Hall or The Girl in the Spider's Web, Claire Foy's big screen debut came in an unexpected project.
She first made her small screen debut in the pilot episode of the supernatural comedy series Being Human in 2008.
She also played the title role in the BBC One miniseries Little Dorrit that same year.
Foy's first major film role was in 2011's Season of the Witch, opposite Nicolas Cage.
The film wasn't a critical darling, but Foy was immediately memorable in a way that foreshadowed her impressive career to come.
Then, it wasn't long before more substantial roles followed. On British television, Foy began to establish herself as a serious dramatic actor, most notably in Upstairs Downstairs and then in Peter Morgan's The Promise.
But it was her turn as the ill-fated Queen Anne Boleyn in the BBC's Wolf Hall (2015) that made critics really sit up and take notice.
That same year, Foy was cast as the young Queen Elizabeth II in Netflix's lavish royal epic The Crown.
Her performance was nothing short of transformative and she quickly became a household name in the UK.
She played a monarch who was very familiar to audiences, but managed tocapture her as a young woman, wife, and reluctant ruler, bringing unexpected vulnerability and steel to the role.
At the time, she told the BBC of playing the role: 'I think that she was an incredible monarch. She united people and she was a massive symbol of continuity and dignity and grace.'
She added: 'My main feeling is just thinking about her as a mother and a grandmother and a great-grandmother, really, and I'm very honoured to have been a teeny tiny, small part of her story.'
Across two seasons, she navigated post-war Britain, familial betrayals, and political upheaval, earning widespread acclaim and a sweep of major awards, including a Golden Globe, a BAFTA, and an Emmy.
Foy's performance laid the foundation for The Crown's ongoing success, and arguably redefined how audiences engage with depictions of modern royalty.
Even after handing the role to Olivia Colman, Foy returned briefly in later seasons, which was a testament to how iconic her version of the Queen had become.
Post-Crown, Foy refused to be boxed in. More Trending
She surprised many by taking on the role of Lisbeth Salander in The Girl in the Spider's Web in 2018. It was a bold, unapologetic pivot that helped her from being stuck in people's minds as just The Queen.
She's since returned to stage and screen with performances that continue to challenge expectations, from First Man (opposite Ryan Gosling) to the intimate and devastating Women Talking, a role that reconnected her with ensemble storytelling and earned praise for its understated emotional weight.
View More »
Through it all, Foy has remained a resolutely private, quietly powerful figure in British acting.
Got a story?
If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@metro.co.uk, calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Gaza: Doctors Under Attack review – this crucial film is the stuff of nightmares. But the world needs to see it
The biggest, and possibly only, failure of Gaza: Doctors Under Attack is that the circumstances of its broadcast threaten to overshadow its content. A brief recap: this film was first commissioned by the BBC, only to be dropped when another documentary – Gaza: How to Survive a War Zone – sparked a furore over impartiality. The abandonment drew uproar from within the corporation, scorn from the wider media and the inescapable sense that what started as a vital piece of film-making had devolved into yet another navel-gazing referendum on the purpose of the BBC. Thanks to Channel 4 picking it up late in the day, Gaza: Doctors Under Attack now exists in the world, and it has never been more evident that this is a work that demands to be seen. Doctors Under Attack bills itself as a 'forensic investigation' into claims that the IDF has been systematically targeting Palestinian medics in all 36 of Gaza's hospitals. The attacks, according to the United Nations, follow a set pattern. First, a hospital comes under bombardment, then it is besieged. After that, it is raided by tanks and bulldozers and its medical workers are detained. And then, once the hospital has essentially been rendered non-functional, the forces move on and repeat. It's a strategy designed to cripple Gaza for years to come, says one talking head. After all, when a building is destroyed, you can throw up another in its place. But medics require years of training. Rob Gaza of their expertise and you deny its chances of ever rebuilding. This is despite, as the film repeats time and time again, healthcare workers being protected under international law. The power of Doctors Under Attack comes in the unhurried way it chooses to unfurl its thesis. There is no clear manipulation, no central villain. What there is, however, is an unceasing timeline of horrors. We are shown doctors doing their best in overwhelmed hospitals with no water or electricity, racing to treat wounds that have already begun to rot. We are shown them coming under what seem like targeted attacks, being detained in black sites where they will be tortured and interrogated. There is footage of a gang rape by soldiers. We are shown children, injured and dead, in vast numbers. The central part of the film, however, is stories of individual doctors. There is Dr Khaled Hamouda, discussing the direct attack on his home that killed 10 members of his family, and the drone strike that moments later hit the house the survivors escaped to. His wife and young daughter dead, he then took refuge in the grounds of his hospital, which was bombarded and raided. He was detained along with 70 other doctors, and beaten. And then there is Dr Adnan al-Bursh, who was detained, stripped, interrogated, disappeared and tortured. Unlike Hamouda, we do not get to hear his testimonial, because he died in prison. But we do get to hear the calls he made to his family before then, telling his children to look after their mother. To hear their stories is to be filled with utter hopelessness. There have been several muscular documentaries about the Palestinian territories this year, either setting the table of the conflict or – as with the case of Louis Theroux's film The Settlers – trying to understand the psychology behind those who choose to exacerbate it. But Doctors Under Attack is by far the most unsparing. The discussion of what has happened to the detained doctors, verified by an anonymous Israeli whistleblower, is the stuff of nightmares. There are beatings. There is torture. Most unsettlingly of all, there are descriptions of mistreatment by Israeli doctors, who would perform procedures without anaesthetic and inform the prisoners that 'You are a criminal and you have to die.' The BBC dropped Doctors Under Attack due to the risk that it created 'a perception of partiality'. However, it is hard to square that claim with the film that has aired on Channel 4. Clarification has been sought from the IDF at every turn. The events of 7 October 2023 are shown here just as graphically as the footage of injured Palestinian children. The film-makers understand that the slightest sign of bias would collapse the argument. In an open letter before its broadcast, Channel 4's Louisa Compton warned that Doctors Under Attack would 'make people angry, whichever side they take.' She is right. This is the sort of television that will never leave you. It will provoke an international reaction, and for extremely good cause. Forget what got it stopped at the BBC. It is here now and, regardless of how that happened, we owe it to the subjects to not look away. Gaza: Doctors Under Attack is on Channel 4 now. Viewers around the world can access the film here
Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Sandman series two branded 'so pretentious it has ruined everything' as critics skewer Netflix for 'turning a dreamy tale into a waking nightmare'
The Sandman season two has been branded 'so pretentious it has ruined everything' and critics have skewered Netflix for 'turning a dreamy tale into a waking nightmare'. Season one was released back in 2022 and was based on the bestselling graphic novel by Neil Gaiman. The author was recently hit with sexual misconduct allegations from eight women, which he denies. Gaiman said back in January: 'I'm far from a perfect person, but I have never engaged in non-consensual sexual activity with anyone. Ever.' The series follows Morpheus (Tom Sturridge) as he 'embarks on a journey across worlds to find what was stolen from him and restore his power,' according to the synopsis. Starring Kirby Howell-Baptiste and Mark Hamill, amongst others, the new instalment launched on Netflix on July 3 has received mixed reviews. The Guardian slammed The Sandman's second season with only two out of five stars and claimed 'Neil Gaiman's emo drama is so pretentious, it ruins everything'. It describes how 'a fug of pretension' 'smothers' the show adding, 'missing every opportunity it creates for itself'. While the Metro rated it a more impressive four out of five stars and urged 'Don't let the Neil Gaiman accusations ruin The Sandman season 2'. They praised the 'fantastic' cast and added, 'it's those playing the Endless who I found most impressive'. The Independent however, was less impressed and only rated the new series two out of five stars. It wrote how the show felt 'like being trapped in a whirlwind of plot and intrigue' but that it 'never materialises into something solid enough to get to grips with'. While The Telegraph scored the series four out of five and described it as 'brilliant'. Though they felt, 'for Netflix, you suspect this dreamy tale has become a waking nightmare that can't end too soon' and claimed 'Neil Gaiman's involvement casts a shadow'. The Wrap however, has described the new instalment as 'mesmerizing in the best way'. It comes after the first season soon soared to number one on Netflix's Top 10 list following its debut. Gaiman's comic book series was first published from 1989-1996, but previous attempts to bring his beloved story to film were held up for years until Netflix signed a deal to produce the show in 2019. The Sandman seasons one and two are available to stream on Netflix.
Daily Mirror
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Controversial Glastonbury set deemed 'high risk' by BBC – but gig still aired
The BBC had originally deemed a number of performances at Glastonbury to be 'high risk' – yet still went ahead and broadcast it on screens and on iPlayer to millions Bob Vylan's performance at Glastonbury Festival had been deemed "high risk" by top dogs at the BBC. However, the publicly funded corporation still went ahead and broadcast the set to millions across the country and online. Now, the BBC have said in a new statement that the duo had previously been deemed to be "suitable for livestreaming" but with "appropriate mitigations", although this was "clearly not the case." Since last Sunday, the BBC has come under scrutiny following the performance, which saw their frontman, Pascal Robinson-Foster, but goes by the name Bobby Vylan, chant: "Death to the IDF" and "Free Palestine." The group performed on the West Holts Stage at Worthy Farm, with their set being live-streamed as they performed ahead of Kneecap's set. The BBC have since said they regret not stepping in to halt its broadcast sooner but told "a small number of staff" to step back from their daily duties on music and live events. Meanwhile, Director General Tim Davie, who attended the festival, issued an apology. In a statement, the corporation said: "We fully understand the strength of feeling regarding Bob Vylan's live appearance at Glastonbury on the BBC. "We deeply regret that such offensive and deplorable behaviour appeared on the BBC and want to apologise to our viewers and listeners and in particular the Jewish community. We are also unequivocal that there can be no place for antisemitism at, or on, the BBC. "It is clear that errors were made both in the lead-up to and during Bob Vylan's appearance. We think it's important to set out some of the detail around the streaming of this performance. Bob Vylan were deemed high risk following a risk assessment process applied to all acts appearing at Glastonbury. "Seven acts including Bob Vylan were included in this category and they were all deemed suitable for live streaming with appropriate mitigations." They added: "Prior to Glastonbury, a decision was taken that compliance risks could be mitigated in real time on the live stream - through the use of language or content warnings - without the need for a delay. This was clearly not the case. "During the performance, the live stream was monitored in line with the agreed compliance protocols and a number of issues were escalated. Warnings appeared on the stream on two occasions and the editorial team took the decision not to cut the feed. This was an error. "The Director-General was subsequently made aware of what had happened and instructed the team that none of the performance should feature in further coverage. The team prioritised stopping the performance from featuring on demand. This meant that no downloads of Bob Vylan's set were available on iPlayer or Sounds. "However, the live feed, which was showing subsequent performances from other acts on the same Glastonbury stage, remained up until it was amended shortly after 8pm while teams worked on a technical solution. Given the failings that have been acknowledged we are taking actions to ensure proper accountability for those found to be responsible for those failings in the live broadcast. We will not comment further on those processes at this time. "Furthermore, as a result, we will make immediate changes to live streaming music events. Any music performances deemed high risk will now not be broadcast live or streamed live. Editorial Policy support will always be available on site at major music festivals and events, to improve compliance processes and the speed of available advice - and we will provide more detailed, practical guidance on the threshold for withdrawing a live stream. Avon and Somerset Police have also confirmed they are investigating both Bob Vylan for their "death to the IDF" chant and comment on working for "f***ing Zionists." In a statement, the force said earlier this week: "Video footage and audio from Bob Vylan and Kneecap's performances at Glastonbury Festival on Saturday has been reviewed. "Following the completion of that assessment process we have decided further enquiries are required and a criminal investigation is now being undertaken. A senior detective has been appointed to lead this investigation. "This has been recorded as a public order incident at this time while our enquiries are at an early stage. The investigation will be evidence-led and will closely consider all appropriate legislation, including relating to hate crimes." They added: "We have received a large amount of contact in relation to these events from people across the world and recognise the strength of public feeling. There is absolutely no place in society for hate. "Neighbourhood policing teams are speaking with people in their local communities and key stakeholders to make sure anyone who needs us knows that we are here for them. We hope the work we have carried out, and are continuing to carry out, reassures the public how seriously we are treating Saturday's events. We politely ask the public refrain from continuing to report this matter to us because an investigation is already taking place." The duo have since been dropped by both their agent and management, while their US visas have been revoked ahead of their upcoming tour across the States, and performances in the UK, including at Radar Festival, have also been pulled. Moments after their performance, Glastonbury bosses issued a statement, saying that they had been "appalled" by the comments and that the lead singer of Bob Vylan had "crossed a line." Since the controversy, the band have taken to social media, saying: "We are not for the death of Jews, Arabs or any other race or group of people. We are for the dismantling of a violent military machine. We like those in the spotlight before us are not the story. We are a distraction from the story. We are being targeted for speaking up. Free Palestine."
