logo
James Cameron calls Christopher Nolan's Oppenheimer "a bit of a moral cop out"

James Cameron calls Christopher Nolan's Oppenheimer "a bit of a moral cop out"

Yahooa day ago
Of the very small number of currently working Hollywood directors who could be said to be at, or even above, the level of Christopher Nolan in terms of both producing power and name recognition, James Cameron is almost certainly the one most willing to talk a little shit. Cameron has many laudable traits as both a filmmaker and an interview subject, but holding his tongue isn't one of them—something that became obvious in a recent conversation he had with Deadline, about a new film centered on the nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and where Nolan came in for some genuine critique over his blockbuster biopic Oppenheimer.
Cameron was speaking at length about Ghosts Of Hiroshima, his planned film adaptation of the book of the same name, soon to arrive from his old buddy (and fellow Titanic and nuclear war obsessive) Charles R. Pellegrino. As with underwater travel, the intricate hair-bonding rituals of the Na'vi, and basically everything else he sets his moviemaking mind to, Cameron has thought and researched about this topic a lot, it is very clear, and he sounds really excited/horrified to tell the story of the bombs dropping. And that includes doing his damnedest to center the conversation in the viewpoint of the people the bombs were actually dropped on, something he (as Spike Lee did a few years back) criticizes Nolan's movie for flinching away from. 'It's interesting what he stayed away from,' Cameron noted of Nolan's film, after being reminded of the implausibility of turning Robert Oppenheimer's life story into a massive box office property.
'Look, I love the filmmaking,' Cameron acknowledges. 'But I did feel that it was a bit of a moral cop out. Because it's not like Oppenheimer didn't know the effects. He's got one brief scene in the film where we see—and I don't like to criticize another filmmaker's film–but there's only one brief moment where he sees some charred bodies in the audience and then the film goes on to show how it deeply moved him. But I felt that it dodged the subject. I don't know whether the studio or Chris felt that that was a third rail that they didn't want to touch, but I want to go straight at the third rail. I'm just stupid that way.' (When told that Nolan felt it wasn't the place of his particular film to tackle the effects of the bombs from the perspective of the people they were dropped on, Cameron quipped, 'Okay, I'll put up my hand. I'll do it, Chris. No problem. You come to my premiere and say nice things.')
Cameron has been on this particular topic for multiple decades at this point—this is the man who filmed that sequence from Terminator 2, so take it as read that he thinks about nuclear bombs more than most people—including traveling to Japan with Pellegrino to meet with Tsutomo Yamaguchi, one of the only people to have survived both bombings. (And who ultimately died of stomach cancer in his 90s.) Cameron is, among other things, un-shy about admitting he has limits on the story he wants to tell, too, saying he has no interest in using the film to discus the politics that led to the dropping of the bomb, and simply wants to capture its effects on the people who were at literal ground zero:
I don't want to get into the politics of, should it have been dropped, should they have done it, and all the bad things Japan did to warrant it, or any of that kind of moralizing and politicizing. I just want to deal in a sense with what happened, almost as if you could somehow be there and survive and see it… I just think it's so important right now for people to remember what these weapons do. This is the only case where they've been used against a human target. Setting aside all the politics and the fact that I'm going to make a film about Japanese people…I don't even speak Japanese, although I have a lot of friends there. I've been there a million times, and I may need to work with a Japanese writer, a Japanese producer, so that I am not a complete outsider to their cultural perspective. I want to keep it as a kind of neutral witness to an event that actually happened to human beings, so that we can keep that flame alive, that memory. They've only died in vain if we forget what that was like and we incur that a thousand fold upon ourselves and future generations.
More from A.V. Club
Podcast Canon: Making Gay History is a treasure trove of archival recordings
3 new songs and 3 new albums to check out this weekend
NASA Plus launches on Netflix this summer
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trisha Paytas Reveals Unconventional Baby Name
Trisha Paytas Reveals Unconventional Baby Name

Buzz Feed

time2 hours ago

  • Buzz Feed

Trisha Paytas Reveals Unconventional Baby Name

If you, like me, have been chronically online for like a decade, you, too, have probably been waiting with bated breath for Trisha Paytas's baby name reveal. Well, the wait is over, folks! The internet personality has officially given birth to her third child and — surprise! — it's a boy! If you're not deeply familiar with Trisha Paytas lore, allow me to catch you up to speed. Among many things, Trisha is well known on the Internet for choosing uber-unique, themed baby names that cause a lot of hubbub online. She and husband Moses Hacmon named their first child, a girl, Malibu Barbie. Her second daughter, who she gave birth to in 2024, was named Elvis after the famous "King of Rock and Roll" (and of course, a year after the Austin Butler-led film came out). Given her penchant for pop culture baby names, the Internet has been in a tizzy the last couple of days trying to guess what the heck she was going to name baby #3. Reportedly, she hinted that the baby's name would fit the theme of her first two kids — who have movie posters in their rooms for Barbie and Elvis — and would be water-themed and gender neutral. This morning on a live episode of her Just Trish podcast, Trisha finally announced her baby boy's name, and over 80K people tuned in. Alright, lock in your guesses, folks! Baby #3 is That's right, baby Aquaman Moses Paytas-Hacmon was born on July 12th at 12:40 a.m.. His name, of course, was inspired by the titular character of the 2018 Jason Momoa-led film, Aquaman. As the news made its way to Twitter and TikTok, I've seen tons of mixed reactions — some people capital-H hate it, and others are just glad it's not Titanic. What do you think? Did you guess it right? Let us know in the comments! You can watch the baby name reveal of Trisha's podcast, Just Trish, below:

‘Happy Hour' Movie News: Joshua Jackson and Katie Holmes Reunite
‘Happy Hour' Movie News: Joshua Jackson and Katie Holmes Reunite

Cosmopolitan

time5 hours ago

  • Cosmopolitan

‘Happy Hour' Movie News: Joshua Jackson and Katie Holmes Reunite

We are so back—back to the '90s, to be exact. Dawson's Creek fans, rise up because Katie Holmes and Joshua Jackson are reuniting in a new movie, Happy Hour. Katie is writing, directing, and starring in the film, and that's not even the best part. Happy Hour is the first in a planned trilogy of films, which means we're about to get a whole lot more nostalgia coming our way. Don't wanna wait for more news? Say less. Here's everything we know about Happy Hour. On the off chance you don't know, Katie and Joshua famously worked together on Dawson's Creek for five seasons—from 1998-2003. They dated IRL off-screen and on-screen as Joey (Katie) and Pacey (Joshua) and became one of the most iconic TV couples of the late '90s and early aughts. So, yeah, seeing them finally reunite on screen is a pretty big deal. Katie announced the news on Instagram, writing in part, 'Working with Josh after so many years is a testament to friendship.' Fellow Dawson's Creek alum Busy Philipps commented on the post, 'we are seated. 👏👏👏.' According to Deadline, Happy Hour is a romantic dramedy about a couple—played by Katie and Joshua—who are 'navigating their relationship within the challenges of careers and family responsibilities and the pursuit of love, despite life's inevitable obstacles.' No, it's not an official Dawson's Creek sequel. But, the outlet did specify that the couple are 'young loves who reconnect as adults.' Sounds pretty Joey and Pacey coded to me! Katie and Joshua will be joined by Mary-Louise Parker, Constance Wu, Joe Tippett, John McGinty, Donald Webber Jr., Nathan Darrow, Johnna Dias-Watson, and Jack Martin. There's no word yet on when Happy Hour will hit theaters, but filming has officially begun, giving fans plenty of first look pics at Katie and Joshua walking through the streets of New York City, looking like Joey and Pacey together again. We'll be sure to update you when we have more news!

James Gunn Thinks Adria Arjona Would Be 'a Great Wonder Woman'
James Gunn Thinks Adria Arjona Would Be 'a Great Wonder Woman'

Elle

time5 hours ago

  • Elle

James Gunn Thinks Adria Arjona Would Be 'a Great Wonder Woman'

If Superman and the forthcoming Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow weren't enough, a new Wonder Woman movie is officially in the works, too. In June, James Gunn confirmed that a new iteration of Wonder Woman is 'being written right now.' Ana Nogueira, who will also write Supergirl, is in talks to write the script. Here's everything we know about the new DC movie. Gal Gadot will not be reprising her role in the new Wonder Woman film. A new actress has not been cast as the titular hero yet, but Adria Arjona is rumored to be in consideration after people noticed that Gunn followed her on Instagram. 'I follow Adria on Instagram, but everybody came out [and thought], 'He just followed her, that means she's Wonder Woman,'' Gunn shared in an interview with Extra, per Deadline. 'She'd be a great Wonder Woman, by the way.' He also clarified that the follow wasn't recent. They had previously worked together on his 2017 film The Belko Experiment. 'She was in a movie that I made seven years ago,' he said. 'We've been friends and have known each other since that time. I followed her then, I didn't just follow her.' In a previous interview with ELLE, Adria Arjona spoke about the types of projects she hopes to make. 'I'm really intentional and I follow my intuition,' she said. 'When [the right project] comes in front of me, I know that's what I want to do next. When you're in the arts, you can't plan too far ahead. I could say right now, 'All I wanna do is comedy.' But [then I] would not be making good ones, you know? I like to stay as open as I can for the opportunities that are coming my way. I don't wanna get in my own way.' Not yet. On Threads, Gunn shared that though Wonder Woman is a 'priority,' it's not being 'fast-tracked.' He continued, 'Nothing is going to be shot unless we're as sure as we can be that the script is good.' No director is attached to the film yet, and screenwriter Ana Nogueira is only still in talks—not yet confirmed—to write the script. It's unclear whether Patty Jenkins will return after helming the two Gadot-starring Wonder Woman films. She was supposed to direct a third movie, but it did not move forward at Warner Bros. After the news broke in 2022, Jenkins said in part of a larger statement, 'I wish her [Wonder Woman] and her legacy an amazing future ahead, with or without me.' This story will be updated.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store