Israeli fire kills 22 as Gazans face deep hunger
Civil defence official Mohammed al Mughayyir said that the Al Awda Hospital received 10 dead and around 200 wounded, including women and children, "after Israeli drones dropped multiple bombs on gatherings of civilians near an aid distribution point around the Netzarim checkpoint in central Gaza". He said that Gaza City's Al Shifa Hospital received six dead following Israeli attacks on aid queues near Netzarim and in the Al Sudaniya area in northwestern Gaza. The Israeli army said it was looking into the reports when asked for comment.
Restrictions imposed on media in the Gaza Strip and the difficulties of access on the ground mean AFP is not able to independently verify the death tolls announced by the civil defence agency.
Mughayyir said another six people were killed in Israeli attacks across Gaza. The US-and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) accused Palestinian group Hamas of attacking aid workers en route to a distribution centre on Wednesday, saying at least five people were killed. GHF said a bus carrying its staff to a distribution site near the southern city of Khan Yunis was "brutally attacked by Hamas" around 10:00 pm. Dozens of Palestinians have been killed while trying to reach GHF distribution points since they began operating in late May, according to Gaza's civil defence agency.
Israel's refusal to allow humanitarian aid into Gaza and its targeting of aid distribution points is causing civilians to starve which constitutes a war crime, Sweden's foreign minister said on Thursday. In early June, UN human rights chief Volker Turk said deadly attacks on civilians around aid distribution sites in the Gaza Strip constituted "a war crime", while several rights groups including Amnesty International have accused Israel of genocide. Israel has vehemently rejected that term.
"To use starvation of civilians as a method of war is a war crime. Life-saving humanitarian help must never be politicised or militarised," Maria Malmer Stenergard said at a press conference. "There are strong indications right now that Israel is not living up to its commitments under international humanitarian law," she said. "It is crucial that food, water and medicine swiftly reach the civilian population, many of whom are women and children living under wholly inhumane conditions," she said.
Meanwhile, the Palestinian Authority said internet and fixed-line communication services were down in Gaza on Thursday following an attack on the territory's last fibre optic cable it blamed on Israel. "All internet and fixed-line communication services in the Gaza Strip have been cut following the targeting of the last remaining main fibre optic line in Gaza," the PA's telecommunications ministry said in a statement, accusing Israel of attempting to cut Gaza off from the world. "The southern and central Gaza Strip have now joined Gaza City and the northern part of the Strip in experiencing complete isolation for the second consecutive day," the ministry said in a statement.
It added that its maintenance and repair teams had been unable to safely access the sites where damage occurred to the fibre optic cable. "The Israeli occupation continues to prevent technical teams from repairing the cables that were cut yesterday", it said, adding that Israeli authorities had prevented repairs to other telecommunication lines in Gaza "for weeks and months". The Palestinian Red Crescent said the communication lines were "directly targeted by occupation fores".
It said the internet outage was hindering its emergency services by impeding communication with first responder teams in the field. "The emergency operations room is also struggling to coordinate with other organisations to respond to humanitarian cases." Maysa Monayer, spokeswoman for the Palestinian communication ministry, said that "mobile calls are still available with very limited capacity" in Gaza for the time being. Now in its 21st month, the war in Gaza has caused massive damage to infrastructure across the Palestinian territory, including water mains, power lines and roads. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times of Oman
43 minutes ago
- Times of Oman
Latest Gaza ceasefire proposal calls for reimplementing UN aid mechanism
Gaza City: The latest ceasefire proposal for Gaza focuses on three central issues, including a commitment to continue negotiations over the broader future of the ceasefire, as reported by The Times of Israel. Firstly, it says that the agreement requires Israeli forces to withdraw to the positions they held before the collapse of the last ceasefire on March 2. At that time, the IDF had not fully withdrawn from Gaza and remained stationed along the 'Philadelphi Corridor'. The second item is the matter of humanitarian aid. According to the report, the United Nations mechanism for delivering aid would be reinstated, "to ensure uninterrupted supply." While the US- and Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is not explicitly mentioned, the report suggests that the UN mechanism would be used exclusively. Finally, the proposal includes a commitment to continue negotiations over the broader future of the ceasefire, even if an agreement on ending the war is not reached before the initial truce begins, as per The Times of Israel. Senior Hamas officials abroad have been told to hand in their personal weapons amid negotiations for a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip and the release of the remaining Israeli hostages, The Times of Israel reported. The directive came from Qatari mediators, and is largely a symbolic initiative and a nod to Israel's demand for Hamas's disarmament, which the terror group has thus far rejected. It says that among the senior Hamas officials instructed to hand over their weapons are lead negotiator and senior politburo official Khalil al-Hayya; the Istanbul-based leader of Hamas in the West Bank, Zaher Jabarin; and the chair of Hamas's Shura Council, Muhammad Ismail Darwish. The report comes as Hamas is reviewing the latest ceasefire proposal, and as mediators and Israel await its response. Earlier, a Saudi report suggested that Hamas was satisfied with the framework of the deal and would submit its response by Friday. Meanwhile, Israel's National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir said that he will not support the ceasefire and hostage release deal currently on the table as he believes it is "reckless", The Times of Israel reported.
Observer
2 hours ago
- Observer
Israel kills 33 as Trump teases Gaza ceasefire push
GAZA: Gaza's civil defence agency said that Israeli strikes killed at least 33 people on Wednesday, as US President Donald Trump urged Palestinian group Hamas to agree to a 60-day ceasefire. After nearly 21 months of war which has created dire humanitarian conditions in the Gaza Strip, home to more than two million people, the Israeli military said this week it had expanded its operations. In southern Gaza on Wednesday, civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal said that five members of the same family were killed and several others wounded in an Israeli air strike that hit a tent housing displaced people in the coastal Al Mawasi area. Images from the nearby Nasser Hospital, in Khan Yunis city, showed medics treating young children covered in blood. Some appeared terrified while others lay still on hospital beds in bloodied bandages and clothes. Despite being declared a safe zone by Israel in December 2023, Al Mawasi has been hit by repeated Israeli strikes. Further north, Bassal said that four people from the same family were killed in a pre-dawn Israeli air strike on a house in Gaza City, and another five in a drone strike on a house in the central Deir el-Balah area. The Israeli military requested precise coordinates for the targeted locations and said it "will try to look into" the reports. On Tuesday, the military said that in recent days its forces had expanded operations across Gaza. After months of stalled mediation efforts to bring an end to the war, Trump on Tuesday said on social media that a new ceasefire proposal has Israel's support. "Israel has agreed to the necessary conditions to finalise the 60-Day CEASEFIRE, during which time we will work with all parties to end the War," Trump said. He added that Qatari and Egyptian mediators, who have been in direct contact with Hamas throughout the war, would deliver "this final proposal". "I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE." Trump is due to host Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House next week. Israel's retaliatory military campaign has killed at least 56,647 people in Gaza, mostly civilians, according to Hamas-run territory's health ministry. The United Nations considers these figures to be reliable. Israel's top diplomat on Wednesday said any chance to free hostages held in Gaza "must not be missed", after US President Donald Trump urged Palestinian group Hamas to agree to a 60-day ceasefire that he said had Israel's backing. Without directly mentioning Trump's remarks, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said that "a large majority within the government and the population is in favour of the plan to free the hostages" held by Hamas in Gaza. "If the opportunity arises, it must not be missed!" Saar wrote on X. Out of 251 hostages seized by Palestinian militants during Hamas's 2023 attack that triggered the war, 49 are still held in Gaza, including 27, the Israeli military says, are dead. Meanwhile, Switzerland said on Wednesday it would close the Geneva branch of the US and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation because it had neither a Swiss address nor a representative in the country. An officially private effort with opaque funding, GHF began operations on May 26 after Israel halted supplies into Gaza for more than two months, sparking mass famine warnings. In the Swiss Official Gazette of Commerce, the Swiss Federal Supervisory Authority for Foundations (ESA) on Wednesday published "a call for creditors following the liquidation" of the GHF. The ESA can "order the dissolution of the foundation if no creditor comes forward within the legal period of 30 days", an interior ministry spokeswoman said. "The GHF confirmed to the ESA that it had never been active in Switzerland and that it intended to dissolve the Geneva-registered foundation," she added.— AFP
Observer
2 hours ago
- Observer
Opinion- Iran's resilience, Israel's disarray: Who won?
It is far too early to determine a victor in the 12-day confrontation between Iran and Israel. Though both sides declared success, the conflict is likely still in its early stages. Supporters on either side tend to view the events emotionally, seeing victory through the lens of allegiance rather than facts. The real measure of success lies in whether either side achieved its stated goals. Israel entered this confrontation with the intention of toppling the Iranian regime in a single night - eliminating top leaders, including the Supreme Leader and the President, and paving the way for exiled figure Reza Pahlavi to assume power. Backed and publicised by the West, Pahlavi himself admitted that these ambitions failed, blaming US President Donald Trump for abandoning the plan. Israel also aimed to dismantle Iran's nuclear programme and provoke internal uprising. Yet Tehran stood firm, its leadership intact, its nuclear capability preserved, and its people — regardless of their political stance — unified in opposition to what they saw as foreign aggression. However, one cannot ignore the painful blows dealt by Israel. It exposed significant weaknesses in Iran's air defence, destroyed drone launch sites and carried out deep infiltration operations. That Mossad managed to establish a three-storey drone factory in the heart of Tehran is a staggering indicator of internal vulnerability. And yet, despite this, Iran managed to strike back with unexpected resilience, shaking Israel's confidence in its famed defence systems and targeting strategic facilities. Disappointingly, several Arab countries acted as a shield for Israel's defence - serving as a real 'Iron Dome.' This episode reinforced a long-standing truth: the world only respects strength. Prime Minister Netanyahu's decision to accept a ceasefire before fulfilling his grand vision of neutralising Iran's nuclear ambitions is an implicit admission of failure. The cost of continuing outweighed the potential gains. Israel, for the first time, found itself forced to retreat from a direct military confrontation without achieving its objectives. The war exposed vulnerabilities in its internal cohesion and confirmed that Israel's deterrence narrative is far from invincible. The idea that it can easily subdue Iran has been severely undermined. While the current round may have ended, the tension is far from over. Israel will remain uneasy as long as Iran holds on to its sovereign decision-making power and nuclear capability. The failure to dismantle the Iranian regime or nuclear facilities, and the rallying of the Iranian people around their leadership, are outcomes that Tel Aviv did not anticipate. Nonetheless, the confrontation revealed alarming security gaps in Iran. The assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in what was claimed to be an Iranian safe zone, the mysterious crash of President Raisi's aircraft, the killings of nuclear scientists, and the exposure of internal drone factories all point to a deeply compromised intelligence environment. More worrying still is the wider regional context. The silence - or worse, complicity of many Arab states has become strikingly apparent. Israel has not only penetrated these governments politically, but also garnered their open or covert support. Once forced to conceal their collaboration, some Arab regimes now show it openly, even proudly, though they lack the legitimacy to justify such alignment. It is telling that the ceasefire was reportedly requested by Israel itself, realising that prolonging the battle could lead to collapse from within. With an estimated two million Israelis having emigrated since the beginning of Al Aqsa operation, and rising dissent within the Knesset and public, internal pressures are mounting. The damage in Tel Aviv, despite tight media restrictions, has not been witnessed since 1948. Iran's strikes successfully targeted key Israeli intelligence and military centres, including the Mossad HQ in Herzliya, military intelligence units and Haifa Port — effectively dismantling Israel's 20-year deterrence narrative. Had Israel succeeded in its plan to dismantle Iran's regime and nuclear programme, Netanyahu would have emerged as the architect of a new Middle East, having eliminated the resistance axis and reshaped the region. For now, Iran has managed to halt that trajectory. Above all, the Iranian people deserve recognition. The same nation that once resisted the Shah's tanks has again closed ranks, temporarily setting aside internal disputes to defend national sovereignty. It is a reminder that legitimacy ultimately stems from the people. So, who won? While Iran's performance may inspire admiration, one cannot claim it has achieved total victory. Likewise, Israel has suffered a strategic setback. What is clear, however, is that the war is not over. This is but an uneasy pause. As long as Iran remains strong, scientifically advanced, and nuclear-capable, this fragile truce could collapse at any moment. Translated by Badr al Dhafri The original version of this article was published in Arabic in the print edition of the Oman daily newspaper on June 30.
