NAB probes ex-SPSC chairman, 15 others over 'illegal appointments'
The NAB initiated the probe following reports of large-scale illegal appointments and misuse of authority within the SPSC. The graft-buster has formally sought the complete service and recruitment records of 16 current and former SPSC officials, including ex-chairman Noor Muhammad Jadmani, secretaries, members, controllers, and additional controllers.
Those named in the investigation include Aftab Anwar Baloch, Haresh Chander, Saindad Solangi, Ghulam Shabbir Sheikh, Ahmad Ali Qureshi, Abdul Karim Durrani, Hadi Bux Kalhoro, Shaukat Ujjan, Javed Chachar, Imtiaz Jhagirani, Muhammad Usman Memon, Abdul Khaliq Jamali, Akhlak Ahmad Kalwar, and Sohail Patoli.
In a formal letter to the incumbent SPSC chairman, NAB has directed the commission to submit within seven days all relevant documents, including complete records of all court petitions filed against the commission, details of cases that have been decided, as well as those still pending adjudication.
The accountability watchdog has further warned that any attempt to withhold information, cause undue delay, or mislead the investigation will be treated as obstruction of inquiry under Section 31 of the National Accountability Ordinance (NAO), 1999. The offence carries a potential sentence of up to 10 years' imprisonment.
Sources told The Express Tribune that the commission had previously submitted incomplete records, prompting NAB to express dissatisfaction and demand full disclosure within the stipulated time. In the next phase of the investigation, individuals who allegedly benefitted from the irregular recruitment process will also be summoned.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
11 hours ago
- Express Tribune
NAB probes ex-SPSC chairman, 15 others over 'illegal appointments'
The premier graft-buster has launched an inquiry against the former chairman of the Sindh Public Service Commission (SPSC) and several other officials over allegations of corruption and irregularities in the recruitment process. The NAB initiated the probe following reports of large-scale illegal appointments and misuse of authority within the SPSC. The graft-buster has formally sought the complete service and recruitment records of 16 current and former SPSC officials, including ex-chairman Noor Muhammad Jadmani, secretaries, members, controllers, and additional controllers. Those named in the investigation include Aftab Anwar Baloch, Haresh Chander, Saindad Solangi, Ghulam Shabbir Sheikh, Ahmad Ali Qureshi, Abdul Karim Durrani, Hadi Bux Kalhoro, Shaukat Ujjan, Javed Chachar, Imtiaz Jhagirani, Muhammad Usman Memon, Abdul Khaliq Jamali, Akhlak Ahmad Kalwar, and Sohail Patoli. In a formal letter to the incumbent SPSC chairman, NAB has directed the commission to submit within seven days all relevant documents, including complete records of all court petitions filed against the commission, details of cases that have been decided, as well as those still pending adjudication. The accountability watchdog has further warned that any attempt to withhold information, cause undue delay, or mislead the investigation will be treated as obstruction of inquiry under Section 31 of the National Accountability Ordinance (NAO), 1999. The offence carries a potential sentence of up to 10 years' imprisonment. Sources told The Express Tribune that the commission had previously submitted incomplete records, prompting NAB to express dissatisfaction and demand full disclosure within the stipulated time. In the next phase of the investigation, individuals who allegedly benefitted from the irregular recruitment process will also be summoned.
Business Recorder
4 days ago
- Business Recorder
Mega corruption scandal: NAB Lahore recovers Rs2bn
LAHORE: Under the supervision of Director General (DG) NAB Lahore, Ghulam Safdar Shah, the NAB Lahore investigation team has successfully concluded a major recovery of Rs 2 billion in ongoing probe pertaining to a mega corruption scandal involving officers and officials of the Public Health Engineering Department (PHED), Sheikhupura. The DG NAB Lahore formally handed over first installment of the recovered amount to Additional Secretary Finance, Punjab Khalid Mehmood in NAB office, Lahore. According to the details, NAB Lahore launched Inquiry proceedings in September 2024 pertaining to the issuance of bogus cheques worth Rs 5 billion (approx.) by the Officers and staff of the Public Health Engineering and District Accounts Office, Sheikhupura. During the inquiry proceedings, some of the accused persons confessed to their crimes and filed Plea Bargain (PB) requests of Rs2 billion, which were duly approved by the Accountability Court, Lahore. Following court approval, the Bureau succeeded to ensure recovery within a remarkably short period and the initial tranche of the recovered amount has been submitted into the national treasury. On the occasion, DG NAB Lahore commended the exceptional performance of the investigation team, noting that the recovery of looted public funds in such a short time reflects team's commitment and competence. He further stated that investigations are actively underway against other accused persons involved in alleged embezzlement of public funds. Highlighting Chairman NAB's vision, DG Ghulam Safdar Shah emphasized that providing immediate relief to common citizens is NAB's top priority, however, all possible measures are being taken towards this end. He added that in order to recover and distribute the looted amounts to the rightful victims, the process of auctioning-off seized properties of the accused persons has been initiated. In this regard, a public auction of valuable confiscated properties was held at Deputy Commissioner Office, Lahore. However, the auction of seized assets will continue as per given schedule in other districts, as well. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
6 days ago
- Express Tribune
SHC stays reversion of BPS 18 officer to 30-year-old post
After serving for over three decades for Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, a BPS-18 officer was reverted to the BPS-7 grade on which he was appointed in 1995. However, the Sindh High Court on Thursday stayed the government's order serving major penalty on Muhammad Shakeel Baig. The reversion to the 'lowest post' was preceded by an inquiry conducted by the Planning and Development Department on directions of the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) which was probing alleged irregularity in Baig's first appointment in LUMHS as BPS-7 Lab Assistant post 1994. On May 23, 2025, Baig was served the office order of returning him to BPS-7 Lab Assistant post as if his career path resembled a snakes and ladders game. He was promoted to BPS-18 on October 19, 2020. During the hearing on Thursday advocate Soulat Rizvi, the petitioner's counsel, briefed the court about all the stages from Baig's appointment to subsequent promotions. "The terms like out of cadre, out of turn promotion, illegal absorption or deputation don't apply to my client's case," he contended. The lawyer maintained that his client is not an exception in the university as several other employees who were also appointed on the same post of the Lab Assistant have climbed their career ladder to the BPS-17 posts. Rizvi argued that the petitioner is being singled out as 18 such staff which made it from the lower to the officer grade posts are still working in LUMHS. He also pointed out names of the officials who continue to work on their posts in blatant violation of the Supreme Court's order concerning the change of cadre. According to the lawyer, his client's demotion to BPS-7 has been carried out on the order of Sindh Chief Minister Syed Murad Ali Shah which, he pleaded, is unlawful. He said the CM under the law can only appoint the vice chancellor, registrar, controller exams and director finance of LUMHS. Rizvi raised a question asking if the LUMHS Ordinance, 2001, gave powers to the CM to overrule decisions of the syndicate and selection boards. He also asked if the NAB can conduct an inquiry about promotion of a university's employee. He maintained that the impugned inquiry did not even offer a chance of hearing his client and that he was not even issued a show cause notice.
