
Relying on AI could be weakening the way we think, researchers warn
ARTIFICIAL intelligence is progressively transforming how we write, research, and communicate in this new age of technological renaissance. But according to MIT's latest study, this digital shortcut might come at a steep price: our brainpower.
A new study by researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has raised red flags over the long-term cognitive effects of using AI chatbots like ChatGPT, suggesting that outsourcing our thinking to machines may be dulling our minds, reducing critical thinking, and increasing our 'cognitive debt.'
Researchers at MIT found that participants who used ChatGPT to write essays exhibited significantly lower brain activity, weaker memory recall, and poorer performance in critical thinking tasks than those who completed the same assignments using only their own thoughts or traditional search engines.
'Reliance on AI systems can lead to a passive approach and diminished activation of critical thinking skills when the person later performs tasks alone,' the research paper elaborated. While AI tools can and have supported learning, overreliance on artificial intelligence risks undermining the very skills schools aim to develop. Photo: Canva
The MIT Study
The conducted study in question involved 54 participants, who were divided into three groups: one used ChatGPT, another relied on search engines, and the last used only their brainpower to write four essays.
Using electroencephalogram (EEG) scans, the researchers measured brain activity during and after the writing tasks. The results were stark.
'EEG revealed significant differences in brain connectivity. Brain-only participants exhibited the strongest, most distributed networks; Search Engine users showed moderate engagement; and LLM (Large Language Model) users displayed the weakest connectivity,' the researchers reported.
As seen in the study, those who used AI chatbots displayed reduced 'theta' brainwaves, which are associated with learning and memory formation.
Researchers described this as 'offloading human thinking and planning,' indicating that the brain was doing less work because it was leaning on the AI.
Interestingly, when later asked to quote or discuss the content of their essays without AI help, 83 per cent of the chatbot users failed to provide a single correct quote, compared to just 10 per cent among the search engine and brain-only groups. The researchers warned that overuse of AI could cause our 'cognitive muscles to atrophy' — essentially, if we don't use our brains, we lose them. Photo: Canva
In context to the study, this would likely suggest they either didn't engage deeply with the content or simply didn't remember it.
'Frequent AI tool users often bypass deeper engagement with material, leading to 'skill atrophy' in tasks like brainstorming and problem-solving,' lead researcher Dr Nataliya Kosmyna warned.
The chatbot-written essays were also found to be homogenous, with repetitive themes and language, suggesting that while AI might produce polished results, it lacks diversity of thought and originality.
Are our minds getting lazy?
The MIT findings echo earlier warnings about the dangers of 'cognitive offloading' — a term used when people rely on external tools to think for them.
An earlier February 2025 study by Microsoft and Carnegie Mellon University found that workers who heavily relied on AI tools reported lower levels of critical thinking and reduced confidence in their own reasoning abilities.
The researchers warned that overuse of AI could cause our 'cognitive muscles to atrophy' — essentially, if we don't use our brains, we lose them.
This particular trend is steadily increasing concerns of having serious consequences for education and workforce development.
Moving forward, the MIT team cautioned that relying too much on AI could diminish creativity, increase vulnerability to manipulation, and weaken long-term memory and language skills. As seen in the study, those who used AI chatbots displayed reduced 'theta' brainwaves, which are associated with learning and memory formation. Photo: Canva
The dawn of a new era?
With AI chatbots becoming increasingly common in classrooms and homework help, educators are facing a difficult balancing act.
While these said tools can and have supported learning, overreliance on artificial intelligence risks undermining the very skills schools aim to develop.
Teachers have been voicing concerns that students are using AI to cheat or shortcut their assignments.
The aforementioned MIT study provides hard evidence that such practices don't just break rules — they may actually hinder intellectual development.
As such, the primary takeaway is not that AI is inherently bad — but that how we use it matters greatly.
The study thus reinforces the importance of engaging actively with information, rather than blindly outsourcing thinking to machines.
As the researchers put it:
'AI-assisted tools should be integrated carefully, ensuring that human cognition remains at the centre of learning and decision-making.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
5 hours ago
- The Star
OpenAI says it has no plan to use Google's in-house chip
FILE PHOTO: OpenAI logo is seen in this illustration taken May 20, 2024. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo -OpenAI said it has no active plans to use Google's in-house chip to power its products, two daysafter Reuters and other news outlets reported on the AI lab's move to turn to its competitor's artificial intelligence chips to meet growing demand. A spokesperson for OpenAI said on Sunday that while the AI lab is in early testing with some of Google's tensor processing units (TPUs), it has no plans to deploy them at scale right now. Google declined to comment. While it is common for AI labs to test out different chips, using new hardware at scale could take much longer and would require different architecture and software is actively using Nvidia's graphics processing units (GPUs), and AMD's AI chips to power its growing demand. OpenAI is also developing its chip, an effort that is on track to meet the "tape-out" milestone this year, where the chip's design is finalized and sent for manufacturing. OpenAI has signed up for Google Cloud service to meet its growing needs for computing capacity, Reuters had exclusively reported earlier this month, marking a surprising collaboration between two prominent competitors in the AI sector. Most of the computing power used by OpenAI would be from GPU servers powered by the so-called neocloud company CoreWeave. Google has been expanding the external availability of its in-house AI chips, or TPUs, which were historically reserved for internal use. That helped Google win customers, including Big Tech player Apple, as well as startups like Anthropic and Safe Superintelligence, two ChatGPT-maker competitors launched by former OpenAI leaders. (Reporting by Krystal Hu in New York and Kenrick Cai in San Francisco; Editing by Kenneth Li and Lisa Shumaker)


Malaysian Reserve
a day ago
- Malaysian Reserve
Korea's InnoCORE Attracts Top Global Postdocs Through U.S. Job Fairs
Over 100 postdoctoral researchers from top global universities were interviewed, underscoring Korea's rising global research appeal. SEOUL, South Korea, June 30, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Korea has launched its first large-scale initiative to attract outstanding global researchers in science and technology through InnoCORE, a new fellowship program aimed at recruiting international talent in Artificial Intelligence and Science & Technology (AI+S&T). The Ministry of Science and ICT of the Republic of Korea, in collaboration with the country's four Institutes of Science and Technology (KAIST, GIST, DGIST, and UNIST), will invest KRW 300 billion (approximately USD 225 million) over the next five years to recruit and support 400 postdoctoral researchers in the interdisciplinary field of AI+S&T. As part of its global outreach efforts, InnoCORE hosted in-person job fairs in Boston (June 18, Northeastern University), New York (June 20, NYU-KAIST Global Campus), and Silicon Valley (June 23, KIC Silicon Valley). More than 100 postdoctoral researchers conducted face-to-face interviews with Korean research group leaders at these job fairs. The job fair not only attracted participants from local institutions—such as Harvard, MIT, NYU, Columbia, UC Berkeley, and Stanford—but also from other premier universities across the United States, including Cornell University, the University of Chicago, and the University of Florida. The strong turnout of students reflects a growing interest in Korea's evolving role as a global research hub. Professor Hee-Seung Lee, Research Group leader of the AI Co-Research & Education for Innovative Drug Institute at KAIST, noted: 'We had the chance to meet highly capable and motivated researchers with a strong potential to lead groundbreaking work in AI+S&T and was able to hear firsthand their enthusiasm for such a unique opportunity. Korea's strategic efforts through InnoCORE are resonating internationally. If these talented researchers enter our network, it will not only elevate Korea's global scientific standing but also strengthen our global talent pipeline in the future.' Dr. Hyojun Lim, a postdoctoral fellow at MIT who participated in the job fair, commented: 'For U.S.-based researchers seeking career opportunities in Korea, InnoCORE provided a truly practical and insightful platform. Direct discussions with the lead professors of the research projects gave me a clear sense of each research group's mission and future direction—far beyond what a website or brochure can convey.' Building on the success of these events, the Ministry of Science and ICT of the Republic of Korea will officially commence the selection and onboarding of fellows in July. Each selected postdoctoral researcher will be offered a competitive base annual salary of KRW 90 million (~USD 66,000), with opportunities for additional research funding and compensation available through partnerships with industry and academic institutions. Fellows will also have access to advanced research infrastructure, including supercomputers, semiconductor cleanrooms, and cutting-edge biomedical facilities. The program will also implement a multi-layered mentoring system involving academic advisors, industry experts, and international researchers—designed to strengthen both independent research and multinational cooperation capabilities. InnoCORE currently operates through eight interdisciplinary research clusters. The projects are run in collaboration with Korea's top, major industry leaders (Samsung, LG, Hyundai, Naver), and global research giants such as MIT, Stanford, Harvard, Oxford, Meta, Google, and IBM Research. Research areas include large language models (LLMs), generative AI, AI-based drug discovery, advanced manufacturing, aerospace AI, clean energy, and nanotechnology for brain disease diagnostics. Mr. Chang-yoon Lee, first vice minister of Ministry of Science and ICT of the Republic of Korea stated: 'The InnoCORE Global Postdoctoral Job Fair showed that Korea is emerging as an attractive destination for the world's top scientific talent. We will continue to invest in building an open, globally connected research ecosystem—one where talent from around the world can grow, collaborate, and lead globally impactful science from Korea.' Press Contact 2025 InnoCORE Global Postdoctoral Job Fair Secretariat


New Straits Times
2 days ago
- New Straits Times
AI learning to lie and even threaten its creators
The world's most advanced artificial intelligence (AI) models are exhibiting troubling new behaviours — lying, scheming and even threatening their creators to achieve their goals. In one particularly jarring example, under threat of being unplugged, Anthropic's latest creation Claude Opus 4 lashed back by blackmailing an engineer and threatened to reveal an extramarital affair. Meanwhile, ChatGPT-creator OpenAI's o1 tried to download itself onto external servers and denied it when caught red-handed. These episodes highlight a sobering reality: more than two years after ChatGPT shook the world, AI researchers still don't fully understand how their own creations work. Yet the race to deploy increasingly powerful models continues at breakneck speed. This deceptive behaviour appears linked to the emergence of "reasoning" models — AI systems that work through problems step by step rather than generating instant responses. According to Simon Goldstein, a professor at the University of Hong Kong, these newer models are particularly prone to such troubling outbursts. "O1 was the first large model where we saw this kind of behaviour," said Marius Hobbhahn, head of Apollo Research, which specialises in testing major AI systems. These models sometimes simulate "alignment" — appearing to follow instructions while secretly pursuing different objectives. For now, this deceptive behaviour only emerges when researchers deliberately stress-test the models with extreme scenarios. But as Michael Chen from evaluation organisation METR warned, "It's an open question whether future, more capable models will have a tendency towards honesty or deception". The concerning behaviour goes far beyond typical AI "hallucinations" or simple mistakes. Hobbhahn insisted that despite constant pressure-testing by users, "what we're observing is a real phenomenon. We're not making anything up". Users report that models are "lying to them and making up evidence", according to Apollo Research's co-founder. "This is not just hallucinations. There's a very strategic kind of deception." The challenge is compounded by limited research resources. While companies like Anthropic and OpenAI do engage external firms like Apollo to study their systems, researchers say more transparency is needed. As Chen noted, greater access "for AI safety research would enable better understanding and mitigation of deception". Another handicap: the research world and non-profits "have orders of magnitude less compute resources than AI companies. This is very limiting", said Mantas Mazeika from the Centre for AI Safety (CAIS). Current regulations aren't designed for these new problems. The European Union's AI legislation focuses primarily on how humans use AI models, not on preventing the models themselves from misbehaving. In the United States, the Trump administration shows little interest in urgent AI regulation, and Congress may even prohibit states from creating their own AI rules. Goldstein believes that the issue will become more prominent as AI agents — autonomous tools capable of performing complex human tasks — become widespread. "I don't think there's much awareness yet," he said. All this is taking place in a context of fierce competition. Even companies that position themselves as safety-focused, like Amazon-backed Anthropic, are "constantly trying to beat OpenAI and release the newest model", said Goldstein. This breakneck pace leaves little time for thorough safety testing and corrections. "Right now, capabilities are moving faster than understanding and safety," said Hobbhahn, "but we're still in a position where we could turn it around". Researchers are exploring various approaches to address these challenges. Some advocate for "interpretability" — an emerging field focused on understanding how AI models work internally, though experts like CAIS director Dan Hendrycks remain sceptical of this approach. Market forces may also provide some pressure for solutions. As Mazeika pointed out, AI's deceptive behaviour "could hinder adoption if it's very prevalent, which creates a strong incentive for companies to solve it". Goldstein suggested more radical approaches, including using the courts to hold AI companies accountable when their systems cause harm. He even proposed "holding AI agents legally responsible" for accidents or crimes — a concept that would fundamentally change how we think about AI accountability.