Humanitarian needs remain pressing month after Myanmar's deadly quake
BANGKOK: The humanitarian needs of hundreds of thousands of survivors remain desperately pressing a month after
Myanmar
's deadly earthquake, compounded by airstrikes that the military government is reportedly carrying out despite ceasefires meant to aid relief efforts during the country's civil war. The 7.7 magnitude March 28 quake hit a wide swath of the country, causing significant damage to six regions and states, including the capital, Naypyitaw. Myanmar's Department of Meteorology and Hydrology reported Monday that there had been 157 aftershocks after the big quake, ranging in magnitude from 2.8 to 7.5.
Quake death toll rises
State-run MRTV television reported on Sunday the quake's death toll had reached 3,769, with 5,106 people injured and 107 still missing. The earthquake left many areas without power, telephone or cell connections and damaged roads and bridges, in addition to tens of thousands of buildings.
In some quake-hit areas, bereaved relatives and friends of the disaster's victims on Monday offered donations to monks, a Buddhist tradition to transfer merit and blessings to the deceased.
Military airstrikes continue
A report released Monday by the Myanmar Witness project of the London-based Centre for Information Resilience said the group had documented 80
post-quake airstrikes
by the military across multiple regions, including 65 after the army declared its unilateral ceasefire on April 2, following similar declarations by its battlefield foes.
Myanmar has been in turmoil since the army's 2021 takeover ousted the elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi, which led to nationwide peaceful protests that escalated into armed resistance, uniting pro-democracy activists and ethnic minority guerrilla groups that have long been fighting for autonomy
"Myanmar's population was already on its knees after years of SAC aggression and armed conflict," said Myanmar Witness project director Robert Dolan, referring to the military's ruling State Administration Council. "The layers of suffering are hard to comprehend - we've seen regions wrecked by war and then the earthquake, only to sustain further damage from continued airstrikes."
The shadow National Unity Government, the main opposition group coordinating resistance to military rule, said Saturday in a statement that the post-quake bombings "have primarily targeted civilian areas - markets, residential zones, Buddhist monasteries, and Christian churches - resulting in the deaths of over 200 civilians, including at least 24 children, from March 28 to April 19, 2025."
The military government hasn't directly commented on the airstrikes, but when it extended its ceasefire on April 22, it reserved the right to respond as "necessary" to certain activities by the resistance forces.
Independent evaluation of most war claims by either side is impossible, due to the military's restrictions on reporting and the remoteness of where many incidents take place.
Agencies warn of dire living conditions
UN agencies and other humanitarian organisations, meanwhile, stress that living conditions remain dire for earthquake survivors. They note that even before the earthquake, the civil war had displaced more than 3 million people and left nearly 20 million in need.
"Critical needs remain for safe shelter, clean water and sanitation, physical and mental health care, comprehensive protection services and cash assistance," the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs said Friday in its latest situation report.
Many who lost their homes are still in makeshift tents with little to protect them from pre-monsoon storms ahead of the months-long rainy season, which normally begins in May, humanitarian services say.
"The delay in removing earthquake debris is increasing the risk of vector-borne diseases, as stagnant water and poor sanitation create breeding grounds for disease-carrying insects," said the UN report.
"Limited access to safe drinking water and clean sanitation poses a significant threat of waterborne diseases, compounded by the absence of rapid diagnostic tests, which delays the detection of potential outbreaks."
The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies said in a report released Monday that displaced people were living outdoors in temperatures of up to forty degrees Celsius, with an overwhelming fear of further aftershocks.
Reconstruction starts
In Naypyitaw, the damaged buildings of the labour and foreign ministries have been demolished for new construction, said a resident who asked not to be named for security reasons. Debris at markets and schools has been cleaned by municipal workers, while thousands of people, who lost their homes, were still living under tarpaulin sheets, he said.
He said that he was told that the departments and offices of several ministries will be temporarily relocated to Yangon, the country's former capital and largest city, until their offices can be rebuilt.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
10 minutes ago
- Mint
White House preps order to punish banks that discriminate against conservatives
The White House is preparing to step up pressure against big banks over perceived discrimination against conservatives and crypto companies with an executive order that threatens to fine lenders that drop customers for political reasons. A draft of the executive order, which was viewed by The Wall Street Journal, directs bank regulators to investigate whether any financial institutions might have violated the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, antitrust laws or consumer financial protection laws. Violators could be subject to monetary penalties, consent decrees or other disciplinary measures, according to the draft. The order could be signed as soon as this week, according to people familiar with the matter. It is possible the order could get delayed or that the administration's plans will change. The draft order doesn't name any specific banks but appears to refer to an instance where Bank of America was accused of shutting down the accounts of a Christian organization operating in Uganda based on the organization's religious beliefs. The bank has said it shut down the accounts because it doesn't serve small businesses operating outside the U.S. The draft order also criticizes the role that some banks played in an investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, riots at the U.S. Capitol. Banks have been on edge about potential action by the Trump administration. The Wall Street Journal reported that the administration was considering an executive order in June. Conservatives for years have accused banks of denying them services on political or religious grounds, and cryptocurrency companies have said they were shut out of banking services under the Biden administration. Banks, for their part, have said their decisions are driven by legal, regulatory or financial risks, including those stemming from the U.S.'s anti-money-laundering laws. They have blamed regulatory pressure for prior decisions to largely steer clear of the crypto industry. A Bank of America spokesman said the bank welcomed the administration's efforts to provide regulatory clarity. 'We've provided detailed proposals and will continue to work with the administration and Congress to improve the regulatory framework," he said. Over the past several months, banks have moved to head off action by the federal government, meeting with Republican attorneys general and updating their policies to clearly state they don't discriminate on the basis of political affiliation. The draft of the order viewed by the Journal directs regulators to strike any policies they have that might have contributed to banks dropping certain customers. It also directs the Small Business Administration to review the practices of banks that guarantee the agency's loans. Under Trump, banking regulators have said they would stop assessing banks for the so-called reputational risk posed by their customers—a practice that banks have cited for their decisions to avoid certain customers or industries. The draft order also calls for regulators to refer potential violations to the attorney general in some cases. The Justice Department in April said it was launching a task force in Virginia, to examine allegations of banks refusing customers access to credit or other services based on 'impermissible factors." Write to Dylan Tokar at and Alexander Saeedy at
News18
32 minutes ago
- News18
Did Sheikh Hasina Give ‘Shoot' Order Against Protesters? Here's What Leaked Audio Suggests
Last Updated: A spokesperson for the Awami League dismissed the allegations, arguing that the audio does not reflect any illegal orders or disproportionate action A leaked audio recording, verified by the BBC, linked former Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to the deadly crackdown on student-led protests last year. In the recording, Hasina is reportedly heard instructing a senior official to deploy lethal force against demonstrators, saying security personnel should 'shoot wherever they find them (protesters)." The directive was allegedly given on July 18, 2024, while Hasina was at her official residence, Ganabhaban, in Dhaka. Hours later, law enforcement officers used military-grade weapons in operations across the capital, according to documents reviewed by the BBC. 1,400 Killed During Protest The United Nations estimates that over 1,400 people were killed during the suppression of protests, which erupted in response to a contentious quota policy for public sector jobs. The violence continued through July and August 2024. The events led to the collapse of Hasina's Awami League government. She left the country on August 5, 2024, and has remained in India since then. The Bangladeshi government has submitted a formal extradition request. Hasina now faces charges in a special tribunal in Bangladesh, where prosecutors intend to present the audio as primary evidence in the case. She is accused of ordering mass violence during the unrest. In her first public remarks since fleeing, Hasina denied authorising any use of force that resulted in deaths. Nevertheless, the leaked audio is seen by investigators as significant in establishing her direct involvement in the crackdown. A spokesperson for the Awami League dismissed the allegations, arguing that the audio does not reflect any illegal orders or disproportionate action, the BBC reported. Toby Cadman, a UK-based human rights lawyer advising Bangladesh's International Criminal Tribunal, said the audio will play a key role in the proceedings. 'The recordings are critical for establishing her role, they are clear and have been properly authenticated, and are supported by other evidence," he told the BBC. view comments First Published: July 09, 2025, 12:29 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Economic Times
37 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump says he's cut drug prices by up to 1,500%. That's not possible
Synopsis Donald Trump claimed significant drug price cuts, even up to 1500%. Experts refute this, stating such cuts are impossible. They suggest it would mean people are paid to take medicine. The White House defended Trump, citing price differences with other nations. Trump also mentioned future price drops. Some drugmakers are open to cuts. AP Days after he sent letters instructing top pharmaceutical manufacturers to use a "most favored nation" pricing model for prescription drugs, President Donald Trump told reporters on Sunday that he had cut costs by up to 1,500%. But Trump's grandiose claim is mathematically impossible. Here's a closer look at the facts. TRUMP: "You know, we've cut drug prices by 1,200, 1,300, 1,400, 1,500%. I don't mean 50%, I mean 14 - 1,500%." THE FACTS: This is false. Cutting drug prices by more than 100% would theoretically mean that people are being paid to take medications. The Trump administration has taken steps to lower prescription drug prices, but experts say there's no indication costs have seen such a massive drop. Geoffrey Joyce, director of health policy at the University of Southern California's Schaeffer Center, called Trump's claim "total fiction" made up by the Republican president. He agreed that it would amount to drug companies paying customers, rather than the other way around. "I find it really difficult to translate those numbers into some actual estimates that patients would see at the pharmacy counter," said Mariana Socal, an associate professor of health policy and management at Johns Hopkins University who studies the U.S. pharmaceutical market. She added that Trump's math is "really hard to follow." Asked what Trump was using to back up his claim, White House spokesman Kush Desai said: "It's an objective fact that Americans are paying exponentially more for the same exact drugs as people in other developed countries pay, and it's an objective fact that no other Administration has done more to rectify this unfair burden for the American people." The White House provided a chart of price differentials for drugs in the U.S. and comparable countries, but did not offer any other evidence. On Sunday, Trump also described cuts to drug prices as a future development, not that already happened. "So we'll be dropping drug prices," he said. "It will start over the next two to three months by 1,200, 1,300 and even 1,400%." Prices for most prescription drugs - unbranded generics are the exception - are higher in the U.S. than they are in other high-income countries. This is in large part due to the way drug prices are negotiated in the United States. Trump made his recent appeal in letters to 17 pharmaceutical manufacturers, the White House announced last week. He asked them to reduce costs in the U.S. by matching the lowest prices of prescriptions drugs in other comparably developed countries. Some drugmakers have since indicated that they are open to cutting costs. This move follows an executive order Trump signed in May setting a 30-day deadline for drugmakers to electively lower prices in the U.S. or face new limits in the future over what the government will pay. The federal government has the most power to shape the price it pays for drugs covered by Medicare and Medicaid. It's unclear what - if any - impact the Trump administration's efforts will have on millions of Americans who have private health insurance. Socal pointed out that if drug manufacturers had cut costs to the extent Trump claims, they would be shouting it from the rooftops, especially given the heat they've taken over the years for their pricing practices. "My expectation would be that they would make announcements - public announcements - and that those announcements would come way in advance of the actual effective dates when those price cuts would come into effect," she said. Joyce agreed that there has been no indication of a substantial cut. "Not at all, not at all, none whatsoever," he said. "And let alone 1,500."
