High-Speed Rail Developers Issue Las Vegas-SoCal Update
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The construction team for Brightline West, a proposed new high-speed rail line linking Las Vegas, Nevada, to Rancho Cucamonga in Southern California, says that it is "getting close" to the construction phase of the project.
Newsweek reached out to Brightline West for comment on Friday via email outside of regular office hours.
Why It Matters
The United States doesn't have any operational high-speed rail lines, defined by the International Union of Railways as operating at a minimum of 155 miles per hour along specially built tracks, in contrast to other advanced nations such as China, which has nearly 30,000 miles of track in operation.
The race is currently underway between California High-Speed Rail, which is under construction between Los Angeles and San Francisco, and Brightline West to see which can be the first to open a U.S. line.
What To Know
Brightline West told Fox 5 Las Vegas that it has now completed 99 percent of the field evaluations for the project, which will help finalize the design.
The company has been collecting soil samples along the proposed route since last year, which are being evaluated to determine the grading and what support is needed for the track, stations, and other facilities.
The company told the news station that it is "getting close" to the main construction stage, more than one year after it held a groundbreaking ceremony in 2024.
A spike is displayed before a groundbreaking ceremony for a new high-speed rail at the Brightline West Las Vegas station on April 22, 2024.
A spike is displayed before a groundbreaking ceremony for a new high-speed rail at the Brightline West Las Vegas station on April 22, 2024.Brightline West trains are planned to travel at up to 200 miles per hour, meaning the journey from Las Vegas to Southern California could be reduced to around two hours.
The company originally planned to open the line in time for the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics, but this date has since been pushed back.
In September 2022, Brightline launched a new railway line in Florida linking Miami and Orlando. This was the first privately operated rail line to open in the U.S. in a century, though it travels at just below the high-speed categorization.
What People Are Saying
Former Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood told Newsweek: "If you look at the Brightline project in Florida between Miami and Orlando, now it's not high-speed rail, but it is wildly popular. They're putting more and more trains on that track every day because people like the idea that they don't have to get on the I-95.
"If you build it, they will come, if you build it, it will be successful and I think that will be the case with Brightline West, Las Vegas to LA, and I think it will be true San Francisco to LA. I think they will be wildly popular. I really believe at this point if you build it, they will come and the proof of that is Europe and Asia. Their trains are wildly popular."
Then Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg pictured at the ground breaking ceremony for Brightline West Las Vegas station on April 22, 2024 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Then Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg pictured at the ground breaking ceremony for Brightline West Las Vegas station on April 22, 2024 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Ethan Miller/GETTY
What Happens Next
Work on Brightline West is expected to intensify in the coming months, while a separate proposal, called the High-Speed Desert Corridor, aims to link it to California High-Speed Rail via a third rail line. It remains to be seen whether Brightline West or California High-Speed Rail can build the first operational high-speed rail line in the U.S.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows States Where Homeowners Benefit Most from Capital Gains Tax Plan
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Blue states, including California and Washington, are among those that stand to benefit the most from President Donald Trump's idea to eliminate the federal capital gains tax on home sales, according to a new study. A proposal to abolish the tax was first pushed forward by Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene last month and then echoed by Trump, who told reporters on July 22 that he was "thinking about…no tax on capital gains on houses." While it is not yet clear if the president's suggestion may lead to a real change in the way home sales are taxed by the government, real estate brokerage Redfin has calculated that homeowners in California, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Washington, and New Jersey, in this order, would benefit the most from the abolition of the capital gains tax. What Is the Federal Capital Gains Tax on Home Sales—and Why Does Trump Want To Abolish It? Homeowners who sell a property where they have been living for longer than a year may have to pay capital gains taxes if they sell their property for more than they originally purchased it for. Capital gains taxes are a portion of the profit made by homeowners through the years that their property has appreciated in value. At the moment, capital gains taxes are limited by a cap. Homeowners who have lived in a home as their primary residence for at least 24 months in the five years before the sale receive an exemption on the first $250,000 of gains for individuals and $500,000 for married couples filing jointly. This cap, however, has not been updated since it was introduced in 1997 nor adjusted for inflation—leading many experts to support urgent changes to the exclusion. "It is not indexed for inflation. In real terms, the exclusion has gone down over these last 20-something years," William McBride, Chief Economist & Stephen J. Entin Fellow in Economics at the Tax Foundation, told Newsweek. "The high inflation we had in recent years, during the pandemic and consequently, is one of the things that has caused a lot of home price appreciation." While this is a problem that typically affects wealthier homeowners the most, the rapid appreciation that occurred during the pandemic homebuying frenzy means that "this is no longer just a concern for high-end properties," Shannon McGahn, executive vice president and chief advocacy officer at the National Association of Realtors (NAR), told Newsweek. According to a recent report by NAR, nearly 29 million homeowners, about one-third of the U.S. market, already face potential capital gains taxes if they sell, "and that number is expected to climb sharply over the next decade," McGahn said. If no change is made to the way capital gains are taxed, nearly 70 percent of homeowners could exceed the $250,000 cap, according to NAR. "A sizable portion of homeowners, especially in states with high home prices that have grown quickly, are sitting on more than the $250k/$500k of capital gains that are exempt from capital gains taxes," Chen Zhao, head of economics research at Redfin, previously told Newsweek. "These homeowners generally have owned their homes for a long period of time, but in some places, people are exceeding the current capital gains exemptions solely based on appreciation during the pandemic." Trump has hinted at the idea of abolishing the capital gains tax on home sales as a solution to the ongoing affordability crisis in the U.S. housing market. On July 22, he told reporters that "if the Fed would lower the rates, we wouldn't even have to do that." Greene has framed the tax as an "unfair burden" hurting the "American dream." Which States Will Benefit the Most—and the Least According to Redfin, more than a quarter of homes across the U.S. have gained at least $250,000 in value since the last time they were purchased, with 8 percent having gained more than $500,000. The owners of these homes are the ones that stand to benefit by a potential elimination of the capital gains tax. By the same reasoning, the states where homeowners stand to gain from the abolition of the tax are those where homes have appreciated the most in recent decades. These include some of the most expensive housing markets in the country: California and Hawaii. In the Golden State, the median home value is $766,896 and the typical capital gain of all homes is $332,659, according to Redfin. A total of 62.3 percent of homes in the state have gained at least $250,000 since they were last sold—the highest share of any state in the nation. One in three (33 percent) have gained more than $500,000. Hawaii followed with 61 percent of homes having gained more than $250,000 in value since they were last sold, while 34.6 percent gained over $500,000. The overall capital gain was even higher than that of California, however, at $338,346. The top five states that would benefit most from the abolition of the federal capital gains tax also include Massachusetts, Washington and New Jersey, with respectively 58.4 percent, 54.1 percent, and 52.2 percent of homes that have gained at least $250,000 in value since they were last sold. Do you think abolishing the federal capital gains tax on home sales is a good or bad idea? Let me know your opinion by emailing The states where homeowners would benefit the least from the change, on the other hand, are Mississippi, North Dakota, Iowa, Oklahoma and Wyoming, which have seen the smallest share of homes that have appreciated over $250,000 in the country, respectively at 1.2 percent, 2.2 percent, 2.4 percent, 3.1 percent and 3.4 percent. What Would Be the Impact of Eliminating the Capital Gains Tax? According to experts, eliminating the federal capital gains tax could have a positive impact on the U.S. housing market, unlocking homes that homeowners were previously holding on to to avoid a high fiscal burden. "Ending the capital gains tax could potentially spur some sales by removing a barrier to selling. Home sales have been in a slump for the past couple years, and this might nudge some sellers to consider," Bankrate's Jeff Ostrowski told Newsweek. "However, the tax burden is far from the main cause of the housing market slowdown." Some experts fear that such a move could have unwanted consequences. "Ongoing affordability issues could be exacerbated by abolishing this tax as it could fuel demand and lead to a more competitive housing market, especially where supply is constrained," Hannah Jones, senior economist at told Newsweek. "Removing this tax would favor wealthy owners which could worsen equity inequality and make the market even more challenging for low-to-mid-earning buyers." McBride also said the measure does not address another cause of home price appreciation in recent years: the lack of supply. "There's a shortage of supply and that's the fundamental problem that needs to be addressed directly. This proposal does not address that," he said. "We have a penalty on investment in housing, on the supply of housing, due to its tax treatment through our depreciation system. That should be addressed, that's the way to directly address this."
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Horror at What Passenger Finds Near Plane Seat Ahead of 9-Hour Flight
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A viral post has ignited a firestorm of disgust and debate over in-flight etiquette after one passenger shared a photo of another traveler resting their bare foot on her armrest during a long-haul flight. Posted by Reddit user u/sarahfayejay in the r/Wellthatsucks subreddit, the image was captioned simply: "I have a 9 hour flight ahead of me." The post quickly gained traction, racking up more than 48,000 upvotes and thousands of comments since it was shared on August 3. The photo shows a bare foot planted firmly on the armrest next to the Reddit user's seat—an invasion of personal space that many online agreed crossed the line from inconsiderate to outright offensive. The poster, who did not share their name or age, told Newsweek that the image was taken on a flight this week on August 3 traveling from Zurich, Switzerland, to John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York City. The woman's bare foot rests on the armrest of the seat on a plane. The woman's bare foot rests on the armrest of the seat on a plane. U/sarahfayejay on Reddit The poster said: "This was economy seating. The person with their foot on my armrest was an adult woman. She had her foot on my armrest as I got to my seat, which was when I took the photograph, and left it there during the duration of boarding until we took off." Travelers had plenty to say when it comes to feet on a plane in a June 2023 survey of 1,000 passengers in the United States and Canada. The survey, conducted on behalf of the travel booking website Kayak, found that you are "not allowed to put your feet against the seat in front of you" because 68 percent of passengers think "feet belong on the ground." You are also not allowed to take off your socks and shoes because 76 percent of travelers "prefer their vision free of toes," while 56 percent believe "there's a difference between a plane and a beach," the survey found. While the barefooted passenger in the Reddit post appeared to have other thoughts on feet etiquette on a plane, she did eventually remove her foot from the armrest. The Reddit user told Newsweek: "I planned to give her until after takeoff where I would then have likely asked her to remove her foot or gotten a flight attendant's attention, but, as we were taking off, she took it down on her own. Thankfully, she did not put it back up for the remainder of the flight." 'Your Foot Is Not a Carry-On' Etiquette experts say the behavior violates even the most-basic standards of public conduct—especially in cramped, shared spaces like airplanes. "Your foot is not a carry-on, and someone's armrest is not your ottoman," Lisa Mirza Grotts told Newsweek. She is an etiquette expert and author of A Traveler's Passport to Etiquette in a Post-Pandemic World. "Unless you're on a beach towel in Tahiti, your bare foot belongs nowhere near another human—especially not on an armrest at 30,000 feet." Grotts added: "When your shoes come off, your manners stay on. Taking off your shoes is one thing, but propping your bare feet on an armrest is a foul in any class of service." Etiquette expert Nick Leighton, co-host of the podcast Were You Raised By Wolves?, told Newsweek that the move isn't just offensive—it is a major etiquette breach. "The most-dignified way to respond is a polite-yet-direct 'excuse me, would you mind moving your foot?' Most people will agree," he said. "But, if not, loop in a flight attendant and let them handle it." Certified life coach Randi Crawford suggested passengers faced with such situations stay calm but assertive. "If this were my client, the first thing I would tell them to do is take a deep breath to center themselves before speaking," Crawford told Newsweek. "Next, turn around, and, with a big smile, say 'Could you move your foot? That's my space. I appreciate it.' Then put your headphones back on and act like the conversation is done, because it is," Crawford said. "If they don't move their toes from your arm rest, the next move is to push that flight attendant button, ASAP." Reddit users didn't hold back. U/Odd_Base_1408 added: "HELL NO. I would turn right around and tell them off." "Tell a flight attendant. Filthy savage," wrote u/Bear-Cricket-89. Others expressed disbelief at the lack of basic courtesy. "That's disgusting," posted u/lowrisk-noreward. U/Tritec_enjoyer96 echoed the sentiment with: "Why are people so … disgusting in public?" User u/GazelleOne1567 asked bluntly: "How can you be so oblivious to making other people uncomfortable." Do you have a travel-related video or story to share? Let us know via life@ and your story could be featured on Newsweek.
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Painting lines on soccer and football fields? That's a job robots can do now
Shaun Ilten had a problem. The senior director of turf and grounds for the Galaxy and Dignity Health Sports Park had 26 full-size practice fields, two game fields and a warm-up pitch to line ahead of last winter's Coachella Valley soccer tournament. And he had less than five days to do it. Since it takes three people nearly two hours to lay out and paint boundary lines on just one field, the math said Ilten wasn't going to make it. 'It's just not possible to do it all by hand,' he said. So he decided to skip the hand part and give the task to a couple of robots, who were able to square out and paint each field in about a quarter the time human hands would have needed. Without the robots, the largest preseason professional soccer event in the U.S. would have necessarily been a lot smaller. 'There would just be no way that it would be humanly possible,' Ilten said. What made it possible was Turf Tank, a GPS-linked machine about the size of large beach cooler that can paint athletic fields of any size for any sport. It was the brainchild of Jason Aldridge, an Atlanta-based entrepreneur with a long history of using technology to innovate workplaces, from restaurants and telecommunications to shipping and sports. The idea of using technology and robotics to relieve groundskeepers of the drudgery of striping athletic fields came to Aldridge about nine years ago, while he was watching business-reality TV show 'Shark Tank' with his son. It was, he said, an ancient ritual that needed a modern solution. 'Even back to the Olympics in ancient Greece, they used to line the lanes to run the sprints,' he said. Months later he partnered with Denmark developers, who four years earlier had designed a prototype robot based on a similar concept, and in 2017, he said, he sold his first two Turf Tanks to the Sozo Sports Complex in Yakima, Wash., and the Commonwealth Soccer Club in Lexington, Ky. Since then Turf Tank has grown into a company with more than 200 employees, tens of millions of dollars in annual sales and 5,000 clients, among them San Diego FC, the Galaxy, LAFC, Angel City, eight NFL teams and hundreds of colleges, including Pepperdine, California, UC Santa Barbara and Loyola Marymount. Turf Tank also drew the stylized on-field logo for last month's MLB All-Star Game in Atlanta. Two other Danish companies — Traqnology and TinyMobileRobots, whose robots have marked more than 2 million fields worldwide, the company says — offer similar services, as does the Swiss company Swozi and Singapore's FJDynamics. But Turf Tank claims to be the dominant force in the U.S. market. The Turf Tank robots, which weight up to 132 pounds and can hold 5.3 gallons of paint, are controlled by a computer tablet and guided by GPS technology linked to a portable base station, which acts as a reference point. All a user has to do is enter the dimensions of the field — the length of the sidelines, the width of the field — into a tablet and the robot does the rest in as little as 24 minutes. Still the concept of autonomous robots was a tough sell for people who are used to doing things by hand and not on a keyboard. Although it sounded like a good idea, most groundskeepers had to be convinced of the accuracy and reliability of the robots. Aldridge tried to sell the University of Alabama on the technology for Bryant-Denny Stadium on a scorching July day. The Turf Tank drew the horizontal and vertical lines without issue but the grounds crew director was certain it couldn't match the precision and accuracy needed to paint hash marks down the center of the football field. So Aldridge took him to lunch and when they returned there was 160 perfect hash marks, each four inches wide, two feet long and 60 feet from the sidelines. The University of Alabama, Aldridge said, now has three robots, two for athletics and one for intramural fields. Ilten also had more doubt than conviction at first. 'I was skeptical when they first reached out to me, just because of how it works. It's all GPS. If something gets in its way, is it going to go rogue?' he said. 'But they brought it out, did a demo and I measured the lines after it was done and they were within a centimeter.' That was 2019 and Ilten now has three robots at Dignity Health Sports Park which he uses to line the main stadium field for football, rugby and lacrosse and the surrounding practice fields for soccer. (For Galaxy games he prefers to mark the pitch the old-fashioned way, with a wheel-to-wheeler roller, which allows him to use a thicker and brighter paint.) 'It just makes everything a little bit more efficient,' said Ilten, who manages a staff of 20. 'Instead of having two or three guys take an hour and half to line a field, I can send one guy out and it takes 35-40 minutes.' But the bulk of Turf Tank's customers don't come from pro or major college teams. The time-saving the robots bring can be life-changing for high school groundskeepers and local park directors, who often must line multiple fields in a day. 'It was a pain point,' said Aldridge, 48. 'They go to school to learn how to grow grass. Painting a field has kind of been that part of the job that wasn't what they really wanted to do, but it was a huge necessity. 'It's like the icing on the cake, right? Building a beautiful field, that's kind of where our robots come in.' ⚽ You have read the latest installment of On Soccer with Kevin Baxter. The weekly column takes you behind the scenes and shines a spotlight on unique stories. Listen to Baxter on this week's episode of the 'Corner of the Galaxy' podcast.
