logo
Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary reveals why he'll soon own TikTok

Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary reveals why he'll soon own TikTok

Daily Mail​2 days ago
Amid the race to find a buyer for TikTok before the embattled app is forced to go dark by the US government, a savior for the widely popular social media platform has emerged. Now, Shark Tank star Kevin O'Leary tells the Daily Mail in an exclusive interview that he's more confident than ever that he'll be involved in the deal to acquire the app.
On Sunday, President Donald Trump said, 'We have a buyer for TikTok ... I think I'll need probably China approval, and I think President Xi [Jinping] will probably do it... It's a group of very wealthy people.' Sources reportedly familiar with the deal told Bloomberg this week that the president was referring to a consortium that includes tech giant Oracle Corp, investment firm Blackstone and venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz.
The rush to find a buyer for TikTok has finally come to a head more than a year after President Joe Biden signed The Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act in April 2024. The law bans social networking services that are defined as 'foreign adversary-controlled' and gave them 270 days to come into compliance with the law.
The South Asian country banned the app over national security concerns in 2020, an outcome that is entirely possible in the US. In January, TikTok voluntarily shut down in the US for 14 hours after the US Supreme Court upheld the Protecting Americans law. Indeed, Republican lawmakers are growing frustrated with repeated delays in enforcement. 'The national security concerns and vulnerabilities are still there, and they have not gone away,' Republican Congressman Darin LaHood, who is a member of the House Intelligence Committee, said last month. 'I would argue they've almost become more enhanced in many ways.'
At the heart of US national security concerns is TikTok's algorithm, which experts allege may compromise the private data of Americans and manipulate content that US citizens see in their feeds. TikTok has denied that it poses any risk to American users. Regardless, the social media platform faces the threat of a total shutdown inside the United States. September 17 is the current deadline for TikTok to find a buyer.
O'Leary, a Daily Mail columnist, maintains that he is 'quite confident' that his group – led by billionaire businessman Frank McCourt and including O'Leary, Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian and others – will be part of the TikTok solution. If anything, O'Leary said, various groups in the running for the acquisition may work together. 'Both sides are missing a piece of the puzzle,' he explained. 'Our group doesn't have any existing shareholders of ByteDance, but [Oracle's consortium] doesn't have any code that's going to be compliant with the order from Congress.'
The proposal from Oracle's camp would not be a viable one, according to O'Leary, because their bid, he says, involves licensing the algorithm from ByteDance. O'Leary predicts that the US government will require the new owner of TikTok to create a unique algorithm. That's where his syndicate comes in. 'There is not going to be a purchase of TikTok with the Chinese algorithm,' he said. 'We've spent millions of dollars on new technology that'll be the engine that is not owned by the Chinese.'
McCourt, who's leading the group called 'The People's Bid for TikTok,' previously told Forbes that users should have more control over their own data. 'Imagine a TikTok where you choose exactly how you experience content, instead of an algorithm secretly deciding for you,' McCourt said. Finally, O'Leary claims that one major hurdle remains – the opposition of the Chinese government. 'We still don't know if [Chinese President] Xi wants to sell TikTok USA to an American-owned entity,' O'Leary explained. 'It's a little unusual to announce the buying group if there's no seller.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

After wrong-footing her doubters with a £2.7bn swoop on rival TSB, meet the most powerful woman in British banking
After wrong-footing her doubters with a £2.7bn swoop on rival TSB, meet the most powerful woman in British banking

Daily Mail​

time22 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

After wrong-footing her doubters with a £2.7bn swoop on rival TSB, meet the most powerful woman in British banking

The most powerful woman in British banking is now Ana Botin, a glamorous and hugely clever Spanish mother-of-three, and a skilled golfer. As executive chairman of Banco Santander, Spain 's number one bank, Botin is known as a winner in the poker game of finance. Last week, she entered British banking's big league after orchestrating a £2.7billion deal to buy high street bank TSB from fellow Spanish group Sabadell.

Inside Trump's 20-hour play to win over stubborn Republicans on Big Beautiful Bill including signed MAGA swag
Inside Trump's 20-hour play to win over stubborn Republicans on Big Beautiful Bill including signed MAGA swag

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Inside Trump's 20-hour play to win over stubborn Republicans on Big Beautiful Bill including signed MAGA swag

President Donald Trump wasn't on the House floor for Thursday's vote on his 'Big, Beautiful Bill' – but he was there in spirit, including on the right hand of one South Carolina lawmaker voting his way. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.), a member of the House Armed Services Committee, was sporting a custom ring on the big day with a golden image of the president's face as he cast his vote for the mega-bill that extended Trump's 2017 tax cuts. With Wilson's help, the massive bill passed 218-214 after a pressure campaign by Trump and congressional leaders kept lawmakers working overnight. 'It's gold Donald Trump on silver. You don't see it every day,' Wilson told the Daily Mail about the special jewelry he wore for the occasion. 'One of my staff was kind enough to get it for me,' he explained. Wilson's vote wasn't considered up for grabs, which may be why his staff came up with its own special Trump swag. For the about a dozen of other lawmakers who were wavering, the president applied his famous fear tactics – as well as a charm and even an array of signed swag – to get Republicans to push the mammoth bill across the finish line. That came despite polls showing the underwater and even some people who voted for it warning about steep cuts to Medicaid or fretting about the estimated $3 trillion it's estimated to tack onto the national debt. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) testified to Trump's salesmanship in a video he posted of himself leaving the White House after conservative House Freedom Caucus members who were wavering met with the president. 'The president was wonderful, as always,' Burchett gushed. 'Informative, funny, he told me he likes seeing me on TV, which was kind of cool.' Then Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida, a Trump loyalist who was walking with him, asked: 'Did you show them what he signed for you?' 'Yeah, he signed a bunch of stuff,' Burchett responded, downplaying it. 'It's cool.' Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins also poured on the charm when she ran into Burchett outside the White House, offering a hug and asking: 'Are we getting it done?' 'Yes m'am,' he replied, before adding, 'I'm a happily married man.' The video also shows Burchett gripping a gold challenge coins of the kind Trump doles out, as he did to an African reporter he called 'beautiful.' 'Donald Trump absolutely was our closer, and Donald Trump never stopped,' said House Majority Whip Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.), whose own role is to line up support for legislation on the Floor. 'Every day [he] was there in the fight [asking] "Who do I need to call? What do I need to do?"' Scalise said no president was 'more directly engaged.' 'President Trump was in the Oval Office making phone calls to just about everybody in the House,' said Trump's economic advisor Kevin Hassett. There were also threats, including some delivered in public. 'For Republicans, this should be an easy yes vote. Ridiculous!!!' Trump wrote in all-caps on his Truth Social site. 'MAGA is not happy, and it's costing you votes!!!' he wrote in another. Not all of his persuasive tactics resulted in votes. Trump golfed this past weekend with ally Sen. Lindsey Graham but also Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, one of three Senate Republicans who voted against the bill. (Victory came in the Senate after leaders offered a series of concessions to Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski, who nevertheless wrote that 'This bill needs more work' and 'this has been an awful process' with a 'frantic rush to meet an artificial deadline.') Trump has notably avoided railing against Paul, even while vowing to primary Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who Trump rips as a 'grandstander' and who also opposed the bill. Just two House Republicans, Massie and Pennsylvania Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, voted against the bill. That comes even as fellow Republicans who had wavered ultimately got behind it. That includes New Jersey GOP Rep. Jeff Van Drew, who had raised concerns that limits on health care provider taxes in his state could and up sapping critical resources for Medicaid. 'I couldn't vote for it that way,' he said, because it would have devastated how the state operates. He said he worked with President Trump directly and got a change incorporated in a final 'wrap-around' amendment. He said he was trying to persuade some of his own colleagues with the misguided view that 'Medicaid was for lazy people.' 'We addressed that, okay? But the bottom line is it's working people, it's disabled people, it's nursing homes, senior citizens, a whole array of people.' Now that the bill is through Congress, Van Drew acknowledged that the fight now becomes a PR battle – with pre-vote polls showing support for Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' is underwater, and a potential risk for Republicans in the 2026 elections. A nonpartisan Congressional Budget estimate said the bill would cut Medicaid by $1 trillion and could cause nearly 12 million people to lose health insurance coverage. 'So the bottom line is, yes, so now this changes from the bureaucratic public policy process into a policy of who's going to be a better mouthpiece? Who's going to articulate the political sense of the ramifications of this bill better? Are you going to be able to emphasize the tax cuts .. So if we articulate that well, if we sell it well, if we talk about we're still maintaining the safety net, then I think we'll be okay.'

States where fast food could get a lot more expensive due to new law
States where fast food could get a lot more expensive due to new law

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

States where fast food could get a lot more expensive due to new law

Ten states and the District of Columbia have banned a popular fast food to-go container that could mean takeouts are about to get more expensive for customers. Earlier this week, Delaware joined the cohort of states and the capital that have banned Styrofoam containers in the fast food industry. The restaurant industry has often leaned on the white, creaky material because it insulated food for roughly 14 cents per container, compared to a biodegradable option that typically runs for around 25 cents. 'It could be something that affects us when it comes to pricing [of our food],' Ezell Barnes, who owns a Delaware food truck called Zoagies, told Delaware Online. 'We already exist on razor-thin profit margins.' CEO of the Delaware Restaurant Association, Carrie Leishman, said the new ban could largely affect small businesses and potentially run them into the ground. 'The stain which this could place on a small business could end so many of them,' she told the outlet. 'What this bill really impacts is equity in the restaurant business,' she said. 'The impact upon our local ethnic minority communities, given its effects on these small restaurants, will be incredibly damaging.' CEO of the Delaware Restaurant Association, Carrie Leishman, said the new ban could largely affect small businesses and potentially run them into the ground The Delaware ban follows that of California, Oregon, and Rhode Island, which outlawed the material January 1, 2025. The first US state to ban the product was Maine in January 2021 However Leishman noted that 'most of Delaware's restaurants were already in compliance' with the law. The Delaware ban follows that of California, Oregon, and Rhode Island, which outlawed the material January 1, 2025. The first US state to ban the product was Maine in January 2021. The law was signed in 2019 by Governor Janet Mills, but didn't go into effect until 2021. The Delaware bill was signed in 2022, but went into effect on Tuesday. 'Polystyrene cannot be recycled like a lot of other products, so while that cup of coffee may be finished, the Styrofoam cup it was in is not,' Mill said in 2019. 'In fact, it will be around for decades to come and eventually it will break down into particles, polluting our environment, hurting our wildlife, and even detrimentally impacting our economy.' New York also signed its law in 2019 under former Governor Andrew Cuomo. It went into effect in 2022. A 2024 waste study by the Department of Sanitation in New York City showed that polystyrene - what Styrofoam is made of - decreased 54 percent by weight between 2017 and 2023. It is feared that the ban will impact small businesses like food trucks the most The containers are popular for containing a variety of takeout food The Empire State was one of the first states to ban plastic bags in March 2020, seeing a decrease of 67 percent between 2017 and 2023, the study found. California was the first to ban plastic bags in 2014 and will enact another law in 2026 prohibiting the sale of 'reusable' plastic bags that are thicker. The Golden State has vowed to cut single-use plastics by 25 percent by 2032 and to recycle 65 percent of what's left. It shift to recycled plastic in the same time frame, according to Cal Recycle. Californians throw out 290 Olympic pool-sized worth of plastic each day. Styrofoam takes 500 years to decompose and it cannot be recycled, like glass and certain types of plastic. The material also leaks large amounts of ozone in the atmosphere, which causes environmental and respiratory issues, according to Colgate University. Styrofoam is estimated to take up roughly 30 percent of the US' landfills, with around 5billion pounds of it, according to Heal The Planet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store