Prince Andrew's ‘Reckoning': A royal crisis that won't go away
Afua Hagan is a contributor to CTVNews.ca, focusing on the Royal Family. Based in London and Accra, Hagan is a regular commentator on the royals across a variety of international outlets, and is a leading voice on diversity in Britain.
A bombshell new book on Prince Andrew by Andrew Lownie, has once again cast a harsh spotlight on one of the most scandal-ridden figures in modern royal history.
Years after his disastrous Newsnight interview and withdrawal from public duties, Prince Andrew remains a liability the monarchy has yet to fully confront. And with each new revelation, the issue is no longer just about Andrew – it's about the institution that repeatedly refuses to distance itself from him.
Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, provides an in-depth, well-researched look at Andrew's fall from grace. It examines his connections to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell as well as the atmosphere of privilege and lack of accountability that enveloped him for years.
Even more troubling, Entitled indicates that despite public claims otherwise, royal insiders have tried to reinstate his status – or at the very least, safeguard his reputation.
'Punches were thrown'
Entitled has rocked royal circles with its startling revelations about Prince Andrew's conduct. Requiring four years of research, the book takes a closer look at the duke's controversial past and troubling behaviour patterns.
It describes a physical altercation between Prince Harry and his uncle at a family gathering in 2013. This confrontation allegedly started after 'something Andrew said behind Harry's back.'
The situation quickly escalated until 'punches were thrown,' claimed the author, leaving Andrew with a 'bloody nose.' The biography also reveals that Andrew told Harry his marriage to Meghan would 'not last more than a month.' Andrew allegedly called Meghan an 'opportunist' and suggested Harry had gone 'bonkers.'
Harry's relationship with his uncle was particularly strained, as the book portrays a 'problematic' dynamic between Andrew and both his nephews. Harry reportedly told William that 'he hated Andrew.'
Prince Harry and Prince Andrew
Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, and Prince Andrew leave Westminster Abbey following the coronation ceremony of King Charles and Queen Camilla, in London, Saturday, May 6, 2023. (Toby Melville, Pool via AP)
Harry and Meghan's response
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex responded forcefully to deny the latest allegations in this, the latest Prince Andrew scandal. Their spokesperson made it clear: 'I can confirm Prince Harry and Prince Andrew have never had a physical fight, nor did Prince Andrew ever make the comments he is alleged to have made about the Duchess of Sussex to Prince Harry.'
The Sussexes took their response a step further. Their legal team delivered a formal letter to the Daily Mail – which published an excerpt Saturday of the 'bloody nose' affair – about what they called 'gross inaccuracies, damaging and defamatory remarks' in Lownie's book.
Claims of 'unbelievably cruel' behaviour
Entitled reveals a troubling pattern of behaviour throughout Prince Andrew's royal life, going well beyond his explosive confrontations with Prince Harry. The latest revelations portray him as a man with a 'fragile ego' mixed with a 'massive sense of entitlement.'
Lownie claimed the Duke turned 'unbelievably cruel' whenever people didn't meet his wishes, and he often berated staff over minor issues. The book details an example in which Andrew ordered his valet to get a teddy bear from his Buckingham Palace bed and place it exactly as he had left it.
The staff allegedly dreaded their shifts with him. One former employee called him 'proper scary' during his angry outbursts.
The Epstein connection
The book also reveals disturbing details about Andrew's connection to Jeffrey Epstein. Lownie suggests Andrew became an easy target for a 'rattlesnake' like Epstein; and although the convicted sex offender manipulated Andrew, the Duke was nowhere near innocent.
The author describes Andrew as 'sex-obsessed' with consistently poor judgment about his relationships. Lownie says Andrew was 'a useful idiot' who gave Epstein 'respectability, access to political leaders and business opportunities.'
Prince Andrew
A combination photo of the front pages of British newspapers on Nov. 21, 2019, headlining the scandal surrounding Prince Andrew. (AP Photo, File)
Andrew's behaviour also allegedly included regular inappropriate comments about women's looks and bragging about his sexual encounters. His conduct at official events, meanwhile, embarrassed many, according to the author. Diplomats avoided seating female guests near him because of his crude comments. Palace insiders' first-hand accounts reveal that royal circles knew about Andrew's troubling conduct for decades. The Queen's favourite son's position protected him from consequences.
Dark clouds hang over the Royal Family as fresh revelations about Prince Andrew paint a disturbing picture of the Duke of York. Entitled reveals many accounts of his alleged staff abuse, inappropriate behaviour, and questionable relationships. The evidence shows how such conduct went unchecked for decades within royal circles.
This isn't just about a royal falling from grace. It's a crisis that could weaken King Charles III's attempts to update the monarchy and gain public confidence. Whenever people see Prince Andrew riding to church with the King, or showing up at a royal memorial, it raises eyebrows – and new questions about the monarchy's decision-making and accountability. For a family that pays close attention to appearances, their failure to cut ties with Andrew is both confusing and harmful.
What's also concerning is how Andrew still thinks he's the victim here. Entitled shows that he's still stubborn behind palace doors, caring more about getting his status back than facing the damage he's been accused of doing to Epstein's victims, and to the public and the monarchy. And that might be the most troubling part of all.
Prince Charles and Prince Andrew
In this Wednesday June 21, 2006 file photo, Prince Charles, right with is brother the Prince Andrew the Duke of York as they arrive in the paddock for the Royal Ascot horse race meeting, Ascot, England. (AP Photo/Alastair Grant, File)
The Royal Family's quiet approach to this problem – and their lack of a clear explanation for Andrew's ongoing presence at private and semi-public events – is becoming harder to defend. In today's world where people demand accountability, the thought that a man so linked to one of the worst scandals in recent times could come back to public life simply doesn't make sense.
Prince Andrew might be laying low, but the harm he's caused is still very much alive. Entitled doesn't just tell us what happened before – it shows us that the Royal Family's unwillingness to tackle that history head-on could weaken the very future they're trying to protect.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Stella Rimington, Britain's 1st female MI5 spy chief, dead at 90
Social Sharing Stella Rimington, the first female chief of Britain's MI5 intelligence agency and later a successful thriller writer, has died, her family said Monday. She was 90. The first woman to head a U.K. intelligence agency, Rimington was the inspiration for Judi Dench's portrayal of the spy chief M in seven James Bond films. Her family said in a statement that Rimington died on Sunday "surrounded by her beloved family and dogs and determinedly held on to the life she loved until her last breath." MI5's current director-general, Ken McCallum, said that "as the first avowed female head of any intelligence agency in the world, Dame Stella broke through long-standing barriers and was a visible example of the importance of diversity in leadership." A rise through the ranks Born in London in 1935, Rimington studied English at Edinburgh University and later worked as an archivist. She was living in India with her diplomat husband in the mid-1960s when she was recruited by MI5, Britain's domestic security service, as a part-time clerk and typist in its New Delhi office. She joined the agency full-time after moving back to London in 1969 and rose through the ranks, overcoming rules that kept the most prestigious roles — such as recruiting and running agents — for men only. She worked in each of MI5's operational branches — counterespionage, counterterrorism and counter-subversion — at a time when MI5's work included sniffing out Soviet spies, infiltrating Northern Ireland militant groups and, controversially, spying on leftists, trade union leaders and other alleged subversives. Rimington acknowledged in 2001 that the organization "may have been a bit over-enthusiastic" in some of its snooping on domestic targets during the Cold War. Rimington was appointed MI5 director-general in 1992, the first head of the organization to be named in public, and her tenure saw the secretive organization become slightly more open. Bond inspiration, damehood and fiction writing Dench's first appearance as M, a role formerly played by men, was in GoldenEye in 1995. The film's producers said the casting was inspired by Rimington's appointment. After stepping down in 1996, Rimington was made a dame, the female equivalent of a knight, by Queen Elizabeth II. Rimington later published a memoir, Open Secret — to the displeasure of the government — and a series of spy thrillers featuring fictional MI5 officer Liz Carlyle. The Devil's Bargain, published in 2022, introduced a new heroine, CIA officer Manon Tyler. Paving the way for others Other women followed Rimington's appointment to top intelligence jobs. Eliza Manningham-Buller led MI5 between 2002 and 2007. Anne Keast-Butler became head of electronic and cyber-intelligence agency GCHQ in 2023. Blaise Metreweli was named in June as the first female head of the overseas intelligence agency, MI6. Rimington and her husband, John Rimington, separated in the 1980s, but moved back in together during the COVID-19 lockdown in 2020. "It's a good recipe for marriage, I'd say," she said. "Split up, live separately, and return to it later."
CTV News
3 hours ago
- CTV News
Pamela Anderson and Liam Neeson's loved ones aren't spilling on their relationship, but they are supportive
Pamela Anderson and Liam Neeson attend "The Naked Gun" UK Premiere at Cineworld Leicester Square on July 22 in London. (via CNN Newsource) 'Naked Gun' costars Pamela Anderson and Liam Neeson are coy when asked if they are romantically involved, but we do know how some of their friends and family feel about their closeness. Bravo executive and talk show host Andy Cohen - who was a good friend of Neeson's late wife, actress Natasha Richardson - was among the first people to provide insight, saying during a recent episode of his SiriusXM show that he and others who were close to Richards were 'very much stanning whatever this is' between Neeson and Anderson. Others appear to also be showing support. Richardson died in a skiing accident in 2009. She was 45. Over the weekend her sister, actress Joely Richardson, commented with seven hearts from her verified Instagram account on a carousel of photos of Anderson and Neeson, which Anderson posted on her verified Instagram account. Anderson and Neeson appeared on Sunday's episode of 'Watch What Happens Live with Andy Cohen' and Cohen let it be known that he would not be asking about the nature of their relationship. But the host did reiterate that Neeson's friends are 'very much stanning this relationship' and referenced the actor's adult son, Daniel Neeson, who was in the studio audience. 'Right, Danny?,' Cohen said to the younger Neeson, who smiled and appeared to agree. Liam Neeson reached out and held Anderson's hand after Cohen made the comment. Speculation about their relationship swirled as the pair began promoting their new film, now in theaters, with onlookers noting their chemistry on and off screen. Neeson first fanned the flames when he told People magazine in an interview last year that he is 'madly in love with' Anderson, going on to compliment her work ethic. Lisa Respers France, CNN
CTV News
6 hours ago
- CTV News
Prince Andrew's ‘Reckoning': A royal crisis that won't go away
Prince Andrew looks round as he leaves after attending the Easter Matins Service at St. George's Chapel, Windsor Castle, England, Sunday, April 20, 2025. (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth, Pool) Afua Hagan is a contributor to focusing on the Royal Family. Based in London and Accra, Hagan is a regular commentator on the royals across a variety of international outlets, and is a leading voice on diversity in Britain. A bombshell new book on Prince Andrew by Andrew Lownie, has once again cast a harsh spotlight on one of the most scandal-ridden figures in modern royal history. Years after his disastrous Newsnight interview and withdrawal from public duties, Prince Andrew remains a liability the monarchy has yet to fully confront. And with each new revelation, the issue is no longer just about Andrew – it's about the institution that repeatedly refuses to distance itself from him. Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, provides an in-depth, well-researched look at Andrew's fall from grace. It examines his connections to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell as well as the atmosphere of privilege and lack of accountability that enveloped him for years. Even more troubling, Entitled indicates that despite public claims otherwise, royal insiders have tried to reinstate his status – or at the very least, safeguard his reputation. 'Punches were thrown' Entitled has rocked royal circles with its startling revelations about Prince Andrew's conduct. Requiring four years of research, the book takes a closer look at the duke's controversial past and troubling behaviour patterns. It describes a physical altercation between Prince Harry and his uncle at a family gathering in 2013. This confrontation allegedly started after 'something Andrew said behind Harry's back.' The situation quickly escalated until 'punches were thrown,' claimed the author, leaving Andrew with a 'bloody nose.' The biography also reveals that Andrew told Harry his marriage to Meghan would 'not last more than a month.' Andrew allegedly called Meghan an 'opportunist' and suggested Harry had gone 'bonkers.' Harry's relationship with his uncle was particularly strained, as the book portrays a 'problematic' dynamic between Andrew and both his nephews. Harry reportedly told William that 'he hated Andrew.' Prince Harry and Prince Andrew Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, and Prince Andrew leave Westminster Abbey following the coronation ceremony of King Charles and Queen Camilla, in London, Saturday, May 6, 2023. (Toby Melville, Pool via AP) Harry and Meghan's response The Duke and Duchess of Sussex responded forcefully to deny the latest allegations in this, the latest Prince Andrew scandal. Their spokesperson made it clear: 'I can confirm Prince Harry and Prince Andrew have never had a physical fight, nor did Prince Andrew ever make the comments he is alleged to have made about the Duchess of Sussex to Prince Harry.' The Sussexes took their response a step further. Their legal team delivered a formal letter to the Daily Mail – which published an excerpt Saturday of the 'bloody nose' affair – about what they called 'gross inaccuracies, damaging and defamatory remarks' in Lownie's book. Claims of 'unbelievably cruel' behaviour Entitled reveals a troubling pattern of behaviour throughout Prince Andrew's royal life, going well beyond his explosive confrontations with Prince Harry. The latest revelations portray him as a man with a 'fragile ego' mixed with a 'massive sense of entitlement.' Lownie claimed the Duke turned 'unbelievably cruel' whenever people didn't meet his wishes, and he often berated staff over minor issues. The book details an example in which Andrew ordered his valet to get a teddy bear from his Buckingham Palace bed and place it exactly as he had left it. The staff allegedly dreaded their shifts with him. One former employee called him 'proper scary' during his angry outbursts. The Epstein connection The book also reveals disturbing details about Andrew's connection to Jeffrey Epstein. Lownie suggests Andrew became an easy target for a 'rattlesnake' like Epstein; and although the convicted sex offender manipulated Andrew, the Duke was nowhere near innocent. The author describes Andrew as 'sex-obsessed' with consistently poor judgment about his relationships. Lownie says Andrew was 'a useful idiot' who gave Epstein 'respectability, access to political leaders and business opportunities.' Prince Andrew A combination photo of the front pages of British newspapers on Nov. 21, 2019, headlining the scandal surrounding Prince Andrew. (AP Photo, File) Andrew's behaviour also allegedly included regular inappropriate comments about women's looks and bragging about his sexual encounters. His conduct at official events, meanwhile, embarrassed many, according to the author. Diplomats avoided seating female guests near him because of his crude comments. Palace insiders' first-hand accounts reveal that royal circles knew about Andrew's troubling conduct for decades. The Queen's favourite son's position protected him from consequences. Dark clouds hang over the Royal Family as fresh revelations about Prince Andrew paint a disturbing picture of the Duke of York. Entitled reveals many accounts of his alleged staff abuse, inappropriate behaviour, and questionable relationships. The evidence shows how such conduct went unchecked for decades within royal circles. This isn't just about a royal falling from grace. It's a crisis that could weaken King Charles III's attempts to update the monarchy and gain public confidence. Whenever people see Prince Andrew riding to church with the King, or showing up at a royal memorial, it raises eyebrows – and new questions about the monarchy's decision-making and accountability. For a family that pays close attention to appearances, their failure to cut ties with Andrew is both confusing and harmful. What's also concerning is how Andrew still thinks he's the victim here. Entitled shows that he's still stubborn behind palace doors, caring more about getting his status back than facing the damage he's been accused of doing to Epstein's victims, and to the public and the monarchy. And that might be the most troubling part of all. Prince Charles and Prince Andrew In this Wednesday June 21, 2006 file photo, Prince Charles, right with is brother the Prince Andrew the Duke of York as they arrive in the paddock for the Royal Ascot horse race meeting, Ascot, England. (AP Photo/Alastair Grant, File) The Royal Family's quiet approach to this problem – and their lack of a clear explanation for Andrew's ongoing presence at private and semi-public events – is becoming harder to defend. In today's world where people demand accountability, the thought that a man so linked to one of the worst scandals in recent times could come back to public life simply doesn't make sense. Prince Andrew might be laying low, but the harm he's caused is still very much alive. Entitled doesn't just tell us what happened before – it shows us that the Royal Family's unwillingness to tackle that history head-on could weaken the very future they're trying to protect.
