OIC chief, Palestinian envoy discuss crisis in Gaza, West Bank
The envoy updated Taha on the escalating situation in Palestine, detailing the deepening humanitarian crisis in Gaza and ongoing violations and crimes by Israeli forces in the West Bank, the Saudi Press Agency reported on Monday.
The two sides also discussed the provocative rhetoric and incitement by Israeli ministers and officials, plans for annexing the West Bank and claims of Israeli sovereignty over the territory.
Taha reaffirmed the OIC's commitment to advocating for an immediate, lasting ceasefire, facilitating humanitarian aid to Gaza, ensuring international protection for Palestinians and supporting a two-state solution in line with UN resolutions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
19 minutes ago
- Arab News
Can Netanyahu deliver a ceasefire Gaza can trust?
With news swirling of a potential ceasefire agreement in Gaza, brokered during a high-profile meeting between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump at the White House last week, Palestinians — particularly those in Gaza — find themselves once again suspended between cautious hope and deep skepticism. The promise of peace may be inching closer, but the lingering question remains: can the world really trust Netanyahu to honor such an agreement? And more fundamentally, can a permanent ceasefire hold in the face of Israel's historical record of violating its own commitments? The Gaza Strip, shattered by relentless airstrikes and years of blockade, is yearning for a pause, for a reprieve. Entire neighborhoods have been reduced to rubble, families torn apart and basic services like food, water and electricity remain scarce. In this humanitarian wasteland, any talk of a ceasefire sparks a flicker of hope — but that hope is deeply guarded. Both Netanyahu and Trump have much to gain politically from a ceasefire. Netanyahu is mired in domestic turmoil, battling corruption charges, protests and an increasingly fractured coalition. Trump is keen to present himself once again as a global statesman capable of forging historic deals. The stakes are high — but so too is the distrust. Palestinians have seen this story play out before. Ceasefire after ceasefire — brokered by Egypt, Qatar or the UN — has collapsed due to Israeli violations, continued settlement expansion or renewed military operations. Despite declarations and photo-ops, Israel has consistently returned to tactics that violate Palestinian sovereignty and humanitarian norms. The Netanyahu government, heavily influenced by its far-right members, has shown little willingness to seriously engage with the Palestinian cause beyond security concerns. And yet, Palestinians are not rejecting the idea of peace — they are rejecting hypocrisy. A genuine and lasting ceasefire must be more than a tactical maneuver or an electoral prop. It must include an unequivocal end to Israeli military operations in Gaza, the lifting of the suffocating blockade and a credible international mechanism to monitor compliance on both sides. Any agreement must address not only the symptoms of war, but also the root causes: occupation, displacement and political disenfranchisement. While the US continues to play the role of chief negotiator, the international community cannot remain a bystander. It must step forward — not just to endorse any agreement, but to provide binding guarantees that Palestinians' rights will be protected and upheld. The Arab world, the EU and the UN should demand oversight mechanisms that ensure Israel complies with its commitments and that the Palestinian people are not once again left to suffer the consequences of broken promises. International actors must insist on a framework that goes beyond ceasefire management and toward a sustainable political solution. The people of Gaza cannot endure another 'pause' that merely resets the countdown to the next war. Hani Hazaimeh The people of Gaza cannot endure another 'pause' that merely resets the countdown to the next war. They need assurance, accountability and, above all, dignity. The ceasefire must not be a reward for violence nor a temporary de-escalation until the next round of bloodshed. It must be the beginning of a broader peace process that affirms the right of Palestinians to live freely in their homeland, with access to food, water, safety and a future. Netanyahu and Trump may seek to shape the headlines in Washington, but history will judge them by what follows on the ground in Gaza. If the proposed ceasefire does not include real protections, real oversight and real political engagement, it will join the long list of failed truces that have left Palestinian civilians to bury their dead in silence. A meaningful ceasefire must be built on trust — but trust is earned, not imposed. And until Israel demonstrates a consistent commitment to peace and until the world holds it accountable for its actions, Palestinians will remain wary of agreements signed with smiles abroad and broken with bombs at home. The people of Gaza are watching. The world must do more than just watch with them — it must stand with them.
Arab News
19 minutes ago
- Arab News
Israel's West Bank ‘emirate' gambit reveals its desperation
Israel is aggressively implementing plans to shape Palestine's future and that of the broader region, sculpting its vision for the 'day after' its genocide in Gaza. The latest bizarre iteration of this strategy proposes fragmenting the West Bank into so-called emirates, starting with the 'Emirate of Hebron.' This unexpected twist in Israel's protracted search for alternative Palestinian leadership first surfaced in the staunchly pro-Israel US newspaper The Wall Street Journal. It then quickly came to dominate all Israeli media. The report details a letter from a person identified by the newspaper as 'the leader of Hebron's most influential clan.' Addressed to Economy Minister Nir Barakat, Jerusalem's former Israeli mayor, the letter from Sheikh Wadee Al-Jaabari appeals for 'cooperation with Israel' in the name of 'coexistence.' This 'coexistence,' according to the 'clan leader,' would materialize in the 'Emirate of Hebron,' which would 'recognize the state of Israel as the nation state of the Jewish people,' in exchange for reciprocal recognition of the 'Emirate of Hebron as the representative of the Arab residents in the Hebron district.' The story may seem perplexing. This is because Palestinian discourse, regardless of geography or political affiliation, has never entertained such an absurd concept as united West Bank 'emirates.' Another element of absurdity is that Palestinian national identity and pride in their people's unwavering resilience, especially in Gaza, are at an unprecedented apex. To float such clan-based alternatives to legitimate Palestinian leadership seems ill-conceived and is destined to fail. Israel's desperation is palpable. In Gaza, it cannot defeat Hamas and other Palestinian factions that have resisted the Israeli takeover of the Strip for 21 months. All attempts to engineer an alternative Palestinian leadership there have collapsed. This failure has compelled Israel to arm and fund a criminal gang that operated in Gaza before Oct. 7, 2023. This gang functions under the command of Yasser Abu Shabab. It has been implicated in a litany of violent activities. These include hijacking humanitarian aid to perpetuate famine in Gaza and orchestrating violence associated with aid distribution, among other egregious crimes. Like the clan in Hebron, Abu Shabab's criminal gang possesses no legitimacy and no public support among Palestinians. Why would Israel resort to such disreputable figures when the Palestinian Authority, already engaged in 'security coordination' with it in the West Bank, is ostensibly willing to comply? The answer lies in the current extremist Israeli government's adamant refusal to acknowledge Palestine as a nation. Thus, even a collaborating Palestinian nationalist entity is deemed problematic from an Israeli perspective. While Benjamin Netanyahu's government is not the first Israeli leadership to explore clan-based alternatives among Palestinians, the prime minister and his extremist allies are exceptionally determined to dismantle any Palestinian claim to nationhood. This was explicitly stated by extremist Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. He famously declared in Paris, in March 2023, that a Palestinian nation is an 'invention.' Thus, despite the PA's willingness to cooperate with Israel in controlling Gaza, Israel remains apprehensive. Empowering the PA as a nationalist model fundamentally contravenes Israel's overarching objective of denying the Palestinian people their claim to nationhood and, consequently, statehood and sovereignty. Though Israel has consistently failed to establish and sustain its own alternative Palestinian leadership, its repeated efforts have invariably proven disruptive and violent. Prior to the Nakba of 1948, the Zionist movement, alongside the British authorities colonizing Palestine, heavily invested in undermining the Arab Higher Committee, a nationalist body comprising several political parties. They achieved this by empowering collaborating clans, hoping to dilute the Palestinian nationalist movement. When Israel occupied the remainder of historic Palestine in 1967, it reverted to the same divide-and-conquer tactics. For instance, it established a Palestinian police force directly commanded by Israeli military administrations, in addition to creating an underground network of collaborators. Following the overwhelming victory of nationalist candidates in the 1976 elections in the West Bank, Israel cracked down on Palestine Liberation Organization-affiliated politicians, arresting, deporting and assassinating some. Two years later, in 1978, it launched its 'Village Leagues' project. It hand-picked compliant traditional figures, designating them as the legitimate representatives of Palestinians. These individuals, armed, protected and financed by the Israeli occupation army, were positioned to represent their respective clans in Hebron, Bethlehem, Ramallah, Gaza and elsewhere. Palestinians immediately denounced them as collaborators. They were widely boycotted and socially ostracized. Netanyahu and his extremist allies are exceptionally determined to dismantle any Palestinian claim to nationhood. Dr. Ramzy Baroud Eventually, it became evident that Israel had no alternative but to engage directly with the PLO. This culminated in the Oslo Accords in 1993 and the subsequent formation of the PA. However, the fundamental problem persisted: the PA's insistence on a Palestinian state remains anathema to an Israel that has shifted dramatically to the right. This explains the Netanyahu government's unwavering insistence that the PA has no role in Gaza in any day-after scenario. While the PA could serve Israel's interest in containing the rebellious Strip, such a triumph would inevitably recenter the discussion of a Palestinian state — a concept repugnant to most Israelis. There is no doubt that neither the Abu Shabab gang nor the Hebron emirate will govern Palestinians, either in Gaza or the West Bank. Israel's insistence on fabricating such alternatives underscores its historic determination to deny Palestinians any sense of nationhood. Israel's persistent fantasies of control invariably fail. Despite their profound wounds, Palestinians are more unified than ever — their collective identity and nationhood hardened by relentless resistance and countless sacrifices.
Al Arabiya
23 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
EU sees limited progress on Gaza aid despite Israel deal, says EU foreign policy chief
There have been some signs of more trucks and supplies getting to Gaza but the European Union doesn't see enough improvement on the ground, the EU's foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Monday, ahead of a meeting with senior Middle Eastern and EU officials in Brussels. The EU reached an agreement with Israel last week to improve the humanitarian situation in the Gaza strip, including increasing aid trucks and opening crossing points and certain aid routes. Meanwhile, Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty said 'nothing has changed' since an agreement between Israel and the European Union on the resumption of humanitarian aid to Gaza. He made the statements to reporters ahead of the EU-Middle East meeting in Brussels on Monday.
