
'The system is broken': Report recommends outing specialists with excessive fees
Some specialists charge two to three times the Medicare rate, with annual costs topping $670 for some services.
Grattan Institute urges reforms, including naming overcharging doctors and expanding access in underserved areas. The report recommended naming specialists who charge excessive fees and scrapping medicare subsidies for them. Some private specialist doctors charge patients two to three times more than the rate Medicare sets for those services, the report found. It said patients of one specialist forked out an average of $300 per year in 2023 - up 73 per cent since 2010.
Average out-of-pocket costs for extreme-fee-charging specialists in 2023 reached $671 for psychiatry services and more than $350 for endocrinology, cardiology, paediatrics, immunology and neurology services. The high costs leave critical health care out of reach for millions, causing patients in poorer pockets of Australia to wait months or years for urgent appointments, and leading to missed diagnoses, avoidable pain and added pressure on hospitals. About four in 10 Australians visited a specialist in 2023/24.
About two-thirds across all specialities are private appointments, with patients receiving a Medicare rebate and paying a gap fee. Grattan's Health Program director Peter Breadon said the system was broken from start to end. "Everywhere, from how the system is planned and how training is funded through to how we target public investment and integrate the system between primary care and specialist care, it all really needs a lot of change," he told AAP.
Federal Health Minister Mark Butler said private health insurers and specialists needed to do more to protect patients from exorbitant bills. He said the Albanese government would upgrade the Medical Costs Finder, which helps patients find the best value for specialist medical advice, and was committed to working with stakeholders to improve cost transparency. "Hopefully it would discourage those specialists who are charging really unreasonable fees, but this is a problem that needs many solutions," Breadon said. The report also recommends governments provide one million extra specialist appointment services every year in areas that receive the least care, a system in which GPs can get written advice from other specialists, modernise public specialist clinics, and allocate $160 million to expand specialist training for under-supplied specialities and rural training. Australian Medical Association President Dr Danielle McMullen said public hospital underinvestment and lagging Medicare rebates made it harder for patients. "The risks of delaying medical care are that the health problem gets worse," she said, adding it also puts pressure on GPs and hospitals in public and private clinics.
The doctors' association supports most of Grattan's recommendations, but said removing Medicare funding from specialists who charged excessive fees was not practical. As governments negotiate the National Health Reform agreement, McMullen urged leaders to sort out longer-term funding for public hospitals and develop a health workforce data tracker to show where investment was needed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
30 minutes ago
- ABC News
Ambulance Victoria launches neuro-inclusion toolkit to help paramedics and patients
As a child, Chris Cleghorn was slow at reading. He remembers it being a hidden thing that he did not talk about, but it was always there. Now aged 45 and working as a paramedic, Mr Cleghorn has the words to describe the difficulty he faced: dyslexia. Reading comes with the territory as a paramedic, but thanks to some adjustments at work, he has been able to manage his dyslexia and establish a thriving career. For example, he transferred lists of medications to an audio format that he could listen to on the commute, a format that suits his brain far better than reading and re-reading text. "I was a very good example of how these adjustments could work for someone, and how that person could thrive with those helps along the way," he said. Ambulance Victoria has launched its first neuro-inclusion toolkit, which sets out what sort of adjustments can help in the workplace. The aim is to better support neurodivergent patients and staff like Mr Cleghorn. He said adjustments that could be helpful for neurodivergent staff included allowing decompression time for paramedics in quiet places, or space to do their paperwork in a distraction-free environment after a job. When it comes to making neurodivergent patients comfortable, he said the toolkit suggested questions paramedics could ask, such as "Would you like the lights dimmed?" or "Would you like the noisy devices turned off?" "Now that there's more of a spotlight on neurodiversity and disability, we do see that we don't do a fantastic job all the time in those areas," he said. "Being able to ask questions and make those adjustments to allow people to feel comfortable … enough to be able to answer our questions and allow us to assess them is such a key point." About 11 per cent of Ambulance Victoria's employees identify as neurodivergent, but it is believed this could be higher due to under-reporting. Ambulance Victoria Gippsland Two region area manager Warwick Bone said he hoped the toolkit would provide clear support for managers, employees and patients. "We know around 15 to 20 per cent of people have some sort of neurodivergence, which can include things like autism, ADHD, obsessive compulsive disorder, dyslexia and other neurological differences," he said. The toolkit includes a community-facing information sheet on the potential sensory impacts inside an ambulance. "If they're in the back of an ambulance and machines are beeping and buzzing, then we can turn those down if they have sensory overload," Mr Bone said. "We reinforce that if you do feel overcome with the sensory experience … talk to the paramedic that's with you and explain that you are neurodiverse and we can definitely support [you]." Amaze chief executive David Tonge said his organisation co-designed the toolkit for Ambulance Victoria after a survey of patients. "What we heard from the community was they'd had varied experiences in their encounters … but there's often a lot of sensory overload," he said. "Pulling together the expertise of Ambulance Victoria and the paramedics with lived experience … is the strength of this project." Mr Cleghorn said when it came to adjusting for disability needs, lived experience was crucial for getting things right. "I can't think of anything where not getting lived experience hasn't improved the outcome or created a more robust system," he said. "It's the gold standard."

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Wood heater pollution is a silent killer. Here's where the smoke is worst
Every year the winter cold brings an ambient haze of wood heater smoke to the suburbs, streets and houses of southern Australia. This smoke can aggravate asthma, divide neighbours and drive people inside. Now, new modelling gives a clearer picture of its toll on the nation's health. The Centre for Safe Air at the University of Tasmania estimates long-term exposure to wood-heater smoke causes 729 premature deaths every year in Australia, which is more than the deaths attributable to emissions from the national fleet of 20 million vehicles, or from energy generation, or even bushfires. Along with this figure, the Centre has built the first national map of wood-heater emissions and deaths attributable to these emissions, with a resolution that can pick out clusters of suburbs most at risk. Cost-of-living pressures, power price hikes and a wood-heater sales boom during COVID may mean more houses are burning wood than ever before. Meanwhile, Australians are increasingly aware the smoke is a risk to their health. Neighbourly bust-ups over the issue appear to be on the rise. Here's where the smoke is worst, and where long-term exposure is costing the most lives. The Centre for Safe Air combined particulate pollution readings from around Australia with surveys of wood heater use to generate its national map of wood heater pollution. Let's focus on the cities in the south-east corner of Australia, which has the highest concentration of wood heaters. The map below shows total wood heater emissions by kilograms per year in 2015. As you might expect, the wood smoke is generally thickest in regional areas. Towns like Armidale in NSW or Devonport in Tasmania have well-documented smoke problems. "In small communities where every second person has a wood heater, you do get that pall of smoke and it's really dense," Fay Johnston, lead investigator at the Centre, said. But wood heater smoke is not solely a regional issue. In fact, when we look at its public health impact, or how wood smoke affects the population as a whole, we find wood smoke causes more harm in capital cities than in regional areas. Every morning, Lisa checks her neighbour's chimney for white smoke. The young mother, who asked to remain anonymous, realised there was a wood-smoke problem soon after moving with her family to Sydney's Sutherland Shire. "[The neighbour] runs the wood heater most weekday evenings and throughout the weekend, so we can't open our windows, can't access our backyard," she said. "Our other neighbour says their cat smells of smoke." She said she was forced to keep her toddler inside on bad smoke days, worried about his health. When she politely raised the issue with the wood-burning neighbours, she said they responded defensively: "They said 'We've been doing this for 20 years and no-one else has complained.'" Wood smoke contains tiny airborne particles that can be trapped in our lungs. Long-term exposure can cause heart- and lung disease. Short-term exposure can aggravate asthma or worsen pre-existing heart conditions. Even a low background exposure to wood smoke can have a measurable public health impact. Wood heaters are so polluting, it only takes a relatively small number of homes burning wood to expose millions of people in a city to pollution, Professor Johnston from the Centre for Safe Air said. By combining this measured effect of wood smoke on health with the estimate of wood heater emissions in different parts of the country, the Centre created a second national map, showing the public health impact of wood smoke. The map below shows estimated earlier-than-expected deaths per 100,000 people due to exposure to wood-heater smoke. The top regions are in south-east Australia. The public health impact of wood smoke squarely falls hardest on the relatively heavily populated cities, even though the concentration of wood smoke may be lower than in some regional towns. And there's one city where the public health impact is greatest. Perhaps surprisingly, given their cooler climates, it's not Hobart or Melbourne. A higher proportion of people die earlier in Lisa's home city of Sydney than expected due to wood-heater pollution than other parts of south-east Australia. This is partly due to its topography, with the harbour and surrounding land forming a bowl that traps smoke. "Our topography definitely lends itself to trapping air pollutants within the Sydney basin," Peter Irga, an expert in air quality at the University of Technology Sydney, said. "Other than Launceston, the other major cities don't have that basin topography." Within this bowl, "middle suburbs" such as Parramatta or Marrickville have a combination of high population density, freestanding homes with chimneys, and access to relatively cheap firewood. About 5 per cent of homes in Sydney own a wood heater, but the Centre for Safe Air's modelling suggests these relatively few emitters cause more than 300 earlier-than-expected deaths in the city every year. "The modelled estimate of deaths attributable to wood heater particulate pollution are higher than that those attributable to motor vehicle particulate pollution," Professor Johnston said. "Wood heaters really punch above their weight when it comes to putting pollution into the atmosphere, relative to the benefit they give us in terms of heat. But these maps don't tell the full story. The modelling relies on air-quality measurement stations dotted around the country that don't capture the emissions for those directly downwind of wood heater chimneys. It's here, at the very local scale, that smoke can be thickest. And where there's smoke, there's often angry neighbours. Arabella Daniel, a Melbourne-based community organiser against wood heater pollution, said it was "a neighbour against neighbour issue". Ms Daniel, who once took legal action against a neighbour over wood smoke, runs the My Air Quality Australia Facebook page, which has 3,000 members. "We've really had a surge in members in the last 12 months," she said. About 10 per cent of households use wood heaters as their primary source of heat, but millions breathe the smoke these heaters produce. It's this disparity that makes wood-heater smoke a prime source of neighbourly conflict. Members of the Facebook group share stories of complaints to councils and heated arguments with neighbours. "There's a lot of suffering. People are silent because to complain about wood smoke means you're dobbing in your neighbour," Ms Daniel said. Members of the group who spoke to the ABC asked to remain anonymous. Max in Thirroul, just south of Sydney, has sealed windows and doorways and installed air purifiers to protect his 11-year-old asthmatic son from wood smoke. "Soon as it gets cold, around 4pm, the wood smoke becomes so bad you can't go outside." He said his air-quality monitors regularly clocked particulate readings of more than 50 micrograms per cubic meter, which was considered unhealthy with prolonged exposure. Amber, in Canberra, fell out with neighbours over wood smoke she said was giving her and her family sinus headaches. "We were initially really good friends with them … Our whole roof is covered in soot from their chimney." Several members feared a complaint would lead to their neighbour burning more wood — a practice known in the group as "revenge burning". Many said complaints to local and state governments have gone nowhere. These were common stories, Professor Johnston from the Centre for Safe Air said. "It's a really knotty neighbourhood problem for which we don't have particularly good tools." Wood smoke pollution was the responsibility of local councils, which were either reluctant to deal with the problem or not resourced to police chimney smoke, she said. Wood heater sales (which don't include open fireplaces, fire pits, pizza ovens or other outdoor wood-burners) increased 40 per cent between 2008 and 2021, according to industry group, the Home Heating Association. Sales dropped after the pandemic, but there's no sign of a long-term decline. Dr Irga from UTS said cost-of-living pressures and higher electricity prices were driving more Australians to burn wood for heat, including — in some cases — toxic construction materials. Meanwhile, new air quality monitoring and mapping technologies are making wood smoke harder to ignore. On July 6, 2025, a combination of cold and calm weekend weather in Melbourne saw wood smoke emissions spike in some areas of the city. The night-time event was captured by a relatively new network of low-cost, real-time air quality monitors, many of them privately owned by households. Called "Purple Air", the data from these monitors is shared to a publicly accessible online database. On July 6, around 7.30pm, Purple Air sensors around Melbourne showed levels of particulate pollution considered unhealthy for sensitive groups, even for short-term exposure. As the night wore on, pollution readings peaked. Heater-owners preparing for bed often close heater vents to stop oxygen flow, leading to incomplete combustion causing wood to smoulder, and produces large amounts of smoke that spreads into the surrounding properties. The pollution spike was also visible on Google Maps, which introduced an air quality overlay earlier this year based on data from government monitoring stations. New maps may be helping some groups like My Air Quality Australia keep tabs on pollution, but there's little sign they're changing attitudes more widely. Surveys show Australians are fairly relaxed about wood smoke, despite having one of the highest asthma rates in the world. Health bodies such as Asthma Australia and the Australian Medical Assocation want state and territory governments to ban new wood heater installs and phase out out the existing ones in residential areas. But governments appear reluctant to impose such a ban. On Facebook pages like My Air Quality Australia, there's a mounting sense of outrage. Even as Australia leads the world in rooftop solar uptake, many rooftops continue to host a much less advanced technology: the smoky chimney. After the July 6 pollution spike, one user observed that about 10 per cent of the 5 million people who live in Melbourne suffer from asthma, which is aggravated by wood smoke. "That's 500,000 people and it still feels like no-one cares. How is that even possible?"


The Advertiser
2 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Bulk bill incentive could miss thousands of GP clinics
A plan to boost the number of fully bulk-billing general practice clinics is likely to fall dramatically short of forecasts, a healthcare directory operator warns. Labor's $7.9 billion plan to expand the Bulk Billing Incentive Program to include non-concession patients projected the number of fully bulk-billing GP clinics to rise to 4800. But healthcare directory operator Cleanbill estimates the number of entirely bulk-billing clinics will rise by just 740 to 2081 because incentive payments will not cover consultation costs for certain clinics. Federal Health Minister Mark Butler slammed the report as inaccurate and fundamentally flawed. "This is a headline-grabbing phone poll conducted by a private company whose own website says their data is not 'reliable, accurate, complete or suitable'," Mr Butler said in a statement. "For the first time, Labor will expand bulk-billing incentives to all Australians and create an additional new incentive payment for practices that bulk bill every patient." From November 1, clinics that bulk bill every patient will receive a 12.5 per cent payment for each consultation, along with a conditional, variable payment depending on the clinic's remoteness. The report found it would only make sense for clinics to accept the Bulk Billing Incentive if their out-of-pocket costs were lower than the national average, or if they were more remote and attracted a higher incentive contribution. "The vast majority (72 per cent) of GP clinics are located in metro areas, where the New Total Medicare Payment is still $16 below the current average total cost of a non-bulk-billed standard consultation," the Cleanbill report said. It estimated the economic effect of the Bulk Billing Incentive expansion would need to be between 20 per cent and 30 per cent greater than the actual amount of the incentive payment for 4800 clinics to become fully bulk-billing as a result of the change. Patients whose clinics did not switch to fully bulk billing would face higher out-of-pocket costs in future, Cleanbill said. The federal health department said the report was based on a false assumption that if a GP did not bulk bill every patient, they bulk billed none. A plan to boost the number of fully bulk-billing general practice clinics is likely to fall dramatically short of forecasts, a healthcare directory operator warns. Labor's $7.9 billion plan to expand the Bulk Billing Incentive Program to include non-concession patients projected the number of fully bulk-billing GP clinics to rise to 4800. But healthcare directory operator Cleanbill estimates the number of entirely bulk-billing clinics will rise by just 740 to 2081 because incentive payments will not cover consultation costs for certain clinics. Federal Health Minister Mark Butler slammed the report as inaccurate and fundamentally flawed. "This is a headline-grabbing phone poll conducted by a private company whose own website says their data is not 'reliable, accurate, complete or suitable'," Mr Butler said in a statement. "For the first time, Labor will expand bulk-billing incentives to all Australians and create an additional new incentive payment for practices that bulk bill every patient." From November 1, clinics that bulk bill every patient will receive a 12.5 per cent payment for each consultation, along with a conditional, variable payment depending on the clinic's remoteness. The report found it would only make sense for clinics to accept the Bulk Billing Incentive if their out-of-pocket costs were lower than the national average, or if they were more remote and attracted a higher incentive contribution. "The vast majority (72 per cent) of GP clinics are located in metro areas, where the New Total Medicare Payment is still $16 below the current average total cost of a non-bulk-billed standard consultation," the Cleanbill report said. It estimated the economic effect of the Bulk Billing Incentive expansion would need to be between 20 per cent and 30 per cent greater than the actual amount of the incentive payment for 4800 clinics to become fully bulk-billing as a result of the change. Patients whose clinics did not switch to fully bulk billing would face higher out-of-pocket costs in future, Cleanbill said. The federal health department said the report was based on a false assumption that if a GP did not bulk bill every patient, they bulk billed none. A plan to boost the number of fully bulk-billing general practice clinics is likely to fall dramatically short of forecasts, a healthcare directory operator warns. Labor's $7.9 billion plan to expand the Bulk Billing Incentive Program to include non-concession patients projected the number of fully bulk-billing GP clinics to rise to 4800. But healthcare directory operator Cleanbill estimates the number of entirely bulk-billing clinics will rise by just 740 to 2081 because incentive payments will not cover consultation costs for certain clinics. Federal Health Minister Mark Butler slammed the report as inaccurate and fundamentally flawed. "This is a headline-grabbing phone poll conducted by a private company whose own website says their data is not 'reliable, accurate, complete or suitable'," Mr Butler said in a statement. "For the first time, Labor will expand bulk-billing incentives to all Australians and create an additional new incentive payment for practices that bulk bill every patient." From November 1, clinics that bulk bill every patient will receive a 12.5 per cent payment for each consultation, along with a conditional, variable payment depending on the clinic's remoteness. The report found it would only make sense for clinics to accept the Bulk Billing Incentive if their out-of-pocket costs were lower than the national average, or if they were more remote and attracted a higher incentive contribution. "The vast majority (72 per cent) of GP clinics are located in metro areas, where the New Total Medicare Payment is still $16 below the current average total cost of a non-bulk-billed standard consultation," the Cleanbill report said. It estimated the economic effect of the Bulk Billing Incentive expansion would need to be between 20 per cent and 30 per cent greater than the actual amount of the incentive payment for 4800 clinics to become fully bulk-billing as a result of the change. Patients whose clinics did not switch to fully bulk billing would face higher out-of-pocket costs in future, Cleanbill said. The federal health department said the report was based on a false assumption that if a GP did not bulk bill every patient, they bulk billed none. A plan to boost the number of fully bulk-billing general practice clinics is likely to fall dramatically short of forecasts, a healthcare directory operator warns. Labor's $7.9 billion plan to expand the Bulk Billing Incentive Program to include non-concession patients projected the number of fully bulk-billing GP clinics to rise to 4800. But healthcare directory operator Cleanbill estimates the number of entirely bulk-billing clinics will rise by just 740 to 2081 because incentive payments will not cover consultation costs for certain clinics. Federal Health Minister Mark Butler slammed the report as inaccurate and fundamentally flawed. "This is a headline-grabbing phone poll conducted by a private company whose own website says their data is not 'reliable, accurate, complete or suitable'," Mr Butler said in a statement. "For the first time, Labor will expand bulk-billing incentives to all Australians and create an additional new incentive payment for practices that bulk bill every patient." From November 1, clinics that bulk bill every patient will receive a 12.5 per cent payment for each consultation, along with a conditional, variable payment depending on the clinic's remoteness. The report found it would only make sense for clinics to accept the Bulk Billing Incentive if their out-of-pocket costs were lower than the national average, or if they were more remote and attracted a higher incentive contribution. "The vast majority (72 per cent) of GP clinics are located in metro areas, where the New Total Medicare Payment is still $16 below the current average total cost of a non-bulk-billed standard consultation," the Cleanbill report said. It estimated the economic effect of the Bulk Billing Incentive expansion would need to be between 20 per cent and 30 per cent greater than the actual amount of the incentive payment for 4800 clinics to become fully bulk-billing as a result of the change. Patients whose clinics did not switch to fully bulk billing would face higher out-of-pocket costs in future, Cleanbill said. The federal health department said the report was based on a false assumption that if a GP did not bulk bill every patient, they bulk billed none.