Delhi govt revises mobile purchase limits for CM, Ministers
Under the updated guidelines being implemented by the General Administration Department (GAD), Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta will now be entitled to purchase a mobile phone worth up to ₹1.5 lakh using government funds, while her cabinet ministers can buy handsets costing up to ₹1.25 lakh.
The revision comes as part of a move to update a decade-old circular originally issued in 2013, which had capped the Chief Minister's mobile phone purchase limit at ₹50,000 and that of ministers at ₹45,000. The newly revised policy is set to provide modern communication tools to senior officials and ensure 'functional efficiency.'
Notably, officials such as the Chief Secretary, Additional Chief Secretary, and Principal Secretaries will now be eligible to purchase phones ranging between ₹80,000 and ₹1 lakh, up from the earlier ceiling of ₹30,000 to ₹40,000. Even ministerial secretaries and other senior staff will now be allowed handsets worth up to ₹50,000.
While the government will reimburse the cost of the handset, SIM cards will not be provided. Officials, including the Chief Minister and ministers, are free to use their personal numbers on these phones.
According to the office memorandum issued by Joint Secretary Pradeep Tayal, the updated guidelines also clarify that a mobile phone purchased under this scheme cannot normally be replaced for two years. However, an exception is allowed if repair costs exceed 50% of the device's original cost, in which case, a replacement may be considered.
Apart from the handset cost, monthly mobile bill reimbursements have also been restructured. The Chief Minister will now be eligible for up to ₹7,000 per month for mobile usage, while ministers and the Chief Secretary can claim up to ₹6,000. Principal Secretaries and Secretaries are allowed up to ₹5,000 and ₹2,500 respectively, while Additional Secretaries and Private Secretaries to CM are allowed ₹1,500 and ₹5,000 respectively. These figures mark a notable revision from the earlier structure, where reimbursement limits were lower and categorized less expansively.
The announcement has stirred political controversy. Aam Aadmi Party's Delhi state president Saurabh Bharadwaj took to Instagram to sharply criticize the BJP-led administration. 'Congratulations to the CM and ministers of Delhi BJP. A ₹1.5/1.25 lakh phone plan and unlimited bills, development is surely happening, at least for someone,' he posted sarcastically.
Bharadwaj's comments underscored a range of public frustrations, including severe waterlogging, prolonged traffic jams, cuts in widow pensions, and the unfulfilled promise of a ₹2,500 monthly allowance for women. 'Not a single woman has received the ₹2,500 even months after March 8,' he remarked. 'Committees were formed, promises made, but in the end, it's the phones that got approved.'
While officials defend the mobile upgrade policy as a modernization step, critics argue that it sends the wrong message when key public needs remain unaddressed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
13 minutes ago
- First Post
US envoy to Israel breaks protocol, attends Netanyahu's corruption trial in show of support
US Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, broke away from the usual protocol as he attended the corruption trial of Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The move was the latest sign of the US President Donald Trump administration's outright support for the Israeli premier in the long-running case read more Mike Huckabee, the U.S. ambassador to Israel, arrived on Wednesday at the court where Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is on trial for corruption. Reuters US Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, made an unusual appearance at the corruption trial of Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday, breaking away from conventional protocol. The move was seen as the latest sign of the US President Donald Trump administration's outright support for the Israeli premier in the long-running case. The Israeli prosecutors indicted Netanyahu for bribery, fraud and breach of trust. The legal challenges came while Israel waged war in Gaza, Lebanon and Iran, which has been raging since the Hamas-led surprise attack on October 7, 2023. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It is unusual for ambassadors to place themselves directly in a particular nation's legal issue. It is pertinent to note that Huckabee's appearance occurred after US President Donald Trump, who has his share of legal convictions, called for the trial against Netanyahu to be suspended. 'An act of friendship': Huckabee Before he went inside the courthouse, Huckabee told reporters in Tel Aviv that his visit was 'an act of friendship' to signal that 'we want Israel to be successful.' He went on to accuse the judge, who is overseeing the case, of being biased, and he compared the Israeli leader to Trump, who was convicted of falsifying business records to conceal a sex scandal in 2024. 'It's an unprecedented thing that while holding office, during an incredibly tense time, that you would spend a lot of your time — as our president had to do — sitting in a courtroom, often before judges who are totally unfair," The American ambassador told reporters outside the Tel Aviv courthouse, The New York Times reported. Not only this, but Trump's call for the trial to end was also rare, and many saw it as a direct intervention by an American president in judicial proceedings against an allied leader. The Potus went on to label the Israeli trials as a ' Witch Hunt against their Great wartime prime Minister'. 'Bibi Netanyahu's trial should be CANCELLED, IMMEDIATELY, or a Pardon given to a Great Hero, who has done so much for the State,' Trump wrote in a post on his social media platform TruthSocial. After leaving the courthouse, Huckabee also took to social media and said that Trump was 'right … again' about the case. He has also disputed that the president was directly intervening in the trial, contending that Trump was not 'trying to pick a side.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD What is the case about? In 2019, the Israeli prosecutors indicted Netanyahu, accusing him of granting regulatory favours and diplomatic support to prominent businessmen in exchange for gifts and sympathetic media coverage. However, the Israeli premier denied all the charges. The trial eventually began in 2020 and split the country, with many wondering whether Netanyahu should continue serving in office while the court proceedings take place. His opponents labelled him a 'crime minister' whose purported dealings had rendered him unfit for office. Meanwhile, Netanyahu and his defenders have accused the prosecutors of seeking to undo his election victory through legal means. When it comes to the outcomes, if the prime minister is convicted, Isaac Herzog, Israel's president, could pardon him. But legal analysts say the trial is set to continue for months at the very least. Another option would be the discussion of a plea bargain, under which Netanyahu would accept some charges in exchange for a suspended sentence. However, Netanyahu has already refused to accept a charge of 'moral turpitude,' which would bar him from holding public office for several years.
India Today
17 minutes ago
- India Today
Can Congress's Haryana revamp serve as its template for other states?
After years of organisational drift, the Congress in Haryana is attempting a structural reset that could determine whether it remains electorally relevant in the part of its 'Sangathan Srijan Abhiyan' (Organisational Rejuvenation Campaign), the party is set to appoint a new crop of District Congress Committee (DCC) presidents across Haryana—for the first time through a semi-democratic, consultative high command is expected to finalise and announce the new district chiefs by the end of July. According to B.K. Hariprasad, AICC general secretary in charge of Haryana, the party has received feedback from all districts. 'Some districts sent two to three names, others five to six. The observers have done interviews, and deliberations are on,' he eligibility criteria for DCC presidents include at least five years of party work and being in the age group of 35-55. However, caste representation and district-level political suitability will also play a decisive role. Party insiders say the AICC observers—appointed in coordination with the Pradesh Congress Committee (PCC)—conducted extensive interviews with shortlisted candidates, assessing their ideological alignment, ability to counter the BJP-RSS narrative and potential to unify faction-ridden local units. Special emphasis was laid on including women, minorities and grassroots organisers with credibility beyond the party the first week of June, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi made a brief visit to the Haryana Congress headquarters in Chandigarh to convene a meeting of a 17-member committee, comprising senior state leaders and AICC officials. Among them were former chief minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda, Haryana PCC chief Uday Bhan, Lok Sabha MP Kumari Selja, former Union minister Birender Singh, and Rohtak MP Deepender reportedly urged them to rein in factionalism. Subsequently, the AICC appointed 22 observers, including MPs and former ministers, to work alongside the 51 Haryana PCC-appointed observers to assess aspirants across marks the first time in over a decade that the Congress is methodically rebuilding its organisational pyramid in Haryana. Earlier attempts floundered. When Rahul loyalist Ashok Tanwar was the state unit chief, the Hooda camp resisted; when Kumari Selja and later Uday Bhan took charge, factionalism continued to plague the process. The 2024 assembly polls exposed the underbelly of a defunct organisation, with the BJP managing an improbable win—securing 48 seats in the 90-member the overhaul was inevitable. In the past, appointments were largely top-down—decided by the state Congress president in consultation with the Congress Legislature Party (CLP) leader. This time, however, the exercise carries the imprint of Rahul's push for internal reform, catalysed by his visit to Chandigarh after the party's electoral Congress appears to be adopting a hybrid model—partly democratic, partly high command-driven. It resembles the BJP's older practice of appointing district presidents based on ground-level feedback from RSS-aligned workers but retains Congress's penchant for top-down endorsement. Whether this becomes a durable template remains to be the Congress is rolling out similar Sangathan Srijan Abhiyan exercises in Gujarat, Odisha, Himachal Pradesh and other states where the party faces organisational atrophy but harbours electoral ambition. Haryana, with its history of alternating governments and caste-based polarisation, could serve as a pilot model for this new approach to internal the surface of this rejuvenation effort, however, lies an unspoken tension: the Congress high command's unease with Bhupinder Hooda's continuing dominance in Haryana. His loyalists currently account for 32 of the party MLAs and four of its five Lok Sabha MPs. PCC chief Uday Bhan is also from the Hooda camp. Yet, the high command has conspicuously left the CLP leadership post vacant, refusing to officially confirm Hooda as its is growing apprehension in Delhi that Hooda may continue to treat the Haryana unit as a political fiefdom, restricting the rise of new voices and alternative power centres. The central leadership is wary—its unplanned removal of Captain Amarinder Singh as Punjab chief minister in 2021 led to a party collapse and paved the way for the Aam Aadmi Party's aftershocks of that misstep echoed in Rajasthan (where Ashok Gehlot resisted pressure), Chhattisgarh (with Bhupesh Baghel's dominance), and now Karnataka, where balancing Siddaramaiah's influence remains a this context, the Haryana reboot is being viewed as a test case of whether the Congress high command can assert itself without alienating powerful regional satraps. Political observers in the state are watching closely: will the new DCC appointments reflect Hooda's continued influence or signal a shift toward a broader, more inclusive mandate from Delhi? Once the list is made public, it will serve as a litmus test for assessing the strength of the Hooda camp in the restructured the new DCC chiefs are not just symbolic. According to party sources, they will have the power to recommend election candidates—though they themselves must resign from their DCC posts at least 18 months prior if they wish to contest. This makes them pivotal figures in candidate selection and grassroots mobilisation for the Lok Sabha and assembly elections in yet, scepticism persists. 'This looks good on paper, but we don't yet know whether the final list will reflect ground realities or be reduced to political tokenism. If Delhi imposes names without genuine local consultation, it could backfire,' a senior Congress leader from Haryana once-formidable BJP-JJP (Jannayak Janta Party) combine is now history. The BJP contested and won the 2024 Lok Sabha and assembly elections on its own. In a bid to revive their fortunes, the Dushayant Chautala-led JJP and uncle Abhay Chautala-led Indian National Lok Dal (INLD) are looking at how Congress deals with an ageing Hooda, 77. The Chautala family competes with Hooda for the dominance of Jat voters. This bloc could easily shift towards them if the Congress doesn't plan the transition is perceived that the BJP's Nayab Saini government takes cues from Saini's political guru and predecessor Manohar Lal Khattar and that decision-making is dominated by a group of bureaucrats. Thus the Congress senses an unless the new DCC chiefs can overcome the legacy of internal sabotage, caste tokenism and organisational apathy, they may end up as placeholders rather than powerbrokers. For the Congress to mount a credible challenge in 2029, these appointments must go beyond symbolism. The Congress's future in Haryana may hinge on whether this quiet overhaul results in genuine grassroots mobilisation or fizzles out as yet another aborted experiment in to India Today Magazine- Ends advertisement
India Today
17 minutes ago
- India Today
Rahul vs Himanta: I will send you to jail; you are out on bail
Few rivalries in Indian politics have flipped so dramatically, or so publicly, as the one between Rahul Gandhi and Himanta Biswa Sarma. A decade ago, Rahul, then Congress vice-president and heir to the Nehru-Gandhi legacy, hardly acknowledged Sarma despite his status as the party's most influential leader in nearly every visit to Assam over the past few years, Rahul, now leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, has taken a pointed aim at Sarma, the state's chief minister and a rising national figure in the BJP. On July 16, at a rally at Chaygaon, Assam, Rahul hardly bothered to conceal that his campaign in Assam revolves around unseating one chief minister thinks of himself as the king of Assam,' he thundered, accusing Sarma of looting public resources and selling Assam's land to corporate cronies. Rahul then issued a dramatic promise to the crowd: 'One day the lions of Congress will catch him Your CM will be in jail after some time, and neither [Narendra] Modi nor Amit Shah will be able to save him.'Sarma, never the one to let a punch go unanswered, hit back on X: 'Rahul Gandhi has come all the way just to issue a threat, conveniently forgetting that he himself was out on bail in multiple criminal cases.' Then came the backhand compliment: 'He mentioned my name repeatedly in all his meetings. I must thank him. He has elevated my stature far beyond what I could've achieved by staying in the Congress.' It was a classic Sarma flourish—turning Rahul's attacks into validation of his own clout.A decade ago, Sarma was a sidelined Congress leader, denied chief ministership despite commanding the support of 54 of 78 Congress MLAs in Assam. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, an observer then, recorded the numbers and Sonia Gandhi, according to multiple accounts, conceded that 'Sarma had a clear majority and should be the new CM'.But Rahul intervened saying that there would be no change in leadership. When it was pointed out that Sarma might exit the party, Rahul said, 'Let him go'. In an ironical twist, the same Kharge, now Congress president, stands beside Rahul on the same stage, urging Sarma to start 'renovating prisons' for his future 2015, Sarma joined the BJP. He did not just switch parties, he systematically dismantled the Congress edifice he had helped build over two decades. His intimate knowledge of the party's workings, combined with his extensive network across the Northeast, made him the BJP's most potent weapon in a region where the saffron party had historically recent exchanges between Rahul and Sarma represent far more than routine political mudslinging. It marks the culmination of a personal conflict that has fundamentally altered the political geography of the Northeast, a transformation that began with a plate of biscuits and a dog named one now-famous anecdote recounted by Sarma, Rahul once summoned Assam's Congress leaders to discuss urgent state matters, only to spend the meeting playing with his pet dog, Pidi, and feeding it biscuits while the politicians waited to be heard. Sarma often recalls that encounter in public, describing Rahul's attitude as a 'servant-master relationship' wherein courtiers are expected to quietly endure royal revelation about another meeting where Rahul responded to every issue with 'So What?' more than 50 times in 20 minutes paints a picture of a relationship defined by contempt on one side and growing resentment on the personal animus between Rahul and his one-time junior has only grown with time, and often in public view. Once freed from the Congress's decorous restraint, Sarma turned into one of Rahul's most unrelenting critics, frequently launching barbed attacks on the Gandhi scion. When Rahul posted about his dog on social media in 2017, Sarma couldn't resist responding: 'Sir @OfficeOfRG, who knows him better than me. Still remember you busy feeding biscuits 2 him while we wanted to discuss urgent Assam's issues.'Over time, Sarma's taunts grew more personal, less restrained and even crude. He has mocked Rahul's credentials, intelligence and even his lineage. In early 2022, at a rally in Uttarakhand, responding to Rahul's insistence on proof for the Indian Army's surgical strike inside Pakistan in 2016, Sarma sneered, 'Did we ever ask you for proof of whether you are Rajiv Gandhi's son or not? What right do you have to demand proof from my Army?'advertisementFor years after Sarma's departure, Rahul chose not to engage publicly with his former lieutenant, avoiding any descent into political mudslinging. He often dismissed Sarma as a turncoat driven by power, someone who had betrayed his party for office. Rahul has even suggested he was 'perfectly okay' with people like Sarma leaving the Congress, arguing that 'Sarma represents a corrupt of politics that is not Congress' politics'. Citing Sarma's penchant for communally charged statements, Rahul implied that losing such individuals was addition by subtraction for the Congress's Sarma framed his departure in ideological terms. He portrays Rahul as the epitome of all that was wrong with the Congress: entitlement, indifference and incompetence. His reminiscences of Rahul's dog and the biscuit and jibes about a 'master-servant' culture are meant to underscore that the Congress under Rahul was a feudal family firm where merit had no continually poking at Rahul, Sarma keeps alive the narrative that he is everything Rahul is not: grounded, hardworking, aggressive in pursuing his state's interests and unafraid to take the fight to much bigger supporters cheer Sarma's caustic put-downs of Rahul, the dynasty's prince, for it reinforces their belief that the once unchallenged Gandhis can be humbled by a self-made regional leader. Sarma's very presence in the BJP is a talking point to woo other Congress leaders: it says, join us and you too can eclipse the simmering feud has lately entered a new phase, one that sees Rahul and Sarma face off almost as equals. Rahul may be a national figure and scion of India's most famous political family while Sarma is 'only' a chief minister of a far-flung state. But in their mutual crosshairs, they appear to recognise in each other a prime political antagonist. The indifferent boss and the disgruntled underling have transformed into combative rivals each determined to best the January 2024, during the Assam leg of his Bharat Jodo Nyay Yatra, Rahul called Sarma 'the most corrupt chief minister in India' and alleged that 'every member of his family, children, wife, and he himself, is involved in corruption'. Sarma hit back, calling the remark 'below the belt' and denouncing the dragnet attack on his children—both students with no political role—as deeply inappropriate. With characteristic bite, he added: 'Rahul Gandhi once feared me. Now he fears my son.'advertisementAnd now, the July 16 confrontation represents a remarkable evolution in this relationship. No longer is this a story of an indifferent boss and disgruntled subordinate. Rahul positions the campaign against Sarma as something of a moral crusade, to save Assam from a 'raja' (king) who has betrayed the public trust and will eventually face justice at the hands of the people. This shows that the Congress leader has finally recognised his former party junior as a formidable opponent worthy of sustained a barely noticed snub in a drawing room to thunderous threats from rally stages, the journey of this rivalry is a story of pride and power, of a relationship soured and then set ablaze. And as the barbs about 'jail' and 'bail' fly, one thing is certain: neither man is likely to back to India Today Magazine- EndsMust Watch
