Local officials warn of possible lawsuit in wake of Alaska governor's education funding veto
Then-Rep. Grier Hopkins, D-Fairbanks, speaks on the floor of the Alaska House, Wednesday, May 18, 2022. Hopkins is now the mayor of the Fairbanks North Star Borough. (Photo by James Brooks/Alaska Beacon)
One day after Gov. Mike Dunleavy made a precedent-setting veto by cutting funding for the state's public school education formula, a group of city and borough leaders denounced the decision during a joint news conference, with some saying that they expect a lawsuit to challenge it.
'Everybody needs to start talking about what a lawsuit looks like,' said Rozlyn Grady-Wyche, a member of the Mountain View Community Council in Anchorage.
Caroline Storm, of the Coalition for Education Equity, has been talking about a lawsuit for more than a year. On Friday, she said the coalition 'will file or be a partner in a lawsuit before next session, because it doesn't seem that between the Legislature and the governor, that they are capable of meeting their constitutional obligation to adequately fund public education.'
State lawmakers this year voted for a bill that increases the base student allocation, core of the state's per-student funding formula, by $700 per student, overriding a Dunleavy veto in the process.
But that formula is subject to the state's annual budget process, in separate legislation. If the formula is a bucket, the budget decides how full that bucket is.
Until now, lawmakers and the governor have filled that bucket to capacity each year. This year, one of Dunleavy's vetoes took $200 per student from that bucket, cutting about $50.6 million statewide.
For municipal officials, it's a significant problem because the ordinary local budget process is over, meaning that they will have to reopen their budgets and make additional cuts to public education.
In some cases, those cuts will come atop school closures — including in Fairbanks, Anchorage, Kodiak and the Kenai Peninsula Borough — and other cuts that were already planned.
'It's a crisis for our state, and that's why we're all here today,' said Fairbanks North Star Borough Mayor Grier Hopkins during the joint news conference.
On Thursday night, the Anchorage School Board voted to implement an immediate hiring freeze while it addresses the veto.
The board had budgeted for a $560 BSA increase, thinking it was being cautious. Now that there's a $500 increase instead, ASD facing a $4.3 million budget gap.
'I cannot even imagine where $4.3 million is going to come from,' said Margo Bellamy, vice president of the ASD board.
Kenai Peninsula Borough Mayor Peter Micciche, R-Soldotna, said the veto has a 'fairly significant impact' in his borough, where voters may be asked to pick up the slack.
'This is essentially a tax shift. It's the state not meeting a constitutional expectation requirement, if you will,' he said.
Penny Vadla, treasurer of the Kenai Peninsula Borough school board, said the impacts in her area will be largest in sparsely populated places.
'We're closing theaters, we're losing library aides in some places where that means that library in a small school will close down,' she said. 'The impact on larger schools is that they might become larger without the capacity to put more students in that building.'
State legislators could override Dunleavy's cuts, but Speaker of the House Bryce Edgmon, I-Dillingham, and Senate President Gary Stevens, R-Kodiak, said they don't expect that lawmakers will be available until the 2026 Alaska Legislature begins in January.
'I'll certainly be getting on my phone and hitting the streets to urge our legislators here, in the borough, the Interior delegation, to override the veto,' Hopkins said.
Micciche was critical of legislators' slow pace.
Before becoming mayor, Micciche served as Senate president. Lawmakers, and particularly the presiding officers of the House and Senate, should have already scheduled a special session to consider a veto override, he said.
'You knew that there was going to be a second swipe by the governor,' Micciche said.
If the Legislature stays on the sidelines, that would leave legal action as the only recourse for Alaskans seeking a quick reversal of the governor's action.
Any legal argument is expected to revolve around the question of whether or not the governor's veto violates the Alaska Constitution's education clause.
'The Alaska Constitution clearly states that the legislators shall, by general law, establish and maintain a system of public schools open to all children of the state, so that language creates a constitutional obligation to provide adequate and equitable public education,' said Grady-Wyche.
'If the state fails to meet this obligation by consistently underfunding schools, closing essential programs and/or making access inequitable across regions, it can be legally challenged in court,' she said.
Storm, of the Coalition for Education Equity, has been watching the governor and Legislature closely for years and talking with other education groups in the meantime. The coalition is a nonprofit that has successfully sued to increase state school funding in the past.
Storm said she sees a national pattern at work, with conservative and limited-government groups and officials attempting to favor charter schools over traditional public schools.
'This is a coordinated attack on public education as a whole, as part of a national trend, or as Project 2025 — one hundred percent — and parents need to really start thinking about what's going to happen when public education goes away, and what that means for their kid, because it's not going to be pretty,' she said.
Storm wasn't in the news conference with municipal officials, who focused on the local consequences of funding — or not — public education.
Micciche, who said he's 'not a courtroom guy,' cautioned that any lawsuit comes with risks: What happens if the plaintiffs lose?
'You can get a ruling; it doesn't necessarily mean that you're going to get an outcome,' he said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
Hochul, Stefanik squabble over Trump megabill: ‘Welcome to the fight'
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) on Friday slammed Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) for 'endangering her own constituents' lives, health, and jobs' by supporting President Trump's megabill. The social media squabble comes just a day after The Hill reported that Stefanik is preparing to officially launch her campaign for governor. Hochul claimed the GOP 'One, Big Beautiful Bill Act' would put five hospitals in Stefanik's district on the chopping block , citing an analysis from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill's Sheps Center for Health Services Research. The GOP lawmaker hit back in a lengthy post on the social media platform X, labeling Hochul the 'worst governor in America' with the 'worst run Medicaid program.' 'Hi @KathyHochul ! Welcome to the fight,' Stefanik wrote. 'You didn't get exposed enough during our last round when you testified and were totally exposed for your dangerous and failed sanctuary state policies ??' she added, referring to the two's standoff earlier this month during a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing. Stefanik dug into the governor for allegedly harboring illegal immigrants who commit crimes in the state. 'Kathy gives Medicaid to ILLEGALS putting New Yorkers most vulnerable LAST. NY's Medicaid program is rampant with tens of billions of waste, fraud, and abuse under Kathy's watch,' Stefanik wrote in her Friday post. 'Oh and Kathy, your numbers in rural NY are plummeting (just like they are everywhere else). I have been nationally recognized as the TOP advocate to deliver results for rural hospitals due to my work for hospitals in my district,' she continued. Stefanik, has yet to officially announce her challenge on Hochul's seat in 2026, but sources familiar with the New York Republican's plans say her announcement is forthcoming. 'It's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when,' one source previously told The Hill, adding that Stefanik will announce 'at the time and place' of her choosing.


The Hill
10 hours ago
- The Hill
Republicans race toward crucial vote on Trump megabill despite uncertainties
Senate Republicans are racing into a crucial weekend in their effort to pass President Trump's mammoth tax and spending bill despite not knowing whether they have the votes to advance it or what some aspects of the final package will look like. GOP leaders are eyeing an initial procedural vote Saturday afternoon to kick off floor consideration of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' If it clears a simple majority threshold, the chamber would debate the bill before moving to a 'vote-a-rama,' during which unlimited amendments can be brought to the floor, before a final vote. Senate Republican leaders took a big step forward when they unveiled most of the final version of bill text shortly before midnight on Friday, reflecting changes required by the Senate parliamentarian and negotiations among various groups. But whether they'll be able to clear that simple majority is a major question, leaving leadership hustling to court the holdouts. 'We will find out tomorrow,' Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said with a laugh on Friday when asked if he has the votes. Republicans can lose no more than three members, and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has long said he is opposed to the bill as long as the $5 trillion debt ceiling hike is included. Beyond that, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) loudly proclaimed on Friday that he is a 'no' on proceeding to the bill over the Senate's planned rollback of an existing federal cap on provider taxes, a deeper cut to Medicaid than the freeze in the House-passed measure that Tillis prefers. Without changes, he insisted he would vote against it, saying it would be 'devastating' to the Tar Heel State as it could lose more than $30 billion as a result. Tillis is up for reelection next year and has warned about the political consequences of keeping that portion of the bill as is. 'I'm looking at this through a policy and political lens. I think this would be extraordinarily difficult politically for my Republican leadership in the legislature to manage,' he said leaving the Capitol on Friday. 'That's what's driving my 'no' vote.' Leadership is still working him hard, though. Tillis was engaged in multiple conversations with GOP leaders on the floor during a vote on Friday. Hours later, GOP leaders inserted a delay in implementing the provider tax from fiscal 2027 until fiscal 2028 with an eye toward winning over the North Carolina Republican and others concerned about Medicaid cuts. Not all Republicans are convinced Tillis will follow through, with many remembering his last minute flip to support Pete Hegseth's nomination to lead the Pentagon earlier this year. 'He sure sounds like he says he would [vote 'no'],' one Senate GOP member said. 'There's a little bit of a pattern here.' But Tillis's vote isn't Thune's only problem. There's a trio of conservative members — Sens. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), Rick Scott (R-Fla.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah) — who have bemoaned the lack of spending cuts in the massive package. The three have indicated they may vote as a bloc. Johnson told reporters on Friday night that he was still a holdout pending text, which arrived hours later. A pair of key moderates, Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Susan Collins (R-Maine), had also indicated they are in a similar spot absent text. Murkowski on Friday also indicated she wasn't happy with the provisions regarding the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Asked briefly about the party's SNAP proposals on Friday, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) told The Hill, 'We're still in trouble on SNAP.' 'The implementation is still next to impossible for us,' she said. Leadership has made a concerted effort to court Murkowski in the final hours, though, as they plan to add additional grants tied to SNAP to the final language, with the aim of helping Alaska specifically. 'We've made some adjustments based on input we've gotten from them in the last few days,' Thune told Politico about SNAP language alterations, referring to Murkowski and Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska). Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) also remains a wild card over concerns about Medicaid provisions and their impact on rural hospitals, concerns Murkowski and Collins have also raised. GOP Leaders included a fund in the final version to bolster them of at least $25 billion in an effort to win over some of the moderates, though Hawley, Collins and others were hoping that number would be higher. 'More money for the rural [hospital] fund is good. But I don't know yet,' Hawley said, rattling off the questions he is still unsure of. 'How much money [for the fund]? What's the delay [for the provider tax]? What are the final provisions?' Already the timing for the vote is beginning to slip. Thune on Friday afternoon told lawmakers to expect a noon vote, though he warned the timeline was 'aspirational.' Republicans are now expected to meet over lunch on Saturday before the chamber reconvenes at 2 p.m. EDT, with the hope of wrapping up the 'Byrd Bath' with the parliamentarian beforehand. Meetings with the parliamentarian were ongoing on Friday night to nail down clearance on key items, including on Medicaid. But lawmakers did see progress on some key items Friday, including on the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap that has proven to be an arduous battle between the Senate GOP and House members from high-tax states. According to multiple Senate GOP members, the $40,000 deduction cap House members agreed to with Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) is set to stick, though it will only last for five years. The cap would then drop to $10,000 for the following five years. 'I think we're very, very close,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told reporters after the Senate GOP's luncheon. Bessent and Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.), the upper chamber's informal liaison to the House, has huddled and talked with key SALT members multiple times this week in search of a deal. Even after the Senate begins consideration of the bill, timing could be fluid. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has threatened to drag out proceedings by having the entire bill, which runs more than 1,000 pages, be read aloud on the floor by the Senate clerk. Johnson pulled a similar move in 2021 by having the clerk read the entire American Rescue Plan, an endeavor that lasted six hours. Mullin predicted that could take more than twice as much time — potentially delaying what will be a high-stakes weekend for Trump and leadership. Democrats are also expected to propose dozens of amendments designed to force Republicans into tough votes. 'It's clear we're not [going to have] unanimity on some of this. That's why God made votes. That's why God made amendments,' said Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.). 'I think everybody recognizes that it's time for us to vote.' Alexander Bolton contributed.


The Hill
18 hours ago
- The Hill
Senate Republicans' new SNAP proposal prompts GOP concern
A GOP-backed proposal that would shift some of the cost of food assistance to states for the first time is drawing renewed concern in the party, as critics argue the effort could lead to states cutting benefits on their own. Republicans are pushing to pass the proposal — which could see states with higher payment error rates covering a greater share of benefit costs — as a part of the broader spending cuts and tax package in the coming days. But that doesn't mean some Republicans aren't concerned about the measure. 'Our big thing is the data to be used, the data to be used on the error rate,' Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska.) told The Hill on Friday. 'So, that's important to make sure that the data is as accurate and reflective of the year you're judging as possible.' Numbers from the U.S. Department of Agriculture showed Alaska's payment error rate — which factors in overpayment and underpayment error rates — hit above 60 percent in fiscal year 2023. The national average hit at 11.68 percent. Sullivan noted the state has seen much lower payment error rates prior to the pandemic and is on a path to improving those figures, noting new numbers are expected soon. But he added, 'It's still higher than our traditional error rate, and as you know, the cost share is based in part on that.' According to the Alaska Beacon, the state's error rate hiked after state officials said they violated federal rules in order to continue feeding people amid a significant backlog in applications. Under the initial plan crafted by the Senate Agriculture Committee, Republicans sought to require states to cover some of the cost of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits if they have a payment error rate above 6 percent beginning in fiscal 2028. The proposal in the megabill would also allow states with rates below that level to continue paying zero percent. It also proposes states with higher payment error rates cover a greater share of benefit costs. If the error rate is 6 percent or higher, states would be subject to a sliding scale that could see their share of allotments rise to a range of between 5 percent and 15 percent. However, Senate Republicans tweaked the plan after facing a setback when their 'state cost-share' proposal was rejected by the chamber's rules referee as part of a megabill the party hopes to pass in the coming days. A release from the agriculture committee said the updated plan would allow states to choose the payment error either fiscal year 2025 or 2026 to 'calculate their state match requirement that begins in Fiscal Year 2028.' For the following fiscal year, the 'state match will be calculated using the payment error rate from three fiscal years prior,' the committee said, adding a 'state must contribute a set percentage of the cost of its SNAP benefits if its payment error rate exceeds six percent.' Asked about further potential changes to the plan, Agriculture chairman Sen. John Boozman (R-Ark.) said Friday that negotiators 'worked really hard to try and get a situation that worked for as many people as we could, and I think we've achieved that.' 'Alaska is a unique state, unique situation, so I know that everybody's trying to work hard to accommodate situations that don't fit,' Boozman said Friday afternoon. 'So, I haven't heard of any changes, and I'm sure that, you know, [Senate Majority Leader John] Thune [(R-S.D.)] will grab me if that comes about.' Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Ala.) also expressed concerns about the proposal, telling reporters earlier on Friday that she's raised them with others in the party, according to Politico. Asked briefly about the party's SNAP proposal later, Murkowski told The Hill, 'We're still in trouble on SNAP.' 'The implementation is still next to impossible for us,' she said. Republicans say the states' cost-share proposal would incentivize states to improve their error rates. But Sullivan and Murkowski aren't the only Republicans who have voiced concerns about the effort in recent weeks. Originally, the House plan called for all states to cover 5 percent of the cost of allotments in its initial version of Trump's megabill, with states that had higher payment error rates having to pay anywhere between 15 percent and 25 percent. However, the proposal was dialed back after concerns from other Republicans, including Sens. Tommy Tuberville (Ala.) and Jim Justice (W. Va.) over the measure. Asked if he's meeting with Boozman or Thune on the matter, Sullivan also told The Hill on Friday evening that he's 'meeting with everybody.' 'For me, it's just important to get the data as close to the date that you're judging,' Sullivan said, adding that he expects Alaska to see a notable drop in its error rate in a coming report.