Thune keeps options open on recess
The Louisiana Republican tried to quell dissent in a closed-door House GOP meeting Tuesday. He told members to stay united, arguing it would take time for the administration to release files that would also protect the names of Epstein's victims.
But Republicans are getting impatient. In an Oversight subcommittee hearing Tuesday, lawmakers voted to compel the full committee to subpoena Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell. Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) later told reporters he had warned GOP leadership last week that if the Epstein files came up in his committee, most of his members would vote on the side of transparency.
'Everyone knew that,' Comer said, adding that his team will visit Maxwell in prison for the interview once they negotiate details with her attorneys.
The saga has given Democrats just the platform they needed to land a successful blow on the White House. In her latest column, Rachael Bade outlines just how much the party has found its mojo in effectively hijacking the House and sticking it to Trump.
Democratic efforts to further drive the MAGA wedge has legs beyond this week. The bipartisan bill led by Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), which would compel the release of more files, could hit the floor as soon as lawmakers return in September.
That means Republican leaders are bracing for Democrats to keep the Epstein issue hot during August recess. And some of their own members who are itching for an outlet acknowledge that five weeks off may not stop Johnson's headache.
'The Epstein issue has contributed to their desire to just get us out of town because they hope that the energy will dissipate,' Massie told reporters Tuesday. 'I doubt that's the case.'
What else we're watching:
— Dems' appropriations strategy: As the Senate continues working through appropriations bills, Democrats met Tuesday to discuss their demands ahead of a government shutdown deadline in September. The Democratic leaders emerged Tuesday with no specific ultimatums for Republicans but called for them to negotiate in good faith.
— Senate's version of the CLARITY Act: Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott (R-S.C.) and Sens. Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, Bill Hagerty of Tennessee and Bernie Moreno of Ohio released draft legislation Tuesday for a digital asset market structure overhaul. It's the Senate's version of the House's CLARITY Act, which passed the House on July 17 with support from 78 Democrats and would divvy up regulation of digital assets under the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
— More funding clawbacks: Republican leaders are in talks with the White House about a second rescissions package, after pushing through the first rescissions package last week. The package would include Education Department funding, which was first reported by the Daily Signal. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise did not disclose the specifics of upcoming rescissions but told POLITICO talks were well underway.
Meredith Lee Hill, Hailey Fuchs, Jasper Goodman, Juan Perez Jr. and Eli Stokols contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
2 minutes ago
- New York Post
Jasmine Crockett tried ‘shutting down' Atlantic reporter for asking lawmakers about her for a friendly profile
Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) lashed out at an Atlantic magazine reporter last week after the journalist reached out to other House lawmakers as part of a profile on the far-left congresswoman. '[F]our days before this story was published, Crockett called me to express frustration that I had reached out to so many House members without telling her first,' Atlantic writer Elaine Godfrey noted in her story, which was published by the magazine on Sunday. 'She was, she told me, 'shutting down the profile and revoking all permissions,'' Godfrey continued. Crockett has been an outspoken critic of President Trump and Republicans. Getty Images for ESSENCE It's unclear how Crockett intended to shut down the profile or why she fumed over the reporter contacting other lawmakers, which is standard journalistic practice. Crockett's office did not respond to The Post's request for comment. The profile included quotes from several House Democrats praising Crockett. 'I don't want people to lose sight of the fact that this is someone with a very fine, legally trained mind,' Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) said of the Texas Democrat, who graduated from the University of Houston law school and is a former public defender. 'People don't necessarily agree with her aggressive communication style,' Rep. Julie Johnson (D-Texas) said. 'I'm thrilled she's doing it, because we need it all.' Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) told the outlet that Crockett is 'one of the strongest fighters we have,' and that Democrats 'should be taking notes on the kinds of skills she exemplifies.' The profile included several glowing quotes about Crockett from Democratic lawmakers, though several refused to comment, according to the reporter. Getty Images However, Godfrey noted that several other Democrats refused to discuss Crockett on the record. Senior Democratic staffers explained that some of Crockett's colleagues find her 'undisciplined' but are 'reluctant to criticize her publicly.' 'She likes to talk,' one of the staffers told Godfrey. 'Is she a loose cannon? Sometimes. Does that cause headaches for other members? 100 percent.' During her time with Crockett, Godfrey observed that the congresswoman 'speaks casually' and 'can also be brusque.' Crockett also 'monitors social-media engagement like a day trader' and is 'highly conscious' about her 'self-presentation,' the reporter found. 'During many of our conversations, Crockett wore acrylic nails painted with the word RESIST, and a set of heavy lashes over her brown eyes,' Godfrey wrote, noting that 'the lock screen on her phone is a headshot of herself.'
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrats blast Lutnick for reversal on China, semiconductors
A group of congressional Democrats blasted the Trump administration's decision to allow advanced computer chips made by Nvidia to be sold in China, in a set of letters sent to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. In a letter to Lutnick on Sunday, Reps. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.) and Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.) said the administration was using export controls on semiconductors and advanced computer parts as a 'bargaining chip,' a move they contended 'risks eroding the credibility of our export controls regime, blurs the line between economic and security priorities, and sends a dangerous signal that critical guardrails are up for negotiation.' The White House announced in May that it would restrict sales to China of Nvidia's H20 chip, widely used on artificial intelligence (AI) models. But in mid-July, it changed course, with Lutnick telling CNBC the reversal was linked to a trade deal involving rare earth magnets. Administration officials including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent are in Stockholm this week for trade talks with China aimed at extending a shaky truce on tariffs between the two countries. Lutnick was not in Stockholm for the first day of the talks Monday, Bloomberg reported. The letter from Krishnamoorthi and Meeks was followed by another message from a group of five Democratic senators to Lutnick on Monday, calling the administration's position on semiconductors 'extremely troubling.' China's 'development of advanced Al capabilities represents a clear risk to the United States' national and economic security,' Democratic Sens. Mark Warner (Va.), Jack Reed (R.I.), Elizabeth Warren (Mass.), Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) and Chris Coons (Del.) wrote. 'We urge you to swiftly reverse course on these ill-advised actions and protect American advantages across the compute stack.' The tussle over computing chips comes after the White House unveiled an artificial intelligence action plan last week aimed at scaling up American investments and innovation in the industry, with an eye on competing with China. Lutnick also faced questions from Republican lawmakers last week over AI chip exports after the White House rescinded a Biden-era control on chip sales worldwide. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Meet Haywood County's new election board
Jul. 27—In the aftermath of a massive overhaul to election laws in North Carolina, little has changed in Haywood County — for now. On paper, the five member Haywood election board flipped from majority Democrat to majority Republican. However, in reality, the board that has always put partisan politics aside says they remain committed to doing so. Every county election board across the state was disbanded and reconstituted per the new election law slid into the Hurricane Helene relief bill by GOP lawmakers in control of the N.C. General Assembly. The law was challenged, but upheld by the N.C. Supreme Court. In Haywood, the reconstituted board brought back four of its five former members: two republicans and two democrats. Republicans Elizabeth Norris and Trudy Schmidt and Democrats Howard Sorrells and Danny Davis (former board chairman) returned to their positions on July 22. The four board veterans were joined by Republican Christian Burnette, who replaced Democrat June Ray with the new board configuration. Before the law change, the state elections board would have been majority Democrat under Governor Josh Stein. Under the new law, election board appointments shifted from the governor to the state auditor — recently elected Republican Dave Boliek. Now, there is a 3-2 Republican majority on the state elections board instead. In his new role, Boliek also appoints the chairpersons of each county elections board. For Haywood, that is long-time election board member Elizabeth Norris. Sybil Mann, Haywood County Democratic Party Chairman, said the GOP's changes to the board structure and other election laws are a Republican power grab, pure and simple. "Luckily in Haywood, our election board members have a history of working together," she said. "This law is another example of taking away the power of the governor and giving it to someone not elected for that purpose. That's the power grab." Though party labels play a role in the appointments, Inman said when Haywood officials enter the elections office, they put aside any partisan feelings. "The administration of elections is bipartisan and by consensus in Haywood County," Inman said. "Ever since I've been here, the rule is to leave politics in the car when you walk through the door. We are honorable and do what's right above everything else." Inman said he has worked with both Democratic and Republican board chairpersons, and all have followed the law to the letter. The composition of the election boards isn't the only election change before legislators made left for the holiday break last year. Other changes included: —Reducing the time to complete provisional ballot counting —Rule changes for those in the military and others voting from overseas —Allowing broader freedom for partisan poll watchers —Eliminating a three-day post election day time frame to count absentee votes received by mail Mann believes there will be statewide ramifications to the changes. She thinks the changes could even cause some to question the trustworthiness of the election process in the state. The new Haywood Republican Party Chairman Michael Loomis said he is very enthusiastic about the three Republicans on the county elections board and that he has only heard good things about the two Democrats on the board. "I'm looking forward to working with them all," he said. Loomis said he understands why the Republicans in the General Assembly took action to switch up how elections are operated in North Carolina. "The Republican Party has been concerned about election integrity. We want people who vote to be actual voters," he said. "We won't let people who aren't citizens vote." But Loomis said he has no examples of that happening in North Carolina.
