Shell denies it is in takeover talks with BP after WSJ report
(Reuters) -Shell denied that it was in talks to buy BP after the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that the oil major was in early discussions over a takeover of its British rival.
"No talks are taking place. As we have said many times before, we are sharply focused on capturing the value in Shell through continuing to focus on performance, discipline and simplification," a Shell spokesperson said.
A BP spokesperson declined to comment on the WSJ report.
The latest in a series of rebuttals by Shell follows recent repeated assertions by CEO Wael Sawan that Shell had a very high bar for big acquisitions and buying back shares was a better allocation of money than the possibility of buying BP.
BP has been the subject of takeover talks for several years because of its stock's relative underperformance, but analysis of its disclosures shows that the British energy group may not be as cheap as its market valuation would suggest.
The company was valued at nearly $80 billion on Wednesday with net debt of $27 billion while Shell's market capitalisation stood at more than $208 billion.
BP's American depository shares were up 1.5% at $30.40 by 1725 GMT and Shell was down 0.7% at $69.70.
If Shell were to submit a bid, it would be a rare attempt by an oil major to acquire such a large rival in the face of heightened regulatory scrutiny of such deals.
A deal of this magnitude has not been attempted in the energy industry since Exxon and Chevron held preliminary talks during the COVID-19 pandemic to discuss a combination that would have been the biggest merger of all time.
Potential terms of any deal could not be learned and a tie-up is far from certain, WSJ reported.
CNBC cited unidentified sources saying that BP could be broken up if a deal materialises.
BP's shares have fallen by 23% over the past year, underperforming the blue-chip FTSE 100 Index, which gained 5.3% during the same period. Shell's shares have risen more than 8% while Exxon has lost 4% with Chevron down about 10%.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Meghan Markle Had 'Absolutely No Compromise' on Quality With As Ever
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Meghan Markle's lifestyle brand has been selling out in minutes because she is taking time to increase stock without sacrificing quality, a source told Newsweek. As Ever is already producing products, including jams, flower sprinkles, and tea, at a "significant scale," and the same will apply to her first wine, a Napa Valley rosé, to be launched on July 1. Meghan's first product run sold out in minutes in April, and she recently said on the Aspire with Emma Grede podcast that another instant sell-out would be frustrating to customers ahead of the second run in June. The company's online shop was then inundated with half a million page views in the week it launched the second batch of products, and completely sold out again. Main: Meghan Markle enjoying a weekend day at the beach. Inset: Meghan's first As Ever rosé wine. Main: Meghan Markle enjoying a weekend day at the beach. Inset: Meghan's first As Ever rosé wine. Meghan Markle/Instagram Meghan Markle's As Ever Supply Chain A source told Newsweek that Meghan was determined not to sacrifice quality and taste, which has meant it has taken time to increase supply. "The supply chain is constantly changing as the business is growing, as is very normal for any business that's trying to scale," they said. "The critical thing is maintaining the quality of the product, and sure, you can just go to any bottling plant and anyone who is growing raspberries anywhere in the country and get it done really quickly. "The reason it's taking time is because there's been absolutely no compromise on the quality, and the ingredients, and the flavor. "The rate at which the product seems to sell out regardless of the scale and the numbers its proving very difficult but that's a great problem to have." Claims on social media that Meghan has deliberately limited the quantities to ensure a sell-out run are "just complete nonsense," the source told Newsweek. "We're talking significant scale." Meghan Markle's Tea Supplier Last week, the British press accused Meghan's brand of hiking prices after it was revealed that the company The Republic of Tea supplied her teas. The Republic of Tea sells its own line for less than half the price of Meghan's. A source told Newsweek that As Ever's hibiscus tea was a different blend and also had more expensive packaging. "The hibiscus tea that they sell and the hibiscus tea that she sells, sourced from them, is different. It's a different blend. Her tea is an entirely unique, bespoke blend," they said. "If you look at the way it is packaged up, there are lots of differences. The packaging and the production that As Ever uses is more expensive than the stuff Tea Republic uses." As Ever sells three types of tea for $12 each: Lemon Ginger, Hibiscus, and Peppermint. Each set includes 12 tea bags in a metal tin. The Republic of Tea charges $14.50 for 36 bags of hibiscus tea in a metal tin. Meghan Markle's As Ever Rosé Wine Newsweek has been told the duchess sourced her first wine using grapes from the vineyards of Fairwinds Estate. The Napa Valley rosé is bottled at the Kunde Family Winery in California. Meghan was particularly eager to support Fairwinds because it was one of the vineyards ravaged by wildfires in the region five years ago. "In 2020, there were the massive, massive fires that ripped through Napa Valley," the source told Newsweek. "Fairwinds was one of those vineyards, and they're still feeling the effects today. "It caused over $15 million worth of damage and the duchess and the duke have both contributed significantly to businesses that have been impacted and affected." The wine launches on Tuesday, July 1, and the As Ever team predicts demand will be high again. "This is her first foray, but I'm sure there will be the naysayers and the usual suspects out there who will claim that she's only bottled 50 bottles," the source told Newsweek. "That is definitely not the case." "It's an entirely bespoke, entirely unique, curated blend. She spent months and months and months testing and tasting and letting her friends do testing and tasting and sampling, giving notes back. She's put a lot of love and care into it," they said. Jack Royston is chief royal correspondent for Newsweek, based in London. You can find him on Twitter at @jack_royston and read his stories on Newsweek's The Royals Facebook page. Do you have a question about King Charles III, William and Kate, Meghan and Harry, or their family that you would like our experienced royal correspondents to answer? Email royals@ We'd love to hear from you.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Supreme Court won't review decision barring American Airlines' partnership with JetBlue
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court won't decide whether American Airlines should have been allowed to partner with JetBlue Airways, a venture the airline said benefited travelers in the congested Northeast. The Justice Department and a coalition of states challenged the American-JetBlue agreement in 2021, saying it hurt consumers by reducing competition in key air-travel markets. Lower courts sided against the airlines. The court on June 30 declined American Airlines' appeal. Lawyers for the airline said there is no evidence that letting them work together led to higher fares or reduced service. Lawyers for the states that sued said the alliance ended competition between rival airlines in highly concentrated markets where each had a substantial presence. The Justice Department said the case isn't worth the Supreme Court's time because JetBlue terminated the partnership about two years ago. Contributing: Reuters
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Consider These Small Acts Of Environmental Social Impact
At this time of government budget cuts and policy changes and elevated international tensions, it's an understatement to say this is a fraught and confusing time for progressive to centrist individuals who want to contribute to creating a more just and environmentally-sound society. Living your values through the ways in which you consume is not THE answer, but can make small but important differences especially on the environmental side of the ledger. Back in 2011 the USPS encouraged American's to "Go Green" through small acts of home improvement ... More like adding insulation. With that in mind, I reached out to a number of social impact leaders for their advice on small steps they believe are meaningful. 'Small steps add up and matter,' said Maureen Carlson of Rebuilding Together, a national non-profit organization focused on repairing homes and making modifications to improve safety and accessibility for low-income homeowners. Rebuilding Together CEO Maureen Carlson leads her organization in rehabilitating homes and ... More encourages everyone to make their residences more energy efficient. 'Something as simple as installing weather stripping or LED lightbulbs can make a difference,' Carlson continued. 'This does not mean that systemic change is not necessary, it just means that if we wait for global systemic change to be mandated among different countries and their leadership, we will have wasted the opportunity to create small changes in our communities that together can make a big difference against the global critical need.' Phil Haid, CEO of the social impact agency Public, was one of several people who advised focusing on shopping one's environmental values. A study released earlier this year by Public suggests ways to move people to buy from more ... More sustainable brands. Haid rejected the argument that such consumption-based activity was too small or passive to count. 'If every person made the intentional choice to be a conscious consumer (which currently sits at 38%) the impact would be massive,' he said. 'We could phase out internal combustion cars. Move to plant based dairy. Eliminate toxins from our cleaning supplies. And substantially reduce the 85% of textiles from fast fashion that end up in landfills. Individual conscious choice is systemic change when the public is mobilized at scale.' Buying from brands that invest in nature restoration is powerful, said David Luba, co-founder of tentree, an apparel company that combines clothing sales with a commitment to environmental sustainability by planting trees for every item purchased. To really make an impact, however, consumers should share what they're doing with family and friends, he emphasized. 'Whether it's at a dinner table, workplace, or online, those climate celebrations build awareness and inspire collective action. Systemic change is essential, but it often starts with everyday choices that challenge the status quo.' The dining table is an especially important nexus of values and consumption, said Bill DiMento, Vice President, Corporate Sustainability & Government Affairs, High Liner Foods. Bill DiMento oversees sustainability at High Liner Foods. An smart issue to focus on: reducing household food waste, DiMento said. 'Be planful when purchasing groceries and consider opting for frozen food items, which offer more flexibility and a longer shelf life, when possible,' he stressed. 'Remember, wasted food means wasted water, energy, and money, and nearly 10% of global greenhouse gas emissions come from food that ends up in landfills!' How we go out to get our groceries or otherwise get around is another area of important choice, according to Anisa Kamadoli Costa, chief sustainability officer of Rivian, the electric vehicle manufacturer. 'Driving an EV is one of the most effective and win-win actions we can take as consumers,' said Kamadoli Costa. 'After a home, buying a car is the largest purchase most of us will make, and study after study shows that EVs have lower lifetime emissions than comparable internal combustion engine vehicles.' Whatever you decide to do on this front, let companies know that you are voting with your dollars, advised Deanna Bratter, Chief Sustainability Officer at Crocs. 'Brands, especially the good ones, listen and respond to consumer needs and interests,' Bratter explained. 'The more consumers ask for, and even demand, meaningful action from businesses - from sustainable materials and packaging to reducing carbon - the greater the likelihood those brands will invest in the transformation required to deliver it.'
