logo
Scotland needs migration more than the rest of the UK. Here's why

Scotland needs migration more than the rest of the UK. Here's why

The National19-05-2025
An ageing population, a low birth rate, and successive Westminster Government's who are hostile to immigration, could pose an existential threat to the country's future, particularly in rural areas.
Last week, Prime Minister Keir Starmer prompted outrage by describing the UK as becoming an 'island of strangers' and moving his Government's immigration policy further to the right.
But Scotland has its specific problems, and while powers over migration are reserved to Westminster, it leaves little room to address the issue.
READ MORE: Inside the extreme far-right plot to infiltrate Reform UK
The last Scottish Census revealed that if it hadn't been for migration, Scotland's population would have declined.
Academics told The National that there is demonstrable evidence that Scotland needs migration more than other parts of the UK.
Equalities Minister Kaukab Stewart, whose portfolio includes population and migration, said Scottish needs were 'totally ignored' by the UK Government.
'In about a third of our local authorities, populations are actually declining in real terms,' Dr David McCollum, senior lecturer at St Andrews University, told The National.
'We've got an aging population, lower fertility rates in the UK, we've got a more dispersed population, so Scotland arguably needs migration more than other parts of the UK.
(Image: Dr David McCollum) 'However, as migration remains reserved to Westminster, Scotland has very little control over immigration.'
Rural areas, McCollum (above) adds, are 'top heavy in the sense there's lots of older people in these places'.
There are higher needs for care workers, and to fill roles in hospitality and other seasonal industries such as hospitality, tourism, agriculture, fisheries and others.
'It would probably be a bit simplistic to say migration, potentially would solve this, but certainly in the short term, it would prevent the most severe implications of this demographic decline in Scotland,' he added.
Brexit has also undoubtedly had an impact on migration to Scotland. Dr Anna Gawlewicz, senior lecturer at the University of Glasgow, conducted research looking at rural communities and migration.
"Migration is very important," she said.
'Migrants also contribute, not only to the labour force, but also to the community more broadly.
'One thing that we found in our research was that apart from contributing hugely to all those sectors [care, hospitality, agriculture] migrant workers also contribute significantly to local communities.
READ MORE: Shirley-Anne Somerville defends top tax rate after millionaire cut call
After Brexit, the number of migrants coming from the EU were replaced by those who are from further afield, such as Central Asia and Africa.
'Migrants from those places are viewed as more disenfranchised because they often come on very kind of temporary, restrictive contracts and restrictive visas, on specific governmental programs,' she explained.
'For example, the Seasonal Worker schemes, and because of that, they don't really have opportunities to settle and they don't have the opportunities to contribute to local communities.'
In the last Census, Scotland's population increased by 2.7% to 5,436,600, hitting a record high. However, the National Records of Scotland has previously said that without migration, the population of Scotland would have decreased by around 49,800 since 2011.
In rural areas, such as the Highlands, Dumfries and Galloway, and island communities, the impact of population decline is even more stark.
Dumfries and Galloway's population was 145,502 in 1981, and despite some growth spurts, in 2021 it was only 146,250. That's an increase of only 748 people in the space of 40 years.
In the Highlands, the population had a steady growth from 1981 when it was 194,903. However, it has slowed in recent years with 232,730 people in 2011, 234,570 in 2016, and 235,850 in 2021.
Stewart, SNP MSP and Equalities Minister, told The National that Scotland certainly has 'distinct' challenges, with migration currently the 'only maintenance' of the population size.
'One of the aims that we have as a Government is to build cohesive communities and we can't do that unless we have all sorts of people, including with families, that are coming and staying,' she explained.
(Image: PA) Stewart (above) told how she had taken part in discussions with the UK Government about various visa pilot schemes that would help to address Scotland's challenges
'The new Government were very keen on resetting the relationship and listening to us,' she said.
'Unfortunately, the evidence is quite clear that they haven't listened to us, and in fact in certain areas, not only have they maintained the status quo, but they've actually gone backwards and an example of that is the graduate visa route.'
The minister noted the Scottish Government's New Scots refugee strategy that aims to make 'people feel welcome from day one'.
The UK Government's approach, Stewart added, 'flies in the face of it'.
We previously told how an independent Scotland would seek to be the 'polar opposite' of a 'hostile' Westminster when it comes to migration policy, according to a Scottish Government white paper.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nigel Farage appearances on Sky News spark thousands of complaints
Nigel Farage appearances on Sky News spark thousands of complaints

Daily Mirror

time23 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Nigel Farage appearances on Sky News spark thousands of complaints

It comes after Reform UK set up its own broadcast studio to pump out slick, TV-style videos online Thousands of people have complained to Sky News about 'excessive' coverage of Nigel Farage 's Reform UK. ‌ It comes after the party set up its own broadcast studio to pump out slick, TV-style videos online. ‌ Twice last week, Sky News broadcast the live feed from Reform's studio, prompting campaigners to accuse them of 'outsourcing editorial control' to Mr Farage's far right party. ‌ It comes after Nigel Farage was confronted by grieving dad whose schoolboy son died. ‌ Cal Roscow, director of campaigns at Best for Britain, said: 'To outsource editorial control wholesale like this is unprecedented, misleading for viewers, and probably doesn't meet Ofcom's impartiality rules. It should never happen again, and over 5,000 Best for Britain supporters have written to say just that.' In one case Sky News broadcast a feed of Mr Farage 'interviewing' party chairman Zia Yusuf about the Online Safety act. In the same broadcast, Reform played Sky News' interview of Tech Secretary Peter Kyle on their feed - meaning Sky was broadcasting its own interview, but through Reform's live feed. Now more than 5,000 supporters of campaign group Best for Britain have complained to Sky about the coverage. READ MORE: Join our Mirror politics WhatsApp group to get the latest updates from Westminster Mr Roscow added: 'Reform UK have built a TV studio of their own - which is fine in principle - but resulted in a bizarre situation where Sky News's own footage of a Minister was being broadcast back to the TV channel - independently of the producers - and overlaid with commentary from a political party's Chair interviewing that same party's Leader. '

DAN HODGES: I thought Starmer was just weak. But after what ministers told me this week, I've had a chilling revelation about our manipulative Prime Minister
DAN HODGES: I thought Starmer was just weak. But after what ministers told me this week, I've had a chilling revelation about our manipulative Prime Minister

Daily Mail​

time23 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

DAN HODGES: I thought Starmer was just weak. But after what ministers told me this week, I've had a chilling revelation about our manipulative Prime Minister

Last October, Keir Starmer sat down on the plush green sofa of the Downing Street White Room and looked into the eyes of the families of the hostages who were snatched away by Hamas the previous year. It was, he said, a profoundly moving moment. For a while he listened to their harrowing stories. Then talk turned to the wider Gaza situation and the search for peace.

Taiwan has a stronger claim to statehood than Palestine. Will Starmer recognise it?
Taiwan has a stronger claim to statehood than Palestine. Will Starmer recognise it?

Telegraph

time23 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Taiwan has a stronger claim to statehood than Palestine. Will Starmer recognise it?

Now that Sir Keir Starmer has declared his intention to recognise the imaginary state of Palestine, perhaps he might want to consider affording similar status to one that does actually exist: Taiwan. Starmer's decision to recognise Palestine at the UN next month might have helped to appease his restless backbenchers, who champion the Palestinian cause without having the faintest notion what they are talking about. But recognising a state that does not exist, is incapable of holding democratic elections and where a decent proportion of the population are in thrall to Islamist-inspired terrorism is hardly a blueprint for success. Taiwan, by contrast, is a self-proclaimed independent territory that regularly holds free and fair democratic elections – despite the malign efforts of China's Communist rulers to disrupt the process – where the overwhelming majority continue to uphold their right of self-determination. Apart from being a fully functioning democracy, Taiwan is also a valued trading partner, with total trade between the UK and Taipei currently averaging around £9.3bn. And yet, despite his willingness to offer full recognition to Palestine, an area that has no formal borders, a non-functioning administration and meagre trading options, our prime minister appears strangely reticent on the subject of upgrading our diplomatic ties with a democratic and prosperous ally such as Taiwan. This aversion to addressing the issue is all the more remarkable given that the official policy is to protect Taiwan from Chinese aggression, a position that means the Royal Navy regularly conducts freedom of navigation exercises in the region – including through the Taiwan Strait – to demonstrate Britain's solidarity. The extent of the UK's military support for Taiwan is evident from the participation of HMS Prince of Wales, the Royal Navy's new 65,000-tonne aircraft carrier, in the Talisman Sabre exercises currently taking place in the Asia-Pacific region. The British warship is part of a 35,000-strong multi-national force conducting military exercises aimed at deterring China from launching an attack against Taiwan. Indeed, Defence Secretary John Healey was at his most bullish when asked about the UK's commitment to defend the region from Chinese aggression, commenting, 'If we have to fight, as we have done in the past, Australia and the UK are nations that will fight together. We exercise together, and by exercising together and being more ready to fight, we deter better together.' It is unlikely that we would ever see Healey, or any other Labour minister, making such robust comments about defending a future Palestine state – assuming, that is, that one ever materialises. The Starmer Government's desire to steer clear of any serious military entanglements in the Middle East was evident during the recent confrontation between the US and Iran. While the US deployed its aircraft carrier groups to the Gulf in anticipation of war with Tehran, the Prince of Wales, which was sailing through the region at the time, continued on its passage to Australia, out of harm's way. If the Government is so determined to defend Taiwan's right to exist, even risking the prospect of war with China by doing so, then it begs the question: why, having recognised a non-state like Palestine, will it not make the same commitment to Taipei? Ever since the leadership of the original Republic of China fled from the mainland to Taiwan in 1949, successive British governments have sought to adopt a neutral position in its dealing with the territory. While the UK is perfectly willing to maintain lucrative trade ties, as well as providing declarations of military support, ministers have been reluctant to upgrade Taiwan's diplomatic status for fear of causing offence to China, its more powerful and prosperous neighbour. Since 1972, when London eventually recognised the People's Republic as the sole government of China, the view in Whitehall has been that the future status of Taiwan should be a matter for the Chinese to decide. A number of recent factors have made this compromise appear less satisfactory, not least Chinese President Xi Jinping's pronounced determination to reclaim Taiwan as Chinese sovereign territory. Having declared that the ' reunification' of China with Taiwan is a cornerstone of his aim of achieving the Chinese dream of nation rejuvenation by 2049, Xi has authorised the Chinese military to engage in a massive build up, with some Western military analysts predicting a Chinese invasion could take place by 2027. The gathering storm clouds over China's territorial ambitions towards Taiwan have already resulted in significant changes to British policy to the region, most notably the 2021 Integrated Review that proposed an Indo-Pacific 'tilt' in our military and security outlook. Apart from sending an aircraft carrier to participate in joint naval exercises, the Royal Navy is also committed to upgrading its 'persistent presence' in the region to include the rotational deployment of nuclear submarines from 2027 as part of the recent Aukus agreement signed between the UK, US and Australia. If the UK is preparing to defend Taiwan's sovereignty, it makes sense for Starmer to give serious consideration to offering the Taiwanese people the same level of recognition that he is prepared to give to the Palestinians. Otherwise the UK could one day find itself in the invidious position of fighting for a people whose sovereignty it does not even acknowledge.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store