With Tamil Nadu's EV Plant, VinFast Dreams Far and Wide
First it was in the port city of Haiphong, turning a swamp into a state-of-the-art factory. Now, the company is attempting a similar feat in southern India, where the contours of its second major plant are beginning to emerge.
Over a year ago, the land outside Thoothukudi was little more than sun-baked scrubland. Today, assembly lines stand ready, the machinery set to stamp, weld and paint the first Vietnamese-designed electric cars meant for Indian roads.
Phase one alone carries a $500 million investment, part of a $2 billion commitment. The assembly facility can turn out 50,000 vehicles annually, with room to triple output if demand rises, and is expected to create 3,000 to 3,500 jobs. Construction has stayed on schedule since the memorandum of understanding was signed in early 2024, and the first VF 6 and VF 7 models are set to reach Indian customers soon after the ribbon-cutting.
Why India, Why Now As it scouts the next stop in its global expansion, VinFast sees India, where electric vehicles still make up only a single-digit share of the market, as a market on the edge of rapid growth. Rising environmental concerns and a demand for affordable mobility are reshaping consumer choices. By assembling locally, the company can bypass steep import duties and bring its premium SUVs closer to the budgets of India's expanding middle class.
But the Tamil Nadu plant is meant to be more than an assembly site. VinFast hopes to replicate a strategy that has served it well in Vietnam: building an ecosystem that integrates production, a network of charging stations, sales to taxi and bus operators, and comprehensive after-sales support, including software updates, repairs and financing.
To deliver this in India, the company has signed 13 distribution partners to open 32 outlets across 27 cities. It has also teamed with RoadGrid, myTVS and Global Assure to establish a charging and service backbone, while working with BatX Energies on recycling and second-life applications to build a closed battery loop and lower lifetime ownership costs.
This ecosystem can require heavy amount of effort and investment, but it may be essential to easing range anxiety and making EV ownership routine.
Tamil Nadu as Launchpad Tamil Nadu's 2023 EV policy offers land concessions, subsidies and expedited permits. State officials often point to the deep-sea Ro-Ro port at Thoothukudi as a springboard for exports. For the state, VinFast's plant represents a significant auto investment, reinforcing Tamil Nadu's status as India's most diverse automotive hub.
The plant's modular design allows production to scale for nearby South Asian countries, Gulf states and African markets. Interest has already come from Nepal, Sri Lanka and Middle Eastern distributors, and trade analysts suggest Thoothukudi could become a hub for right-hand-drive exports if tariff agreements with the United States advance.
For India, the gains may extend well beyond the state. The facility is expected to strengthen the country's EV supply chain, generating thousands of direct jobs and supporting many more in component manufacturing, logistics and software. Local sourcing requirements could draw dozens of suppliers into Tamil Nadu, accelerating technology transfer and giving Indian firms a foothold in Southeast Asian and Middle Eastern EV markets.
The project is also expected to speed the Inia's transition to cleaner transport. A widespread network of service centers and chargers can help reduce one of the biggest barriers to EV adoption. By delivering competitively priced vehicles with reliable after-sales support, VinFast may pressure local automakers to expand their EV lineups, nudging India closer to its target of electrifying 30 percent of new car sales by 2030.
Yet competition looms. Homegrown manufacturers dominate the EV market, and global giants are recalibrating their India strategies. But VinFast is betting that 'premium yet accessible' models - mid-range pricing paired with strong connectivity and after-sales packages - will sway drivers away from gasoline.
(Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with Newsvoir and PTI takes no editorial responsibility for the same.). PTI PWR
This is an auto-published feed from PTI with no editorial input from The Wire.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
7 minutes ago
- Indian Express
A reminder for Trump: US wanted India to buy Russian crude to keep oil market stable, prices in check
US President Donald Trump seems frustrated with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin over the war in Ukraine, clearly wanting the over three-and-half-year-old war to end, while Putin appears unyielding. The American president, meanwhile, believes he has a lever the he can use to push Putin's buttons. That lever is India's significant oil imports from Russia. Trump has been berating India over its Russian oil imports and pressuring New Delhi into cutting down on imports from Moscow in the hope that threatening or penalising a key trade partner would force the Kremlin's hand into ending the war in Ukraine. While Trump evidently finds it convenient to go after India on the issue at a time when New Delhi and Washington are locked in tense trade pact negotiations, it is worth noting that the US had a major role to play in India ramping up oil imports from Russia, for which New Delhi is now being vilified by Trump and his administration. Over the course of the war in Ukraine, US officials have publicly stated that India's purchase of Russian oil had Washington's endorsement, at least implicitly. In his latest salvo, Trump on Monday said that threatened that he will 'substantially' raise tariffs on New Delhi for profiting from exporting fuels derived from Russian oil. Trump's latest attack came just days after he announced 25 per cent tariffs and an unspecified 'penalty' on India for its defence and energy imports from Russia. Responding sharply to Trump's remarks, India said that while it has been targeted by the US and the European Union for importing oil from Russia, these imports began as its traditional supplies were diverted to Europe, and the US at that time 'actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets stability'. When Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2024, Moscow's share in New Delhi's oil imports was less than 2 per cent. The reasons were obvious: Russia was a far-away geography and already had established markets where a bulk of its crude was exported. India, on the other hand, depended significantly on West Asian suppliers like Iraq and Saudi Arabia, which are located close by. With much of the West shunning Russian crude following the invasion, Russia began offering discounts on its oil to willing buyers. Indian refiners were quick to avail the opportunity, leading to Russia—earlier a peripheral supplier of oil to India—emerging as India's biggest source of crude within a matter of months, displacing the traditional West Asian suppliers. Russia now accounts for 35-40 per cent of India's total oil imports by volume. As Europe decided to stop the import of refined petroleum fuels from Russia, Indian refiners increased fuel exports to the continent. Apart from alleging that India was helping fund the war in Ukraine by buying Russian oil, critics of India's oil and fuel trade argued that the country's refiners were facilitating a backdoor entry into Europe for fuels made from Russian crude. There was, however, nothing illegitimate about this trade as there was no specific ban on fuel imports from countries that were buying Russian oil. That ban has now been announced by the EU, and is slated to take effect from January 2026. Despite the noise from sections of the West against India over the country's hefty purchases of Russian crude, this shift in oil and petroleum product trade had Washington's blessings, as the US wanted energy markets to remain stable and well-supplied. In a recent interaction with CNBC International, global energy expert and Rapidan Energy Group President Bob McNally said that it was the Biden administration that 'begged' India to buy Russian crude to keep global energy prices in check. 'The Indians must be having some confusion (due to Trump's stance) because Joe Biden went to India after the invasion of Russia and begged them to take Russian oil…they begged India, 'Please take the oil', so that crude prices would remain low, and they did. Now we're flipping around, saying, 'What are you doing taking all this Russian oil?' The point is Trump is serious…he is frustrated with Putin,' said McNally, who served as the Special Assistant to the President on the White House National Economic Council and Senior Director for International Energy on the National Security Council during George W Bush's first term as US President. India's actions in line with US policy: Biden era officials Various US government officials during the Biden presidency also publicly acknowledged that India's actions helped balance the international oil market, and were in line with what the US wanted in order to keep the global market well-supplied. Had most of the Russian oil gone off the market—as happened with Iran and Venezuela—international oil prices would have shot up, which would have hit the global economy that was still fragile coming out of the pandemic. At an event in May 2024, the then US Ambassador to India Eric Garcetti said, 'Actually, they (India) bought Russian oil because we wanted somebody to buy Russian oil at a price cap. That was not a violation or anything. It was actually the design of the policy because as a commodity we didn't want oil prices going up, and they fulfilled that.' Garcetti was correct, as Rusian oil was and continues to be sanction-free, and only a price cap of $60 per barrel was introduced in December 2022 on seaborne Russian crude by the US and its allies. The cap prohibits export of Russian seaborne crude at over $60 per barrel if the trade involves Western shipping or insurance services. Oil importers like India, which are not part of the price cap coalition comprising G7 countries and their allies, are not bound by the price cap as long as their purchase of Russian oil does not involve any shipping or insurance service from providers in the coalition countries. In April last year, senior US officials had said at a New Delhi event that the US neither expected India to reduce its oil imports from Russia and had not even requested it to do so. The then US Treasury Assistant Secretary for Economic Policy Eric Van Nostrand had said that the objective of the sanctions and G7 price cap regime was not to push Russian crude out of the market, but to keep it flowing while limiting Kremlin's revenue from oil exports, which in turn impaired Russia's ability to fund the war in Ukraine. 'The price cap is designed to leave Russia with only bad options…We want him (Putin) to choose between three bad things: selling with coalition services under the price cap, selling outside the price cap, or shutting his oil in and not putting it to market. With a strong and robust price cap regime, Putin is going to prefer to sell as much as he can outside the price cap. But in order to maximise his sales outside the price cap, when a large part of the global coalition is already involved in the price cap, he is going to have to offer it cheaper,' Nostrand said. Anna Morris, the then US Assistant Secretary for Terrorist Financing and Financial Crime, said at the same event that from a technical standpoint, Russian oil once refined into petroleum fuels and products could no longer be considered of Russian origin, dismissing the argument that India refiners were facilitating Russian petroleum's entry into Europe. 'I also want to specify that once Russian oil is refined, from a technical perspective it is no longer Russian oil…If it is refined in a country and then sent forward, from a sanctions perspective that is an import from the country of purchase, it is not an import from Russia,' Morris said. While the Biden administration seemed satisfied with the price cap, while letting Russian oil flow, Trump has taken a much more aggressive stance, threatening financial costs on importers of Russian energy. Sukalp Sharma is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express and writes on a host of subjects and sectors, notably energy and aviation. He has over 13 years of experience in journalism with a body of work spanning areas like politics, development, equity markets, corporates, trade, and economic policy. He considers himself an above-average photographer, which goes well with his love for travel. ... Read More
India.com
7 minutes ago
- India.com
Paytm goes China-free, eliminates Chinese ownership in Rs 38000000000..., Indian investor can now...
Paytm Paytm goes China-free: In a major development for investor sentiment and the India digital economy, Jack Ma's Chinese giant Antfin has fully exited Indian financial technology company Paytm. Eliminating all Chinese ownership from the fintech major, the Netherland based Chinse company has sold the entire 5.84% stake in large bulk deals valued at around Rs 3,800 crore. The move is seen as a big positive for Indian investors as it eases regulatory concerns and is expected to boost institutional interest in the stock. What Billionaire Jack Ma's Ant Financial exit indicates? In the recent development, billionaire Jack Ma's Ant Financial exited One97 Communications, the parent company of Paytm, by selling its entire 5.84 per cent stake for around Rs 3,803 crore. Following the stake sale, shares of One97 Communications fell 1.45 per cent to Rs 1,062.60 apiece on the NSE, while the scrip of the company went lower by 1.23 per cent to Rs 1,065 on the BSE, as per a report by PTI news agency. Why Chines exit is a good news for India? Antfin's complete exit removes Chinese ownership from Paytm, which can potentially attract a wider range of investors who were previously cautious due to the Chinese ownership along with geopolitical and regulatory risk. Who does Ant Group belong to? Ant Group, through its affiliate Antfin (Netherlands) Holding BV, has offloaded the shares of Noida-based One97 Communications. Ant Group, formerly known as Ant Financial, is an affiliate company of the Chinese conglomerate Alibaba Group. According to the term sheet reviewed by PTI, the sale involves up to 37.3 million or 3.73 crore equity shares or 5.84 per cent stake in One97 Communications. The shares were sold at a floor price of Rs 1,020 per share, which represents a discount of up to 5.4 per cent to Paytm's closing price of Rs 1,078.20 on the NSE as of Monday. (With inputs from agencies)
India.com
7 minutes ago
- India.com
'Will raise tariffs on India substantially in...': US Presidents threatens India days after imposing 25% tariff
(Image: Reuters) Washington: US President Donald Trump on Tuesday said that he is going to further raise tariffs on India in the next 24 hours, after announcing 25 per cent tariffs from August 7. In an interview with CNBC, Trump said he will raise tariffs on India, revising the earlier settled rate of 25 per cent. 'India has the highest tariffs. We do very little business with India. We settled on 25 per cent, but I think I am going to raise that substantially within the next 24 hours,' the US President was quoted as saying. He claimed that India is buying Russian oil and fuelling the Russian war machine. This comes a day after the US President stated that he will 'substantially' raise US tariffs on India, accusing it of buying massive amounts of Russian oil and selling it for big profits. New Delhi has called the threat of additional tariffs 'unjustified and unreasonable.' Russia also responded strongly on Tuesday, labelling such US pressure tactics as 'illegitimate'. It backed India and, while criticising Trump over his threats to increase tariffs on New Delhi for buying oil from Moscow, contended that 'sovereign nations must have the right to choose their trading partners'. 'Russia notes US threats against India but does not consider such statements to be legitimate. Sovereign countries must have and have the right to choose their own trading partners, partners in trade and economic cooperation, and to choose those trade and economic cooperation regimes that are in the interests of a particular country,' the Russian President's spokesman Dmitri Peskov was quoted as saying by Russia's state-owned news agency TASS. After Trump threatened to impose hefty tariffs on New Delhi, the Indian government on Monday said that the targeting of the country by the US over Russian oil purchase is unjustified and unreasonable. A statement released by the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) spokesperson said that like any major economy, 'India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security'. According to the government, India has been targeted by the United States and the European Union for importing oil from Russia after the commencement of the Ukraine conflict. 'In fact, India began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict. The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets' stability,' it emphasised. –
