OPR decision looms large over property market
For developers, the direction of the rate will determine the cost of financing new projects. For homebuyers, especially first-time buyers, it could mean the difference between affording a home or being priced out.
If the Monetary Policy Committee maintained the rate, developers could plan projects confidently, especially in key urban centres like Kuala Lumpur and Johor Bahru, according to Dr Muhammad Najib Razali, an associate professor in property economics and finance at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
He said the steady rate has already contributed to a rise in residential construction, with housing starts increasing over 20 per cent year-on-year in 2024.
For homebuyers, Najib said a stable OPR helps keep mortgage rates predictable, supporting affordability and purchasing power, especially for first-time buyers and those with variable-rate loans.
However, he warned that these trends mask deeper structural problems, with the core issue being that much of the new housing supply remains priced beyond the reach of average Malaysians.
Even if rates stay low, he said affordability is hampered by upfront costs, loan eligibility barriers and a persistent mismatch between available units and what they can afford.
"If the central bank decides to cut the OPR, borrowing costs would decrease, which could provide a temporary boost by making mortgages cheaper and potentially encouraging more purchases in the affordable segment.
"Developers, in turn, could take advantage of cheaper financing to invest in affordable housing projects — but only if demand signals and government incentives align," he said.
On the flip side, Najib said the affordable housing issue could worsen if the rate is increased, as it could raise borrowing costs for both developers and homebuyers, reducing affordability across all price segments.
Compounding this, he stated that the external pressures, such as trade wars and global economic uncertainties, could push Bank Negara toward a more accommodative policy stance to protect the country's economy.
He said such a move would aim to stimulate domestic demand and safeguard sectors like property from external shocks.
While the OPR plays a crucial role in shaping financing conditions, Najib said it is not a silver bullet for Malaysia's affordable housing issue.
"Addressing that challenge requires a combination of monetary policy, targeted government programmes, regulatory incentives and private sector commitment to deliver housing that meets the needs of the underserved population.
"Regardless of the OPR outcome, stakeholders must stay attuned not only to interest rate movements but also to the broader structural issues in the housing market that affect long-term affordability and accessibility," he added.
Juwai IQI co-founder and group chief executive officer Kashif Ansari said an interest rate hike could discourage new development activity, while a steady or lower rate would support both supply planning and homebuyer affordability.
He also noted that a single change to the rate may not shift the property market overnight but it offers a clear signal of the central bank's policy direction.
"If the rate holds or drops, it's a green light for continued confidence. It suggests inflation is under control and growth is still a priority," he said.
Amid rising global economic uncertainty fuelled by escalating US-driven trade tensions, Ansari said it is not yet the right time to cut the OPR.
"The threats of tariffs and trade wars are still just that — threats. Bank Negara's policy decisions are grounded in empirical data rather than media headlines," he added.
Right now, Malaysia has stable growth, manageable inflation, and steady employment. There's no urgent need to cut."
Ansari noted that the country currently enjoys stable economic growth, manageable inflation and steady employment, indicating there is no urgent need to cut the interest rate.
However, he said that change could come later this year if warranted by conditions such as slowing economic growth or a rising unemployment rate.
Meanwhile, CCO & Associates (KL) Sdn Bhd executive director Chan Wai Seen emphasised the urgent need for Malaysia to bolster domestic consumption in light of growing global trade uncertainties driven by US tariffs.
He suggested that a reduction in the rate could be a timely and effective measure to stimulate the economy, noting that the inflation rate remains at a manageable level, offering room for monetary easing.
"The reduction in the OPR will positively benefit the economy, including the property market. The loan monthly loan instalments will reduce, allowing surplus cash to be injected into the market. This augurs well for the retail as well as the hospitality sectors.
"Lower monthly loan instalments will improve the loan eligibility of the prospective buyers. This will increase the demand for properties in the primary or the secondary property market," Chan said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
MAXIS POWERS UP HOME SOLAR
MALAYSIA, a land blessed with year-round sunshine and a tapestry of rooftops, possesses an often underutilised natural resource – solar energy. While the nation drives towards the National Energy Transition Roadmap (NETR) goals, to achieve 70% renewable energy installed capacity by 2050, a critical piece of the puzzle – accessible home solar energy – has lagged. This is precisely the gap that integrated telecommunications provider Maxis Bhd aims to fill with its innovative Maxis Home Solar package, launched in 2024, and expanded across Peninsular Malaysia earlier this year. 'The reason why solar energy adoption is not moving forward as fast is that people are still unsure. 'They would ask: 'Do I have to invest thousands of ringgit?' or 'Am I going to get the value for that money?'', said Maxis Green Solutions director and Maxis chief people and transformation officer Patrick Er. 'We feel that there is still a way to give worry-free experiences for Malaysians. 'Not everybody is comfortable with making such big upfront investments,' he added, highlighting the intention of Maxis Home Solar – to de-risk solar adoption and empower more households to embrace cleaner energy alternatives. A household name connecting millions daily, through its mobile and fibre solutions for consumers, homes and businesses, the company realised its expertise and experience in customer service and reliability could be a game-changer in unlocking home solar market potential. 'Our roofs could be doing more. We need to think of them as prime real estate for solar energy,' said Er. — RAJA FAISAL HISHAN/The Star Maxis Home Solar The move to solar is a natural extension of Maxis' converged home solutions ecosystem. As part of its broader push into home solutions across fibre broadband and a wide range of devices, solar is the 'next piece' in the mission to improve lifestyle experiences through technology. Er said that Maxis Home Solar is built on a 10-year subscription model, with a low RM1,000 upfront payment, to address consumer apprehension about solar energy. 'Customers can opt for a fixed rate, which most prefer because there is less uncertainty, or a consumption-based rate based on the amount of energy produced.' The fixed-rate options provide unparalleled peace of mind, locking in rates for a decade (even if tariff rates increase), after which the solar assets are fully transferred to the homeowner. To ensure quality and reliability, Maxis exclusively utilises Tier 1 solar panels and inverters and provides insurance coverage for the system. But the difference that Maxis offers extends far beyond just hardware, as Er explained that the company's comprehensive support sets Maxis Home Solar apart from fragmented market offerings. 'We ensure that what we install will be around for a very long time, and we are happy to choose only the best products for our customers. 'On top of that, we will also monitor the system for you. If maintenance or repairs are required, we will conduct them as needed and even handle warranty claims where necessary. 'So, over the subscription period, you do not have to worry about anything,' said Er. Sustainable energy consumption Leveraging its deep expertise in network operations, Maxis extends this capability with its remote energy monitoring system, enabling the company to proactively identify and rectify any performance issues. 'At one point, we found that about 15% of installations were not optimal, where certain panels were not producing the desired amount of energy. When we saw this, we were able to quickly address it. 'We have already learnt a lot since launching this service. If we were to just install the systems and 'walk away', we would not know if your house had not been generating power optimally,' said Er. He explained that this vigilance allows Maxis to identify issues impacting panel performance, ensuring reliable and consistent performance in customers' solar energy systems. Looking ahead Moving forward, Maxis sees significant potential beyond residential homes, with interest from commercial and industrial sectors, and a keen eye on East Malaysia, should a scheme such as Net Energy Metering (NEM) be made available there. Er believes that reaching the NETR goal necessitates 70%-80% of landed homes adopting solar, making the case for home rooftops as a viable alternative to vast solar farms. 'If you look at the last 10-15 years, solar adoption is less than 5% of households nationwide, and I do not think that we would want to wait another decade or more for minimal growth,' said Er. 'Our roofs could be doing more. We need to think of them as prime real estate for solar energy.' When asked about the future of the NEM scheme, Er states that the hope is for the scheme to continue to thrive and evolve, potentially increasing the adoption rate of solar energy among more households. 'The government has done an excellent job in supporting solar adoption, and I believe that withcontinued commitment, we can push this even further. In the long term, it's a win-win for everybody,' he said. 'I am confident that we are one of the few companies that can make this ambition come to pass.' For those hesitant about making the switch to solar, Er opines that there is 'no downside' to adopting renewable energy solutions. 'With Maxis Home Solar, there is low risk. Coupled with the low barrier of entry, it could create almost instant savings. And, at the very least, you will be doing your part to protect the environment,' said Er. In all, Maxis Home Solar is not just about providing clean energy but also simplifying complex technology and driving Malaysia towards a sustainable, connected future, one rooftop at a time. For more information, visit
Focus Malaysia
2 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Coherent SST reform requires zero exemptions for policymakers
THE Malaysian government's recent changes to the Sales and Service Tax (SST) are true to an at least decade-old tradition of self-defeating consumption tax policies. Raising taxes is a thankless but necessary task that requires astute policy design and nuanced messaging to manage both economic and political narratives. Both the 1 July changes and the case for them have left policymakers open to justifiable but needless criticism. Malaysian policymakers have long recognised the need to significantly increase revenue collections but have struggled to convince Malaysians. Tax reforms repeatedly adopt a narrow, small-target strategy that—by lacking both vision and tangible economic sustainability and equity objectives—instead become lightning rods for critics. Malaysians worried about their household budgets naturally fear higher taxes and do not count fiscal sustainability among their chief concerns. Making the case for consumption tax reform needs and deserves better than pointing to unsustainable budget deficits and delivering patronising rebukes of SST critics. It requires a consistent, coherent and non-condescending narrative that garners public support for changes that will improve not threaten their livelihoods. Policymakers should be explaining the importance of taxing consumption, how it supports a tax strategy that balances fairness, competitiveness and sustainably, and how the money raised will be used to benefit Malaysians. Consumption taxes have advantages that are especially relevant to Malaysia's circumstances. Malaysia has a large visiting and undocumented population whose income cannot be taxed but whose consumption can be. It has a sizeable informal sector contributing around a quarter of gross domestic product, whose income likewise escapes direct taxes but whose inputs may be partially captured by consumption levies. Shaping consumption choices through price signals will be essential to making Malaysia's future economic development less carbon intensive and more sustainable. Consumption taxes progressed alone cannot address Malaysia's revenue needs or be implemented equitably. Consumption taxes are regressive as low-income households consume more of their disposable incomes and therefore experience a greater relative impact. Attempts to neutralise these impacts by exempting or setting to zero the rate for basic goods introduces complexity for businesses and consumers, exempts rich and non-Malaysian consumers at the same time, and opens policymakers to arguments of inconsistency or bias. Accompanying changes to income taxes, transfers or welfare for low-income households would be a superior approach. Malaysians would be more receptive to tax hikes if their purpose were more tangibly linked to spending for their benefit. Public wariness remains high in the shadow of 1MDB and other newsworthy examples of funds being misused, with the government's fiscal challenges explicitly associated with corruption. At the same time Malaysians want better schools and hospitals, greater access to safe and efficient transport and technology, more generous social welfare and more. Transparent and well communicated spending intentions are an essential enabler of tax reform. The SST reforms have thus far been mapped poorly in these regards. Far from presenting a coherent vision for equitably, efficiently and sustainably raising revenue to spend in the interests of Malaysians, the reforms adopt a piecemeal and discriminatory approach to taxation. Two particularly concerning elements that have attracted fair criticism are the inclusion of basic goods and differential rates for local and imported goods. Malaysia is a net importer of food including many staple products, with openness to trade a critical contributor to food security both at the household and national levels. SST increases that represent an implicit import tariff, especially on basic and healthy goods like fruit, send precisely the wrong signal at a time when Malaysia is trying to counter global economic policy uncertainty. Malaysia must reinforce its openness to trade and investment by avoiding discriminatory taxes on overseas goods. Bowing to public backlash to provide post-announcement tax exemptions for imported apples and oranges (among other changes) further illustrates the policy development and communication shortcomings. Policymakers were either unaware of or misread public sensitivity on the price and availability of basic food imports, and in the absence of a compelling defence for the proposed SST increase were forced to make concessions. Evident is both a need for wider consultation and that complex and subjective tax design leaves policymakers exposed. Making the case for tax reform in Malaysia should also stick to message not mechanism. Long-running arguments comparing the SST with a restored GST are of greater distraction than consequence to the current debate. Either mechanism can be tailored to achieve comparable coverage and revenue outcomes, and tax incidence (who ultimately pays: consumers or producers) is determined by markets not tax design. Differences in administrative efficiency and effectiveness are important considerations that are adaptable to a consumption tax with either (or any) name. What Malaysia needs from policymakers is greater tax policy reform coherence, communication and ambition. And the leadership to design and deliver tax strategies and mechanisms that benefit Malaysia and Malaysians. ‒ July 2, 2025 Dr Stewart Nixon is the deputy director of research at the Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (IDEAS). The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: Bigstock
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
Bonded to interest rates
PETALING JAYA: The strong demand for ringgit-denominated bonds among foreign investors who have shifted their portfolio to minimise risks from US president Donald Trump's policies will depend on the trajectory of central bank monetary policy going forward, say bond specialists. Experts said that if the US Federal Reserve (Fed) decides to maintain the benchmark US interest rate while Bank Negara cuts the overnight policy rate (OPR) to support the domestic economy leading to widening yield differentials between US and Malaysian government securities (MGS), then investors chasing yields could shift their focus back to US treasuries (UST). Bond yields represent the rate of return an investor receives on a bond upon its maturity. The Fed maintained the benchmark interest rate at the 4.25% to 4.5% range in the May meeting as the US central bank sees the economy growing at a modest pace, with inflation slightly above its 2% target. Bank Negara has also held the OPR steady at 3% in its recent meeting, but reduced the statutory reserve requirement (SRR) to 1% from 2% that resulted in the release of an additional RM19bil in liquidity into the banking system to support the economy. However, despite the SRR decision, experts said there was still a high risk for an OPR cut in the second half of the year. In comparison, the bond yield spread between the 10-year UST and the 10-year MGS stood at 0.84% on June 5, 2025, based on the Bond Pricing Agency Malaysia's (BPAM) data. The 10-year UST on that date was at 4.40% and the 10-year MGS was at 3.56%. BPAM chief executive officer Meor Amri Meor Ayob told StarBiz several challenges could weigh on the ringgit bond market in 2025, with US monetary policy being one of them. 'UST continues to offer relatively higher yields compared to MGS, which may limit the appeal of MGS going forward. 'Moreover, with growing expectations that Bank Negara may cut the OPR in the second half of the year, yield differentials could widen further, potentially dampening foreign appetite for ringgit-denominated bonds. 'If the Fed maintains the current interest rates while Bank Negara cuts its OPR, the widening yield between the UST and MGS differential could reduce the attractiveness of Malaysian bonds to foreign investors and put pressure on the local ringgit,' he added. Meor Amri said another challenge lies in geopolitical uncertainties, especially around US trade policies under President Trump's administration, which could trigger market volatility and risk-off sentiment. He said the recent surge in foreign demand for ringgit bonds in March and April 2025 was driven by uncertainty surrounding President Trump's flip-flopping tariff policies and his proposed 'One Big Beautiful Bill'. These developments have prompted some bond investors to reduce their exposure to UST and seek diversification in emerging market assets such as MGS, he noted. Foreign net buying of Malaysian bonds surged to RM10.2bil in April this year compared to RM3.2bil in March, marking the second consecutive month of net inflows, despite 'Liberation Day' tariffs announced on April 2, 2025. The increase was primarily driven by strong demand for MGS and government investment issues (GII), which attracted RM9.7bil of inflows (March inflow: RM3bil), as well as the shorter-term Malaysian Treasury Bills (MTB) and Malaysian Islamic Treasury Bills (MITB). OCBC Bank (M) Bhd head of global markets Stantley Tan said the future demand from foreign investors for ringgit-denominated bonds would largely depend on a variety of macroeconomic and domestic factors. Since the onset of 2025, he said global economic uncertainties have escalated, primarily due to rising geopolitical risks and inconsistencies in US tariff policies. He said the imposition of substantial trade tariffs by the United States on its trading partners has disrupted global trade flows and increased the risk of a recession, particularly within the United States. As trade negotiations continue, investors have also rebalanced their portfolios, reallocating investments towards emerging markets and economies less impacted by the tariff conflicts. 'On the domestic front, Bank Negara has reiterated its confidence in the resilience of Malaysia's economy, which is fundamentally supported by robust domestic demand. 'However, the tone of the monetary policy committee (MPC) statement has shifted from cautious optimism to a neutral-dovish stance, reflecting the heightened external risks. 'In its latest meeting, the MPC reduced the SRR by 1% to provide additional liquidity support to the economy,' Tan said. He said the ringgit bond market has started to price in the possibility of a policy rate cut in the coming months following the central bank's slightly dovish tone. However, he said the risks to the current bond valuations remain, particularly if the economy proves resilient, prompting Bank Negara to hold policy rate steady, which could lead to a repricing of the bond market. 'A significant fiscal improvement by the government could mitigate the risk of a sell-off by easing the supply of MGS and GII in future issuances. Additionally, external risks may arise from the potential resolution of the US fiscal situation, which is currently under intense scrutiny by global investors. Should the US fiscal outlook improves, there is a possibility that investors may shift back to safe-haven assets, resulting in potential outflows from emerging markets including Malaysia,' Tan noted. RAM Rating Services Bhd economist Nadia Mazlan said foreign investor appetite for Malaysian bonds may continue to be under pressure in 2025 amid continued heightened uncertainties arising from US protectionist trade policies. She said the 'risk-off' sentiments among investors at the start of the year and at the onset of the 'Liberation Day' tariffs have already triggered a sell-off across both the equity and bond markets, including in Malaysia. Nadia said while there was some temporary reprieve from the postponement of higher reciprocal tariffs and signs of easing US-China trade tensions, which contributed to the net inflows in March and April, the continued unpredictability of US policies may still haunt global investors. 'The continued easing of market volatility recently may help support investor appetite for risker emerging market bonds in the short term, but it may be capped by the still-elevated uncertainties, especially as the 90-day pause on higher reciprocal tariffs is nearing its end. 'The potential future volatility from other proposed tariffs will likely leave foreign investors teetering on the edge,' she said. However, she said a tapering yield differential between the UST and MGS may help buoy some foreign demand for domestic bonds this year. 'With the Fed widely expected to reduce the federal funds rate in the face of slower economic growth, Bank Negara is expected to keep its OPR at 3%. This could help compress the UST-MGS yield spread, which should increase the appeal of Malaysian bonds and strengthen the ringgit this year. 'The country's strong economic fundamentals and prudent fiscal discipline also play important roles in making the country an attractive investment destination. 'Therefore, maintaining stable and effective domestic policies is essential to strengthening foreign investor confidence while ongoing improvements in fiscal metrics could further support demand for Malaysian bonds,' Nadia added.
