
Firms led by US military veterans deliver aid in Africa and Gaza, alarming humanitarian groups
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
The American contractors say they're putting their security, logistics, and intelligence skills to work in relief operations. Fogbow, the US company that carried out last week's air drops over South Sudan, says it aims to be a 'humanitarian' force.
Advertisement
'We've worked for careers, collectively, in conflict zones. And we know how to essentially make very difficult situations work,' said Fogbow president Michael Mulroy, a retired CIA officer and former senior defense official in the first Trump administration, speaking on the airport tarmac in Juba, South Sudan's capital.
But the UN and many leading nonprofit groups say US contracting firms are stepping into aid distribution with little transparency or humanitarian experience, and, crucially, without commitment to humanitarian principles of neutrality and operational independence in war zones.
Advertisement
'What we've learned over the years of successes and failures is there's a difference between a logistics operation and a security operation, and a humanitarian operation,' said Scott Paul, a director at Oxfam America.
''Truck and chuck' doesn't help people,' Paul said. 'It puts people at risk.'
Fogbow took journalists up in a cargo plane to watch their team drop 16 tons of beans, co,rn and salt for South Sudan's Upper Nile state town of Nasir.
Residents fled homes there after fighting erupted in March between the government and opposition groups.
Mulroy acknowledged the controversy over Fogbow's aid drops, which he said were paid for by the South Sudanese government.
But, he maintained: 'We don't want to replace any entity' in aid work.
Fogbow was in the spotlight last year for its proposal to
Since then, Fogbow has carried out aid drops
Fogbow says ex-humanitarian officials are also involved, including former UN World Food Program head David Beasley, who is a senior adviser.
Operating in Gaza, meanwhile, Safe Reach Solutions, led by a former CIA officer and other retired US security officers, has partnered with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a US-backed nonprofit that Israel says is the linchpin of a new aid system to
Advertisement
Starting in late May, the American-led operation in Gaza has distributed food at fixed sites in southern Gaza, in line with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's stated plan to use aid to concentrate the territory's more than 2 million people in the south, freeing Israel to fight Hamas elsewhere. Aid workers fear it's a step toward another of Netanyahu's public goals, removing Palestinians from Gaza in 'voluntary' migrations.
Since then, several hundred Palestinians have been killed and hundreds more wounded
The Israeli military has denied firing on civilians. It says it fired warning shots in several instances, and fired directly at a few 'suspects' who ignored warnings and approached its forces.
It's unclear who is funding the new operation in Gaza. No donor has come forward, and the US says it's not funding it.
In response to criticism over its Gaza aid deliveries, Safe Reach Solutions said it has former aid workers on its team with 'decades of experience in the world's most complex environments' who bring 'expertise to the table, along with logisticians and other experts.'
Last week's air drop over South Sudan went without incident, despite fighting nearby. A white cross marked the drop zone. Only a few people could be seen. Fogbow contractors said there were more newly returned townspeople on previous drops.
Fogbow acknowledges glitches in mastering aid drops, including one last year in Sudan's South Kordofan region that ended up with too-thinly-wrapped grain sacks split open on the ground.
Advertisement
After gaining independence from Sudan in 2011, South Sudan has
South Sudan said it engaged Fogbow for air drops partly because of the
But two South Sudanese groups question the government's motives.
'We don't want to see a humanitarian space being abused by military actors ... under the cover of a food drop,' said Edmund Yakani, head of the Community Empowerment for Progress Organization, a local civil society group.
Asked about suspicions the aid drops were helping South Sudan's military aims, Fogbow's Mulroy said the group has worked with the UN World Food Program to make sure 'this aid is going to civilians.'
'If it wasn't going to civilians, we would hope that we would get that feedback, and we would cease and desist,' Mulroy said.
In a statement, WFP country director Mary-Ellen McGroarty said: 'WFP is not involved in the planning, targeting or distribution of food air-dropped' by Fogbow on behalf of South Sudan's government, citing humanitarian principles.
Longtime humanitarian leaders and analysts are troubled by what they see as a teaming up of warring governments and for-profit contractors in aid distribution.
When one side in a conflict decides where and how aid is handed out, and who gets it, 'it will always result in some communities getting preferential treatment,' said Jan Egeland, executive director of the Norwegian Refugee Council.
Advertisement
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Option Care Health, Inc. (OPCH): A Bull Case Theory
We came across a bullish thesis on Option Care Health, Inc. on Brian's Substack by Brian Flasker. In this article, we will summarize the bulls' thesis on OPCH. Option Care Health, Inc.'s share was trading at $29.35 as of July 31st. OPCH's trailing and forward P/E were 23.29 and 19.65, respectively according to Yahoo Finance. A home infusion nurse in full PPE gown delivering treatments to a patient in their own home. Option Care Health (OPCH) has evolved into the dominant independent provider of home and alternate site infusion services in the U.S., originating from Madison Dearborn Partners' 2015 acquisition of Walgreens Infusion Services. The 2019 reverse merger with BioScrip and full divestiture by Walgreens and MDP by 2023 paved the way for OPCH to operate with full independence. Led by CEO John Rademacher and CFO Michael Shapiro, both with substantial equity stakes, OPCH has built a national infrastructure of 91 pharmacies and 99 infusion suites, covering 96% of the U.S. population. The company's integrated model provides cost-effective, high-quality infusion therapies in outpatient and home settings, capitalizing on a healthcare trend shifting treatments away from costly hospitals. This platform serves over 1,400 contracts with 800+ partners, including all top 10 national insurers. Acute therapies, though operationally complex, act as a competitive wedge, while chronic therapies anchor long-term recurring revenues. OPCH's mix—75% chronic, 25% acute—combined with a focus on generics and biosimilars, ensures resilience against pricing volatility. With its Advanced Practitioner (AP) model, OPCH is pushing clinical boundaries, managing more complex therapies in lower-cost settings and enhancing utilization of its already-built infrastructure. Only ~50% of its infusion suite capacity is currently utilized, leaving ample runway for capital-light growth. Despite industry concerns like drug pricing reforms and labor shortages, OPCH's embedded relationships, clinical capabilities, and scalable model offer strong visibility into cash flow and earnings. Trading at ~15.4x 2025 owner earnings with a 17.4% expected IRR, OPCH represents a high-quality compounder with an entrenched moat and significant upside. Previously, we covered a bullish thesis on Chemed Corporation by 310 Value in April 2025, which highlighted the durability of its earnings, temporary volatility in its subsidiaries, and disciplined share repurchases. The company's stock price has depreciated by approximately 29% since our coverage. This is because temporary segment headwinds persisted longer than expected. The thesis still stands as Chemed's core fundamentals remain intact. Brian Flasker shares a similar view but emphasizes OPCH's capital-light model and payer-aligned infrastructure. Option Care Health, Inc. is not on our list of the 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 40 hedge fund portfolios held OPCH at the end of the first quarter, which was 40 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the potential of OPCH as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 8 Best Wide Moat Stocks to Buy Now and 30 Most Important AI Stocks According to BlackRock. Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The former New Jersey governor said Trump just wanted 'someone to blame' for poor job numbers.
Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie ripped President Donald Trump as a 'petulant child' on Sunday for his dramatic firing of the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Christie said Trump just needed 'someone to blame because he won't take the responsibility himself' about the July jobs report, where the bureau reported the U.S. had only added a paltry 73,000 new jobs. The bureau also sharply revised down the May and June jobs reports, prompting Trump to fire BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer and accuse her of having 'RIGGED' the report to make him look bad. 'This is the action of a petulant child,' Christie said on ABC's This Week. "Like, 'You give me bad news, I fire the messenger.'"


New York Post
13 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump admin plans first ‘Golden Dome' test of space-based missile defense system: report
Pentagon officials are aiming to test President Trump's space-based Golden Dome missile defense system to safeguard the US in the fourth quarter of 2028, according to a report. That timeframe lines up with Trump's ambitious goal to 'have it done in three years' and comes amid pitches from defense contractors to score coveted contracts to develop the cutting-edge system. 'They want a win to point to in November [2028],' a defense official told CNN. 'And DoD [Department of Defense] wants to avoid anything they perceive will slow them down.' Advertisement The test, which will be conducted by the Missile Defense Agency, is expected to be called FTI-X, which stands for 'Flight Test Integrated,' in a nod to how it will assess the Golden Dome's vast array of sensors and weapons systems, according to the report. Development of the state-of-the-art missile defense system is expected to cost about $175 billion, according to Trump, who tapped Gen. Michael Guetlein, vice chair of operations at the Space Force, to oversee the ambitious project in May. 4 President Trump wants the US to develop a state-of-the-art missile defense system to protect the homeland from advanced attacks. Getty Images Advertisement 4 The Golden Dome system is intended to safeguard the colossal continental US. AP Congress has already allocated $25 billion in funding for the Golden Dome in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which Trump signed into law last month. Military officials have explored space-based missile defense technologies for decades, including during Ronald Reagan's Star Wars program, also known as the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). Space-based missile defense technology can be advantageous because it can help thwart an enemy missile much earlier in its trajectory than other technologies that the US currently has in its arsenal. Advertisement It can also reduce geographical barriers and catch certain types of enemy missiles at a stage when they are slower and easier to intercept. However, there are many drawbacks. The US would need to make significant technological advances to develop that system, which is likely to be very costly and could entice other countries to weaponize space. 4 Skeptics have raised questions about whether the Golden Dome can be completed on time and within the budget President Trump laid out. Getty Images The defense official called it a 'hard problem, and technically very risky,' CNN reported. Advertisement 'The possible number of satellites needed to achieve a probability of engagement success is going to be very high, given the time and area needed to cover the continental United States,' the defense official said. Plans for the test in 2028 are expected to be 'phase one' of the project. A deluge of defense contractors and other private companies have been jockeying for contracts to help develop the massive defense system. Precise details of how the Golden Dome system will function are not fully known. Trump has taken inspiration from Israel's feted Iron Dome system, which helps defend populated areas from short-range attacks. Trump's plans would encompass much more sophisticated missiles, such as ballistic and hypersonic missiles, that may potentially be fired off from much more distant locations than what Iron Dome defends against. 'Once fully constructed, the Golden Dome will be capable of intercepting missiles even if they are launched from other sides of the world,' Trump teased in May. 4 Precise details about how the Golden Dome system will function are not clear. Getty Images Guetlein has admitted that the Pentagon faces enormous challenges in successfully completing the project. Advertisement 'I think the real technical challenge will be building of the space-based interceptor,' Guetlein said at a summit last month. 'That technology exists, I believe. I believe we have proven every element of the physics, that we can make it work.' 'What we have not proven is, first, can I do it economically, and then second, can I do it at scale? Can I build enough satellites to get after the threat? Can I expand the industrial base fast enough to build those satellites?' The initiative comes amid advancements in the American space industry, with tycoons such as Elon Musk working to bring down the costs of launching satellites. The Defense Department didn't reply to a request for comment Sunday.