
Debate: Torry Raac crisis — who should foot the bill to save Aberdeen homes?
Of more than 500 Balnagask homes set to be razed to the ground due to unstable 'bubbly' concrete in their roofs, 138 are privately owned.
And until this week ACC's only solution to the crisis was to buy-back properties from owner occupiers on a voluntary basis, so the site can be cleared and redeveloped.
However, low valuations on their homes – on average £50,000 less than their pre-Raac values – means the local authority has only managed to acquire four of nearly 140 private homes.
This week, the Torry Community Raac Campaign and The P&J encouraged councillors to consider other creative solutions.
Following intense workshop sessions with council officers, homeowners asked again for fair offers, reflecting pre-Raac crisis prices for their houses.
A 'home for a home' scheme where private homeowners can swap their current home for one of ACC's council stock, at a similar value, was also considered.
A third option is for those who don't want to leave Balnagask. In this scenario, a cluster of homes could be identified and the roofs could be replaced. However, who will pay for this is where Aberdeen City Council and Torry families differ.
ACC wants homeowners to take out low-cost loans to pay for their roof replacements. But owners say they're in this situation through no fault of their own, and that the council built and then sold the houses, so they should pay.
As feelings run high and with the mental health toll on families only worsening, we're asking the Aberdeen public what should happen?
Who should pay and what can be done to bring about justice for homeowners about to lose everything they've worked for?
Keep an eye out for our debates published each week. Our journalist will be in the comments from 10-11am each Thursday, responding to your opinions.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
2 days ago
- The Sun
Legendary British shoe shop with 326 stores axes 1200 jobs after suffering heavy losses
A LEGENDARY shoe shop loved by parents has slashed 1200 jobs in a bid to cut costs. The iconic store revealed that revenues fell by nearly £100m in the latest financial year. Clarks ' staff members dropped from 7,413 to 6,161 over the last year, according to accounts filed by Companies House. Heavy Losses The footwear specialists reported a £39.2m pre-tax loss, with sales down from £994.5m in 2023 to £901.3m over the latest tax year. This comes after Clarks fell to a pre-tax loss of £39.8m in the 12 months prior. The company revealed that an impairment of £32.1m of right-of-use assets and store property plant and equipment has "significantly impacted" annual results. Plan For Growth Clarks said that its 'focus is to return to sustainable sales growth combined with a cost-focused attitude to delivery healthy store profitability in 2025'. 'Significant changes have been made to the operations in the year to right size the overhead cost for the current business size, refocus the marketing approach, reposition the product assortment and set up the business for recovery and sustainable profitable growth in 2025," it added. The shoe shop last reported a pre-tax profit when it posted a total of £35.9m for the 48 weeks to the end of 2022. Clarks closed almost a dozen stores in 2024, including its stores at the Saddlers Shopping Centre in Walsall and the. In 2023, the retailer closed seven stores, with shoppers describing the losses as a "terrible shame". More Brands Axing Jobs A struggling car brand confirmed earlier this week, it will be axing hundreds of jobs at one of its UK factories. Major cinema chain with 100 branches 'to close dozens of sites' in major blow to high street The move comes after the firm reported £4 billion losses in the last financial year. Nissan has now confirmed the axing of around 250 jobs from its Sunderland factory. Meanwhile, Pizza Hut is rolling out new digital ordering screens across all 136 of its dine-in restaurants, a move that could make over 100 staff members redundant. The pizza chain, which employs 3,000 staff, is set to cut 120 front-end roles as part of the shake-up. What are my rights if I'm made redundant? YOU are entitled to statutory redundancy pay if you have worked for your employer for two years or more. The statutory rate is based on your age, weekly pay and number of years in the job. You will get: Half a week's pay for each full year you worked aged under 22 One week's pay for each full year you worked aged 22 or older, but under 41 One and half week's pay for each full year you worked while aged 41 or older. You cannot be paid less than the statutory amount. If you were made redundant on or after April 6 2025, your weekly pay is capped at £719 and the maximum statutory redundancy pay you can get is £21,570. The government has a calculator on its website to help you work out how much you are owed. You may get more than this statutory amount if your employer has a redundancy scheme. Earlier this year Burberry told staff that their jobs will not be safe if they work at a certain time of day. The fashion house said it would be culling 1,700 jobs as part of a radical cost-cutting strategy in the face of losses and slumping sales. The job cuts, equivalent to a fifth of its entire workforce, will fall on head office staff and cutting back on the shifts at its retail stores depending on peak hours. Bosses admitted that the firm would also be culling its entire night shift workforce at its Castleford factory in West Yorks.


Scotsman
2 days ago
- Scotsman
Tourist tax Scotland: Aberdeen bosses 'gambling' over plan to introduce one of Europe's highest levies
Aberdeen's proposals for a 7 per cent levy could see tourists charged more than they would in major European cities like Barcelona and Rome. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Council bosses in Aberdeen are being warned their proposals to introduce one of the highest tourist taxes in Europe is gambling with the city's future. Aberdeen City Council is considering proposals to introduce a 7 per cent visitor levy, which they hope can generate millions of pounds. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Should this proposal be accepted, it could see visitors to the city paying more than they would to stay in major European cities such as Barcelona, Rome, Prague and Budapest. The peloton make their way through Aberdeen's Union Street during stage one of the AJ Bell Tour of Britain. Picture: PA | PA The Federation of Small Businesses said the city council was gambling with Aberdeen's ambitions to establish itself as a tourist destination. Mike Duncan, the federation's development manager for north Scotland, said: 'A 7 per cent levy would be the most expensive so far proposed in Scotland and one of the very highest in Europe. 'Apart from the actual cost of the levy, Aberdeen needs to consider the perception this will create among potential visitors and whether this will put people off coming. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'The city quite rightly has ambitions to grow its visitor economy, but adopting a visitor levy at such a high rate represents a gamble with those ambitions.' Mr Duncan pointed to an impact assessment commissioned by the Welsh Government, which suggested visitor levies could reduce tourist numbers by up to 2.5 per cent. The assessment said this would cut visitor spending by as much as £35 million a year. 'So-called tourist taxes might be common in major destinations around the world, but there is research to suggest some such charges may deter visitors and negatively affect the local economy,' Mr Duncan said. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Accommodation providers we spoke to are concerned that might happen here.' However, other local authorities such as South Ayrshire and the Western Isles have paused their plans to introduce such a levy over concerns about the impact it would have on the local tourist economy. The federation is now calling for a 'full Aberdeen-specific economic impact assessment', including researching the impact of a lower charge, to be carried out to understand the potential impact it could have on the city. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Duncan said: 'It is crucial to appreciate one size most certainly does not fit all. What works in Glasgow, Edinburgh, Amsterdam or Berlin, for example, might be very different to what works for Aberdeen. 'That is particularly true when the neighbouring and nearby local authorities have yet to introduce a charge, and any local levy could place Aberdeen at a competitive disadvantage.' Should the city council introduce a tourist tax, the levy would come into effect on April 1, 2027.


Wales Online
6 days ago
- Wales Online
Concern raised for RAAC affected homeowners who don't qualify for grant funding
Concern raised for RAAC affected homeowners who don't qualify for grant funding Councillor Karen Morgan raised the issue at a recent meeting of Rhondda Cynon Taf full council (Image: WalesOnline/Rob Browne ) Concern has been raised for home-owners in the Valleys who are facing financial hardship or losing their homes because of the discovery of RAAC and who don't qualify for grant funding. A question at Rhondda Cynon Taf full council on Wednesday, June 25, from Hirwaun, Penderyn and Rhigos councillor Karen Morgan of Plaid Cymru said that the council has publicly stated that it is supporting the private home-owners who face financial hardship or losing their homes because of the discovery of RAAC (Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete) in their properties by assisting them with access to grant funding. But her question said: 'In reality the restrictive criteria means that only two home-owners in Hirwaun are eligible to apply for this support and private landlords are completely excluded from the available schemes. 'Given the devastating impact and urgency of the situation what effective support will this council give to these residents who feel they have been dismissed and abandoned by all?' Councillor Bob Harris, cabinet member for public health and communities, said works required to remove RAAC and replace it with a permanent solution at privately owned properties are ultimately the responsibility of the home-owners. To get all the latest money news straight to your inbox, sign up to our newsletter here. But he said the council has informed the home-owners that it can help contribute towards the costs of remedial works. Article continues below Cllr Harris said that owners who have met grant eligibility criteria have been offered a £6,500 grant along with an interest free loan using Welsh Government funding to cover the remaining costs of the work. He also said that the council's housing grants department offer several loan options that provide financial assistance to residents and home-owners within RCT to ensure their home is safe to live in which includes the owner occupier home improvement loan and the property appreciation loan. Homeowners facing bills of £23,000 to deal with RAAC join call for national emergency fund He also mentioned the dedicated support worker as a point of contact for advice and assistance as well as support for private landlords and contract occupiers from public health officers in respect of the works required for each property. The housing standards team has also served legal notices on landlords to engage structural engineers to inspect their premises and once reports were received Housing Act prohibition orders were served and one family was rehoused as a priority. Cllr Morgan said many of the residents are pensioners in their 70s, 80s and older and she also said that both Welsh Government and RCT Council seem to be 'passing the buck' on this issue. She asked if the cabinet member would contact the Welsh Government to urge them to provide support as they did many years ago to private home-owners with the issue of previous council homes of non standard construction and asbestos. She said: 'It's been done before. Can we put pressure on Welsh Government to help with funding again please?' Cllr Harris said he was happy to take the point up with Welsh Government and get back to Cllr Morgan with a proper answer. Article continues below