After Sambhal & Bahraich, Barabanki admin too disallows mela with Mahmud Ghaznavi connection
A police officer said Tuesday evening that permission was denied for the Barabanki fair, scheduled to be organised between 14 and 18 May at the dargah of Salar Sahu in Satrikh area, as the administration feared it could cause communal tensions in the region, especially in the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack.
Lucknow: Apprehending a law and order situation, the Barabanki administration has denied permission for an annual fair to commemorate Saiyyed Salar Sahu, who was a commander of Mahmud Ghaznavi, days after cancelling melas in Sambhal and Bahraich held in respect of Salar Sahu's son Saiyad Salar Masud.
The memorandum claimed Satrikh mazar, where the fair is organised, belongs to Salar Sahu, who was a commander of Mahmud Ghaznavi, and attacked the Somnath Temple and forcibly converted a large number of Hindus.
The petitioners contended that projecting Salar Sahu as a Sufi figure and organising a fair in his name was 'misleading and an affront to the country's self-respect'.
After submitting the memorandum, BJP Kisan Morcha district president Ashutosh Awasthi claimed the Satrikh fair takes place on a land that is a sacred site for Hindus.
'Even today, a 'chakra' (religious disc) is present there. However, people are being misled by building the tomb of Salar Sahu at the site. We demand the fair be stopped. No fair commemorating foreign invaders will be allowed here. We will not retain any symbol that is a symbol of slavery,' he told the media.
A Uttar Pradesh police official said they apprehended that allowing the fair to go ahead amid such protests would have created communal tension in the area.
'We received some complaints regarding a land dispute at the venue where the mela was about to be organised and we also kept in mind the situation in the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack. So we denied the permission. The mela committee has also accepted the decision and released a video statement related to it,' said Akhilesh Narayan Singh, Additional SP, Barabanki (South).
Kaleemuddin Usmani, a fair organising committee member, released a statement supporting the cancellation of the mela. 'After the Pahalgam incident, the situation is deteriorating. So, the committee requests everyone to stay home and pray. We are fine with the administration's decision.'
This traditional fair is held at the dargah of Salar Sahu Ghazi in the Satrikh area of Barabanki district for more than 100 years.
The Sambhal row
The controversy started from the Sambhal district in the third week of March after the local administration denied permission for 'Neja Mela' which is organised to commemorate Saiyyed Salar Masud Ghazi, son of Salar Sahu.
'It (Neja Mela) was a wrong tradition. It is not right to continue wrong traditions. They (the organisers) have been informed that it is not right to continue with wrong traditions. That is why permission was not given,' Sambhal Additional Superintendent of Police Shrish Chandra had told the media.
He also said people objected to raising a flag at the venue in the name of the military commander of Mahmud Ghaznavi who invaded the country with the aim of looting.
'That is why permission was not given. There is complete peace in the area and a flag march was also conducted on March 18,' he added.
After Sambhal, the Bahraich administration also denied permission on May 3 to organise a similar mela. The fair was proposed to be organised between May 15 to June 15.
Uttar Pradesh Congress General Secretary (Organisation) Anil Yadav questioned the administration's decision.
'Many Hindus, particularly from the backward sections, also participate in such melas in Bahraich and Barabanki. There are many traditions and rituals related to these fairs,' he said.
'At mazars also, people from both Hindu and Muslim communities go. So, why is the BJP making it a communal issue? These fairs were known for promoting Hindu-Muslim unity, but now the BJP government is giving them communal colour. They should focus on development issues rather than communalising these things,' he added.
(Edited by Ajeet Tiwari)
Also Reads: From 'offensive songs' to lathi-charge & killing, how communal violence flared up in UP's Bahraich
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
6 minutes ago
- India.com
Rahul Gandhi Claims Arun Jaitley Sent To Threaten Him; Rohan Jaitley Refute, Says My father Died Before Farm Law
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Saturday alleged that the BJP had once sent the late Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley to "threaten" him for opposing the farm laws introduced by the Narendra Modi government. While addressing the Annual Legal Conclave 2025, the Congress leader recalled his response, saying, 'I looked at him and said, 'I don't think you have any idea who you are talking to.'' "I remember when I was fighting the farm laws, Arun Jaitley was sent to me to threaten me. He told me, 'If you carry on opposing the government, fighting the farm laws, we will have to act against you. 'I looked at him and said 'I don't think you have an idea who you are talking to,'" Rahul Gandhi said. Responding to Congress leaders' claim that the late Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley threatened him over the farm laws, DDCA chief Rohan Jaitley shared a post on X and reminded the Congress leader that his father died before the laws were even introduced. "Rahul Gandhi now claims my late father, Arun Jaitley, threatened him over the farm laws. Let me remind him that my father passed away in 2019. The farm laws were introduced in 2020. More importantly, it was not in my father's nature to threaten anyone over an opposing view. He was a staunch democrat and always believed in building consensus," Jaitley said.
Time of India
6 minutes ago
- Time of India
"Have we become so weak?" Congress MP Sukhdeo Bhagat on Trump's 25% tariff on India
Congress MP Sukhdeo Bhagat has criticised PM Modi's silence on the 25% tariff imposed by the US, questioning the government's vulnerability to US interference in strategic matters. Trump's announcement of tariffs and threats of further penalties for importing Russian oil have sparked concern. The government is examining the impact and engaging with stakeholders to safeguard national interests. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads New Delhi: Congress MP Sukhdeo Bhagat criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi for his silence on the 25 per cent tariff imposed by US President Donald Trump on questioned whether the BJP government has become so vulnerable that discussions regarding strategic initiatives or oil procurement are subject to interference from US President Trump."Trump has created a state of confusion. Neither the government nor PM Modi made any statement in the House or took responsibility... Have we become so weak that even discussing strategies prompts interference from Trump?... The saddest part is when we discuss the trade balance, especially since we have about 130 billion dollars worth of trade with the US. Our position is strong on this, so there is no reason for America to dominate us... PM Modi should come forward and clarify the entire situation regarding India's decision... We are a sovereign country, but such interference contradicts the dignity of the nation," he on Wednesday made a shocking statement on his social media platform Truth Social after the announcement of 25 per cent tariffs against India and threatened an additional "penalty" for importing Russian oil."I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care. We have done very little business with India; their tariffs are too high, among the highest in the world," Trump later signed a fresh executive order imposing revised tariffs for 70 countries, including imposed on India's neighbouring countries are less than India's 25 per cent, except for Myanmar at 40 per cent. The new tariffs for Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Japan, and Sri Lanka are 19%, 15%, 20%, 19%, 15%, and 20%, new tariffs, outlined in a sweeping order signed on Friday (IST), will come into effect from 12:01 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on August the government told the Parliament on Thursday that it is examining the impact of the recent events and will take all necessary steps to safeguard the national interest. Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal made a statement in the lower House of Parliament a day after Trump announced the tariff. He later made a similar statement in the Rajya said the Ministry of Commerce and Industry is holding talks with exporters, industries and all stakeholders and gathering information on their assessment of this issue.
Hindustan Times
6 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Pak woman deported after Pahalgam attack to get visitor's visa: Govt to J&K HC
The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has informed the Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh High Court that it has decided to grant a visitor's visa to Rakshanda Rashid, a Pakistani woman who was deported from Jammu after the Pahalgam terror attack, prompting the court to dismiss her petition seeking nod to return to her family here. Rashid, daughter of Mohammad Rashid from Namuddin Road in Islamabad, entered India on February 10, 1990, via Attari on a 14-day visitor visa to visit Jammu.(Pixabay/Representational) The court, however, stated that the MHA order should not constitute a precedent in any manner. Rashid (62), a Pakistani citizen who married Sheikh Zahoor Ahmed 35 years ago in Jammu, was deported as part of the decision taken by the Indian government to deport Pakistani nationals staying in India in the aftermath of the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 lives. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the home ministry, informed the court that after considerable deliberation and in light of the peculiar circumstances of this case, an in-principle decision had been made to grant a visitor visa to Rashid. The division bench comprising Chief Justice Arun Palli and Justice Rajnesh Oswal acknowledged this in its order. The bench further noted that Rashid can pursue the two applications moved by her regarding acquiring Indian citizenship as well as a long-term visa. The court recorded the submission of the solicitor general and noted that "once an in-principle decision is taken by the competent authority, there is hardly any doubt that, post compliance of the requisite procedures and formalities, the authority would process and accord a visitor's visa to the respondent at the earliest". The court dismissed Rashid's writ petition seeking relief from the deportation, saying that as a natural consequence, the impugned interim order loses its relevance and thus ceases to exist and operate. On July 22, Mehta requested the court to defer the proceedings to enable him to explore whether the respondent could be helped in any manner or if it was still feasible to address her concerns. In response, Rashid's counsel, Ankur Sharma and Himani Khajuria, submitted that she was agreeable to the course suggested by the solicitor general. On June 6, a single-judge bench of Justice Rahul Bharti ordered the Central government to "retrieve" Rashid. While passing the order, Justice Bharti observed, 'This court is bearing in mind the background reference that the petitioner was having long-term visa (LTV) status at the relevant point of time, which per se may not have warranted her deportation, but without examining her case in a better perspective and coming up with a proper order with respect to her deportation from the authorities concerned, she came to be forced out.' Rashid was served with a Leave India Notice on April 28 under Sections 3(1), 7(1), and 2(c) of the Immigration and Foreigners Act, 1946, issued by the Criminal Investigation Department, directing her to leave the country by or before April 29. She approached the high court and sought interim relief to stay the operation of the order. However, she was issued an exit permit and escorted to the Attari-Wagah border in Amritsar by the authorities, from where she crossed over to Pakistan. Rashid, a resident of Jammu's Talab Khatikan area, has four children who continue to reside in Jammu and Kashmir. Rashid, daughter of Mohammad Rashid from Namuddin Road in Islamabad, entered India on February 10, 1990, via Attari on a 14-day visitor visa to visit Jammu. She continued to stay under an LTV granted by the authorities on an annual basis. During her stay, she revealed that she married an Indian national. "It wasn't disputed either that her LTV was valid up to January 13, 2025, and she had applied for an extension on January 4, 2025. But no such extension was ever accorded," the order noted. Her husband expressed happiness over the decision and thanked the court. 'We are relieved... The entire family was under tension. We were suffering due to the decision (to deport her),' he said.
