Saudi Arabia deploys drones, AI to curb unauthorized Hajj pilgrims
Saudi Arabia has deployed advanced technologies, including drones and artificial intelligence, to intensify its crackdown on unauthorized Hajj pilgrims, Gulf News reported. The initiative aims to strengthen surveillance and enforcement ahead of this year's Islamic pilgrimage.
The Kingdom's General Directorate of Public Security released footage showing drones equipped with high-resolution cameras tracking individuals and vehicles suspected of attempting to reach the holy sites without valid permits.
Saudi Hajj Security Forces…
– Modern technologies
– Advanced security systems
To enforce Hajj regulations and instructions, and to apprehend violators of the laws and regulations.#No_Hajj_Without_Permit#HajjSecurity#Hajj2025
pic.twitter.com/BVTm9A2N5x — Hajj News (@hajj1_ENG) May 23, 2025
In one instance, a drone detected a suspicious vehicle in a remote desert area and relayed its coordinates to ground patrols, who quickly apprehended the suspects.
These drones are part of a sophisticated surveillance system that integrates artificial intelligence and thermal imaging, enabling authorities to identify and intercept violators in real time.
The campaign, titled 'No Hajj Without a Permit,' is central to the government's efforts to regulate the pilgrimage and ensure the safety of all participants.
Read more: Saudi Arabia announces strict penalties for unauthorised Hajj pilgrims
Several individuals have been arrested in recent days for illegally transporting undocumented pilgrims. The Ministry of Interior confirmed that special seasonal committees have issued administrative penalties, including prison terms, fines of up to SR100,000 per violator, deportation of expatriates after serving their sentences, a 10-year re-entry ban, and the judicial seizure of vehicles used in these violations.
The ministry reiterated that performing Hajj requires a specific Hajj visa. Individuals on visit visas are strictly prohibited from undertaking the pilgrimage. International pilgrims must obtain Hajj visas through their respective Hajj Affairs offices in 80 countries or via the Nusuk Hajj platform, which facilitates applications from 126 nations.
In addition, the Ministry has announced fines of up to SR20,000 for anyone caught performing or attempting to perform Hajj without official authorization. These stringent measures come amid concerns over foreign visitors overstaying their visas with the intent to join the pilgrimage illegally.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Iran executes two members of opposition group
DUBAI: Iran executed two members of the banned Mujahideen-e-Khalq group for attacking civilian infrastructure with homemade projectiles, the judiciary news outlet Mizan said on Sunday, amid criticism from Amnesty International over a 'grossly unfair' trial. Mehdi Hassani and Behrouz Ehsani-Eslamloo, identified as 'operational elements' of the MEK, were sentenced to death in September 2024 - a verdict upheld by the Supreme Court, which denied their request for a retrial, Mizan said. 'The terrorists, in coordination with MEK leaders, had ... built launchers and hand-held mortars in line with the group's goals, fired projectiles heedlessly at citizens, homes, service and administrative facilities, educational and charity centres,' the report said. Maryam Rajavi, who leads the National Council of Resistance of Iran of which the MEK is the main force, paid tribute to the pair. 'Honour to these steadfast Mojahedin who, after three years of unwavering resistance under torture, pressure, and threats, fulfilled their solemn pledge to God and the people with pride and dignity.' The defendants were indicted with 'moharebeh' - an Islamic term meaning waging war against God - destroying public property and 'membership in a terrorist organisation with the aim of disrupting national security.' Amnesty International said that Ehsani-Eslamloo and Hassani were arrested in 2022 and maintained their innocence during a trial which the rights group called 'grossly unfair and marred by allegations of torture and forced confessions.' 'According to informed sources, agents interrogated them without lawyers present and subjected them to torture and other ill-treatment, including beatings and prolonged solitary confinement, to extract self-incriminating statements,' it said in January. According to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, the number of people executed in Iran rose to at least 901 in 2024, the highest number since 2015. The MEK, known in English as People's Mujahideen Organisation of Iran, was a powerful leftist-Islamist group that staged bombing campaigns against the shah's government and US targets in the 1970s but ultimately fell out with the other factions of the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Since then, the MEK has opposed the Islamic Republic and its leadership in exile has been Paris-based. The group was listed as a terrorist organisation by the US and the European Union until 2012.
Express Tribune
4 days ago
- Express Tribune
Sanctuaries of violence!
The writer is a public policy analyst based in Lahore. She can be reached at durdananajam1@ Listen to article It is never easy to speak about religion in Pakistan. Yet silence, especially when it protects abuse, is not piety. The recent tragic death of a young boy named Farhan — allegedly at the hands of his madrassa teachers in Swat town of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa — has once again exposed the dark underside of religious seminaries in Pakistan. This is not an isolated incident. Stories of violence, abuse and trauma regularly emerge from madrassas, but the country moves on after registering an FIR, capturing the culprits and issuing a few condemnations. What remains untouched is the institution itself — the structure that permits such acts to be repeated without fear of accountability. Let me share a personal experience from the mid-2000s. I used to attend a Quran recitation class at a madrassa in DHA Lahore, Block B. It was affiliated with a seminary in Gujrat, well-known for its accurate teaching of tajweed (Quranic pronunciation). The system worked like a franchise: female teachers, trained in the Gujrat seminary, were sent to various cities, their boarding and lodging the responsibility of the local elites. One morning, deviating from my usual evening visits, I walked in to find the classroom full of children, mostly girls under the age of 14. What I witnessed shook me. A female teacher (ustani) suddenly grabbed two teenage girls by the hair, dragged them to a wall, and began banging their heads against each other's and then against the wall. Their crime? They had threaded their eyebrows. The ustani, invoking a hadith that condemns this act, believed it was her duty to enforce divine punishment. When I protested this abuse, I was asked to leave the madrassa. The teacher remained, for she was seen as merely executing Allah's will. The real tragedy lies not in isolated events of brutality but in the systematic way violence is sanctified in some seminaries. Teachers — often themselves products of rigid, outdated curricula — feel entitled to discipline students through beatings, humiliation, or worse. Pakistan's seminary landscape is vast and largely unregulated. While the government has made some progress through the Directorate General of Religious Education (DGRE), registering over 17,700 madrassas with more than 2.2 million students enrolled as of 2024, thousands more remain unregistered and beyond the reach of formal oversight. Despite reforms the reality is that many madrassas continue to function as parallel educational systems, with little accountability. Rarely do Islamic political parties or religious scholars raise their voices against such incidents. Ironically, they come together only when one of their own is arrested or criticised. Consider how our mainstream political parties expressed solidarity with a far right religio-political party when it clashed with law enforcement authorities, causing chaos on the streets and endangering Pakistan's diplomatic relations — especially during the FATF (Financial Action Task Force) grey-listing period. Tragically, not just political or religious groups, but even segments of Pakistan's judiciary contributed to this glorification. In 2016, during Qadri's funeral, many religious organisations hailed him as a hero. More disturbingly, sections of the judiciary reportedly treated Qadri with unusual leniency and respect during court proceedings, projecting him not as a convicted murderer, but as a man driven by righteous indignation. The religious personalities in Pakistan are quick to condemn others but rarely introspects. Our leaders recite the Quran in public yet pay little heed to its central commandment of rahmah (mercy). They preach discipline but ignore the Prophet Muhammad's (peace be upon him) own example — he never once struck a child or raised his hand against a student. Even more striking is the Prophet's (peace be upon him) conduct toward his political and ideological opponents. Despite being affronted, attacked and boycotted, he consistently responded with forbearance. At the conquest of Makkah, when he had absolute power over those who had once persecuted him and his followers, he declared, "You are free." He never used religion as a tool to exact revenge or silence dissent. So, where do we go from here? First, there needs to be an independent madrassa regulatory authority, not one under the religious affairs ministry but one constituted with legal experts, child rights activists and progressive religious scholars. Second, Pakistan must modernise the Dars-e-Nizami curriculum. This does not mean diluting religious education but enhancing it with ethics, child psychology, civic education and Quranic studies that focus on values, not just memorisation. Third, it is time to initiate state accountability. The state's decades-long policy of using religion for political gain has created monsters. From blasphemy lynchings to honour killings, the roots lie in a culture where the divine is invoked to justify the violence. Pakistan's greatest threat today is not from the outside world. It is not India, not America, not Israel. It is from within — from its own political class, its religious elite, and a system that glorifies anger over empathy, fear over knowledge and silence over justice. Faith is not fragile — it can survive questioning. But a society that allows its children to be beaten in God's name is already on the path to moral death. Let this not be just another news cycle. Let it be the beginning of a national reckoning.
Business Recorder
5 days ago
- Business Recorder
Balochistan PA condemns Degari honour killings
QUETTA: The Balochistan Assembly Tuesday passed a unanimous condemnation resolution against the brutal double honour killing of a man and a woman in the Sinjadi Degari area of Quetta, calling the act inhumane, illegal, and a violation of both Islamic teachings and constitutional rights. The session, chaired by Speaker Abdul Khaliq Achakzai, began 45 minutes late and opened with Fatiha for the martyrs of recent terrorist attacks and fallen security personnel in the province. The joint resolution, presented by MPA Ghazala Gola and supported by other members, condemned the killing of unarmed individuals in the name of honor and stated that no person has the right to act as judge, jury, and executioner. 'Justice is the sole responsibility of the state,' read the text, urging the government to ensure the accused receive exemplary punishment. Women lawmakers, including Shahida Rauf, Mena Majeed, and Farah Azeem Shah, delivered powerful speeches condemning the Degari incident, describing it as a societal failure and a throwback to 'centuries of backwardness.' Mena Majeed said, 'Women around the world are reaching the moon, while women in Balochistan are being murdered in the name of honor.' Rauf demanded strict action and legislative reforms, calling for the formation of a joint government-opposition committee to oversee the investigation. She also questioned the role of traditional jirgas, suggesting they be redirected toward positive societal contributions rather than reinforcing outdated customs. Farah Azeem Shah criticised the double standards in the justice system, emphasising that 'honor does not mean taking a woman's life, but protecting her dignity.' Religious leader Hidayat-ur-Rehman, while condemning the killings, warned against adopting what he described as a "Western mindset" and stressed the need for balance, saying, 'No one has the right to kill in the name of honor, but no one should be allowed to violate our cultural and religious values either.' The House acknowledged that while laws against honor killings exist, implementation remains weak and societal mindset change is necessary. The resolution reaffirmed that such crimes have no link to religion, tradition, or morality and urged urgent action. The session was adjourned until 3:00 PM on July 25, 2025.
