Google, Justice Department face off in climactic showdown in search monopoly case
Google lawyers are expected to assert only minor concessions are needed, especially as the upheaval triggered by advances in artificial intelligence already are reshaping the search landscape, as alternative, conversational search options are rolling out from AI startups that are hoping to use the Department of Justice's four-and-half-year-old case to gain the upper hand in the next technological frontier.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
'Over weeks of testimony, we heard from a series of well-funded companies eager to gain access to Google's technology so they don't have to innovate themselves,' Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google's vice president of regulatory affairs, wrote in a blog post earlier this month. 'What we didn't hear was how DOJ's extreme proposals would benefit consumers.'
After the day-long closing arguments, Mehta will spend much of the summer mulling a decision that he plans to issue before Labor Day. Google has already vowed to appeal the ruling that branded its search engine as a monopoly, a step it can't take until the judge orders a remedy.
Advertisement
While both sides of this showdown agree that AI is an inflection point for the industry's future, they have disparate views on how the shift will affect Google.
The Justice Department contends that AI technology by itself won't rein in Google's power, arguing additional legal restraints must be slapped on a search engine that's the main reason its parent company, Alphabet Inc., is valued at $2 trillion.
Google has already been deploying AI to transform its search engine i nto an answer engine, an effort that has so far helped maintain its perch as the internet's main gateway despite inroads being made by alternatives from the likes of OpenAI and Perplexity.
The Justice Department contends a divestiture of the Chrome browser that Google CEO Sundar Pichai helped build nearly 20 years ago would be among the most effective countermeasures against Google continuing to amass massive volumes of browser traffic and personal data that could be leveraged to retain its dominance in the AI era. Executives from both OpenAi and Perplexity testified last month that they would be eager bidders for the Chrome browser if Mehta orders its sale.
The debate over Google's fate also has pulled in opinions from Apple, mobile app developers, legal scholars and startups.
Apple, which collects more than $20 billion annually to make Google the default search engine on the iPhone and its other devices, filed briefs arguing against the Justice Department's proposed 10-year ban on such lucrative lock-in agreements. Apple told the judge that prohibiting the contracts would deprive the company of money that it funnels into its own research, and that the ban might even make Google even more powerful because the company would be able to hold onto its money while consumers would end up choosing its search engine anyway. The Cupertino, California, company also told the judge a ban wouldn't compel it to build its own search engine to compete against Google.
Advertisement
In other filings, a group of legal scholars said the Justice Department's proposed divestiture of Chrome would be an improper penalty that would inject unwarranted government interference in a company's business. Meanwhile, former Federal Trade Commission officials James Cooper and Andrew Stivers warned that another proposal that would require Google to share its data with rival search engines 'does not account for the expectations users have developed over time regarding the privacy, security, and stewardship' of their personal information.
The App Association, a group that represents mostly small software developers, also advised Mehta not to adopt the Justice Department's proposed changes because of the ripple effects they would have across the tech industry.
Hobbling Google in the way the Justice Department envisions would make it more difficult for startups to realize their goal of being acquired, the App Association wrote. 'Developers will be overcome by uncertainty' if Google is torn apart, the group argues.
Buy Y Combinator, an incubator that has helped create hundreds of startups collectively worth about $800 billion filed documents pushing for the dramatic overhaul of Google, whose immense power has discouraged venture capitalists from investing in areas that are considered to be part of the company's 'kill zone.'
Advertisement
Startups 'also need to be able to get their products into the hands of users, free from restrictive dealing and self-preferencing that locks up important distribution channels. As things stand, Google has locked up the most critical distribution channels, freezing the general search and search text advertising markets into static competition for more than a decade,' Y Combinator told Mehta.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AT&T results: Here's the read-through for Apple
-- AT&T's second-quarter results offer a modest positive read-through for Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), particularly in terms of iPhone unit sales, according to analysts at Barclays. 'We estimate AT&T (NYSE:T) sold roughly 3.4M iPhones in the quarter, up high teens year-over-year,' Barclays wrote. That performance was 'in-line to slightly better than expected' for Apple's iPhone contribution, the analysts said, though they noted that upgrade rates remained subdued. AT&T reported 5.2 million smartphone sales overall for the June quarter, with iPhone units likely making up around 7% to 8% of Apple's total units, according to Barclays. The firm noted that 'tariffs may have helped pull in some iPhones for C2Q,' suggesting trade dynamics may have had a short-term impact on demand. Despite a 40-basis-point rise in the upgrade rate year-over-year, it remained at 3.3%, slightly below the five-year June quarter average of 3.4%. Barclays said this reflects 'continued lengthening of replacement cycle and lower demand.' Beyond Apple, Barclays also highlighted implications for capex-exposed hardware names. AT&T's capital expenditures came in at $4.9 billion, ahead of the Street's $4.7 billion forecast. The company also raised its full-year capex guidance to about $22.5 billion, and projected annual capital investments of $23–24 billion from 2026 to 2027. 'We view the lifted full-year capex guide positive to mostly neutral to our SP capex-exposed stocks in our coverage,' Barclays said, naming Ciena (NYSE:CIEN), Corning (NYSE:GLW) and Cisco (NASDAQ:CSCO) as key beneficiaries. The analysts added that they 'expect telcos' ongoing fiber expansions to be lumpy for GLW, though we expect sustained, accelerated recovery for SPs for the year into 2026.' Related articles AT&T results: Here's the read-through for Apple These Under-the-Radar Stocks Offer Better Risk-Reward Ratio Than Nvidia Risks Rising? Smart Money Dodged 46%+ Drawdowns on These High-Flying Names Sign in to access your portfolio
CNET
5 minutes ago
- CNET
I Tested T-Mobile's Satellite Service: The Hardest Part Was Finding a Dead Zone
Driving the wooded highways of the North Cascades in Washington state, I deliberately pointed my car toward nothing. Specifically, I needed to get out of Seattle to find an area with no cellular coverage so I could try out T-Mobile's new Starlink-based satellite texting service, T-Satellite, with my phone. It was more difficult than I expected. Most areas of the US are covered by some level of cellular service. But that still leaves around 500,000 square miles of wireless dead zones, according to a T-Mobile estimate. For those rural and remote areas, the carrier, other wireless providers and phone-makers including Apple, are betting satellite connectivity is the answer. The wireless bars on my phone finally abandoned me at Lake Diablo, about two and a half hours northeast of Seattle, giving me a chance to bounce messages back and forth from space to test whether T-Mobile has made satellite texting as easy as everyday cellular texting. How T-Satellite differs from other satellite services On one hand, driving 120 miles just to text someone seems like overkill. But texting -- or any immediate outside communication -- slams to a halt when cellular coverage disappears. Satellite texting isn't new. Apple started offering SOS communication backed by Globalstar on the iPhone 14. And later, that allowed emergency texting when you're outside coverage areas -- a literal lifesaver for people injured, lost or stranded in remote areas. The feature also allowed you to share you location via satellite in the Find My app. Apple then expanded the service to include any texting using the Messages app, as well as calling for roadside assistance. CNET's David Lumb used Messages via satellite on his iPhone 15 Pro to text friends and share his thoughts when he summited Mount Haleakalā's peak in Hawaii. Google has a similar feature in its Pixel 9 phones, except the Pixel 9A, which works with satellite provider Skylo. Samsung Galaxy phones, like the recently released Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7, can use Verizon for satellite texting and to contact emergency services through Skylo, too. However, that communication involves a few steps to activate the feature. You need to be outdoors with a clear view of the sky -- no trees or buildings -- and point your phone at a passing satellite, keeping it steady to maintain the connection. With T-Satellite, the experience is quite different. Texting is almost indistinguishable from when you're within cellular coverage. On a Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra with a T-Mobile plan, opening the Messages app showed the phone already connected to satellite, with a banner reading "You're messaging by satellite." A small satellite icon appears in the menu bar with radiating curves to indicate the status of the connection. The phone has automatically connected to the T-Satellite network, as indicated by its (teeny) status icon. Screenshot by Jeff Carlson/CNET This is due in part to the fact that there are now more than 650 Starlink satellites overhead providing wider coverage, but also because they use a frequency band compatible with most phones sold in the last four don't need a specific phone model that has satellite messaging hardware, such as the Motorola Razr Ultra. The experience of setting up T-Satellite on my iPhone 16 Pro was generally the same. One unique thing about T-Satellite is that T-Mobile is offering the service to anyone, even if they use another carrier for cellular service. In my case, I set up the T-Satellite beta using the second eSIM slot on my phone, and turned off the primary service (AT&T) in order to test just T-Mobile's feature. A solid black satellite icon appears in the menu bar. I should note that I performed this testing a couple days before T-Satellite went live, so it was technically during the T-Satellite beta period, and using a beta version of the Messages app on Android. Plus, I didn't attempt to make an emergency call, either, which on the T-Satellite service would mean dialing 911 in the phone app, versus initiating an SOS text communication using Apple's service. Texting, but sometimes slower Mostly, texting via satellite is just like texting via cellular. The data pipe between the phone and a satellite flying overhead at 17,000 miles per hour is small, so occasionally texts would take several seconds to go through. But sometimes a conversation would happen without any extended lag. By comparison, when CNET's Patrick Holland tested Apple's Messages via satellite feature, he noted that "most sends were nearly instantaneous, others took 15 to 20 seconds with one taking over a minute." One feature going live today for Android is the ability to send images, videos and audio files using Multimedia Messaging Service over the satellite network. On the Galaxy S25 Ultra, I snapped a photo of the lake and sent it using Messages as I normally would. The only difference over satellite is that it took around two and a half minutes to send. On Android, you can send photos via MMS even over the satellite connection. The feature is coming later for iOS. Screenshot by Jeff Carlson/CNET However, MMS is currently only supported on Android; iOS support is coming later. Also arriving in the future -- October, specifically -- is the ability for apps to send and receive data over the satellite connection. T-Mobile has cited AllTrails as an example of apps that'll be compatible with the service. This would be a great use of data for other mapping tools. Although I was never lost on this trip --I pulled into a well-marked scenic overlook to test with a stunning view -- I also made a point of downloading an offline map of the area using Apple Maps while I was still within cellular range. Lingering questions and challenges Not every message went through, and after my limited testing, there are a few areas where more clarity would help. For example, on Android, it wasn't always obvious when I'd lost satellite connection. In theory, with many Starlink satellites overhead, you shouldn't have to worry about pointing at a specific patch of sky to maintain a connection. But at one point after sending a message, some text below it said the app was waiting to connect. Only then did I notice the tiny satellite icon was showing thin gray bars instead of thin black bars. Compare that to Apple's implementation, which uses Dynamic Island to show an impossible-to-miss green status button to indicate a solid connection to a satellite. Or Google's Satellite SOS service, with its full-screen visual prompts that help you stay connected to a satellite or connect to a new one if needed. The prominent green icon in the Dynamic Island indicates a satellite connection when using Apple's satellite texting feature. (The red icon shows that the screen is being recorded and isn't related to the connection.) Screenshot by Jeff Carlson/CNET I also ran into some confusion with my iPhone 16 Pro running T-Satellite as a secondary eSIM. When attempting to text a friend who came along with me and was using Apple's method on his iPhone, I got a message that he was connected via satellite and was given the option to tap Send via Satellite. What I didn't realize at the time was that the connection dropped as I was typing the text. On further research, I discovered that an active third-party satellite connection shows "SAT" in the menu bar. When SAT is replaced by a black satellite icon, it means T-Satellite is no longer connected, but that Apple's satellite option is available; I thought it meant that I was still connected. At one point, I was unable to text my friend who was also using satellite access, even though it appeared to be connected (see the satellite icon in the menu bar). (The red button in the Dynamic Island shows that the screen is being recorded.) Screenshot by Jeff Carlson/CNET Look up, and ahead Will satellite services cover the remaining dead zones and allow easy communication even in remote areas? Based on my experience, the potential is definitely there. It's been less than two years since Apple first launched Emergency SOS via satellite on the iPhone and it's impressive how satellite connectivity has expanded so quickly with the ability to support texting. I appreciate that the T-Satellite implementation is similar to the way millions of people communicate every day via text. Removing friction is key to adopting technologies like this. As companies build up the capacity and performance of satellite services, it's easy to see a near future where you don't have to think about how you're getting data, just as we currently don't ever think about which cellular tower is relaying our data. As someone who lives in cellular-saturated Seattle, I probably won't need to rely on satellite data. But the North Cascades is where I've gone camping for years, so I can see it being occasionally useful, especially if there's ever an emergency situation. As I was juggling my phones and pestering my friends and family with texts, a couple approached to ask what I was doing. They were visiting the area from a small town in northern Idaho near the Canadian border, where cellular coverage is a rarity. After talking for a few minutes, I realized that being able to connect wirelessly via satellite could be a real boon for them, especially in emergencies. We've seen this recently when T-Mobile opened T-Satellite access in communities affected by massive flooding in central Texas -- but it's also useful when other forms of communication aren't available, like during power outages.
Entrepreneur
5 minutes ago
- Entrepreneur
What Is AppleCare One? New Multi-Device Coverage Plan.
Apple unveiled its new AppleCare One plan on Wednesday, which lets customers cover devices up to four years old. Apple unveiled AppleCare One on Wednesday, offering customers a way to cover multiple Apple products with one plan. "Built on the trusted foundation of AppleCare+, AppleCare One extends that same reliability and makes it easier than ever to protect the products you love and depend on, like iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch, combining simplicity and exceptional value," said Bob Borchers, Apple's vice president of Worldwide Product Marketing, in a news release. What's the difference between AppleCare One and AppleCare+? AppleCare One includes the benefits that come with AppleCare+. This includes loss and theft protection, unlimited repairs for accidents (drops, spills), 24/7 priority support, Apple-certified service, and battery coverage. AppleCare One also expands theft and loss protection to the iPad and Apple Watch. Related: Here's When the New Apple iPhone 17 and MacBooks Are Being Released How much does AppleCare One cost? The service offers coverage for three Apple devices for $19.99 a month. Previously, insurance coverage was separate. For example, AppleCare+ with Theft and Loss for iPhone is $9.99 a month or $99.99 for the year. For Mac, it costs $3.49 a month or $34.99 for the year. The iPad, meanwhile, costs $4.99 a month or $49.99 a year to cover. Apple says that enrolling in AppleCare One can save customers up to $11 a month when covering multiple Apple products instead of getting AppleCare+ plans for each device. If you want to cover more than three devices, it will cost $5.99 per month for each. Related: Apple's Next Big Launch Is Reportedly Foldable iPhones. Here's When It Will Be Revealed. One additional change is that customers can add products they already own, but only up to four years old. This extends the window for past purchases — previously, customers only had 60 days after purchase to sign up for AppleCare+. Apple When is AppleCare One available? AppleCare One is available for purchase starting Thursday, July 24, 2025.
