India exporters cautiously optimistic as US tariff deadline looms
New Delhi and Washington have been locked in multiple rounds of talks, with hopes for an interim pact to avert the 26 percent "reciprocal" tolls meted out to India.
The tariffs, which came on top of 10 percent levies across the board for every country, were imposed for what the White House says are unfair US trade deficits.
While India -- the world's most populous country -- is not a manufacturing powerhouse, it still ran up a $45.7 billion trade surplus with the United States last year.
And now some of its most labour-intensive exports, including electronics, gems and jewellery and shrimp, are under threat.
Exporters are "optimistic" that India may be able to carve out a bilateral agreement on the "trade side at least", Ajay Sahai, Director General of the Federation of Indian Export Organisations, told AFP.
But he added that it was "quite a fluid situation", suggesting one outcome could see the deadline extended, given that India is "constructively engaged" with Washington.
"The feedback which I am getting suggests positive developments either way -- and we are hopeful," he added.
India's seafood industry is seeing "some amount of anxiety", but also "more reason for hope", said KN Raghavan, Secretary General, Seafood Exporters Association of India.
He did not give details, but said a "solution appears to be in the anvil".
US officials have been upbeat about the prospect of an agreement.
Trump on Tuesday raised the possibility of an agreement, saying it is "going to be a different kind of a deal".
"It's going to be a deal where we're able to go in and compete," he added. "Right now, India doesn't accept anybody in. I think India is going to do that, and if they do that, we're going to have a deal for much less tariffs."
His Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said last month that a pact could be expected in the "not too distant future".
However, Indian media reports on Tuesday, quoting unnamed sources, struck a more neutral tone, saying negotiators were still working to resolve key differences that had cropped up during talks.
'Alternative sources'
An Indian commerce ministry official told AFP that New Delhi's unmet demands included relief from separate sectoral tariffs on steel and aluminium as well a greater access for labour-intensive exports including textiles and footwear.
They have also spoken of disagreements over Washington's push to have India open up its agriculture sector and allow freer trade of American farm produce.
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has said she was eager for a deal.
"I'd love to have an agreement, a big, good, beautiful one; why not?" she told India's Financial Express newspaper, in an interview printed on Monday.
Sitharaman, however, added that "agriculture and dairy" are the "very big red lines".
Experts believe a smaller agreement is still possible ahead of the deadline.
"The more likely outcome is a limited trade pact," said Ajay Srivastava of Global Trade Research Initiative, a New Delhi-based think-tank in a recent note.
Srivastava said that under such a deal, India could cut tariffs on a range of industrial goods and offer limited access for US agricultural produce --- in return for Trump dropping the 26 percent levies.
But he also warned that talks "may collapse" if Washington "continues to insist on opening India's core agriculture sectors or allowing entry of GMO (genetically modified organism) products".
And seafood exporters remain on edge as talks go down to the wire.
"Currently, exporters believe they can manage with a 10 percent tariff, as it can be absorbed. But if it goes back up to 25 percent to 30 percent levels, we could see American buyers finding alternative sources," Raghavan said.
"They will find some other cheaper source," he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Japan plans 'world first' deep-sea mineral extraction
Earlier this week the country pledged to work with the United States, India and Australia to ensure a stable supply of critical minerals, as concern grows over China's dominance in resources vital to new technologies. Rare earths -- 17 metals difficult to extract from the Earth's crust -- are used in everything from electric vehicles to hard drives, wind turbines and missiles. China accounts for almost two-thirds of rare earth mining production and 92 percent of global refined output, according to the International Energy Agency. A Japanese deep-sea scientific drilling boat called the Chikyu will from January conduct a "test cruise" to retrieve ocean floor sediments that contain rare earth elements, said Shoichi Ishii, director of Japan's Cross-ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion Programme. "The test to retrieve the sediments from 5,500 metres (3.4 miles) water depth is the first in the world," he told AFP. "Our goal... of this cruise is to test the function of all mining equipment," so the amount of sediment extracted "doesn't matter at all", Ishii added. The Chikyu will drill in Japanese economic waters around the remote island of Minami Torishima in the Pacific -- the easternmost point of Japan, also used as a military base. Japan's Nikkei business daily reported that the mission aims to extract 35 tonnes of mud from the sea floor over around three weeks. Each tonne is expected to contain around two kilograms (4.4 pounds) of rare earth minerals, which are often used to make magnets that are essential in modern electronics. Deep-sea mining has become a geopolitical flashpoint, with anxiety growing over a push by US President Donald Trump to fast-track the practice in international waters. Beijing has since April required licences to export rare earths from China, a move seen as retaliation for US curbs on the import of Chinese goods. Environmental campaigners warn that deep-sea mining threatens marine ecosystems and will disrupt the sea floor. The International Seabed Authority, which has jurisdiction over the ocean floor outside national waters, is meeting later this month to discuss a global code to regulate mining in the ocean depths.
AFP
2 hours ago
- AFP
Philippine senator's plea to colleagues misrepresented as 'vow to defy constitution'
"We will be defying the constitution, we, the senators," Hontiveros is heard saying in Tagalog in a Facebook reel posted on June 26, 2025. It was shared after the Senate voted to send back to the House of Representatives the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte (archived link). The vice president was impeached by the lower house in February on charges of graft, corruption and an alleged assassination plot against one-time ally and former running mate President Ferdinand Marcos. A conviction in the Senate would require the support of two-thirds of its 24 members, and would see Duterte removed as vice president and permanently banned from public office. Before the case can return to the Senate, the House must certify that it did not violate the constitution in its handling of impeachment proceedings and that it remained willing to prosecute the case after its new members take their seats. Hontiveros opposed the motion to send the case to the lower body, calling the decision a "functional dismissal'. Image Screenshot of the false Facebook post captured on July 1, 2025, with a red X added by AFP The clip also spread in similar Facebook and TikTok posts. "Wow, defy the constitution? You think you're more powerful than the country's laws?" read a comment on one of the posts. Another wrote: "She really wants to remove the vice president!" But the clip has been misleadingly edited to omit Hontiveros's full remarks. It was also earlier fact-checked by Philippine media organisation Vera Files (archived link). A reverse image search on Google using a keyframe from the falsely shared clip found it was taken from a news conference held by Hontiveros on June 9 (archived link). At the 9:15 mark, Hontiveros was asked if she thinks convening as an impeachment court is optional for the Senate. "Oh, definitely not. Definitely not," she says before responding further in Tagalog. "If we look at it and act as if convening as an impeachment court is optional, we will be defying the constitution, we, the senators. "And that's why I've been saying that will not allow this. As a senator, I will not agree to that." Her answer is also shown in the transcript of the press conference published on the Senate's website (archived link). Duterte's impeachment has spawned a wave of misinformation debunked by AFP here.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Top China official says US defence chief 'inciting conflict'
China and the United States last month said they had reached an understanding on a trade deal -- a truce after bruising tit-for-tat tariffs on each other's goods. But the two countries still disagree on issues ranging from technology and security to geopolitics, including the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, as well as Beijing's territorial claims in Asia. US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has warned that China is preparing to use military force to upend the balance of power in Asia and has urged American allies to achieve "peace through strength". On Thursday, Liu Jianchao, the head of the International Department of China's ruling Communist Party, said Hegseth's remarks constituted "hegemonic thinking". "What he truly wants is force, not dialogue," Liu told the World Peace Forum in Beijing. "What he is inciting is confrontation and conflict, not peace and harmony," he said. China and the United States have long been at odds over Beijing's expansive claims in the strategically crucial South China Sea, and its refusal to rule out using force to seize Taiwan, the self-governed island it claims as its own. "The Chinese government has made it crystal clear that it will never back down on these issues," Liu said. "The Chinese people will do their utmost to strive for the prospect of peaceful reunification of the motherland, but we will never allow Taiwan independence," he added.
