
I did 8000 miles in a second-hand Tesla Model 3 - and this is what I learned
Across the past decade, industry disruptor Tesla has been the global automotive success story.
And much of that success has been spearheaded by the affordable Tesla Model 3, more than a million of which have found homes since 2017. But 'affordable' is a relative term, and a new one will still set you back just shy of £40k – or nearer £45k for the reassurance of a bigger battery Long Range model.
As our 15 January used buying guide reported, those first cars are now being replaced, so the market is flooded with Model 3s – which is great news for buyers, with prices starting from just £12k.
There's plenty to choose from, whether you want the standard 252bhp rear-wheel drive model or the loopy 444bhp dual-motor Performance. I decided that 346bhp (and 0-60mph in a shade over 4.0sec) was probably more than enough and a claimed 360-mile range suited me, so I opted for the Long Range AWD.
My car has covered 37,771 miles and, being of 2021 vintage, got a heat pump as standard and was made in China (the timber on the dashboard and doors is the giveaway).
Finished in my favourite colour scheme of Midnight Silver with black pleather interior and attractive silver multispoke 19in wheels, it would retail for around £25k-£28k through Tesla's Certified Pre-Owned (CPO) scheme, and I picked it up from the Gatwick branch in West Sussex.
'All CPO Teslas undergo a 200-point inspection that goes through all the vitals of the vehicle,' explained sales manager Kul Rajbansh, who ran me through all of the car's features, pointing out that the tyres on CPO cars must have at least 10,000 miles left on them at the point of sale and there are checks to the cosmetics, interior, battery and brakes.
There's the odd scuff on the alloys, as you would expect of a four-year-old car, but it's otherwise very smart and has had a software upgrade to the latest operating system, along with Enhanced Autopilot (as on all CPO cars).
Usefully, going through a main dealer also adds a year or 10,000 miles to the remaining term or mileage of the original four-year/50,000-mile warranty, including Europe-wide roadside assistance, which is not to be sniffed at. (The separate warranty for the battery and drive unit is unaffected, at eight years or 100,000 miles for a standard car and eight years or 120,000 miles for a Long Range or Performance.)
If you're coming from an ICE car or even a relatively conventional EV, I would recommend getting someone like Kul to give you a guided tour of a Tesla, because even this four-year-old Model 3 has the kind of tech to make 50% of the new cars on the market feel outdated.
A few weeks in, I'm still trying to get my head around all the things the car can do, both remotely via the phone app and inside, where everything bar wipers, indicators and gears is controlled by the huge, 15in touchscreen in the centre of the otherwise completely bare dash.
As a fan of buttons, that alone has given me a bit of a headache, and at first, I felt the Tesla interface wasn't as intuitive as Apple CarPlay.
I think that's just about what you're used to, and once you've linked everything to your phone (easily done via QR codes for key apps such as Spotify), it's pretty seamless, and the built-in Google Maps sat-nav is remarkably good at guessing a journey time.
In truth, it doesn't take too long to realise that most of the car's design and technology is focused on making life as easy as possible.
The single-pedal operation works superbly and it soon becomes a matter of pride never to need to use the friction brakes, and I was right to decide that the performance of the Long Range AWD would be more than adequate.
Most of the time I leave it in Chill mode, because throttle response in Standard can be brutal in the wet; it's all too easy to light up the rear wheels. No wonder the Performance version gives supercars nightmares.
The Model 3 is also vastly roomy, certainly more so than it looks from the outside, with the full-length tinted glass roof giving even more of an impression of space.
Which means there's plenty left for the large elephant that follows me around wherever I go: the fact that, right now, for many people a Tesla is a fairly uncomfortable thing to drive in Britain.
Tesla registrations across Europe dropped by 45% year on year in January 2025, when overall EV sales were up 37% in the same period, and I reckon a lot of that can be attributed to that gesture by figurehead Elon Musk.
I'm sure some will dismiss this as me living in a London bubble, but I have friends who will refuse to go in a Tesla, let alone buy one. So it's very clever and more than a little controversial, but is the Model 3 any good as an actual car?
Right now, I'm still trying to decide, because I find myself so bamboozled by its 'otherness'. But that makes me particularly intrigued for the months ahead, and I will try to come back with a definitive answer once I've got my head around it. Update 2
One of the reasons I went for a Dual Motor Long Range version of the Model 3 was to avoid the range anxiety that's a feature of life with most EVs. A claim of 360 miles sounded like more than enough, particularly because I don't do many long journeys.
Of the 82kWh battery, only around 75kWh is usable, so that total sounded ambitious against the WLTP efficiency claim of 4.2mpkWh, yet I still found myself frustrated by my early economy.
On motorway runs, the car was getting about 3.7mpkWh, but that was dropping in town, resulting in a disappointing average of 3.4mpkWh for the first thousand miles or so, meaning a 255-mile range.
Decent but not as good as I had hoped for – not least because the Tesla consumes energy even when I'm not using it, which can take significant chunks from that total. I was shocked during my first week with it to find that the total had dropped by 7% overnight.
I went straight to the forums, where it was suggested that I might have had Sentry mode on (a remarkable security system that monitors the car via its multiple cameras and wards off would-be thieves) and, if so, apparently that loss was about right.
So now I only use it if I think the car might be at risk. The onboard diagnostics are great for researching losses.
I've switched the powertrain from standard to Chill mode, which softens the throttle response and increases the severity of the regenerative braking (which has actually made it much nicer around town) and am trying to be stingier with the hugely effective climate control system.
Tesla claims average battery degradation of 12% after 200,000 miles, and out of interest I asked for a check on my car to see how its batteries were getting on. I wasn't given any specific numbers but was reassured that it was in line with expected degradation, so I'd guess there should still be 72-73kWh left.
Of course, after all of my stresses, the biggest change has been in the weather: as soon as spring came, things started to improve.
That means I will be spending less time at Tesla Supercharger stations, which is both a blessing and a curse, because I've had to queue for some (my nearest, in Croydon, is particularly busy) but there's also a nice camaraderie among owners as we sit glued to our central screens while our totals gradually tick up. Update 3
A few days away on the Isle of Wight helping my best friend do some work to his parents' holiday home was a good opportunity to give the Model 3 a proper run on a mixture of roads.
Among my pre-flight checks was topping up the windscreen washer fluid, which is under the bonnet and reminded me that the Model 3 has extra storage space up front that I hadn't used yet.
Once this frunk is combined with the long, deep rear boot, it gives a hatchback-rivalling 425 litres of luggage room – which was plenty for our bags, painting gear and various DIY tools without having to resort to folding the rear seats.
Our journey didn't start particularly well because we arrived in Portsmouth to discover that our 10pm Wightlink crossing had been cancelled.
We had over an hour to wait for the next sailing, but that time was easily passed watching That Mitchell and Webb Look sketches on the Tesla's central screen and we were soon aboard the ferry.
In my haste to get to the cafe, I couldn't work out which menu I needed to turn off the alarm (as instructed by warning signs on the car deck), but when the sensors detected movement as the ferry got under way, the car sent my phone a notification via the Tesla app and I was able to turn it off and feel smug as I listened to a chorus of beeping from everyone else's alarms.
I'm not sure I saw another Tesla the whole time I was on the island, though there was a smattering of small 'commuter' EVs.
Yet the Model 3 felt fairly at home: its compact dimensions are ideal for threading along the narrow roads and its cross-country pace is impressive, even if the inert steering means that it isn't a whole lot of fun, and rearward vision is restricted by the high tailgate.
When reversing, I've tended to rely on the rear camera more than in any other car. Happily, the one thing I wasn't preoccupied with was range.
Despite having established before departure that there were public charging options available to me on the island (albeit no Tesla Superchargers), the car managed the return trip and a few days on the island on a single charge. Update 4
Such is the advanced level of tech, and the lack of obvious wear and tear, that it's easy to forget my Model 3 is actually more than four years and 40,000 miles old.
But there is the odd reminder, such as the fact that the wipers were rubbish and overdue for replacement.
So I nipped to my local Euro Car Parts and grabbed a set of Valeo wipers – not cheap at £55 the pair – and fired up the Tesla app to check the 'Do it yourself' section, which has a useful guide to changing them.
Handily, within the Service menu on the central screen is a button for 'Wiper service mode', which parks the wipers about a third of the way up the windscreen to make switching blades a doddle.
The next bit of maintenance wasn't a DIY job. Since the car arrived, I have been disappointed by the ride quality: the primary ride is decent enough, if firm, but the secondary ride can be really niggly.
It's sufficiently bad that it can make the car feel oddly skittish at speed – despite its heft, at 1919kg unladen. It seems to vary from car to car: some Model 3s I've ridden in (often Ubers) appear to ride more sweetly and it's definitely better with a load on board.
But then my mechanic friend, Tim, spotted a potential reason. Although the tyres still had some life left in them (under Tesla's Certified Pre-Owned programme, all cars have at least 10,000 miles left on them at point of sale), they were dated May 2020, a year older than the car, and showing their age with cracks and crazes.
That pointed to hard, unyielding rubber, which won't do much for the ride, and they were also really badly shouldered so it made sense to replace them.
Interestingly, around the same time, Kwik Fit released research that suggested Teslas are harder on tyres than any other car in the UK.
The Model 3 topped its table of cars that require replacement rubber at an above-average rate in 54 areas across Britain, the most of any car, with the Model Y coming third.
I opted to take the car back to my supplying dealer, Tesla Centre Gatwick, but shop around and my car's 235/40 R19 Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3s can be had for around £180 a corner, fitted.
While I waited, I had a look at the latest Model 3 facelift in the dealership: aside from looking a bit sharper from the front (to my eyes the rear of the older car looks better), it's little changed from my four-year-old car, though my daughter would appreciate the new touchscreen panel in the rear.
A couple of hours later and my decision to invest in new tyres was vindicated. The ride is still very firm but it feels more supple – and quieter – over small road imperfections, and I have more confidence in grip levels in the wet. Update 5
EVs are pretty much universally accepted as an ideal solution to the challenges of urban driving, but there remains a stigma around their suitability for long road trips.
However, when we saw the cost of a sleeper train while investigating a 20th-wedding-anniversary long weekend to visit friends in Fort William, wife Emma and I decided to entrust our Tesla.
The usual M25 tedium was dispatched fairly quickly, followed by a fairly swift run up the M40/M42 and then the joy of the clear, fast M6 Toll, where we were comfortably the slowest car, keeping just shy of 70mph to conserve energy.
The dreadful tailbacks around Manchester were unpleasant, but once into the Lake District and beyond the roads were just glorious, their sweeping bends perfectly suiting the Model 3.
Using the Tesla's sat-nav system on a journey such as this forces you to adapt your way of thinking: instead of the traditional ICE mindset of using a tankful of fuel and then refuelling, you set your desired charge level on arrival and it gives you 'splash and dash' stops to keep the charge topped up without forcing you to spend hours waiting each time.
Usefully, these pauses tend to be timed perfectly for when you need a break – or in our case when our spaniel does (for which I can highly recommend Charnock services, where there's a pleasant dog walk beside the bank of Superchargers).
We made an overnight stop in Lockerbie, just north of the border, where we encountered a Dutch Model 3 undertaking a far more ambitious journey than ours.
Moving farther north, as we got into the breathtaking scenery and spectacular roads of the Highlands, it was impossible to resist switching the car's Dynamic mode from Chill to Standard to gain access to the outrageous full-bore acceleration that was able to dispatch the seemingly endless trains of motorhomes safely and with ease.
The stretch through Glen Coe was magical as ever. It was just a shame that the driving experience wasn't more interactive, as the Model 3's lack of communication prevented it creating a proper bond with me.
Nevertheless, it delivered us to Fort William refreshed and relaxed, and it did the same on the near-600-mile schlep home again, despite encountering terrible traffic on a sweltering bank holiday Monday.
It's refined (bar quite a bit of road noise), comfortable in spite of the firm ride and relaxing, and it managed an impressive 3.9mpkWh despite the climate control being on for the majority of the trip.
Above all, the trip was far easier than we expected, and a big part of that is thanks to Tesla's remarkable charging network. So many times in previous EVs I've arrived at chargers to find them all occupied, broken or reluctant to communicate with my car.
But there are now more than 1800 ultra-rapid Tesla Supercharger stalls at 160-plus locations across the UK, which are fast, plentiful and cheaper than most rivals – and, in the case of the Fort William station, pretty scenic as you sit and charge in the shadow of Ben Nevis. Final update
I will admit to having had reservations about Tesla, and in particular the company's owner, so it was hard not to embark on Model 3 ownership without some negative preconceptions.
But it's fair to say the car has comprehensively won me over, even if I have a few lingering doubts over its parentage.
After several months together, I've come to the conclusion that the Model 3 is an excellent appliance. If that sounds negative, it's not meant to: it inspires similar reliance and reverence as my unfailing Bosch dishwasher, 25-year-old Black & Decker Workmate and DeWalt drill, because it makes life easier.
The technology is initially overwhelming but swiftly becomes something you rely on: get into another car and you find yourself wondering why you have to unlock the doors, turn on the ignition, adjust your seat or connect your devices – or even steer, accelerate and brake, should you use Tesla's Enhanced Autopilot system (I prefer to stick to adaptive cruise control, which at least leaves me with the sense that I have an influence over my own destiny).
But the element of Tesla ownership that makes life easiest isn't the car at all: it's the supporting infrastructure. Tesla has ensured that its customers won't suffer the frustrations that most EV users do on a long journey by having more – and better – chargers than anyone else.
There are now more than 1800 in the UK, and when you plan your route, the car's navigation system automatically tells you when and where to stop, with minimal disruption to your journey, as well as how long you will need to charge for and how much it will cost (usually less than from rival charging providers).
When I got my Model 3, I asked whether a used Tesla would make the most of these advantages in the same way as a new one, both in terms of range and software integration. The answer is an emphatic yes.
Initially, I wondered whether all of that wizardry was there to blind me to the Model 3's shortcomings, but in reality, they are relatively few.
I can't help wishing it were the hatchback that its shape implies, but it's still eminently practical – aided by the rear seats dropping down (although the seatbelt warning chimes if you put a heavy load on the folded seatbacks).
In addition to overall capacity, storage for everyday essentials is excellent: there's a deep well in the boot for charging cables and more, plus up front there are large cubbies for the essentials of family life. That said, the fact that you have to go into a sub-menu on the touchscreen to open the glovebox is infuriating.
The technology in what is now a four-year-old car continues to be cutting-edge, aided by regular over-the-air software updates, that touchscreen impresses both with the insights it can give when you're driving and the entertainment available when you're not.
I'd like to have had a head-up display, because the speed readout isn't easy to see at a glance, but otherwise the controls (both on board and in the Tesla phone app) are hard to fault and the climate control (with automatic heated seats and steering wheel) is intuitive and effective.
It's telling that I've got this far without talking about what the Model 3 is like to drive, because it's hard to define.
It's comfortable over long distances, despite a firm ride, and devastatingly rapid cross-country, with 346bhp of instant punch combined with a low centre of gravity, swift turn-in and plenty of grip.
Yet it's difficult to forge any kind of emotional bond with, there being little in the way of feel and feedback through either the wheel or the seat.
I've found that in most conditions, I barely scratch the surface of its performance, preferring to pop it in less aggressive Chill driving mode rather than seeking out opportunities to go for a blast as I might in, say, a BMW 3 Series.
The range has improved as we have transitioned from late winter to mid-summer, and across a full year I'd expect better than my 3.8mpkWh average.
If ultimate distance is your ambition, it might be worth tracking down a single-motor car; reader Fred Reschen reports that he gets 5mpkWh on longer journeys in his Long Range RWD.
Fred has also been impressed by his car's build quality – something I'd had concerns about following warnings from bar-room pundits. In truth, my Model 3 has never looked or felt like a 'used' car: it feels as well screwed together as any other premium saloon.
But it isn't a new car, and I spent more on maintenance – new tyres, new wipers and an MOT test (which it strolled through with no advisories) – than I did on charging, although that would balance out long term.
The fact that there has been little deterioration in battery life is reassuring, and Tesla has now sold more than 250,000 cars in the UK, which means a healthy used buyer's market.
Add in the fact that my car represents a saving of nearly 50% over its new equivalent – which, facelift aside, is essentially the same – and it's a compelling package. As for my feelings about Elon Musk, I guess I could always buy a bumper sticker… Used Tesla Model 3 specification
Prices: List price new £49,935 List price now £49,990 Price as tested £28,000 Options: Enhanced Autopilot £3400, Midnight Silver metallic paint £1000, 19in silver sports wheels £1450 (prices all in 2021)
Fuel consumption and range: Claimed economy 360 miles Battery 82/75kWh (total, usable) Test average 3.8mpkWh Test best 4.3mpkWh Test worst 3.4mpkWh Real-world range 285 miles
Tech highlights: 0-62mph 4.2sec Top speed 145mph Engine Permanent magnet synchronous motor (r), asynchronous motor (f) Max power 346bhp Max torque 299lb ft Transmission 1-spd reduction gear, 4WD Boot capacity 425 litres Wheels 8.5Jx19in, alloy Tyres 235/40 R19 Kerb weight 1919kg
Service and running costs: Contract hire rate £404pcm CO2 0g/km Service costs MOT test £54 Other costs Tyres £720, wipers £54.99 Fuel costs £489 Running costs inc fuel £1318 Cost per mile 19 pence Faults Tyre-pressure sensor failure
Back to the top
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
an hour ago
- Times
Rail & Sail ferry service to Belfast ‘set up to fail'
The number of passengers using a flagship rail and ferry service between Scotland and Northern Ireland has tumbled to 12 a day. Freedom of Information figures obtained by The Times reveal the 'Rail & Sail' service carried 4,400 passengers in the year to 2025, compared with 15,000 passengers five years previously. A drastic cut in service levels has been blamed for the 71 per cent drop in annual passenger numbers since 2019. Services were curtailed during the Covid-19 lockdowns, with tickets valid only on a single train, coach and ferry combination each day. This system remains in place. Before the pandemic, several options were available daily. Colin Smyth, Labour's MSP for South Scotland, accused SNP ministers of allowing the service to be 'set up to fail' and called for a direct rail link to Cairnryan port, which replaced Stranraer as Scotland's ferry gateway to Belfast. Currently, passengers must take a coach from Ayr to the port, a transfer that a rail expert says is the root of the problem. 'The rot set in when Stena Line moved operations from Stranraer, where the port directly adjoined the railway station, to the remote Cairnryan,' said Mark Smith, who founded the travel website The Man in Seat 61. He said the service 'appears to have reneged on the promise to provide a bus connection, reducing service to one per day'. Colin Smyth said the once-popular 'boat train' was no longer viable for most travellers owing to its inflexibility. 'By cutting the connection back to a single daily coach, the journey has been made so awkward and inflexible that it's no longer a viable option for most travellers,' he said. He believes the service is being intentionally run down so it can be written off due to 'lack of demand', a move that he says goes against the Scottish government's commitment to promote public transport and reduce transport emissions. Despite the low usage, some travellers have complained that the service was often sold out when they try to book online, with some opting for direct coach transfers from Glasgow instead. The low numbers have also led to instances of the bus leaving Cairnryan with a single passenger onboard. Transport Scotland said that a rail link to the port had been considered in 2022 as part of a strategic transport review but the idea was rejected because it 'was not expected to provide value for money'. Campaigners argue that the current situation goes against Scotland's national transport strategy, which prioritises public transport over cars. Ellie Harrison, a transport campaigner, said this strategy needs to be 'reflected in the cost of the different transport modes, so that the lower-carbon journeys are always cheaper.' She added that with ScotRail now in public ownership, it should be a priority for the government to promote the service and help reduce short-haul flights. In response, ScotRail's commercial director, Claire Dickie, said the company was 'committed to supporting the Rail & Sail route and encouraging sustainable travel options'. She said that ScotRail was working with Stena Line to make the service more 'appealing and reliable for customers' and that ticket sales to Belfast via Cairnryan were 'up 35 per cent so far in 2025'. Stena Line echoed this sentiment, calling the Rail & Sail service 'a key part of the Stena Line travel offer' and stating that the company 'would welcome improvements in rail services and products'. A Transport Scotland spokesman said any commercial decisions related to ticket initiatives would be for Stena Line to decide, in liaison with other operators such as ScotRail.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Villagers whose country idyll was 'destroyed' by traveller site overnight furious after family submits retrospective permission to make site permanent and some are even considering moving
A luxurious property has gone on the market just weeks after an illegal travellers' site appeared on its doorstep. The stunning four-bedroom detached bungalow – priced at offers around £950,000 – is less than 150 yards from the caravan park, which is built on green belt land and without planning permission. Set in 3.5 acres of rural land, the high-specification property includes stables and a hot tub area, perfect for entertaining friends. Estate agents Stapleton Derby described the home as: 'Set within a peaceful rural location and offering superb access to all major motorway connections. 'This absolutely stunning, newly built four-bedroom detached bungalow presents a rare opportunity to acquire a luxurious home with its own equestrian facilities and expansive land. 'Designed with elegance and practicality in mind, the property is a true sanctuary, combining high-end finishes with thoughtful architectural detail. 'Externally, the front of the property welcomes you with a charming courtyard and ample parking for multiple vehicles. 'To the rear, a private oasis awaits, featuring patios, a hot tub, decking with seating areas, an Astro turf lawn, and a large pergola with its own bar and social space —perfect for entertaining or unwinding in style.' The current owners made the decision to sell as villagers fear the caravan camp, which sprung up in May – will knock hundreds of thousands of pounds off property prices. Rex Bennett, 78, said: 'Judging from past experiences of travellers' sites appearing close by, house prices will definitely fall. 'I've lived here nearly 40 years, and it's happened before when travellers' site spring up. 'The value of people's houses will fall and the owners lose money. 'Whether the reasons are justified or not, no one would choose to live near a caravan site.' He added: 'I haven't heard of anyone having trouble with the travellers but that doesn't make what they have done right. 'They have been very clever about how they have gone about building it. 'Turning up on a Bank Holiday weekend, knowing full well they wouldn't be stopped. 'It was very well thought out.' Stephen Holgate, 55, said: 'I don't have a problem with the site but then again, I don't have to live next to it. 'I'm not sure how I'd feel if they were my neighbours.' The travellers tore up the protected six-acre greenbelt plot, in Burtonwood, Cheshire, in just 72 hours – covering it in hardstanding and erecting a 10ft perimeter fence. The site located between Tan House Lane and Farmer's Lane was lit up like 'Blackpool Illuminations' at night according to one neighbour. Warrington Borough Council said it was aware of the 'potential breach of planning control' and vowed to 'take strong enforcement action within the legal framework.' A retrospective application has been submitted seeking full planning permission for a change of use of land associated with Tan House Farm. The documents state the change of use is for a gypsy and traveller residential site, with four pitches and associated landscaping, and the installation of a farm gate to a footpath on the corner of Tan House Lane and Farmers Lane. Applicant John Varey said the pitches can accommodate a mix of 16 caravans and mobile homes, occupied by Romani gypsies. The report added: 'All of the proposed occupants grew up in nomadic families and have continued to follow that way of life. The families travel in caravans for work and to attend fairs. 'The site is in the greenbelt, however, the land represents 'grey belt', and on that basis, the development is not necessarily inappropriate within the green belt.' Planning documents continued: 'The proposed site provides four gypsy and traveller pitches which are safe, well-designed, and ensure that the site will be private and provide a favourable living environment. 'The proposals include substantial planting and screening, which will result in an on-site biodiversity net gain 'The site will be well screened and capable of integrating with the area, which is characterised by farmland and some other pockets of residential development. 'The site is already connected to water, and connection to the electricity grid is proposed and achievable. 'The package treatment plant and welfare units facilitate the effective management of foul waste. 'The entire site remains permeable, ensuring that surface water will soak away, and the site is well drained with a ditch along the northern boundary. 'Given the families' lack of alternative accommodation, their living standards have been greatly improved since moving onto the application site.' Villagers have already expressed concerns that a metal gate has been installed on a public right-of-way. The planning document read: 'The metal gate is 3.6m, and a 1.2m gap is left to the right-hand side for pedestrians which enables continued access to the public right of way. 'The road is owned by the applicant and the gate is locked with a padlock. For reasons relating to fly-tipping and security, we would argue that the gate should be approved as part of the planning application.' The council has been inundated with objections by villagers. One objector wrote: 'The land has been destroyed without any planning permission, our greenbelt completely vandalised with absolutely no regard to the rules or residents. 'It is absolutely disgusting that this has been allowed to happen.' Another said: 'The site has damaged the natural beauty of the area and transformed once green belt land into a caravan park. 'Not only this, but a footpath has been obstructed with little to no consideration for anyone who plans to use this regularly used route. 'Failure to reject this planning application will only lead to further exploitation of the system in similar ways around the area, which will seriously damage an area of considerable natural beauty and wildlife.' But one letter of support read: 'I have spoken with some of the people on the caravan park at the village café. 'They were polite, friendly, and explained the situation of Warrington having no caravan sites for them to live on. I am happy with them being there. It is better than them on our parks.' The council is expected to reach a decision on the retrospective planning application later in the year.


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Concrete sales plunge to 62-year low as hopes for Labour's building boom fade
Demand for concrete has fallen to its lowest level since 1963 in a serious blow to Labour's hopes of building more houses. Sales of ready-mixed concrete fell by 11.5pc in the three months to June against the previous three months, according to data from the Mineral Products Association (MPA), which represents producers. The product is widely-used in housebuilding to lay foundations, and provide the base for flooring and driveways. The figures suggest that Labour will miss its target of building 1.5m new homes by the end of this Parliament 'by a significant margin', the MPA said. Concrete sales have fallen by a third in 10 years, and more than halved over the last 20 years. The drop means that annual sales have not been this low since 1963 – before the nationwide housing and infrastructure building boom that transformed Britain. The MPA said that sales of other building materials, such as mortar and sand, also fell, with demand for most products at 'historically low levels'.