
What Netanyahu fears the most in Gaza
Why has the Gaza war lasted this long?
Some believe that Israel fears for the remaining hostages. Others think Israel wants to avoid further losses among its troops. And some see it as incapable of eliminating what remains of Hamas.
In my opinion, Israel does not want to end the war except on its own terms – by preventing the return of the Palestinian Authority to rule the Gaza Strip. To prolong the crisis, it will use whatever weapons it has left, from starvation to displacement. In short, what Netanyahu fears most is the establishment of a Palestinian state.
Washington has a practical solution to stop the war: Hamas leaves Gaza, and Israel halts its military campaign. But neither Hamas nor Israel is willing to accept this!
Israel, in particular, as the stronger party, refuses to eliminate Hamas if the price is the return of the Palestinian Authority. Netanyahu and his team are convinced that the Palestinian Authority poses a greater threat to Israel than Hamas. Hamas has no international legitimacy and represents everything that terrifies most of the world – even the Arab world. It is a militant, ideological jihadist group. Meanwhile, the Palestinian Authority is recognized by the United Nations as the legitimate representative of the Palestinian people. If it regains control over Gaza, that would mark the path toward a Palestinian state.
Despite all that Hamas has done – including the attacks on October 7 – it remains, in Israel's eyes, merely a 'terrorist group' that can be dealt with just as other countries deal with similar groups.
Netanyahu believes it would be foolish to destroy Hamas only to reward the Palestinian Authority with control of Gaza, allowing it to emerge as the victor of these wars and create a de facto Palestinian state. Netanyahu has personally worked to prevent this scenario, fostering a symbiotic relationship with Hamas since the early days of his rule by empowering the group to govern Gaza.
Netanyahu is corrupt and opportunistic – but not a fool. He understands that handing over the keys to Gaza to Ramallah would automatically mean the countdown to the creation of a Palestinian state has begun.
After his swift and dazzling victories over Hezbollah, al-Assad, and Iran, Netanyahu now faces a reckoning similar to the post-Gulf War moment in 1991. Back then, the US-Gulf coalition defeated Saddam Hussein, liberated Kuwait, and eliminated a major threat to Israel – then demanded a price: A solution to the Palestinian issue.
In that same year, the Madrid Conference was held despite Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir's reluctance. He ultimately accepted, paving the way for the later Oslo Accords, which for the first time allowed the Palestinians to return from exile.
Netanyahu knows this history – and fears his own victories could similarly 'deviate' toward the establishment of a Palestinian state.
In practice, Israel – having destroyed Hezbollah and tracked its leader Hassan Nasrallah underground – could do the same to Hamas. As we've seen, Israel is not deterred by casualties among its soldiers, its hostages are not a top priority, and certainly, the scale of Palestinian deaths is of no concern. Of the 251 original hostages, only about 23 remain alive in captivity.
Today, the American envoy's negotiations have reached an advanced stage to end the tragedy in Gaza, secure the release of the remaining hostages – around 50, dead or alive – and disarm Hamas. Yet Netanyahu's main concern remains: the return of the Palestinian Authority to govern Gaza.
Even without a deal from the envoy Brett McGurk or David Satterfield, Netanyahu could end the war by eliminating the remaining Hamas forces. He has proven willing to accept further casualties, as he has in parallel wars. He risked his people's safety by opening fronts with Hezbollah, Iran, and the Houthis, and he is prepared to take risks and accept losses in a final showdown with Hamas.
So why doesn't Netanyahu end the war?
As the conflict nears a possible resolution in the coming two months, I believe his dilemma lies in finding an arrangement that prevents the emergence of a Palestinian state. What's stopping him from ending the Gaza war is not concern over additional Israeli casualties or even losing his role as prime minister – especially since Trump is openly working to shield him from accountability and helping him stay in power.
From a strategic perspective, the issue goes beyond current events: Israel does not want the Palestinian Authority to return to Gaza and unite it with Ramallah – even if that means reinstating Hamas or handing Gaza to Ibrahim al-Arjani to run it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Arabiya
7 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
FAA planning more helicopter route changes after January collision that killed 67
The Federal Aviation Administration said on Friday it is planning additional helicopter route changes near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport after the January 29 mid-air collision of an American Airlines regional jet and an Army helicopter that killed 67 people. FAA official Nick Fuller said at a National Transportation Safety Board investigative hearing that an agency work group is planning changes on a key helicopter route near Reagan after imposing permanent restrictions on non-essential helicopter operations in March and further restricting where they could operate in June. NTSB officials at the hearing expressed concerns about a 'disconnect' between front-line air traffic controllers and agency leaders and raised other questions about FAA actions before the fatal collision, including why earlier reports of close call incidents did not prompt safety improvements. Board members have also raised concerns about the failure of the FAA to turn over documents in a timely fashion during the investigation of the January collision. The NTSB received details on staffing levels at the time of the January 29 crash 'after considerable confusion and a series of corrections and updates from the FAA,' a board report said. The hearing has run more than 30 hours over three days and raised a series of troubling questions, including about the failure of the primary controller on duty to issue an alert to the American regional jet and the actions of an assistant controller who was supposed to assist the primary controller. 'That did not occur and we're trying to understand why. And no one has been able to tell us what the individual was doing during that time,' NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy said. Homendy said earlier this week the FAA had ignored warnings about serious safety issues. 'Every sign was there that there was a safety risk, and the tower was telling you,' Homendy said. 'You transferred people out instead of taking ownership over the fact that everybody in FAA in the tower was saying there was a problem... Fix it. Do better.' FAA officials at the hearing vowed to work more collaboratively and address concerns. Senator Tim Kaine on Friday also cited concerns raised by an FAA manager about the volume of flights at the airport before the collision and the decision by Congress last year to add five additional daily flights to Reagan. 'Congress must act to reduce dangerous congestion by removing flights into and out of (Reagan National),' Kaine said.


Asharq Al-Awsat
an hour ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Barrack Hails ‘Opportunity' to Find Solution to Hezbollah Arms Ahead of Beirut Visit
US envoy to Lebanon Thomas Barrack has declared that the opportunity is ripe to address the crisis over Hezbollah's arsenal, sending a pointed message ahead of his scheduled arrival in Beirut. His statement comes as Lebanon's leadership continues to struggle to agree on a unified response to Washington's list of demands, amid an uncompromising stance from Hezbollah, whose Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem reaffirmed the group's commitment to resist American and Israeli pressure. A committee appointed by President Joseph Aoun, Speaker of Parliament Nabih Berri, and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam held another meeting at the Presidential Palace without agreeing on a final draft of Lebanon's reply to the US proposal. The committee is set to convene again before Barrack's anticipated arrival on Monday. Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Berri stressed the Lebanese leadership's determination to maintain a unified position. 'Barrack came to us with a proposal, and we must respond. We are working to ensure our position is unified, especially among the three presidents, while taking Hezbollah's stance into account, as Barrack requested,' Berri said. He confirmed that Hezbollah has yet to provide a definitive answer. Committee sources described intense regional and domestic consultations aimed at overcoming remaining obstacles, citing 'cautious optimism' over the prospects of consensus. Barrack is expected to arrive in Beirut on Monday to discuss the Lebanese response to Washington's proposal, which calls for the Lebanese state to ensure that all weapons remain exclusively in the hands of official security institutions, alongside commitments to administrative, financial, and political reforms. On the eve of his trip, Barrack posted on X: 'Lebanon's hope awakens!!! The opportunity is now. This is a historic moment to supersede the strained confessionalism of the past and finally fulfill Lebanon's true promise of the hope of 'One country, one people, one army.' As Potus has consistently shared with the world, "Lebanon is a great place, with great people. Let's make Lebanon Great again.' Hezbollah Sets Conditions Hezbollah and the Lebanese state have found some common ground in demanding American guarantees before implementing any agreement. While Hezbollah has shown limited flexibility, it has insisted that any progress hinges on Israel fulfilling its obligations under the ceasefire agreement reached last November. These obligations include Israel withdrawing from occupied Lebanese territory, ending air, sea, and land violations, releasing detainees, allowing displaced residents to return, and launching reconstruction efforts in southern Lebanon. According to Lebanese sources familiar with the talks, Hezbollah has previously discussed certain details of surrendering its arsenal, including handing over heavy missiles and drones and transferring medium-range missiles back to Iran. However, the group insists that any such steps be contingent on Israel's implementation of the ceasefire deal.

Al Arabiya
6 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Italy to begin Gaza air drops: foreign minister
Italy said Friday it would begin air drops over Gaza, which UN-backed experts say is slipping into famine — the latest European country to do so. 'I have given the green light to a mission involving Army and Air Force assets for the transport and airdrop of basic necessities to civilians in Gaza, who have been severely affected by the ongoing conflict,' Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani said in a statement. Italy's air force will work with Jordan's military to air drop special containers containing essential goods, he said. The first drops could come on August 9, he added. Spain on Friday said it had air-dropped 12 tonnes of food into Gaza, joining Britain and France, which have partnered with Middle Eastern nations to deliver sorely needed humanitarian supplies by air to the Palestinian enclave.