Dear Richard Madeley: ‘I'm always doing favours, but now I need some time for myself'
Dear Richard,
I'm a retired woman and my husband left me in good financial shape after his death six years ago. Since the children grew up I've tended to fill my days with 'good works', helping out at charity shops, ferrying friends around and sitting as a magistrate. However, I've had a couple of minor health issues recently that put the fear of god into me. I've come out of the experience with the intense desire to live for myself a little – having a nice time with people I like, doing a bit more culture and travel – possibly even dating.
The problem I am having is my commitments to other people and organisations that seem to have me on speed dial. I've experimented with saying no to a couple of these but I got a sense of guilt at letting them down. Even the children have been supportive in principle, but reacted to news that I wasn't going to be around on a given weekend with incredulity.
I don't want to live purely selfishly – I just need to rebalance things a bit. Do you have any advice for me?
– Audrey, via email
Dear Audrey,
Yes, I do. Rather than making saying no to requests for your time on a reactive basis – which takes people by surprise, given your previous automatic acceptance – you should be proactive. Move on to the front foot. Take the initiative.
Write emails or letters to everyone, similar to your one to me. Explain how and why you are currently readjusting your life. How can they object? Why shouldn't you reassess the way you spend your time, who with and where? By doing this you'll have prepared them for the change in your mindset, and a refusal will be far less likely to offend. But if it does – to heck with them. It's your life. Live it exactly as you want. It sounds like you've earned the right.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Grade I listed? Liverpool's ghastly cathedral should never have been built at all
However, by the 1990s, when the building was barely 25 years old, the cheapness of its construction had made it a liability. An extensive and expensive programme of renovation began. That was probably the last opportunity to pull the thing down and return to the Lutyens plan (which Rome itself could have helped fund). To have done so would have created huge numbers of skilled jobs for decades, and made Liverpool a place of religious and artistic pilgrimage. But it was not to be. Those who praise the Wigwam – and they have been out in force since its new listing – often argue that much of its merit lies in its interior, notably some John Piper stained glass, and a crucifix by Elisabeth Frink. Pevsner otherwise laments that the original 'harmony' of the abstract art that Gibberd wanted in the building has been compromised by much more traditional works that have arrived since. I fear the main consequence of the Grade I listing will be to preserve a monument to the ugliness of the 1960s, perhaps as a warning to architects and their patrons in the indefinite future. One can only imagine how people in 500 years' time will view the Wigwam: if it can manage to stand that long.
Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
My selfish neighbour installed a satellite dish right outside my bedroom window
A woman was left fuming after her 'selfish' next door neighbour installed a satellite dish right outside her bedroom window blocking her view. Taking to TikTok, the upset woman, who appears to be from the UK, claimed her neighbour deliberately decided to place the dish in front of her window instead of his own. The clip, posted on @Seewara_xo, racked up more than 1.2 million views, with many viewers suggesting she may have grounds to take legal action against him. Words accompanying the video footage said: 'POV: Neighbour enters his selfish era and puts the satellite dish where you look out, not where he does.' The woman showed how her view of the garden was being partly blocked by the dish - in addition, her window could no longer open fully. The woman also provided a view from her garden, showing the proximity of the dish to her window. She then asked internet users if she was overreacting which sparked a debate online. In the caption she wrote: 'Is this normal or am I overreacting ?' One person wrote: 'If a neighbor attaches something to their house that extends over your property line without your permission, it's considered an encroachment.' Meanwhile, others suggested a more petty approach, saying she should try to block the signal. One person suggested: 'Ok, so here's what you'll do- put some tin foil on your window, across the whole pane. 'Then open it right across the satellite dish. He won't get any reception whatsoever, - then he can move it, his choice. This is level 1 petty. We have 52 stages remaining if needed….' Another added: 'The dishes don't work if they're just a few degrees out, say, if a window accidentally bumped into them... repeatedly... every week or so.' Someone else added: 'Placing a strong magnet near a satellite dish aerial can potentially interfere with its reception. 'The magnetic field created by the magnet can disrupt the delicate electromagnetic field used by the aerial to capture and transmit signals. 'Please DO NOT attach a strong magnet to your window and open it as this might affect your neighbour's viewing pleasure.' She then asked internet users if she was overreacting which sparked a debate online A fourth added: 'Can tell that's been really poorly installed. It will more than likely "fall off" during the night.' Meanwhile others suggested she should just speak to her neighbour and politely ask him to move it. One person wrote: 'Talk to them, ask them to move it, then proceed with the rest of your life' Another said: 'If there wasn't any consent have them move it, state 'property encroachment'.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Manchester Museum asks visitors if Egyptian woman's body should be taken off display
One of Europe's leading museums is asking visitors if it should continue to display the body of an ancient Egyptian woman 200 years after it was brought to the UK by cotton merchants, as it 'decolonises' some of its most famous exhibits. Manchester Museum, which in May was named 2025's European museum of the year, is running a consultation on the future of Asru, a woman who lived in Thebes, the ancient city in the location of modern-day Luxor, 2,700 years ago. A plaque at the museum asks: 'Should we continue to display the body of Asru?', inviting visitors to submit answers in a postbox underneath. It adds: 'Asru's mummified body was unwrapped at the Manchester Natural History Society in April 1825. She has regularly been on display for the two centuries since. In that time, we have also changed as a museum and are thinking more about how we care for people.' The story of Asru's body is one of several that show how the development of the UK museum sector benefited from colonialism and transatlantic slavery, at a time when the ethics of displaying human bodies and spoils from imperial expansion are being questioned. In March a report by MPs from the all-party parliamentary group for Afrikan reparations called for bans on selling ancestral remains and publicly displaying them without consent. Asru's finely decorated wooden coffin reveals a few biographical details. An affluent woman who was about 60 when she died, her father was called Pa-Kush, which means 'the Kushite', a Black man from modern-day Sudan. Pa-Kush worked as a scribe, a high-status role, when Egypt had Kushite pharaohs. Asru's name means 'her arm is against them'. In the 19th century, Asru's sarcophagus was acquired by Robert and William Garnett, the sons of a former trader in enslaved African people, who had followed him into the cotton industry, research by one of the museum's curators, Campbell Price, found. The Garnetts donated Asru's body to the Manchester Natural History Society, the forerunner to Manchester Museum. Alongside the Asru consultation, the museum has launched its Decolonise! Trail , named after the initiative in arts and culture that is being used to challenge stereotypical perspectives linked to empire and colonialism. The trail links displays of items from Africa and Asia, subverting traditional 'Eurocentric' narratives about them through artworks newly displayed alongside them. It is supported by a booklet that asks questions such as 'Should a desire for knowledge override the wishes of ancient cultures?', 'Do you know where the minerals in your technology come from?' and 'What is climate justice?'. Sign up to The Long Wave Nesrine Malik and Jason Okundaye deliver your weekly dose of Black life and culture from around the world after newsletter promotion Next to African spearheads – items that the booklet describes as having 'reinforced reductive and inaccurate ideas about African people' – is an LGBTQ+ comic strip story by the Congolese artist Edher Numbi. A mural by the British artists the Singh twins in the museum's south Asia gallery examines the link between enslavement and India's colonisation. It features a 1928 quote from the then UK home secretary, William Joynson-Hicks, who, speaking of India as a major export market for 'Lancashire cotton goods', said: 'We did not conquer India for the benefit of the Indians … We conquered India as an outlet for the goods of Britain. We conquered India by the sword, and by the sword we shall hold it.' Chloe Cousins, Manchester Museum's social justice manager, who created the trail, said: 'The trail is new but the concept of decolonising isn't new to Manchester Museum at all. Telling more accurate and nuanced accounts of the history of the collections is one of the ways we can care for the people and communities whose belongings, stories and histories are held here.'
