Van Velden steers WorkSafe toward a softer touch
WorkSafe is being urged to soften its tone, sharpen its focus, and become an enabler of safe work, not just an enforcer of compliance, as part of significant changes to New Zealand's health and safety regime.
Under direction from Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden, the regulator is undergoing something of a transformation to prioritise education over punishment, and trust over fear.
'There is a huge culture of fear around our regulator for health and safety; this needs to change,' van Velden told Q + A with Jack Tame. 'We have to focus on reducing death and serious injuries before we sweat the small stuff.'
She says while enforcement remains on the table for serious breaches and dangerous workplaces, engagement and guidance will be the dominant force going forward.
But not everyone is convinced this is the right move.
Journalist and author Rebecca Macfie, who has written extensively about workplace failures, tells The Detail there is no benefit in watering down enforcement in a country where workplace deaths remain stubbornly high.
On average, 73 people die in a New Zealand workplace every year.
'My instinct is no, the changes won't [save lives],' says Macfie. 'It is missing so many critical parts of what a good system would look like. Most importantly, it is absolutely missing the place of workers and worker voice.'
Macfie authored a book on the deadly Pike River Mine explosion, a tragedy that killed 29 workers and led to the creation of WorkSafe in 2013 and a major overhaul of health and safety law in 2015.
'I have written and covered so many stories about [workplace deaths], they keep on happening, we keep on killing 70-plus workers a year in this country, and nobody can be satisfied with that, so change and improvement are drastically needed.
'But my response to van Velden's changes is they are not getting to the kind of change that is actually needed.
'On one hand, she wants to dial back on enforcement against businesses and increase guidance. The increased guidance is good, but the dialling back of enforcement is not.
'And there is inconsistency … she wants to see more prosecutions of workers.'
'She also wants to reduce the obligations on directors.
'That seems pretty brazenly inconsistent to me,' Macfie says.
'The bottom line is, the minister now wants WorkSafe to go gently, be more supportive, and be prepared to help. On one level, this is fine, but we need serious enforcement as well.'
Newsroom political editor Laura Walters tells The Detail that the changes are on brand for Act.
'This is an important area for Act, in terms of workplace relations, employment relations, negotiations, workplace settings … this is important for Act around reducing – in their words – unnecessary red tape, reducing intervention from government and letting people get on with business and try and lift productivity … this is core Act stuff.
'It's hard to know if this will be a win for Act until we see the effect of the changes … the biggest test is obviously election time.
'But you will imagine this will be welcomed by businesses … they have been asking for this kind of change, so they will be happy.
'But will it reduce deaths in the workplace?
'Right now, that is too hard to know.'
The reforms follow months of internal and external reviews of WorkSafe's effectiveness, capacity, and culture. Van Velden says WorkSafe must now be a coach, not just a cop.
Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here.
You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
13 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Sentencing reforms come into effect as govt targets crime
By Natalie Akoorie of RNZ Sentencing reforms which will cap discounts judges can give to an offender and introduce aggravating factors at sentencing, have come into effect as the government targets tougher crime consequences. The Labour Party says the move will only exacerbate an already clogged court system, add huge costs to the taxpayer by increasing the prison population, and will not reduce crime or the number of victims. But Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said the sentencing reforms, which came into effect on Sunday, were about restoring real consequences for crime. Communities and hardworking New Zealanders should not be made to live and work in fear of criminals who had a "flagrant disregard for the law, corrections officers and the general public", he said. "We know that undue leniency has resulted in a loss of public confidence in sentencing, and our justice system as a whole. We had developed a culture of excuses." The tougher stance was part of the government's plan to "restore law and order, which we know is working", he said. "It signals to victims that they deserve justice, and that they are our priority." The changes include: • Capping sentence discounts when considering mitigating factors • Preventing repeat discounts for youth and remorse • Introducing aggravating factors at sentencing for offences against sole charge workers and those whose home and business are interconnected • Encouraging the use of cumulative sentencing when someone commits a crime on bail, in custody or on parole • Requiring courts to take victims' needs and interests into account at sentencing Act backs reforms Act MP Nicole McKee welcomed the new rules saying there had been a steady erosion of public confidence in the justice system. "Offenders faced fewer and shorter prison sentences, while communities paid the price." She said police data showed a 134 percent increase in serious assault leading to injury from 2017 to 2023 under "Labour's failed experiment of being kind to criminals". "We've restored Three Strikes, and from today additional measures are coming into force to make the message even clearer." She said the vulnerability of people who worked alone or in a business attached to their home would be "recognised in law" thanks to Act's coalition agreement to crack down on retail crime with the introduction of the aggravating factors. 'Smart on crime' Labour's spokesperson for Justice Duncan Webb, however, said tough on crime sounded good but did not actually have the effect of reducing crime. "We've got to be smart on crime as well. We've got to address the causes of crime which we know are poverty, family violence, mental illness and addiction, and until we address those, there'll continue to be crime and there'll continue to be victims." Tougher sentences were just one option, he said. "If we're gonna be serious about reducing crime and reducing harm, we've got to address those causes of crime." Evidence showed tough on crime initiatives such as the Three Strikes law, which the government had reinstated, did not reduce victims, Webb said. "Victims are absolutely central to the approach and the best thing we could ever have is avoiding someone becoming a victim and that means addressing the causes of crime before crime occurs. "And absolutely I understand that when people are victims of crime they want to see the perpetrator punished and that's the right thing to happen, but I'd rather see the appropriate amount of resources put into mental health, reducing poverty, [and] eliminating homelessness, because those are things that create crime and we've seen them all increase under this government." The fact white collar crime such as fraud - which was one of the few crimes that responded to deterrents - was not captured by Three Strikes was inconsistent, Webb said. Webb said he had sought feedback from those in the social services, intervention, and criminal justice sectors. "They're all frustrated with the fact the direction that's being taken is going to clog up the courts, it's going to create more offenders, it's going to create more victims and it's not actually going to address what we really want to address which is the things that cause crime."
Otago Daily Times
13 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Sentencing reforms to 'restore law and order' come into effect
By Natalie Akoorie of RNZ Sentencing reforms which will cap discounts judges can give to an offender and introduce aggravating factors at sentencing, have come into effect as the government targets tougher crime consequences. The Labour Party says the move will only exacerbate an already clogged court system, add huge costs to the taxpayer by increasing the prison population, and will not reduce crime or the number of victims. But Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said the sentencing reforms, which came into effect on Sunday, were about restoring real consequences for crime. Communities and hardworking New Zealanders should not be made to live and work in fear of criminals who had a "flagrant disregard for the law, corrections officers and the general public", he said. "We know that undue leniency has resulted in a loss of public confidence in sentencing, and our justice system as a whole. We had developed a culture of excuses." The tougher stance was part of the government's plan to "restore law and order, which we know is working", he said. "It signals to victims that they deserve justice, and that they are our priority." The changes include: • Capping sentence discounts when considering mitigating factors • Preventing repeat discounts for youth and remorse • Introducing aggravating factors at sentencing for offences against sole charge workers and those whose home and business are interconnected • Encouraging the use of cumulative sentencing when someone commits a crime on bail, in custody or on parole • Requiring courts to take victims' needs and interests into account at sentencing Act backs reforms Act MP Nicole McKee welcomed the new rules saying there had been a steady erosion of public confidence in the justice system. "Offenders faced fewer and shorter prison sentences, while communities paid the price." She said police data showed a 134 percent increase in serious assault leading to injury from 2017 to 2023 under "Labour's failed experiment of being kind to criminals". "We've restored Three Strikes, and from today additional measures are coming into force to make the message even clearer." She said the vulnerability of people who worked alone or in a business attached to their home would be "recognised in law" thanks to Act's coalition agreement to crack down on retail crime with the introduction of the aggravating factors. 'Smart on crime' Labour's spokesperson for Justice Duncan Webb, however, said tough on crime sounded good but did not actually have the effect of reducing crime. "We've got to be smart on crime as well. We've got to address the causes of crime which we know are poverty, family violence, mental illness and addiction, and until we address those, there'll continue to be crime and there'll continue to be victims." Tougher sentences were just one option, he said. "If we're gonna be serious about reducing crime and reducing harm, we've got to address those causes of crime." Evidence showed tough on crime initiatives such as the Three Strikes law, which the government had reinstated, did not reduce victims, Webb said. "Victims are absolutely central to the approach and the best thing we could ever have is avoiding someone becoming a victim and that means addressing the causes of crime before crime occurs. "And absolutely I understand that when people are victims of crime they want to see the perpetrator punished and that's the right thing to happen, but I'd rather see the appropriate amount of resources put into mental health, reducing poverty, [and] eliminating homelessness, because those are things that create crime and we've seen them all increase under this government." The fact white collar crime such as fraud - which was one of the few crimes that responded to deterrents - was not captured by Three Strikes was inconsistent, Webb said. Webb said he had sought feedback from those in the social services, intervention, and criminal justice sectors. "They're all frustrated with the fact the direction that's being taken is going to clog up the courts, it's going to create more offenders, it's going to create more victims and it's not actually going to address what we really want to address which is the things that cause crime."
Scoop
17 hours ago
- Scoop
Real Change Promised And Delivered For Sole-Charge Workers
'Today, ACT has delivered on its promise to protect some of our most vulnerable workers,' says ACT MP Dr Parmjeet Parmar. 'New sentencing laws come into force today that put the rights of retailers and other sole-charge workers at the centre of sentencing decisions. These changes fulfil ACT's coalition commitment to add new aggravating factors for offences against people working alone, or whose home and business are connected,' says Dr Parmar. 'I've met countless shop workers and small retailers in Auckland who have spent thousands on security measures just so they can keep their doors open and provide for their families. It's heartbreaking. Many came to New Zealand believing it was a safe country, only to find themselves constantly fearful at work. 'People working alone are especially vulnerable because they have no one to help them in a crisis. For those running businesses attached to their homes, there's the added fear of putting their loved ones at risk if they try to flee. From today, the law recognises that vulnerability. 'These new sentencing provisions also ensure that any victim's specific circumstances will be given greater weight by judges when deciding sentences. 'Ultimately, this means tougher penalties for criminals who prey on hard-working New Zealanders just trying to make an honest living. It's about making our communities safer and delivering on our promise of real change.'
