
Is it any wonder legions of wealthy Brits are leaving – the country is in bleak place under hostile Labour
I'm not going because of over-regulation, crippling taxes and a hostile environment to entrepreneurship, but tens of thousands are.
3
Yet there is no denying that during my year writing this Monday column, things have become a lot bleaker for our country — once a shining beacon on the hill for investors and wealth creators.
These were successful Brits who paid billions into our coffers but will now prop up public services and state spending elsewhere.
They are fleeing a government that has already punished employers and workers alike with the heaviest tax burden in peacetime history, and is now cooking up more years of stealth taxes on income as well as the doomed leftist fantasy of a wealth tax.
Is anyone surprised that top earners are scarpering for the Gulf, America or Switzerland?
While I will be keeping a beady eye on what's going on here from across the Pond in Trump-land (and keeping you updated in The Sun's pages, too) others who are leaving won't be looking back.
Brain drain
According to consultants Henley & Partners, who admittedly have a stake in helping well-off business folk relocate, the UK is projected to lose 16,500 millionaires in 2025, which, it says, is double what had been expected.
That's one world-beating title we still have, with the UK firmly at the bottom of the global millionaire loser league.
We are miles behind even communist China, who are second bottom with a projected 7,800 millionaires taking flight.
But it's not just the faceless, nationless super-rich fleeing — many of them have already fled Labour — but aspirational British citizens who are turning their backs on the place they once called home.
And it's not just millionaires, either.
PM vows to drastically increase the numbers of channel migrants sent back to France
As many as 40,000 Brits moved to Dubai last year, with around a quarter of a million expats earning their keep there rather than in our cities.
Call it a Taxodus, or a brain drain, or whatever, but there is no logical argument to importing a thousand illegal migrants a week to prop up the black market while watching our best and brightest leave.
Or you could just sneer like many Labour MPs seem to, muttering good riddance.
But they won't be so cocky when Chancellor Rachel Reeves has to fill the Budget black hole this autumn.
The top ten per cent of income tax payers contribute more than 60 per cent of all income tax receipts.
The top one per cent pay 29.6 per cent of all income taxes, despite earning just 12.9 per cent of the income.
Those with the broadest shoulders are already carrying the biggest load.
And yet the drumbeat to hit them even harder to fund unsustainable benefits and healthcare spending is already deafening.
But where do you think that money is going to come from if you do not try to lure them to stay and pay instead?
Yep, the pain will have to fall on those that DO NOT have the broadest shoulders and on yet more borrowing — cruelly hampering the yet-to-be-born future generations.
And on that note it's not just the physical abandonment of Britain that should bring on a fresh bout of tears for the Chancellor.
Our £2TRILLION debt mountain is only growing, and getting more expensive to service.
Long-term borrowing costs are now consistently higher than during the Liz Truss disaster, but you don't hear the BBC screaming day in day out this time round.
The UK was once seen as a safe haven for long-term investment, safe as houses and trustworthy.
'Buying in Britain was like buying in gold,' one banker said to me recently.
'It was a safe option when everything else goes a little crazy.'
But now the rug has been pulled, with a government unable to get even the slightest decrease in the rate of public spending through Parliament, let alone a significant cut.
And a political class totally lacking in the will, know-how or cojones to be honest with voters about what needs to be done.
We have a PM who stood on the steps of Downing Street last year and promised he would be honest and his Government would 'tread more lightly' on its citizens.
Yet now, 12 months later, he is too weak to stand up to his own Deputy Prime Minister, who along with Labour's union paymasters, is creating more bureaucracy and red tape for anyone actually trying to employ someone in Britain.
Lower wages
And who is it going to hurt? Yep, regular workers.
A shocking report this week from the Institute of Economic Affairs says business faces a £5billion bill for Angela Rayner's Employment Bill, which will be passed on through lower wages, which have already stagnated for nearly two decades.
I was going to try to write something a bit more positive about Britain as my last Monday offering, but now — running out of words — I realise what a struggle that would have been.
Of course we are still a great country.
We are not yet going cap in hand to the IMF like Labour in the 1970s, and there is still time to turn things around.
We've been in tighter spots, we have been more broke — though only when winning two world wars.
But recoveries have only happened when there has been leadership and honesty.
When vested interests and the unions were stared down rather than given more power.
When taxes were cut, and spending brought to heel — despite the screaming, shouting and protests.
A time when backbenchers were not caving in at the first whiff of cordite.
Business rates can be cut, Brexit exploited, madcap red tape attacks can be ditched, virtue-signalling Net Zero targets can be put in the reality check bin.
But only when our politicians wake up.
NOT allowing Donald Trump the chance to address Parliament when he visits in September is simple political cowardice.
Especially after the red carpet was rolled out for Emmanuel Macron to lecture and hector Britain on Brexit last week during his own state visit.
3
This is the twice democratically elected leader of the free world and President of our closest ally.
Caving over fears that hard-Left Labour and anti- Israel Independent MPs could protest or shun the speech is the height of pathetic.
And says so much about who is pulling the Government's strings these days.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
6 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump sued by US states over withholding $6.8 billion for schools
July 14 (Reuters) - A coalition of mostly Democratic-led states filed a lawsuit on Monday challenging a move by U.S. President Donald Trump's administration to withhold about $6.8 billion in congressionally approved federal funding for K-12 schools. Attorneys general or governors from 24 states and the District of Columbia sued in federal court in Providence, Rhode Island, arguing that the U.S. Department of Education and the Office of Management and Budget threw schools nationwide into chaos by unconstitutionally freezing funding for six programs approved by Congress. The freeze extended to funding used to support the education of migrant farm workers and their children; recruitment and training of teachers; English proficiency learning; academic enrichment; and after-school and summer programs. The administration also froze funding used to support adult literacy and job-readiness skills. The government was legally required to release the money to the states by July 1, the lawsuit said. Instead, the Education Department notified states on June 30 that it would not be issuing grant awards under those programs by that deadline. It cited the change in administration as its reason. An OMB spokesperson at the time cited an "ongoing programmatic review" of education funding and said initial findings showed what he termed as a misuse of grant funds to "subsidize a radical leftwing agenda." OMB also raised objections to the use of the grant money to support scholarships for immigrant students and lessons that involved LGBTQ themes. The Democratic-led states said the sweeping funding freeze has disrupted school systems, resulting in summer school and after-school programs being canceled or put at risk and the halting of other initiatives with little time for school districts to fill in the holes left in their budgets. The states say the administration violated the U.S. Constitution by disregarding Congress' sole authority over spending and ran afoul of federal administrative law by freezing the funds without any reasoned explanation. The states also say the administration failed to abide by procedures of the Impoundment Control Act, which bars the executive branch from unilaterally refusing to spend funds appropriated by Congress unless certain steps are followed. The lawsuit follows a series of other cases Democratic-led states and others have filed challenging the administration's sweeping efforts to freeze or terminate federal funding for programs out of line with Trump's agenda.


Powys County Times
8 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Mass protests planned in London and Windsor for Trump's state visit
Anti-Trump campaigners are to stage a mass demonstration in central London on the first day of the US president's state visit to the UK. The Stop Trump Coalition is also planning further protests, including one near Windsor Castle, during Donald Trump's high profile trip in two months' time. Buckingham Palace confirmed on Monday that the King is to host the controversial American leader at the Berkshire royal residence from September 17-19, when he will be feted with a ceremonial welcome and a state banquet. The trip will be Mr Trump's second state visit to the UK – an unprecedented gesture for a US president – with his last one in 2019 seeing thousands of people turn out on the streets in London in opposition. A 20ft Trump baby blimp also took to the skies above Parliament Square, just as it did during a previous visit by the billionaire-turned politician in 2018. The Stop Trump Coalition has yet to confirm whether the famous inflatable effigy, which depicts the US president as an angry baby in a nappy clutching a mobile phone, will make a reappearance, but urged people to 'keep your eyes on the skies'. The original was donated to the Museum of London in 2021. Other inventive creations by protesters in 2019 included a 16ft talking robot of Mr Trump sitting on a gold toilet, which said the phrases 'No collusion', 'You are fake news' and 'I'm a very stable genius' in audio of Mr Trump's own voice; and Handmaids Against Trump – women draped in red with white hoods in homage to Margaret Atwood's dystopian novel about a crackdown on reproductive rights. On September 17 – the first day of Mr Trump's visit – demonstrators will assemble at London's Embankment at 2pm and march to a 5pm rally at an as-yet-undisclosed location. Further protests, including one near Windsor Castle, are set to be confirmed once more details of Mr Trump's visit is known. Security is expected to be at peak levels for the American leader, who survived an assassination attempt last year. The Stop Trump Coalition's spokesperson Seema Syeda said: 'This will be a massive protest against Trump's state visit. 'Trump and his authoritarian politics are not welcome here. Keir Starmer should not be rolling out the red carpet for Trump. 'They are already running scared. They have chosen the first possible date that stops Trump from being able to address Parliament. 'We know that Trump is deeply unpopular with the public. 'We mobilised hundreds of thousands of people against Trump during his first term, and he has only got worse since then. 'We are working at speed to bring together all the movements – for democracy, for equality, against climate change, for a free Palestine – to show our unity against Trump.' Asked about the Trump effigy, she said: 'Will Trump Baby be back? You'll have to keep your eyes on the skies.' The House of Commons will not be sitting at the time of Mr Trump's visit as it will be in recess for party conference season, meaning the president will not be able to address Parliament as French President Emmanuel Macron did during his state visit last week. However, the House of Lords will be sitting. Nick Dearden, director of Global Justice Now which is part of the coalition, accused Mr Trump of being a bully and suggested there was a growing global resistance against him. 'Trump is engaged in economic warfare against both friend and foe,' he said. 'He's bullying countries, including the UK, to give in to the demands of American multinational corporations. 'And he's taking his own country down an increasingly fascist path – crushing the rights of Americans, ignoring the courts, threatening the media and universities.' Mr Dearden added: 'Why on earth would we want to accord this man a second state visit? 78% of Britons have a negative view of Trump, and with good reason. 'If Starmer won't stand up to Trump, we will – by taking to the streets as part of the growing global resistance against Trump and the oligarchs that surround him.'


Powys County Times
8 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Trump threatens Russia tariffs if Ukraine war is not resolved within 50 days
Donald Trump said he would punish Russia with tariffs if there is not a deal to end the war in Ukraine within 50 days. The US president made the announcement during an Oval Office meeting with Nato secretary general Mark Rutte. 'We're going to be doing very severe tariffs if we don't have a deal in 50 days,' Mr Trump said. He did not provide specifics on how the tariffs would be implemented. 'I use trade for a lot of things,' he added. 'But it's great for settling wars.' Meanwhile, Mr Trump's special envoy to Ukraine and Russia met with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky in Kyiv on Monday, as anticipation grew over a possible shift in the Trump administration's policy on the three-year war. Mr Rutte also planned to hold talks with US defence secretary Pete Hegseth and secretary of state Marco Rubio, as well as members of Congress. Mr Trump made quickly stopping the war one of his diplomatic priorities, and he has increasingly expressed frustration about Russian president Vladimir Putin's unbudging stance on US-led peace efforts. Mr Trump has long boasted of his friendly relationship with Mr Putin, and after taking office in January repeatedly said that Russia was more willing than Ukraine to reach a peace deal. At the same time, Mr Trump accused Mr Zelensky of prolonging the war and called him a 'dictator without elections.' But Russia's relentless onslaught against civilian areas of Ukraine wore down Mr Trump's patience. In April, Mr Trump urged Mr Putin to 'STOP!' launching deadly barrages on Kyiv, and the following month said in a social media post that the Russian leader ' has gone absolutely CRAZY!' as the bombardments continued. 'I am very disappointed with President Putin, I thought he was somebody that meant what he said,' Mr Trump said late on Sunday. 'He'll talk so beautifully and then he'll bomb people at night. We don't like that.' Mr Zelensky said he and Mr Trump's envoy, retired Lt Gen Keith Kellogg, had 'a productive conversation' about strengthening Ukrainian air defences, joint arms production and purchasing US weapons in conjunction with European countries, as well as the possibility of tighter international sanctions on the Kremlin. 'We hope for the leadership of the United States, because it is clear that Moscow will not stop unless its … ambitions are stopped by force,' Mr Zelensky said on Telegram.