CCI found global ad agencies colluded on fees, document shows
India's antitrust body found that global ad agencies breached laws by coordinating on commissions they charge advertisers, prompting the watchdog's raids on advertising and media companies in March, according to a document which sheds new light on the investigation into the media sector.
The
Competition Commission of India
conducted surprise raids in March at the local offices of ad agencies WPP-owned
GroupM
, Interpublic, Publicis and Dentsu and at the offices of an Indian broadcasters' body and an association of advertising companies.
A CCI document dated February 7 and seen by Reuters on Friday sheds new light on allegations that three separate cartels operated through three different industry groups: the Indian Society of Advertisers (ISA), Advertising Agencies Association of India (AAAI) and Indian Broadcasting and Digital Foundation (IBDF).
Before the raids, the CCI document said, it reviewed evidence that showed the alleged misconduct was prevalent since at least 2023, and advertising agencies exchanged commercially sensitive information on WhatsApp groups and agreed to adhere to pre-decided commission structures.
"AAAI and its members are in contravention" of competition laws, the CCI noted in its initial review, while ordering the investigation which triggered the March raids, the document said.
AAAI also often organised virtual meetings among members to align on prices and responses to be shared with clients, and discussed "retaliatory action" against members who don't follow such guidelines, the document said.
The group "also fixed the formula for fee in case of fee-based service to advertisers," CCI said.
The groups - AAAI which represents GroupM, Dentsu and Publicis, ISA which counts dozens of Indian and foreign companies as members, and the IBDF group of broadcasters - did not respond to Reuters queries.
The CCI also did not respond to a request for comment.
The CCI does not publicly disclose any details of price fixing investigations. Reuters reported in March that the allegations relate to collusion between media buying agencies and broadcasters, and the case was triggered after Dentsu made disclosures under a whistleblower-type federal programme.
The raids cast a shadow on India's fast-growing media and broadcast sector which counts Reliance-Disney and Sony as top players, and could alter how ads are priced and sold in the country.
Detailing the allegations, the CCI document said the advertisers "established a buyer's cartel", while the broadcasters who provide channels separately engaged in "collective action to refrain from giving discounts" to clients.
Another cartel "exists in the media segment of advertising agencies and attempts are underway" to establish a cartel in its creative business segment, the CCI added.
The three industry groups also "coordinate their activities and indulge in collective negotiations ... on issues which should ideally be negotiated independently," it added.
"The respective industry association appear to evolve guidelines, advisories or negotiation parameters ... to secure the commercial interests of their members," it added.
In recent weeks, AAAI privately asked its members to avoid discussions over pricing during meetings, where the group's legal adviser must be present, Reuters has reported.
The investigation comes amid major shifts in India's advertising landscape following last year's $8.5 billion merger between Walt Disney and Reliance's Indian media assets, which is estimated to have a 40% share of the ad market in TV and streaming segments.
India is the world's eighth-biggest ad market, where revenues stood at $18.5 billion last year, GroupM estimates.
The CCI investigation is likely to continue for several months before final findings are issued.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
37 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Bengaluru stampede: Karnataka HC questions suspension of 5 cops, seeks govt reply
Bengaluru: The Karnataka high court on Thursday sought an explanation from the state government over the suspension of five police officers in connection with the June 4 stampede outside Bengaluru's M Chinnaswamy Stadium, which left 11 people dead, questioning whether a milder action—such as transferring them to other posts—might have been more appropriate. The June 4 stampede outside Bengaluru's M Chinnaswamy Stadium left 11 people dead. (PTI) A bench of Justices SG Pandit and TM Nadaf said the state will have to 'justify whether it was proper to keep the officers under suspension, or, whether shifting them to another post would have been sufficient?' The court was hearing an appeal filed by the Karnataka government challenging the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) July 1 order quashing Indian police service (IPS) officer Vikash Kumar Vikash's suspension. Terming the state's suspension order 'mechanical' and not supported by sufficient material, the tribunal had directed the state to 'immediately' reinstate Vikash. It had also suggested that the government extend similar relief to the other four officers suspended along with Vikash, including the then commissioner of police B Dayananda. Urging the court to stay the tribunal's order, advocate general Shashikiran Shetty on Thursday said that the tribunal had acted in haste and had also overstepped in suggesting the remaining four officers, who were not even parties before it, also be reinstated. Shetty said the state was ready to show the court that all five officers who had been suspended were guilty of 'dereliction of duty.' 'I will be able to show from the records that the suspension order was justified,' Shetty added. Shetty told the court that the tribunal had granted Vikash relief on July 1 and he had reported to duty in his uniform on July 2 without waiting for any formal order from the state reinstating him. The high court, however, said it will hear the matter further on July 9 and until the next hearing, Vikash must show restraint and not precipitate the matter any further. Also Read: Bengaluru stampede: Karnataka moves HC against quashing of officer's suspension Vikash's counsel, senior advocate Dhyan Chinappa, assured the court that his client will 'not do anything' until the next hearing before the high court. Vikash and the four other officers of Bengaluru police were suspended on June 5, a day after the stampede. Vikash had challenged his suspension before the tribunal, claiming he was not responsible for the tragedy and that the police had no prior notice of the Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB)'s Indian Premier League (IPL) victory parade, which triggered the stampede. It blamed RCB for unilaterally announcing the event via Instagram without informing the authorities. Also Read: HC allows govt to file reply on stampede plea in sealed cover In its order, the tribunal held that RCB announced free public entry, drawing massive crowds to the stadium, and failed to formally seek police permission or coordinate with authorities for the victory parade and celebrations. The Karnataka government, however, has challenged the tribunal's order claiming that the revocation of suspension of the officers while the magisterial and judicial inquiries into the stampede were ongoing was likely to adversely impact the probes. Vikash's 'presence in service during this period might adversely affect the examination of witnesses' and undermine the process of justice, the state has argued.
Indian Express
38 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Who is Soham Parekh, techie behind ‘Soham-Gate' who allegedly juggled multiple startup jobs and fooled YC founders
The Internet has been buzzing with shock and disbelief after a bombshell accusation surfaced against an Indian techie, Soham Parekh, who has allegedly been juggling jobs at multiple startups simultaneously. The story erupted earlier this week when Suhail Doshi, founder of Playground AI and ex-CEO of Mixpanel, called him out on X, setting off a firestorm in tech circles. Doshi claimed that Parekh, believed to be operating out of India, has been quietly collecting paychecks from as many as four to five startups, many of them funded by Y Combinator, at the same time. The revelation has not only raised eyebrows over hiring practices in the remote work era, but also sparked larger concerns about how easy it is to slip through the cracks in the startup world. 'PSA: there's a guy named Soham Parekh (in India) who works at 3-4 startups at the same time. He's been preying on YC companies and more. Beware,' Doshi warned, sharing what he said was Parekh's CV–an impressive-looking document that, according to Doshi, is mostly smoke and mirrors. 'Probably 90% of it is fake,' he alleged, pointing out that many of the listed links no longer even exist. What makes the situation even more confounding is that despite multiple red flags and formal complaints, Parekh reportedly continued to land new roles with little difficulty. In a follow-up, Doshi added, 'I want to also say that I tried to talk sense into this guy, explain the impact and give him a chance to turn a new leaf because sometimes that's what a person needs. But it clearly didn't work.' Probably 90% fake and most links are gone. — Suhail (@Suhail) July 2, 2025 Parekh's career path, as outlined by an AI industry executive, reflects an impressive academic and professional trajectory. He earned a Master's degree in Computer Science from Georgia Tech in 2022, following a Bachelor's in Computer Engineering from the University of Mumbai in 2020. Professionally, Parekh has held a string of senior roles, mostly remote. His résumé features stints such as a Senior Software Engineer (contract) at DynamoAI starting January 2024, a Senior Fullstack Engineer at for a year before that, and similar roles at Synthesia and Alan AI. He also participated in GitHub's Open Source Fellowship during the summer of 2020. There aren't any confirmed photos of Parekh in the public domain, but screenshots from Zoom calls—shared by frustrated employers—have surfaced online. One founder, upset by what they called misleading hiring practices, wrote: 'He lies about his location. We thought we were hiring someone in the US. Even sent a laptop to a US address. Got it back! Allegedly it was sent to his 'sister'.' This allegation, coupled with the growing conversation around remote work transparency, has sparked a fresh round of questions in the startup ecosystem—especially around international hiring at high-profile accelerators like Y Combinator. He lies about his location. We thought we were hiring someone in the US. Even sent a laptop to a US address. Got it back! Allegedly it was sent to his 'sister.' — Suhail (@Suhail) July 2, 2025 Founders who've interacted with Parekh echoed similar stories. Flo Crivello, founder of Lindy, tweeted, 'Fired this morning. He did so incredibly well in interviews, must have a lot of training.' Nicolai Ouporov, CEO of Fleet AI, said Parekh had worked with them too, noting 'he's been doing this for years.' Michelle Lim of Warp added that her team hired Parekh for a trial, but cancelled it immediately after learning of the accusations. Joke aside, the real lesson from Soham is we as an industry ought to do way more public shaming I personally know 4 people(!) who got scammed by him We'd have gone for another month if it wasn't for @Suhail So: I will now post publicly when I'm screwed over by someone in a way… — Flo Crivello (@Altimor) July 2, 2025 We just signed him up for our work trial next week. Saw this tweet. Cancelled work trial. Thank you for sharing! — Michelle Lim (@michlimlim) July 2, 2025 Suhail also wrote, 'Not a joke. This is happening real time. This is the 3rd DM today about someone firing him.' and called the entire thing as, 'Soham-gate.' Not a joke. This is happening real time. This is the 3rd DM today about someone firing him. soham-gate — Suhail (@Suhail) July 2, 2025 Until now, Parekh has stayed silent publicly, but Suhail Doshi revealed that he had reached out to him in private. In a message Doshi shared, Parekh seemed remorseful and uncertain about his future, asking, 'Have I completely sabotaged my career? What can I do to improve my situation?' He also added that he was willing to 'come clean.' Soham has reached out. His primary question: 'Asking this as genuine advice since I do really love what I do, have I completely sabotaged my career? What can I do to improve my situation? I am also happy to come clean' Vox Populi, Vox Dei — Suhail (@Suhail) July 3, 2025 An X account under the handle @realsohamparekh has surfaced, claiming to be the genuine Soham Parekh and actively commenting on the controversy. There's a lot being said about me right now, and most of you don't know the full story. If there's one thing to know about me, it's that I love to build. That's it. I've been isolated, written off, and shut out by nearly everyone I've known and every company I've worked at.… — Soham Parekh (@realsohamparekh) July 3, 2025 However, as of now, the identity behind the account–and even the real identity of Parekh himself–remains unverified.
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Degree. Yes. Employable? Not quite
Rajesh Kalra is a journalist for almost three decades and has also tried his hands at entrepreneurship in between. Although he has written on several subjects, he has a weakness for IT, telecommunications, sports and developmental issues. He is an avid sportsman, a trained high-altitude mountaineer, a passionate mountain biker and a marathoner. He is on the PM's Olympic Task Force and a member of the All India Council of Sports. His blog, Random Access, will cover issues that take into account these varied interests. Follow @rajeshkalra on Twitter LESS ... MORE A post by a LinkedIn user, Sanket S, has been doing the rounds, almost going viral: He recently hired three graduates from top-tier private Indian institutions—specialising in business, food, and hospitality. Each had spent Rs 40–50 lakh on their education. All three were excellent at making PowerPoint presentations—something even AI can now do. But when it came to core, real-world skills, they fell dramatically short. The MBA graduate didn't understand P&L or cash flow. The hotel management graduate had never seen a food processing line. None of them understood precision fermentation—a core capability in modern food-tech. Let's not act surprised. This isn't new. This problem has been festering for decades. I had once written a piece where I described India's talent output as 'Educated Unemployables.' That unfortunate phrase continues to define our system. Degrees, yes. Skills, no. From schools to engineering colleges to competitive exams, the rot is wide and systemic. What Sanket experienced is just the tip of a very large iceberg. Degrees ≠ Knowledge Think back to the IT boom of the 1990s and 2000s. Hundreds of computer training institutes sprang up overnight. Families broke FDs and took loans to enroll their children, hoping they'd become coders and land jobs abroad. But what did most students actually learnt? Basic computer literacy — Word processors and spreadsheets — while believing they were mastering programming. Even respected engineering colleges weren't spared. A decade ago, an IT honcho interviewed Computer Science graduates from a prominent REC in North India. None could answer basic questions. One student finally admitted: 'We have no faculty. No real tests. Everyone is promoted at the end of the year.' Officially, we produce X number of engineers. But what do those numbers even mean? They just add up to the statistics that show this many computer graduates produced by the country. And the rot doesn't start in college. It starts much earlier, in school. In the name of progressive policy, we decided not to fail any child till Class 8. In practice, this has been disastrous. Students who can't cope with Class 5 content are pushed up to Class 8. When higher-level academic rigour begins, the foundation is too weak. They're set up to fail quietly — or worse, coast through the system without ever knowing what they missed. Of course, then there is the great scam involving several exams for jobs except, perhaps those conducted by the UPSC. The way the system is gamed, is well, systemic. Even competitive exams — supposedly sacrosanct — have been compromised. The process looks secure: A sealed question paper packet from a bank locker Invigilators, videography, independent observers Surprise checks by flying squads And yet: Over 50% of candidates in some centres are impersonators with fake IDs. Some already know the questions — in the right sequence — before the exam begins. In extreme cases, teachers dictate answers to paid candidates. The flying squad? Often tipped off well in advance. When results come out, the best scores go to those who paid for their place. The sincere, hardworking candidates — the ones who actually deserve it — are shown the door. How do you fix a system where every layer — policy, teaching, exams, oversight — can be manipulated? Yes, we can frame bulletproof policies. But unless they're implemented with integrity, we're just papering over deep cracks. India aspires to be a global leader. But how will that happen if our talent supply chain is fundamentally broken? Worse still, our youth — the supposed beneficiaries of this system — are being consumed by distractions. TikTok, reels, addictive apps. The ability to focus, reflect, grasp depth? Rapidly vanishing. And yet, society seems eerily comfortable with this decline. We're not just facing a crisis of education. We're looking at a future where mediocrity wears the mask of merit. Where shortcuts triumph over substance. Where effort is no longer rewarded — and that should scare us all. We're not staring at a crisis. We're already in it. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
