Junior doctors planning to strike AGAIN over pay 'are now earning as much as £100,000 a year' - as new poll shows slump in public support and leading medics urge union to call off walkout
Rebranded as 'resident doctors' in September last year, those working a 40-hour week plus a full on-call rota may be making six-figure annual salaries, The Telegraph reported.
Earlier this week, the British Medical Association (BMA) announced that up to 50,000 resident doctors in England would walk out for five consecutive days from 7am on July 25, in a dispute over pay.
However, new polling suggests that the strike does not have the support of the British public.
Only just over a third (36 per cent) of those surveyed supported the mass industrial action, which would see a large number of routine care appointments postponed in order to keep A&E fully staffed.
The poll, conducted by YouGov on behalf of The Times, found that nearly half (49 per cent) of the population opposes the walkout.
The survey also found that 43 per cent would support legislation that made it illegal for doctors to go on strike while 54 per cent of respondents said that the pay rise sought by the BMA was unaffordable.
That is a dramatic decrease in support compared to the previous round of industrial action by doctors, who staged a five-day strike between June 27 and June 2 last year.
Adding to the crescendo of voices discouraging the strike, two of the nation's most well-known doctors have also joined calls for the BMA to reconsider its plans as they warned walkouts could cause irreparable harm to public trust in the profession.
Lord Ara Darzi, 65, a former health minister and surgeon, followed calls made by Professor Robert Winston, a Labour peer, who told the Times the 'highly dangerous' walkout could damage the public's trust in doctors.
Professor Winston said: 'Strike action completely ignores the vulnerability of people in front of you.
'Doctors need to be reminded that every time they have a patient in front of them, they have someone who is frightened and in pain. It's important that doctors consider their own responsibility much more seriously.'
Lord Darzi, 65, told the same newspaper: 'Doctors have a special place in society. The public's trust in doctors is earned, not guaranteed.
'I fear it will never recover if the BMA go ahead with strikes that are plainly unjustifiable.'
Meanwhile, Professor Sir Stephen Powis, who is set to leave his post as NHS England national medical director imminently, warned the BMA to 'think really hard' about whether the industrial action is justified.
In his final interview before retiring, Sir Stephen, 64, told the newspaper the walkout would cause 'tens of thousands of appointments and procedures' to be cancelled.
Resident doctors in England and Wales have dismissed a suggestion from health secretary Wes Streeting (pictured) that their pensions could be trimmed to fund pay demands
The pair's calls echoed those made by Prof Winston, 84, who said he resigned from the BMA on Thursday.
In a statement on Friday, a BMA spokesman said it is 'disappointing' when any of its 195,000 members resign, but said resident doctors are beginning their careers 'more than 20% worse off in real terms than their counterparts in 2008'.
The spokesman added: 'We're sure that doctors who dedicated their lives to the health of the nation want to safeguard the profession and the NHS for the future.
'This means improving pay and conditions so that resident doctors stay in the health service and the UK to become expert clinical leaders, running entire services and innovating treatments.
'Doctors take their professional obligations incredibly seriously, and the decision to strike is not made lightly.
'But with nine out of 10 of our resident doctor members who voted backing industrial, it's clear that there is support for doing what is necessary to fight to restore pay.
'Of course, no strikes have to happen, and no care needs to be disrupted, if the Health Secretary meets with us to discuss the 'journey' to pay restoration as he so often called it in opposition.'
The BMA is demanding a 29 per cent increase in wages for its resident doctors in order to stave off strikes, although that figure is controversial.
They say that is necessary since in real terms pay for junior doctors has dropped by 21 per cent over the last 17 years - the same as if they worked for free for a fifth of their time.
However, the professional body based that number on the retail price index measure of inflation, a statistic jettisoned by the UK government in 2013.
Junior doctors start on £38,831 a year following the government's decision to award them an above-inflation rise in May this year.
But once residents are in ST8, their final training stage, annual wages can be as high as £73,992 a year.
That means if a junior doctor works a regular 40-hour week but also does significant amounts of 'on-call' locum work then they can rake in as much as £100,000.
Health secretary Wes Streeting posted about the forthcoming strike action on X, calling it 'unreasonable' and 'unnecessary'.
Hewrote: 'We negotiated and delivered pay rises worth 28.9 per cent. This year's pay award was the highest in the entire public sector.
'We cannot afford to re-open that pay award. I have offered talks without any preconditions. The BMA is refusing. Unreasonable. Unnecessary.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
15 minutes ago
- Sky News
'It's the Wild West': Dozens of women develop botulism linked to anti-wrinkle injections
A woman who thought she was being injected with Botox was left unable to swallow and doctors thought she had suffered a stroke - after she contracted a life-threatening illness from a potentially illegal product. Nicola Fairley is one of dozens of people who have developed botulism linked to unlicenced anti-wrinkle injections. She had the procedure done with her regular beautician after winning a Facebook competition for three areas of "Botox". "Within two or three hours my forehead and the sides of my eyes had started to freeze," Nicola says. "At first I thought 'amazing', that's what I wanted - then it just carried on." Nicola was eventually sent to A&E in Durham, where she met several other patients who all had similar symptoms. Doctors were stumped. "They thought I'd had a stroke," she says. "We all had problems with our eyes, some of us with our breathing. I couldn't swallow - they put me on nil by mouth because they were worried I would choke in the waiting room." It turns out all of the patients had recently had anti-wrinkle injections containing botulinum toxin. Health officials believe they were imported, illegal products. Botulism - the disease they caused - is so rare many doctors never see it in their entire careers. It can cause symptoms including slurred speech and breathing problems, and can be deadly. The disease is so unusual, and so many cases were coming in, that doctors exhausted their stocks of anti-toxin and had to ask hospitals as far away as London to get more. The UK Health Security Agency has so far confirmed 38 cases of botulism linked to cosmetic toxin injections, but Sky News has been told of several more. The outbreak began in the North East but cases have now been seen in the East of England and East Midlands as well. There are only a handful of legal botulinum toxin products in the UK - of which Botox is one. But cosmetic treatments are largely unregulated, with anyone allowed to inject products like fillers and toxins without any medical training. Cheap, illegal products imported from overseas are easily available. 'It's the Wild West' Dr Steven Land runs Novellus Aesthetics clinic in Newcastle upon Tyne. He worked for decades as an emergency medicine doctor before moving into aesthetics. He says he has been warning health officials of an outbreak for years. "It's the Wild West," Dr Land told Sky News. "Because anyone can do this, there is a lack of knowledge around what is legal, what's not legal, what is okay to be injected. "These illegal toxins could have 50 units, 5,000 units or rat poison - there could be anything in there." Dr Land showed us messages that he says he gets on a weekly basis, from sellers trying to push him cheap, unlicenced products. They advertise "limited time offers" and cheap bundles on toxins imported from overseas. He calls them "drug dealers". "They are preying on the lack of knowledge among non-medical practitioners," he says. Consultations on how to regulate the aesthetics industry have been ongoing for years - but so far, no changes have been introduced. The UK government now says it does plan to regulate certain procedures, but it's not said how it will do this, or when. "What will it take?" Nicola says. "One of the women we were with did almost die - she had to be resuscitated." Nicola's beautician has stopped responding to her messages, so she says she still has no idea what the product was "or how much of it is in me".
The Sun
15 minutes ago
- The Sun
Popular baby toy sold at Boots for £10 is urgently recalled over ‘health risk' after mould found in boxes
A POPULAR children's toy sold in Boots has been urgently recalled over fears it could pose a health risk to youngsters. The issue affects a batch of See and Sound Giant Flashcards made by Orchard Toys and sold nationwide, including in Boots stores across the UK. 3 The Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS) issued the warning after confirming the batch poses a potential health risk. The product is sold for around £10 and is aimed at babies and toddler s as a fun way to learn animal names and sounds. The recall only applies to a specific batch — code SPHK/001622/132/16.01.25 — which can be found printed on the side of the packaging. No other batch numbers are affected. Parents and carers are being urged to check their toy boxes immediately. Anyone who owns the flashcards should stop using them, take a photo of the batch code, and dispose of the item safely. Those affected are entitled to a refund or digital credit voucher by contacting Orchard Toys directly. You can phone 01953 423422 or visit their website here. Aldi urgently recalls £3.29 freezer essential over dangerous disease that affects 1 in 100 of Brits The OPSS said the risk is classed as low, but could be harmful to children or adults with weakened immune systems, lung conditions or mould allergies. "The product presents a health risk as there may be mould present in the base of the product box. "Mould may pose a health risk to individuals with compromised immune systems, damaged lungs or allergies," the recall notice warned. The flashcards come in a colourful rectangular box and feature cartoon animal characters. They are part of a popular line of educational toys aimed at young children. Orchard Toys confirmed the affected product does not meet the requirement of the Toys (Safety) Regulations 2011, a set of rules designed to ensure childnren's toys are safe to use. The toy was manufactured int he UK and is not counterfeit. Product recalls like this are issued when items pose a risk to health, even if the danger is only present in some batches or under certain conditions. This comes just days after another recall involving toys sold online, including a remote-control car imported from China that contained unsafe chemical levels and posed a serious health risk. If you have any concerns about a product you've bough for your child, you can check the official government product recalls and alerts page. Safety experts advise parents to regularly inspect children's toys for damage, strange smells, or any signs of mould, especially if they've been stored in damp areas. Your product recall rights Chief consumer reporter James Flanders reveals all you need to know. Product recalls are an important means of protecting consumers from dangerous goods. As a general rule, if a recall involves a branded product, the manufacturer would usually have lead responsibility for the recall action. But it's often left up to supermarkets to notify customers when products could put them at risk. If you are concerned about the safety of a product you own, always check the manufacturer's website to see if a safety notice has been issued. When it comes to appliances, rather than just food items, the onus is usually on you - the customer - to register the appliance with the manufacturer as if you don't there is no way of contacting you to tell you about a fault. If you become aware that an item you own has been recalled or has any safety noticed issued against it, make sure you follow the instructions given to you by the manufacturer. They should usually provide you with more information and a contact number on its safety notice. In some cases, the manufacturer might ask you to return the item for a full refund or arrange for the faulty product to be collected. You should not be charged for any recall work - such as a repair, replacement or collection of the recalled item 3
South Wales Argus
44 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Streeting: We are doing everything we can to minimise patient harm during strike
A five-day walkout by resident doctors in England is under way, with members of the British Medical Association (BMA) manning picket lines across the country. The Health Secretary condemned the strike as 'reckless' and said the Government would not allow the BMA to 'hold the country to ransom'. Asked about the risk of patient harm during a visit to NHS England HQ in London, he told the PA news agency on Friday: 'I'm really proud of the way that NHS leaders and frontline staff have prepared and mobilised to minimise the disruption and minimise the risk of harm to patients. 'We've seen an extraordinary response, including people cancelling their leave, turning up for work, and resident doctors themselves ignoring their union to be there for patients. I'm extremely grateful to all of them. 'What I can't do today is guarantee that there will be no disruption and that there is no risk of harm to patients. 'We are doing everything we can to minimise it, but the risk is there, and that is why the BMA's action is so irresponsible. 'They had a 28.9% pay award from this Government in our first year, there was also an offer to work with them on other things that affect resident doctors – working lives – and that's why I think this is such reckless action. 'This Government will not allow the BMA to hold the country to ransom, and we will continue to make progress on NHS improvement, as we've done in our first year.' Asked about next steps and the continued threat of doctor strikes, given the BMA has a six-month mandate to call more industrial action, Mr Streeting said: 'When the BMA asks, 'what's the difference between a Labour government and a Conservative government?', I would say a 28.9% pay rise and a willingness to work together to improve the working conditions and lives of doctors. Resident doctors are beginning a five-day strike (James Manning/PA) 'That is why the public and other NHS staff cannot understand why the BMA have chosen to embark on this totally unnecessary, reckless strike action.' It comes as NHS chief executive Sir Jim Mackey told broadcasters on Friday about his different approach to managing the strike, including keeping as much pre-planned care going as possible rather than just focusing on emergency care. 'So the difference this time is the NHS has put a huge effort in to try and get back on its feet,' he said at NHS England HQ in London. 'As everybody's been aware, we've had a really tough period, and you really feel colleagues on the ground, local clinical leaders, clinical operational colleagues etc, really pulling together to try and get the NHS back on its feet. 'And we also learned from the last few rounds of industrial action that harm to patients and disruption to patients was much broader than the original definitions. So we've decided to say it needs to be a broader definition. We can't just focus on that small subset of care. 'Colleagues in the service have tried to keep as much going as humanly possible as well, and the early signs are that that's been achieved so far, but it is early doors. 'In the end, capacity will have to be constrained by the numbers of people we've actually got who do just turn up for work, and what that means in terms of safe provision, because the thing that colleagues won't compromise is safety in the actual delivery. But it does look like people have really heard that. 'They're really pulling together to maximise the range of services possible.' Asked about further strikes, he said: 'It is possible. I would hope not. I would hope after this, we'll be able to get people in a room and resolve the issue. 'But if we are in this with a six month mandate, we could be doing this once a month for the next next six months, but we've got to organise ourselves accordingly.' The Prime Minister has said the strikes will 'cause real damage' (PA) Asked why he was not willing to bump pay from what the BMA calculates is £18 an hour to £22 per hour, Mr Streeting told broadcasters: 'I think the public can see, and other NHS staff can see the willingness this Government showed from day one coming into office to try and deal with what had been over a decade of failure on behalf of the previous government, working with resident doctors to improve their pay and to improve the NHS. 'That's why resident doctors had a 28.9% pay award, and that's why the disruption they are inflicting on the country is so unnecessary and so irresponsible.' Mr Streeting said 'we know there'll be real challenges over the next five days'. He added that patients, particularly those who end up waiting a long time for care due to strikes, 'do come to harm, and however much the BMA try and sugarcoat it, what they are fundamentally doing today is forgetting the three words that should be at the forefront of every doctor's minds every day, which is, 'do no harm'.' On whether strikes are going to become the 'new normal', he added: 'As I've said before, the BMA have had a 28.9% pay award from this Government, and we were willing to go further to help on some of the working conditions that doctors face. 'That offer of joint working, that partnership approach, that hasn't gone away, but it does take two to tango, and I hope that the BMA will reflect very carefully on the disruption they are inflicting on patients, the pressures they're putting on their colleagues, and the circumstances in which they are doing so – a 28.9% pay rise and a government that was willing to work with them. 'Those are not grounds for strike action.' It comes after Sir Keir Starmer made a last-minute appeal to resident doctors, saying the strikes would 'cause real damage'. He added: 'Most people do not support these strikes. They know they will cause real damage… 'These strikes threaten to turn back the clock on progress we have made in rebuilding the NHS over the last year, choking off the recovery.' The BMA has argued that real-terms pay has fallen by around 20% since 2008, and is pushing for full 'pay restoration'. The union took out national newspaper adverts on Friday, saying it wanted to 'make clear that while a newly qualified doctor's assistant is taking home over £24 per hour, a newly qualified doctor with years of medical school experience is on just £18.62 per hour'. BMA council chairman Dr Tom Dolphin told BBC Radio 4's Today programme the union had been expecting more pay for doctors. He said: 'Where we were last year when we started the pay campaign, we were down a third on our pay compared to 2008. 'So you've got last year's pay offer which did indeed move us towards (pay restoration), but Wes Streeting himself said that pay restoration is a journey, not an event, implying that there would be further pay restoration to come, and we were expecting our pay to be restored in full – that's our campaign's goal. 'We got part way there, but then that came to a halt this year – we've only had an offer that brings us up, just to catch up with inflation.' Asked what it would take for doctors to go back to work, he said the BMA needed to see 'a clear, guaranteed pathway' to pay restoration. He added that 'it's very disappointing to see a Labour Government taking such a hard line against trade unions'. Elsewhere, the Nottingham City Hospital – where Dr Melissa Ryan, co-chairwoman of the BMA's resident doctors' committee works in paediatrics – reached an agreement with the BMA to exempt one doctor from the strike to work on the neonatal intensive care unit. Speaking from a London picket line, Dr Ryan told The Times: 'I do know that we've granted a derogation already. It is actually at my work, with the babies on one of the neonatal units I work on. That is because it is an intensive care unit for babies. 'We don't have enough senior staff to cover the doctors that aren't there, the residents. And actually, it is important to us that those very sick babies get a lot of care. So we have granted a resident doctor to go back.' A derogation was agreed for one doctor in the emergency department and another doctor in the ISGM at the Northern General Hospital. 'We advise resident doctors to return to work if contacted by the Trust to staff these shifts tonight,' the BMA said in an X post on Friday evening. The BMA said it had also agreed a derogation for two anaesthetists to work at University Hospital Lewisham on Saturday to ensure patient safety. Louise Stead, group chief executive of Ashford and St Peter's and Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trusts, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that around 500 appointments were being rescheduled 'but we are continuing to do about 96% of the work we've had planned'.
