
Ghana: Can a 24-hour economy change a nation?
The new leader is seeking to shift the West African nation away from relying solely on its traditional sectors to establishing a more diversified economy. To this end, Mahama has launched a so-called 24-hour economy designed not only to create job opportunities around the clock but also to transform Ghana from an imports-based economy to self-sufficiency.
'This policy is made for Ghana and the future,' said Mahama. 'The 24-Hour Plus Programme will be the catalyst for Ghana's economic growth, and we are sure it will make Ghana prosper.'
Under the plan, various industries will operate in three eight-hour shifts daily, with public and private sectors working together to keep the economy running day and night. The initiative chiefly targets existing key sectors in the country such as agriculture, manufacturing and essential services, but could be expanded to other areas in the long term.
But as promising as it may seem, questions remain about the feasibility of Mahama's pet project.
A country that never sleeps?
Ghana's capital, Accra, can't compare to New York, Dubai or Tokyo when it comes to 24-hour amenities. In the African context, few cities run nonstop services, although Accra and cities in Nigeria, Democratic Republic of Congo, South Africa and Kenya boast vibrant informal nighttime economies.
Mahama's plan is about far more than creating cities where shops, restaurants and bars can operate day and night: His vision is to boost Ghana's economic output by tripling the hours that vital industries and sectors operate – from an average of eight hours per day to 24 hours.
By the end of the decade, this ambitious policy could create 1.7mn new jobs across the nation, which would mean a 5% drop in unemployment.
Economist Daniel Amateye Anim believes that bridging the gap from the theoretical idea behind the new policy to its actual application is where things could potentially go awry.
'About US$4bn to drive this 24-hour policy is needed,' he told DW. The expense has to be seen in the context of Ghana already owing US$3bn to the International Monetary Fund after defaulting repeatedly on some of its existing debt in recent years.
Implementing an ambitious vision
Ghana's approach as a government-backed policy is unique on the African continent, but faces multiple hurdles in its implementation.
'On paper, the programme sounds or appears innovative and progressive, with a propensity of transforming Ghana's economy. So it makes theoretical sense … (because) it's a programme that seeks to create jobs, bring about productivity, lift up from poverty,' said Amateye.
'As it stands now, we have so many graduates who are unemployed. And so, a programme that would ensure that people are employed and jobs are created, will also increase our GDP.'
But in practical terms, he said, funding will be a limiting factor. 'Who exactly is the private sector, who you are expecting (to fund the program)? The internal private sectors do not have the financial muscle … to drive such an innovative programme.'
According to Amateye, even if Ghana's private sector were able to fund a major transformation of the economy, it would still take time for private enterprises to fully buy into Mahama's ambitious idea.
'(Each enterprise) would have to do a cost-benefit analysis first, and that takes time.'
Amateye suggested that the onus should be on the government to cough up the funds first and thus 'dictate the pace' before private enterprises across Ghana can actually join Mahama's 24-hour economy revolution.
DW
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Observer
an hour ago
- Observer
Nature risk is financial risk
On December 26, 2004, a massive undersea earthquake triggered a tsunami that left 230,000 people across Southeast Asia dead. Almost everyone, both human and animal, was caught off guard, with a notable exception: elephants. In places like Thailand and Sri Lanka, elephants became agitated hours before the waves hit. Wild elephants fled to higher ground, and captive ones defied their handlers, sometimes with tourists still on their backs. Sensing low-frequency vibrations undetectable to most species, they acted on early warning signals – and were far more likely to survive. Today, another, far larger disaster is brewing, as rapid planetary warming and escalating environmental degradation threaten every sector of the global economy. And while many investors continue with business as usual, as if unaware of what is coming, one group is attempting to get out of harm's way: long-term asset owners, such as pension funds and sovereign wealth managers. These investors, unlike hedge funds or private equity firms, take a generational view of the assets they manage. They cannot afford to ignore the inextricable link between global financial stability and environmental stability, an awareness reflected in new initiatives like the Debt Suspension Clause Alliance and the Global Hub for Debt Swaps for Development. While some claim that accounting for climate change amounts to 'mission creep' for global financial stewards like the International Monetary Fund, bellwether investors recognise that nature and climate risks will materialise in near- and medium-term shocks, affecting every facet of the global economy. So, even as many shareholders and CEOs remain focused on quarterly results, long-term asset owners have begun to scrutinise companies for natural-capital risk, in order to anticipate environmental shocks that could reduce the long-term value of their assets. Norway's Government Pension Fund Global, which manages $1.7 trillion in assets, is now assessing a whopping 96 per cent of its portfolio for such risk. This is not some internal refinement of environmental, social and governance (ESG) pledges; it is a major institutional change. Norway is not alone. Finland's State Pension Fund recently began exploring ways to quantify nature-related financial risks in relation to long-term pension liabilities. And Temasek Holdings in Singapore has started using satellite monitoring and biodiversity data to evaluate natural-capital risks and opportunities. At a time when ESG frameworks have become a flashpoint in political and culture wars, there can be no doubt that these actions are driven not by political pressures or social trends, but by pragmatism – and a growing sense of urgency. Already, extreme weather, biodiversity loss, water stress and resource scarcity are disrupting economies, with vulnerable low-income countries especially hard hit. In 2022, floods in Pakistan devastated agriculture – which employs 40 per cent of the workforce – driving up food prices and pushing the country to the brink of default. In Indonesia, deforestation and peatland degradation from unsustainable palm-oil production led to the imposition of a temporary export ban in 2022. In Brazil and Ethiopia, rising temperatures and erratic rainfall have slashed coffee yields in recent years, causing global prices to spike and undermining rural incomes and export revenues. High-income countries are far from immune to these risks. In the United States, prolonged droughts are reducing crop yields from Arkansas to Oklahoma, forcing farmers to drill deeper wells and switch to less profitable crops. Meanwhile, climate-related disasters, such as hurricanes and wildfires, are causing home insurers to raise premiums, reduce coverage and even exit high-risk regions. In Europe, nature-related risks have affected olive oil production in Italy and Greece; grapes in France, Italy and Spain; timber supplies in Central and Northern Europe; fishing in the Mediterranean; and transport on the Rhine and Danube rivers. And this does not even begin to cover the vast human costs of the nature and climate crisis, evident in places like Valencia and Texas. Yet such risks have not been adequately priced into financial models. This is partly because data on natural capital, unlike on greenhouse-gas emissions, remain fragmented, inconsistent and difficult to access. The risks are complex and systemic – water scarcity, biodiversity loss and climate change cut across sectors and borders, triggering cascading effects – and there are no measuring or reporting standards in place. As a result, most banks lack the information they need, especially location-specific data, to evaluate borrowers' environmental dependencies. But new tools are emerging that can help close these gaps. For example, Exploring Natural Capital Opportunities, Risks and Exposure (ENCORE) is a free online tool that helps financial institutions identify nature-related risks to which they are exposed through their lending, underwriting and investment in high-risk industries. Moreover, the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) has devised a set of disclosure recommendations and guidance aimed at helping businesses and financial institutions integrate nature into their decision-making. Some central banks have developed integrated scenario models aimed at assessing the impact of climate- and nature-related risks on the economy and financial system. Investors do not need to fly blind. This is no longer a matter of awareness. With investors already confronting the financial consequences of ecological instability – from stranded agricultural assets to declining sovereign-credit ratings in climate-vulnerable economies – there can be no doubt that nature risk is financial risk. Asset owners, central banks and institutions like the IMF now have a responsibility to integrate this recognition into all their activities – before the next preventable shock materialises. The institutions that lead will be those willing to move beyond silos, align capital with planetary boundaries and invest not only in markets, but also in the systems that support them. @Project Syndicate, 2025


Muscat Daily
5 hours ago
- Muscat Daily
Ghana: Can a 24-hour economy change a nation?
Accra, Ghana – Since taking office six months ago, Ghanaian President John Mahama has placed a firm focus on reviving the country's economy – a key promise of his campaign. The new leader is seeking to shift the West African nation away from relying solely on its traditional sectors to establishing a more diversified economy. To this end, Mahama has launched a so-called 24-hour economy designed not only to create job opportunities around the clock but also to transform Ghana from an imports-based economy to self-sufficiency. 'This policy is made for Ghana and the future,' said Mahama. 'The 24-Hour Plus Programme will be the catalyst for Ghana's economic growth, and we are sure it will make Ghana prosper.' Under the plan, various industries will operate in three eight-hour shifts daily, with public and private sectors working together to keep the economy running day and night. The initiative chiefly targets existing key sectors in the country such as agriculture, manufacturing and essential services, but could be expanded to other areas in the long term. But as promising as it may seem, questions remain about the feasibility of Mahama's pet project. A country that never sleeps? Ghana's capital, Accra, can't compare to New York, Dubai or Tokyo when it comes to 24-hour amenities. In the African context, few cities run nonstop services, although Accra and cities in Nigeria, Democratic Republic of Congo, South Africa and Kenya boast vibrant informal nighttime economies. Mahama's plan is about far more than creating cities where shops, restaurants and bars can operate day and night: His vision is to boost Ghana's economic output by tripling the hours that vital industries and sectors operate – from an average of eight hours per day to 24 hours. By the end of the decade, this ambitious policy could create 1.7mn new jobs across the nation, which would mean a 5% drop in unemployment. Economist Daniel Amateye Anim believes that bridging the gap from the theoretical idea behind the new policy to its actual application is where things could potentially go awry. 'About US$4bn to drive this 24-hour policy is needed,' he told DW. The expense has to be seen in the context of Ghana already owing US$3bn to the International Monetary Fund after defaulting repeatedly on some of its existing debt in recent years. Implementing an ambitious vision Ghana's approach as a government-backed policy is unique on the African continent, but faces multiple hurdles in its implementation. 'On paper, the programme sounds or appears innovative and progressive, with a propensity of transforming Ghana's economy. So it makes theoretical sense … (because) it's a programme that seeks to create jobs, bring about productivity, lift up from poverty,' said Amateye. 'As it stands now, we have so many graduates who are unemployed. And so, a programme that would ensure that people are employed and jobs are created, will also increase our GDP.' But in practical terms, he said, funding will be a limiting factor. 'Who exactly is the private sector, who you are expecting (to fund the program)? The internal private sectors do not have the financial muscle … to drive such an innovative programme.' According to Amateye, even if Ghana's private sector were able to fund a major transformation of the economy, it would still take time for private enterprises to fully buy into Mahama's ambitious idea. '(Each enterprise) would have to do a cost-benefit analysis first, and that takes time.' Amateye suggested that the onus should be on the government to cough up the funds first and thus 'dictate the pace' before private enterprises across Ghana can actually join Mahama's 24-hour economy revolution. DW


Muscat Daily
a day ago
- Muscat Daily
China's PM Li Qiang calls for global ‘consensus' on AI regulation
Shanghai, China – Chinese Premier Li Qiang on Saturday urged the international community to build a global consensus on artificial intelligence (AI) governance, highlighting security risks amid the raging tech race between Beijing and Washington. Speaking at the opening of the World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC) in Shanghai, Li said it is prudent to look at 'how to find a balance between development and security (which) urgently requires further consensus from the entire society'. Li also announced the creation of a Chinese-led body to promote global AI cooperation and open-source development to keep AI from becoming 'the preserve of a few countries and a few enterprises'. The tech rivalry between US, China The three-day WAIC event comes amid intensifying US-China competition in advanced AI technology. Just days before, US President Donald Trump announced the slashing of AI regulations to maintain the US' dominance in the field even as Washington continues to restrict exports of high-end chips to China, citing national security concerns. These restrictions are forcing Chinese companies to look for alternatives, with startup DeepSeek introducing an AI model in January that matched the performance of leading US systems, despite working on less advanced chips. Li, without naming the US, criticised monopolistic control and called for open access to AI technologies, warning of insufficient supply of AI chips and restrictions on talent exchange otherwise. 'Only by adhering to openness, sharing and fairness in access to intelligence can more countries and groups benefit from (AI),' he said. 'A test of international cooperation' At the WAIC opening ceremony, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said in a video message that AI regulation would be 'a defining test of international cooperation.' More than 800 companies are participating in this year's WAIC, showcasing over 3,000 tech innovations. While Chinese firms like Huawei and Alibaba are the main entrants, international firms including US-based companies Tesla, Alphabet, and Amazon are also present. DW