
Trade tensions aren't stopping Chinese companies from pushing into the US
Chinese companies are so intent on global expansion that even the biggest stock offering to date on Shanghai's tech-heavy STAR board counts the US as one of its biggest markets, on par with China.
Shenzhen-based camera company Insta360, a rival to GoPro, raised 1.938 billion yuan ($417 million) in a Shanghai listing Wednesday under the name Arashi Vision. Shares soared by 274 per cent, giving the company a market value of 71 billion yuan ($15.3 billion).
The US, Europe and mainland China each accounted for just over 23 per cent of revenue last year, according to Insta360, whose 360-degree cameras officially started Apple Store sales in 2018. The company sells a variety of cameras — priced at several hundred dollars — coupled with video-editing software.
Co-founder Max Richter said in an interview Tuesday that he expects US demand to remain strong and dismissed concerns about geopolitical risks.
'We are staying ahead just by investing into user-centric research and development, and monitoring market trends that ultimately meet the consumer['s] needs,' he said ahead of the STAR board listing.
China launched the Shanghai STAR Market in July 2019 just months after Chinese President Xi Jinping announced plans for the board. The Nasdaq-style tech board was established to support high-growth tech companies while raising requirements for the investor base to limit speculative activity.
In 2019, only 12 per cent of companies on the STAR board said at least half of their revenue came from outside China, according to CNBC analysis of data accessed via Wind Information. In 2024, with hundreds more companies listed, that share had climbed to more than 14 per cent, the data showed.
'We are just seeing the tip of the iceberg. More and more capable Chinese firms are going global,' said King Leung, global head of financial services, fintech and sustainability at InvestHK.
Leung pointed to the growing global business of Chinese companies such as battery giant CATL, which listed in Hong Kong last month. 'There are a lot of more tier-two and tier-three companies that are equally capable,' he said.
InvestHK is a Hong Kong government department that promotes investment in the region. It has organised trips to help connect mainland Chinese businesses with overseas opportunities, including one to the Middle East last month.
Roborock, a robotic vacuum cleaner company also listed on the STAR board, announced this month it plans to list in Hong Kong. More than half of the company's revenue last year came from overseas markets.
At the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas this year, Roborock showed off a vacuum with a robotic arm for automatically removing obstacles while cleaning floors. The device was subsequently launched in the US for $US2600 ($4020).
Other consumer-focused Chinese companies also remain unfazed by heightened tensions between China and the US.
In November, Chinese home appliance company Hisense said it aimed to become the top seller of television sets in the US in two years. And last month, China-based Bc Babycare announced its official expansion into the US and touted its global supply chain as a way to offset tariff risks.
Chinese companies have been pushing overseas in the last several years, partly because growth at home has slowed. Consumer demand has remained lackluster since the COVID-19 pandemic.
But the expansion trend is now evolving into a third stage in which the businesses look to build international brands on their own with offices in different regions hiring local employees, said Charlie Chen, managing director and head of Asia research at China Renaissance Securities.
He said that's a change from the earliest years when Chinese companies primarily manufactured products for foreign brands to sell, and a subsequent phase in which Chinese companies had joint ventures with foreign companies.
Insta360 primarily manufactures out of Shenzhen, but has offices in Berlin, Tokyo and Los Angeles, Richter said. He said the Los Angeles office focuses on services and marketing — the company held its first big offline product launch in New York's Grand Central Terminal in April.
Chen also expects the next phase of Chinese companies going global will sell different kinds of products. He pointed out that those that had gone global primarily sold home appliances and electronics, but are now likely to expand significantly into toys.
Already, Beijing-based Pop Mart has become a global toy player, with its Labubu figurine series gaining popularity worldwide.
Pop Mart's total sales, primarily domestic, were 4.49 billion yuan in 2021. In 2024, overseas sales alone surpassed that to hit 5.1 billion yuan, up 373 per cent from a year ago, while mainland China sales climbed to 7.97 billion yuan.
'It established another Pop Mart versus domestic sales in 2021,' said Chris Gao, head of China discretionary consumer at CLSA.
The Hong Kong-listed retailer doesn't publicly share much about its global store expansion plans or existing locations, but an independent blogger compiled a list of at least 17 US store locations as of mid-May, most of which opened in the last two years.
The toy company has been 'very good' at developing or acquiring the rights to characters, Gao said. She expects its global growth to continue as Pop Mart plans to open more stores worldwide, and as consumers turn more to such character-driven products during times of stress and macroeconomic uncertainty.
CNBC
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


West Australian
39 minutes ago
- West Australian
'Exploited' investors lose fortune, $280m fines mulled
Brokerages found to have profited handsomely from vulnerable customers who lost millions of dollars on highly risky investment products could be hit with $280 million fines. Investors lost $83 million by investing in complex, high-risk over-the-counter derivatives pushed by foreign exchange broker Union Standard International Group and its two authorised representatives between 2018 and 2020. Union Standard and the two representatives EuropeFX and TradeFred committed hundreds of contraventions of corporations and financial law through systemic misconduct that targeted inexperienced consumers, the Federal Court found in December. The complex products allowed customers to speculate on the change in value of an underlying asset, such as foreign exchange rates, stock market indices, single equities, commodities or crypto-assets. The court found some customers were "flying blind during most, if not all, of the time" that they traded derivatives with EuropeFX. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is now seeking fines totalling $287.1 million against the three firms. EuropeFX, the only one not in liquidation, should face a $114.1 million penalty, ASIC barrister Luke Livingston SC argued during a hearing on Tuesday. The firm's revenue was directly linked to customers' trading losses, he said. "In short, the more its customers lost, the more revenue it earned," he told Justice Michael Wigney. The judge found in his December decision that all three firms had profited "handsomely" from their conduct. Union Standard and TradeFred - both unrepresented at the hearing - should be fined $143.5 million and $29.4 million, Mr Livingston said. EuropeFX has pushed for a lower penalty of $40 million, claiming ASIC's proposed fine was "double punishment". ASIC argued the lower amount was insufficient to deter similar unlawful conduct in the future. EuropeFX's barrister Michelle Painter SC said her client should be hit with a lower penalty than Union Standard as that was the firm issuing the financial products in the first place. The company claimed at a prior hearing on liability that it had relied on Union Standard to train its staff properly. Justice Wigney rejected those allegations. EuropeFX's account managers unlawfully gave personal financial advice, pressured customers into depositing more funds and made misleading statements regarding investments, he found. The firm also tried pressuring customers who had threatened to go to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority into accepting modest settlements instead, he said. "EuropeFX's conduct was so far outside societal norms of acceptable behaviour in respect of the provision of financial services as to warrant condemnation as conduct that is offensive to conscience," he said at the time. The judge also found Union Standard did not warn customers based in China they would breach Chinese law by investing in its products. Several Union Standard directors have been banned from providing financial services based on their conduct at the firm or other companies. The hearing continues.


Perth Now
40 minutes ago
- Perth Now
'Exploited' investors lose fortune, $280m fines mulled
Brokerages found to have profited handsomely from vulnerable customers who lost millions of dollars on highly risky investment products could be hit with $280 million fines. Investors lost $83 million by investing in complex, high-risk over-the-counter derivatives pushed by foreign exchange broker Union Standard International Group and its two authorised representatives between 2018 and 2020. Union Standard and the two representatives EuropeFX and TradeFred committed hundreds of contraventions of corporations and financial law through systemic misconduct that targeted inexperienced consumers, the Federal Court found in December. The complex products allowed customers to speculate on the change in value of an underlying asset, such as foreign exchange rates, stock market indices, single equities, commodities or crypto-assets. The court found some customers were "flying blind during most, if not all, of the time" that they traded derivatives with EuropeFX. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is now seeking fines totalling $287.1 million against the three firms. EuropeFX, the only one not in liquidation, should face a $114.1 million penalty, ASIC barrister Luke Livingston SC argued during a hearing on Tuesday. The firm's revenue was directly linked to customers' trading losses, he said. "In short, the more its customers lost, the more revenue it earned," he told Justice Michael Wigney. The judge found in his December decision that all three firms had profited "handsomely" from their conduct. Union Standard and TradeFred - both unrepresented at the hearing - should be fined $143.5 million and $29.4 million, Mr Livingston said. EuropeFX has pushed for a lower penalty of $40 million, claiming ASIC's proposed fine was "double punishment". ASIC argued the lower amount was insufficient to deter similar unlawful conduct in the future. EuropeFX's barrister Michelle Painter SC said her client should be hit with a lower penalty than Union Standard as that was the firm issuing the financial products in the first place. The company claimed at a prior hearing on liability that it had relied on Union Standard to train its staff properly. Justice Wigney rejected those allegations. EuropeFX's account managers unlawfully gave personal financial advice, pressured customers into depositing more funds and made misleading statements regarding investments, he found. The firm also tried pressuring customers who had threatened to go to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority into accepting modest settlements instead, he said. "EuropeFX's conduct was so far outside societal norms of acceptable behaviour in respect of the provision of financial services as to warrant condemnation as conduct that is offensive to conscience," he said at the time. The judge also found Union Standard did not warn customers based in China they would breach Chinese law by investing in its products. Several Union Standard directors have been banned from providing financial services based on their conduct at the firm or other companies. The hearing continues.


West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Live sheep export ban transition advocate to meet WA Agriculture Minister within weeks
WA Agriculture Minister Jackie Jarvis is set to meet the Federally-appointed live sheep export ban transition advocate within weeks after accusations the State Government had 'walked away' from the industry. Shadow agriculture minister Lachlan Hunter came out swinging last month after it was revealed Ms Jarvis had not met the WA-based advocate, Dr Chris Rodwell, since his appointment to the role five months ago. Dr Rodwell, a former CSIRO staffer, was picked by the Federal Government to facilitate two-way communication between the Commonwealth and farmers affected by Labor's plan to ban live sheep exports. A spokeswoman for Ms Jarvis said the Cook Government had been 'clear and consistent from the start' in its lack of support for the Federal Government's planned live sheep export ban and a meeting with Dr Rodwell had been in Ms Jarvis' diary 'for some time'. She declined to reveal what date and where the meeting would take place, but said it would be 'within weeks'. 'We understand the Transition Advocate has met, and is meeting, with a range of stakeholders and industry representatives, including the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, as part of their role,' the spokeswoman said. 'Minister Jarvis has an upcoming meeting with the transition advocate, which has been scheduled for some time.' Dr Rodwell was appointed as the transition advocate for the Federal Government in January, taking on a role described as Australia's 'most unpopular job' by industry leaders and the Opposition. Ms Jarvis' spokeswoman said the State Government had gone in to bat for WA farmers affected by the ban, netting an additional $32.7 million in Federal funding for the transition package after lobbing to have it increased from $107m to $139.7m. 'This additional funding was announced in October and as part of this announcement, the Federal Government committed $43.5m for WA to support processing capacity grants and community wellbeing,' she said. 'A process is under way to contract providers for the $1.5m community wellbeing program, with announcement expected in August. 'Program guidelines for the Commonwealth Government's $40m processing capacity program are being developed by Rural Business Development Corporation in partnership with the Commonwealth.' The live sheep export ban is set to come into effect in mid-2028. Mr Hunter, who is the Central Wheatbelt MLA, said the State Government's lack of engagement with Dr Rodwell demonstrated it had walked away from the industry. 'It's shocking that the Agriculture Minster has not bothered to meet with Dr Rodwell after nearly five months,' he said. 'It confirms what we've long suspected — WA Labor has walked away from our sheep producers, exporters, and regional communities. 'No State-led plan. No advocacy. No care. 'WA is the home of Australia's live sheep trade — and Labor has thrown it under the bus.' Ms Jarvis' spokeswoman said while the State Government opposed the end of live sheep export, 'the Federal legislation has passed'. 'Even the member for Central Wheatbelt acknowledged this ... in the Legislative Assembly, stating 'to be fair, the Federal Government won the election and has a mandate to end the live sheep trade. It took that to the people and people spoke',' she said. 'The Cook Government will continue to work with industry and advocate on their behalf for certainty and sustainable future here in WA for meat processing, WA sheep meat and wool producers.' A spokeswoman for the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry confirmed Dr Rodwell was scheduled to meet Ms Jarvis regarding the phase-out transition. 'Dr Rodwell has met with a number of State Government representatives and will initiate further meetings as required,' she said.