
Most Americans Say Democracy Is Under Threat
Around three-quarters of Americans feel that U.S. divisiveness poses a 'serious threat to democracy,' according to the NPR/PBS News/Marist poll released on Tuesday.
The survey, conducted from June 23 to 25 in the wake of U.S. airstrikes on Iran and the shootings of two Minnesota lawmakers and their spouses, found that 89% of Democrats, 80% of independents, and 57% of Republicans believe the future of democracy is threatened.
The recent shootings may have been fresh in respondents' minds: 73% called politically motivated violence a major problem in the U.S., compared to the 23% that called it a minor problem.
Democratic state Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, were tragically killed in the attacks on June 14. Democratic state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, were shot multiple times and hospitalized.
Politically motivated violence has been on the rise more broadly in the country in recent years. More than 9,500 instances of threats and concerning statements against members of Congress, their families, and their staff, were recorded in 2021, the same year rioters stormed the U.S. Capitol, according to Capitol Police—marking a sharp increase from the 3,939 recorded just four years earlier. Several high-profile politicians have also been targeted in attacks. President Donald Trump faced two assassination attempts on the campaign trail last year, one of which left an attendee at his campaign rally dead and two others injured. Other assailants have injured Rep. Nancy Pelosi's husband, who was beaten with a hammer in a home invasion in 2022 in an apparently politically motivated attack targeting the Democratic Speaker, and Republican Rep. Steve Scalise, who was wounded in a mass shooting at a congressional baseball practice in 2017. Earlier this year, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro's house was set on fire while he and his family slept inside.
More than 1,300 adults were surveyed for the poll. Here's what to know about the survey's findings.
Confidence in political leadership low across party lines
Americans' approval of both the President and lawmakers on both sides of the aisle is low.
President Donald Trump's second Administration has shaken the country's political and economic landscape with back-and-forth tariff policies, federal layoffs, and moves to crack down on immigration and restrict transgender rights. Just 43% of respondents said in the survey that they either approved or strongly approved of the Administration. The numbers largely fell along partisan lines: About one in ten Democrats said they approved of the job the President is doing, compared to 86% of Republicans. One in three independents expressed approval.
Public opinion of Congressional Democrats is much grimmer. Just 27% of respondents said they approved of the job they are doing, marking their lowest rating in seven years, per the poll. While their approval among Republicans, at 18%, and independents, at 20%, was markedly lower, Democrats were also less than complimentary of their party's performance in Congress. Only 44% of Democrats said they approved, while 43% disapproved.
Congressional Republicans, meanwhile, recorded their highest approval rating since 2011—though it was still low, with only thirty-five percent of respondents approving. They were buoyed somewhat by majority support from Republican respondents, 73% of whom expressed approval of the job their party is doing in Congress, even as only 11% of Democrats and 25% of independents said the same.
Sharp partisan divide over immigration and American identity
The United States has more immigrants than any other country; they make up about 14% of the total U.S. population, according to the Pew Research Center. Two-thirds of Americans agree that 'openness' to immigrants is key to the fabric of the nation, Tuesday's poll found.
An overall majority agreed that undocumented immigrants who have been convicted of a violent crime should be deported from the U.S.
Responses were split on deporting undocumented immigrants who have been convicted of nonviolent crimes or work in the agriculture or food industries. Republicans were far more likely than Democrats or independents to say immigrants with a nonviolent criminal conviction and without legal status should be deported, with 86% supporting their removal compared to 36% of Democrats and 57% of independents. Seventy-three percent of Republican respondents said those who worked in the specified industries should be deported, compared to 22% of Democrats and 40% of independents.
The responses come as the Trump Administration has moved to launch the 'largest deportation' program in U.S. history. The Administration has taken a hard stance against immigration, enacting arrest quotas for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, looking to alter a longstanding constitutional amendment that guarantees birthright citizenship, and targeting international students' ability to study at universities such as Harvard.
Overall, 43% of Americans approve of Trump's immigration policies, though that number, too, is sharply divided by party identification. Just 11% of Democrats expressed approval, compared to 86% of Republicans.
Sixty-two percent of Republicans said they believe the U.S. 'risks losing its identity' if it is too open to immigrants.
White women and older voters most concerned about violence and democracy
Across various demographics, white women with a college degree reported the highest level of concern about politically motivated violence in the U.S., with 83% calling it a major problem. Baby Boomers across different genders and races followed closely behind at 82%.
Majority say presidents must follow court orders
Americans overwhelmingly agree that a president should abide by a federal court's decision, with 83% of respondents saying so.
Many of Trump's Executive Orders and other policies have been entangled in the legal system. Legal scholars warned of a potential constitutional crisis when the Trump Administration stalled in abiding by a unanimous Supreme Court order to facilitate the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man who was wrongfully deported to El Salvador. Months after the order, officials brought Abrego Garcia back to the country in June to face criminal charges of human smuggling. He is currently in federal custody.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
34 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
U.S. tariff letters delayed, being sent Monday to first 12 countries
July 5 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump said letters will now go out on Monday to 12 countries with a final "take it or leave it" offer on tariff negotiations, pushing the date forward by two days. Trump did not name the 12 countries, adding that news would be made public on Monday. The president told reporters earlier in the week the letters would start going out on Friday but has since postponed the date. "I signed some letters and they'll go out on Monday, probably twelve," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force 1. "Different amounts of money, different amounts of tariffs." A 90-day pause instituted in April on Trump's so-called reciprocal tariffs of different sizes expires on July 9. A separate 10% "baseline" U.S. tariff on all countries is unrelated. The letters are expected to be sent by July 9, Trump told reporters this week. The pause was meant to give countries time to negotiate a deal with the Trump administration, but only a few have been finalized to date. Several other nations and the European Union have said they are not close. Britain and the United States came to an agreement at the end of June. American officials earlier this week announced a deal with Vietnam. Japan has said a deal with the United States on tariffs remains "unlikely," while European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the three-month window was not long enough to properly negotiate a comprehensive agreement. This week, South Korean President Lee Jae Myung said negotiations on a tariff deal with the United States were "not very easy." "They'll range in value from maybe 60% or 70% tariffs to 10% and 20% tariffs, but they're going to be starting to go out sometime tomorrow," Trump told reporters earlier in the week, confirming the 90-day pause would end as scheduled. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said last month the deadlines are flexible in his understanding and that he expects negotiations to continue with the possibility of further deals getting done before Labor Day. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

Miami Herald
34 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
BRICS countries set to criticize U.S. tariffs
July 5 (UPI) -- The so-called BRICS group of countries is reportedly set to issue a formal statement criticizing the United States current tariff situation when the group meets for a two-day summit in Brazil. Brazil, India, Russia, China, South Africa and the other five countries that comprise the intergovernmental organization, are expected to adopt a position of "serious concern" regarding U.S. President Donald Trump's enactment of so-called reciprocal tariffs, Bloomberg reports, citing sources familiar with ongoing deliberations. Leaders of the BRICS countries are in Rio de Janeiro for the group's 17th summit which begins Sunday and is being hosted by Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Brazil currently holds the BRICS chair position and counts the United States as its second-biggest trading partner after China. Earlier in the week, Trump confirmed U.S. tariffs will begin July 9 when a 90-day pause is scheduled to end. The president has previously been at odds with the organization. After winning the election last year and before taking office, Trump said the group would "wave goodbye to America" if it created its own currency, adding he would also impose a 100% tariff in U.S. domestic markets if that scenario unfolded. In 2023, BRICS formally invited Saudi Arabia and Iran to join the organization. Iran became the group's latest member last year. Last month, BRICS issued a statement on the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities, using the same "grave concern" language. The organization continues its recruiting attempts. Last month, Colombia announced it would become a member of the BRICS-backed New Development Bank as the country looks to distance itself from its reliance on Western financial markets. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.


New York Post
42 minutes ago
- New York Post
New York's special interests will eat Zohran Mamdani for lunch
For all his radicalism, Zohran Mamdani's program is often as vaporous as steam wafting from a Midtown manhole. It's a lot more about vibes than about delivering real change. His city-owned grocery store scheme, for starters, is almost entirely symbolic — not any real answer to the price-gouging he and his fans pretends is common at privately owned markets. The initial plan is only for one city store in each borough: That literally can't make any difference for most New Yorkers. And those five stores can't even be a meaningful test because it'd be a disaster for the new mayor if any of the stores failed. Tellingly, Mamdani brags that Chicago has already done a 'feasibility study' for city-owned groceries. Problem is, no one can read the Chicago analysis, because city leaders shelved it — almost certainly because they discovered that municipal-owned supermarkets have no chance of success. Contrary to what the hipster socialists imagine, groceries' profit margins are not rich but as thin as deli-sliced ham: Keeping the store going requires obsessive management — not the casual oversight that's given the world the phrase 'good enough for government work.' Of course, even Mamdani's plans to finance his stores is as airy as coffee-cart bagels: He said he'd tap the $140 million that the city already gives away to corporate grocery chains as a subsidy — except his crack crew misread the facts on the city's 'Food Retail Expansion to Support Health' program. That $140 million, it turns out, is how how much private store owners invested in the local economy after getting much smaller tax breaks, not city outlays a mayor could redirect. The socialist's confusion here recalls fellow DSAer Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's celebration when Amazon pulled out of the plan to build a major headquarters in Queens: This freed up $3 billion that New York could spend on schools instead of a corporate giveaway, she exulted. But no: The massive e-tailer had simply been promised (just like many other companies) tax breaks if it created so many jobs; with the deal dead, Amazon wouldn't generate any income for the state to hold off on taxing. Zeroed-out Zohran must have the same math tutor as AOC, because zilch is how much the city has on hand to pay for his food pantries posing as groceries. Of course, Mamdani actually got the funding for another of his pilot-project schemes — then lost it because he couldn't even cooperate with fellow Democrats. Ending fares on MTA buses is one of his big ideas for making NYC 'affordable'; he helped author a one-year experiment in fare-free buses on five routes in 2024 — only to see Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie quietly can the next year's funding after Mamdani refused to vote to pass the state budget. Reminder: Much of Mamdani's program — starting with getting $10 billion to cover many initiatives by hiking taxes on the rich — depends on getting Albany's OK, and he's going to need Heastie's enthusiastic support since Gov. Kathy Hochul has already said 'no go!' How will Heastie fight for a guy he already sees as a lightweight? Look: New York politics, state and city, is packed with deeply connected special interests — with public-sector outfits (unions, massive nonprofits) often more ruthless than the real-estate lobby and other private-sector players. Voters' revulsion at that corruption is a big reason Mamdani won the primary, but this crew will eat the pretty boy for lunch while he's busy filming his next viral YouTube.