
Varanasi gang rape case: Claims of survivor can't be overruled, says SIT report
In the light of the Supreme Court and high court judgments, the report mentioned that the claims made in her statement cannot be denied. "During her disappearance, the presence of several accused individuals was found at different places and times with her. In such serious cases, SC and HCs have issued various important decisions and guidelines, emphasising that the survivor's statement should be given priority.
In this context, based on her statement and the facts found during the investigation, it cannot be denied that the accused committed the crime," the SIT said.
On April 17, commissioner of police Mohit Agrawal had formed SIT following the submission of a memorandum by the family members, especially women, of the accused persons. The SIT was asked to submit a report within 30 days. Further arrests in the case were stopped until the submission of this SIT report.
Taking note of the SIT report, the CP said, "Based on the recorded statements, medical reports, CCTV footage, call detail records, IP logs, and other evidence collected during its investigation, the SIT concluded that the possibility of the incident occurring cannot be ruled out. The investigator of the case has been asked to incorporate all points mentioned in the SIT report and conclude his investigation impartially and promptly.
"
The mother of the survivor reported to Lalpur Pandeypur police station on April 4 that her daughter left home on March 29 but did not return. After lodging the case, the police started searching for her and, after finding her at a friend's house, they asked her to return home. Initially, she refused to return home, but after much persuasion, she was handed over to her family.
On the night of April 6, her mother lodged a complaint with the police, alleging that upon returning home, her daughter revealed that during the period of disappearance, different individuals committed wrongful acts against her at different places.
After lodging the FIR, Lalpur Pandeypur police arrested a total of 14 individuals, including nine named accused on April 8, three on April 11, and two more on April 15.
The survivor was taken for a medical examination to PDDU district hospital, where she initially refused external and internal medical examinations. After the police explained the legal aspects, she agreed to undergo a medical examination.
During the investigation by the SIT, the CDR of various individuals' mobile numbers, witness statements, CCTV footage, the victim's Instagram IP logs, the survivor's statement, and statements of the accused and their relatives were collected, and all evidence was examined.
The investigation revealed that during the period of disappearance, the victim was found to be moving freely and was seen with some of the accused. During this time, she was seen going to the mall and Chausatti Ghat with her colleagues and some friends. During the incident, the victim borrowed mobile phones from about 11 different individuals to log into Instagram and also made several calls. When asked why she didn't go home or inform anyone about the incident, she said she was afraid to go home and didn't tell anyone about the incident due to fear and shame.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
44 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Four revenue officials suspended over lapses in SC survey
Following many complaints about lapses in the ongoing Scheduled Castes (SC) survey in the city, the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) has suspended four revenue officials. Three officials — revenue inspector Ramesh and tax collector Peddaraju, working in HBR sub-division, and tax collector C. Sentil Kumar of Kengeri sub-division — were suspended on Thursday for not contacting residents, but pasting stickers on their houses that the survey of these houses was completed. On Friday, the BBMP suspended revenue inspector Kavita, working in the Vasanthnagar sub-division, for erroneous survey in ward no. 62, Vasathnagar. In her suspension order, the BBMP said when the head office called up residents to cross-check on the survey in the ward, they found that surveyors had marked SC families from neighbouring Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu as 'non-SC households' during the survey, but included them as 'SC households' and uploaded their details on the app, when they went to paste stickers, creating discrepancies in the survey.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Several cheated in Canada job permit, visa fraud
Surat: A complaint alleging fraud of Rs 17 lakh has been filed against the operator of Sky Macron Immigration, located in Central Bazaar within the Vesu police station area. The operator allegedly enticed individuals by promising work permits and visas for countries including Canada, collected substantial sums of money, and then disappeared overnight after shutting down the office. Sanjay Lathiya, 30, a resident of Tagdi village in Bhavnagar, came across the company's advertisement offering visa and work permit services on Instagram in August 2024. He followed the page and contacted the number provided. Jenil Prajapati, who answered the call, instructed Sanjay to bring his original documents and passport to their office. At the office, Sanjay met Jenil and his partners, Ankita Mistry and Rajesh Shah. They informed him that the complete process — including the visa, air ticket, work permit, and medical expenses — for Canada would cost Rs 25 lakh. They collected his passport and documents. On Jenil's instructions, Sanjay initially paid Rs 5 lakh and later a total of Rs 17 lakh in installments for the visa process. In March 2025, Jenil and his partners sent a letter stating that a job letter would soon arrive at their office. The letter also mentioned a cashier position in Canada with a wage of 32 dollars per hour but did not specify the name of the company. Suddenly, Jenil and his partners stopped responding to calls. Sanjay traveled to Surat and visited the Vesu office, only to discover that many pwoplw had been defrauded in the name of foreign work permits and visas, and the office had been shut down.


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Know your laws: Forced marriage and the legal framework to correct social crime
In June, a 16-year-old girl fled her house in Bihar and reached Delhi, where she was granted police protection by the Supreme Court. She had been forcibly married off to a 33-year-old man who abused another case that grabbed national attention, Sonam Raghuvanshi, accused of murdering her husband Raja Raghuvanshi during their honeymoon in Meghalaya, was allegedly forced to marry, despite her what does the law say about forced marriage? Firstly, marrying off a girl under 18 or a boy under 21 is completely illegal in India under the Prevention of Child Marriage Act. This law applies across all adults, the Supreme Court has upheld the right to choose one's partner as a fundamental right in multiple judgments. Any adult - a man or a woman - who is being forced to marry - can seek police protection to prevent such can also go to the state human rights body or women's rights commission for adult woman who has been kidnapped or criminally intimidated into agreeing to a marriage can file an FIR under Section 87 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) against those who kidnapped or forced her into marriage. This carries a punishment of up to 10 years in a minor, there are much stricter connected to the child - a friend, family, neighbour or a teacher - can file a police complaint against a minor being married off. The complaint can be made to the local police, or the Child Marriage Prevention Officer of the district, or the Juvenile justice Unit of the district police. The officials are obliged by law to then step in and stop the marriage from happening.A child marriage that has been solemnised carries both civil and criminal penalties under the Prevention of Child Marriage Act, BNS, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (Pocso) and the Juvenile Justice adult male spouse of a minor, the fathers of both the girl and the boy, as well as other people responsible for carrying out the wedding rituals face up to two years in jail and a the minor bride has been made to have sex, the husband faces up to 10 years of jail under the Pocso Act. The exemption given to "marital rape" under the rape law does not apply if the bride is under 18, which means that the husband also faces up to life imprisonment under the rape laws of husband's family members may also be liable for abetment of rape of the child. Juvenile Justice Act provisions for the safety of the child and offences by the parent/guardian will also apply in this civil consequences depend on the a child marriage cannot be legally registered in India unless the marriage happened before the Act of 2006 and both spouses agreed to remain married after turning the child marriage is not reported at the time of the wedding, a child who is married off, can approach the police, the Child Marriage Prevention Officer or a district court to file a petition to get the marriage is an option available to both the husband and the wife, that is, if both were under 18 at the time of the minor spouse need not wait until she turns 18 to approach the court. A family member, guardian or the Child Marriage Prevention officer can sign the petition with them. The court will grant a decree of nullity of the if the minor is forcibly taken away from their guardian, threatened or defrauded, the marriage itself is void, which means it never the rights and responsibilities towards maintenance will still husband's family is responsible for the payment of maintenance to the wife and any children born to the marriage. The court may also pass orders for the safe residence of the minor bride.A monthly maintenance amount must be paid to the wife till she born to such marriages are considered legitimate, even if the marriage itself is voided. They have the right to get child support as well as inherit the property of their father's family.- EndsTrending Reel IN THIS STORY#Supreme Court