You say tomato, I say potato: Researchers finally solve the mystery origins of the humble spud
'We've finally solved the mystery of where potatoes came from,' Sanwen Huang of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China, said in a statement.
As it turns out, the more than 4,000 species of modern-day potatoes are the result of crossbreeding between wild tomato plants and potato-like species in South America some nine million years ago.
The evolutionary event led to the formation of the tuber, which is the swollen and edible underground root of certain plants, such as potatoes and yams.
To reach these conclusions, Chinese researchers analyzed 450 genomes -- the complete set of an organism's DNA -- from human-grown potatoes and 56 of the wild potato species.
They found that every potato species contained a mix of genetic material from tomato plants and three potato-like species from Chile called Etuberosum. Modern potato plants are nearly identical to Etuberosum, but the Etuberosum species does not carry tubers. This suggested that potatoes originated from an ancient hybridization between the two.
Notably, tomatoes and Etuberosum shared a common ancestor approximately 14 million years ago. They diverged for about 5 million years before crossbreeding.
The researchers also traced the origins of the potato's tuber-forming genes. They examined what is known as the SP6A gene. SP6A is comparable to a 'switch,' telling the plant when to start making tubers. The researchers said that the gene came from tomatoes. However, another important gene called IT1, which helps to control the growth of the stems that form tubers under the ground, came from the Etuberosum side.
Without either gene, the hybrid offspring would be incapable of producing tubers that create potatoes.
The researchers said they had traced the event to a period when the Andes mountains were uplifting, leading to ecosystem shifts. The resiliency and adaptability of early potatoes allowed them to reproduce and expand
'Evolving a tuber gave potatoes a huge advantage in harsh environments, fueling an explosion of new species and contributing to the rich diversity of potatoes we see and rely on today,' Huang said.
The study was published on Thursday in the Cell Press journal Cell.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Scientists identify bacterium behind devastating wasting disease in starfish
A decade after the onset of a sea star wasting disease (SSWD) epidemic considered the largest ever documented in the wild, researchers have identified the microbial culprit responsible: a strain of the bacterium Vibrio pectenicida. In 10 years the bacterium has ravaged sunflower sea stars (Pycnopodia helianthoides), a large sea star or starfish, along the western coast of North America, with a loss of 5.8 billion since 2013 – or 90% of the total global population. The sunflower sea star is now included on the International Union for Conservation of Nature's red list of critically endangered species. Previous studies had tested for V pectenicida in tissue samples and yielded inconclusive results. Instead, by examining the sea stars' coelomic fluid, which acts like blood, researchers were able to confirm with certainty V pectenicida's role in causing SSWD due to its high abundance there. Infection with the V pectenicida strain FHCF-3 begins with exterior lesions, leading to limb loss and contortion, and ultimately kills afflicted individuals by melting their tissues into a white, mucus-like paste. Identifying the disease in afflicted sea stars was impossible without a known pathogen, as sea stars can respond with similar visual signals to other stressors such as low oxygen, salinity variation and extreme heat. The indirect link between rising ocean temperatures and SSWD remains a key area of interest, since V pectenicida is known to proliferate in warm water during seasonal variations and anomalous marine heating events. The research, published this week in the journal Nature Ecology & Evolution, was led by Dr Melanie Prentice and Dr Alyssa Gehman of the Hakai Institute in British Columbia, Canada, as part of a four-year international collaboration involving the University of British Columbia, the University of Washington and the Nature Conservancy, among other parties. The decline of sunflower sea stars has ramifications for marine ecosystems beyond the loss of a single species. 'Identifying the cause of SSWD is incredibly impactful,' Prentice said. 'In the absence of sunflower stars, [kelp-eating] sea urchin populations increase, which means the loss of kelp forests, and that has broad implications for all the other marine species and humans that rely on them.' Kelp forests provide a habitat for thousands of marine creatures, support local economies through fisheries and recreation, and are culturally important for First Nations and tribal communities. They also stabilise sediments, protect coastlines from storms, and are an important carbon sink for sequestering carbon dioxide. Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion Though the epidemic is still ongoing, the hope is that this breakthrough will aid recovery and treatment efforts for various sea star species across the world and the ecosystems affected by their decline. Methods being explored include captive breeding for resistant individuals and developing probiotic solutions which can be introduced to ecosystems. 'Now that we have found the causative agent of disease, it makes me hopeful that we might actually be able to do something for sunflower sea stars,' says Gehman. 'We can be really targeted in how we work with them, and I think that's going to help us move a lot faster and to try to tackle SSWD.'
Geeky Gadgets
2 hours ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Gemini Deep Think : The Future of Precision AI Complex Problem-Solving?
What if the toughest problems humanity faces—those that stump our brightest minds and stretch the limits of human ingenuity—could be tackled by a single, purpose-built system? Enter Gemini Deep Think, an advanced artificial intelligence model designed to confront the most intricate challenges in mathematics, algorithm development, and design optimization. Unlike general-purpose AI tools, this system doesn't aim to be a jack-of-all-trades; instead, it's a master of depth and precision, engineered to excel where others falter. With features like parallel thinking and extended inference time, Gemini Deep Think pushes the boundaries of what AI can achieve, offering a glimpse into a future where even the most complex problems have solutions within reach. Prompt Engineering explores how Gemini Deep Think redefines AI-driven problem-solving, from its new innovations to its specialized applications in fields like advanced mathematics and software analysis. You'll discover how its unique capabilities—such as iterative refinement and reinforcement learning—enable it to outperform competitors and set new benchmarks for excellence. But this isn't just about technology; it's about the profound implications for industries and researchers tackling humanity's hardest questions. As we unpack its features and limitations, consider this: could a tool like Gemini Deep Think become the cornerstone of innovation in a world increasingly defined by complexity? Core Features That Define Gemini Deep Think Gemini Deep Think stands out due to its unique capabilities, which are specifically designed to address highly complex problems. These features enable it to operate at a level of sophistication that few AI systems can match: Parallel Thinking: The model generates, evaluates, and refines multiple ideas simultaneously. This approach minimizes blind spots, fosters creativity, and ensures a thorough exploration of potential solutions. The model generates, evaluates, and refines multiple ideas simultaneously. This approach minimizes blind spots, fosters creativity, and ensures a thorough exploration of potential solutions. Extended Inference Time: Unlike conventional AI models, Gemini Deep Think dedicates additional time to analyzing hypotheses and exploring nuanced solutions. This makes it particularly effective for problems requiring sustained and detailed reasoning. Unlike conventional AI models, Gemini Deep Think dedicates additional time to analyzing hypotheses and exploring nuanced solutions. This makes it particularly effective for problems requiring sustained and detailed reasoning. Reinforcement Learning Innovations: Through advanced reinforcement learning techniques, the model iteratively improves its reasoning and decision-making processes, refining its outputs based on feedback. These features collectively make Gemini Deep Think a powerful tool for solving problems that demand advanced logical, mathematical, and creative reasoning. Performance Benchmarks: Redefining Excellence Gemini Deep Think has achieved remarkable results across a variety of benchmarks, solidifying its position as a leader in AI innovation. Its performance highlights include: International Mathematics Olympiad (IMO) Benchmark: The model achieved gold medal-level performance on the 2025 IMO benchmark, solving advanced combinatorial and geometric problems with unparalleled accuracy. The model achieved gold medal-level performance on the 2025 IMO benchmark, solving advanced combinatorial and geometric problems with unparalleled accuracy. Reasoning and Coding Benchmarks: Gemini Deep Think excelled in tasks such as 'Humanity's Last Exam' and live code generation, setting new standards for AI in logical reasoning and programming. Gemini Deep Think excelled in tasks such as 'Humanity's Last Exam' and live code generation, setting new standards for AI in logical reasoning and programming. Iterative Refinement: By optimizing algorithms and refining solutions over multiple cycles, the model has demonstrated its value in scientific research and engineering applications. These achievements underscore the model's potential to transform industries that rely on advanced reasoning, design, and optimization. Gemini Deep Think Explained : The Future of Precision AI Technology Watch this video on YouTube. Here are more guides from our previous articles and guides related to advanced AI models that you may find helpful. Specialized Applications and Use Cases Gemini Deep Think is not a general-purpose AI but is specifically designed to excel in high-complexity, specialized scenarios. Its primary applications include: Advanced Mathematical Problem-Solving: The model is highly effective in solving intricate problems in combinatorics, geometry, and algebra, making it a valuable resource for researchers, mathematicians, and academics. The model is highly effective in solving intricate problems in combinatorics, geometry, and algebra, making it a valuable resource for researchers, mathematicians, and academics. Software Framework Analysis: Gemini Deep Think identifies gaps in software systems, proposes improvements, and implements robust solutions, streamlining development processes and enhancing system reliability. Gemini Deep Think identifies gaps in software systems, proposes improvements, and implements robust solutions, streamlining development processes and enhancing system reliability. Thought Experiments and Economic Impact Analysis: It models large-scale scenarios, providing insights into potential outcomes and aiding strategic decision-making for organizations and policymakers. These specialized capabilities position Gemini Deep Think as an indispensable tool for researchers, engineers, and organizations operating at the forefront of innovation. Limitations and Considerations While Gemini Deep Think excels in its specialized domains, it is important to recognize its limitations to ensure appropriate use: Specialized Focus: The model is optimized for specific problem domains and is not suitable for general-purpose tasks or casual applications. The model is optimized for specific problem domains and is not suitable for general-purpose tasks or casual applications. Higher Refusal Rate: Gemini Deep Think may decline certain requests more frequently than other models, particularly when prompts are ambiguous or outside its expertise. Rephrasing queries often resolves this issue. Gemini Deep Think may decline certain requests more frequently than other models, particularly when prompts are ambiguous or outside its expertise. Rephrasing queries often resolves this issue. Access Restrictions: The experimental version is available exclusively to Gemini Ultra subscribers, while the gold medal-winning variant is reserved for select users with specialized needs. These constraints reflect the model's focus on delivering exceptional performance in targeted areas rather than attempting to address a broad range of applications. Innovative Technologies Behind Gemini Deep Think Gemini Deep Think integrates several new technologies that enhance its ability to solve complex problems: Parallel Thinking: This technique allows the model to explore multiple solutions simultaneously, fostering creativity and reducing the likelihood of oversight in problem-solving. This technique allows the model to explore multiple solutions simultaneously, fostering creativity and reducing the likelihood of oversight in problem-solving. Iterative Refinement: By revisiting and improving its outputs over multiple cycles, the model achieves higher levels of accuracy and efficiency, particularly in scientific discovery and design optimization. By revisiting and improving its outputs over multiple cycles, the model achieves higher levels of accuracy and efficiency, particularly in scientific discovery and design optimization. Enhanced Safety Mechanisms: The system prioritizes objectivity and safety in its responses, making sure reliability even in high-stakes scenarios. However, this can sometimes result in refusals of ambiguous or unclear requests. These innovations ensure that Gemini Deep Think remains at the cutting edge of AI technology, particularly for applications requiring rigorous reasoning and precision. Competitive Edge: How Gemini Deep Think Stands Out When compared to other AI models, Gemini Deep Think consistently demonstrates superior performance in several key areas: Benchmark Dominance: The model outperforms competitors such as Grok 4 in reasoning and problem-solving benchmarks, showcasing its advanced capabilities in standalone tasks. The model outperforms competitors such as Grok 4 in reasoning and problem-solving benchmarks, showcasing its advanced capabilities in standalone tasks. Tool-Augmented Scenarios: While there is room for improvement in tool-augmented tasks, Gemini Deep Think's exceptional standalone performance highlights its core strengths and potential for further development. These comparisons highlight the model's leadership in specialized problem-solving while also identifying opportunities for future enhancements. Gemini Deep Think's Role in Shaping the Future Gemini Deep Think represents a significant advancement in AI technology, offering unparalleled capabilities in solving complex problems across mathematics, coding, and design. Its specialized features, new innovations, and exceptional performance make it a valuable asset for researchers, engineers, and organizations tackling humanity's toughest challenges. While it is not designed for general-purpose use, its precision and depth ensure its relevance in addressing critical, high-stakes problems that demand advanced reasoning and creativity. Media Credit: Prompt Engineering Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Not all fierce-looking dinosaurs like T rex packed strong bites, study reveals
A comprehensive new analysis of the bite forces of 18 species of dinosaurs has revealed that, despite their size, several of the giant prehistoric predators packed much weaker bites than previously thought. Researchers, including from the University of Bristol, found that while dinosaurs like the mighty Tyrannosaurus rex were optimised for quick, strong bites, much like a crocodile, many others that walked on two legs, such as the spinosaurus and allosaurs, had much weaker bite forces and instead specialised in slashing and ripping flesh. The research, published in the journal Current Biology, revealed that meat-eating dinosaurs followed different evolutionary paths in terms of skull design and feeding style despite their similarly gigantic sizes. 'Tyrannosaurs evolved skulls built for strength and crushing bites while other lineages had comparatively weaker but more specialized skulls, suggesting a diversity of feeding strategies even at massive sizes,' Andrew Rowe, one author of the study from the University of Bristol, said. 'In other words, there wasn't one 'best' skull design for being a predatory giant; several designs functioned perfectly well.' In the study, scientists probed how walking on two legs influenced skull mechanics and feeding techniques in dinosaurs. Previous research showed that despite reaching similar sizes, predatory dinosaurs evolved in very different parts of the world at various times and conditions and had different skull shapes. This raised doubts on whether the skulls of these dinosaurs were functionally similar under the surface or if there were notable differences in their predatory lifestyles. 'Carnivorous dinosaurs took very different paths as they evolved into giants in terms of feeding biomechanics and possible behaviors,' Dr Rowe said. To understand the relationship between body size and skull biomechanics, researchers used 3D X-ray scanning technology to analyse the skull mechanics and quantify the feeding performance and the bite strength across 18 species of two-legged carnivorous dinosaurs ranging from small ones to giants. Researchers were surprised to find clear divergence among the species. For instance, skull stress didn't show a pattern of increase with size. Some smaller dinosaurs even experienced greater stress than the larger species due to increased muscle volume and bite force. 'Tyrannosaurids like T rex had skulls that were optimised for high bite forces at the cost of higher skull stress,' Dr Rowe noted. 'But in some other giants like Giganotosaurus, we calculated stress patterns suggesting a relatively lighter bite. It drove home how evolution can produce multiple 'solutions' to life as a large, carnivorous biped.' Overall, being a predatory two-legged dinosaur did not always equate to being a bone-crushing giant like T rex. Unlike T rex, some dinosaurs like spinosaurus and allosaurs became giants while maintaining weaker bites more suited to slashing at prey and stripping flesh. 'Large tyrannosaur skulls were instead optimised like modern crocodiles with high bite forces that crushed prey,' Dr Rowe explained. 'I tend to compare Allosaurus to a modern Komodo dragon in terms of feeding style.' 'This biomechanical diversity suggests that dinosaur ecosystems supported a wider range of giant carnivore ecologies than we often assume,' he added.
