Safety Jowell Combay commits to Tennessee football, following teammate to Vols
On July 9, Combay made his announcement alongside coaches and teammates at Kell High School in Marietta, Georgia. A day earlier, Kell four-star linebacker Brayden Rouse also pledged to the Vols.
Advertisement
Combay is a 6-foot-1, 190-pounder. He is ranked the No. 49 safety and No. 635 prospect overall in the 2026 class, according to 247Sports Composite.
Combay chose Tennessee over South Carolina, Georgia, Missouri and Wisconsin. He drew scholarship offers from more than 30 FBS schools, including 10 in the SEC.
SEC MEDIA DAYS Why Tennessee's Joey Aguilar, Jermod McCoy won't attend 2025 event
Here are Tennessee football commitments in 2026 class
Combay is Tennessee's 11th commitment since June 27.
UT now has 20 commitments in the 2026 recruiting class, led by five-star quarterback Faizon Brandon.
Advertisement
Rouse, defensive lineman Dereon Albert, edge rusher Zach Groves, wide receiver Tyreek King, offensive tackle Gabriel Osenda, tight end Carson Sneed and linebacker TJ White committed to the Vols. They are rated four stars by 247Sports Composite.
The class also includes cornerback Zay Anderson, offensive lineman Edward Baker, athlete Legend Bey, edge rusher CJ Edwards, edge rusher Kedric Golston, safety KJ McClain, linebacker Braylon Outlaw, defensive lineman Darryl Rivers, athlete Javonte Smith, cornerback Jamyan Theodore and safety Luke Thompson. They are rated three stars.
Adam Sparks is the Tennessee football beat reporter. Email adam.sparks@knoxnews.com. X, formerly known as Twitter@AdamSparks. Support strong local journalism by subscribing at knoxnews.com/subscribe.
Get the latest news and insight on SEC football by subscribing to the SEC Unfiltered newsletter, delivered straight to your inbox.
This article originally appeared on Knoxville News Sentinel: Safety Jowell Combay commits to Tennessee football, following teammate in 2026 class
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Auburn, Oklahoma among Power 4 programs playing catch-up in recruiting
There will be some high-profile recruits who make decisions in the coming weeks as their senior seasons approach, and of course, there will be flips as we get closer to the early signing period. But now that we've moved past June and the July Fourth commitment wave, we have a pretty good idea of where each program stands in the 2026 recruiting cycle. Advertisement Programs like Alabama, Georgia, Michigan, Texas A&M and others have had strong summers. But today, we're focusing on the teams that have been less fortunate over the past few weeks. Let's examine which programs still have much to do to reach their standards. (Note: All rankings are from the 247Sports Composite.) The Tigers have signed top-10 classes each of the past two recruiting cycles. For the most part, coach Hugh Freeze has made good on the unofficial mandate he received when he was hired: Get Auburn's recruiting back to where it needs to be. His 'worst' class ranked 18th back in the 2023 cycle, and he had just weeks to really build that one. So it's pretty staggering to look at the 2026 team rankings and see Auburn in the 70s, hovering around Oregon State and Toledo. The Tigers hold just eight commitments, which is a factor in the lower ranking. A majority of the programs in the top 25 have at least 15 commitments in their class. But Auburn has to play catch-up elsewhere, too. Only three of the Tigers' eight commitments are blue-chip prospects. Their average player rating is 89.16, which is not horrible but not where a program needs to be to compete at a high level in the SEC. Auburn's average player rating was 91.57 in 2025 and 92.10 in 2024. The Tigers did flip four-star quarterback Peyton Falzone from Penn State in late June and landed four-star linebacker Adam Balogoun-Ali, but that's the only real splash they've made. They've also had three blue-chip commits flip to other programs in recent weeks. Freeze and Auburn athletic director John Cohen addressed recruiting, House settlement interpretations and roster-building methods with reporters last week. Freeze alluded to Auburn needing to pay to retain players on the current roster, which impacts how much they'll spend recruiting. Advertisement Cohen mentioned Aug. 1 as a critical date. 'Aug. 1 is the first day a prospective student-athlete can receive (a financial) offer on paper,' Cohen said. 'That's a big day. It's not a rumor. It's not innuendo. It's not this person said this. It's an offer on paper. We're a good distance away from Aug. 1st and a really good distance away from December.' We'll know where Freeze stands in December. He's just 11-14 through two seasons as Auburn's coach and needs to dramatically improve to cast aside doubts about his future with the Tigers. That uncertainty likely hasn't helped on the recruiting trail either. Another situation where a coach's future with the program is far from certain. Brent Pry is just 16-21 in three seasons as the Hokies' coach, and Virginia Tech underwhelmed when it had pretty high expectations in 2024. So, Pry badly needs wins. It's going to be difficult to achieve recruiting at this rate. Pry's first four classes were all ranked somewhere between 35th and 45th nationally. The Hokies landed a commitment from homegrown four-star offensive lineman Thomas Wilder, which was a good step. But Wilder is the only blue-chip pledge in Virginia Tech's class. He's the only commitment the Hokies have ranked in the top 500. Virginia Tech's average player rating is just 86.24 ahead of only Wake Forest, NC State and Virginia in the ACC. The Hokies have received just nine verbal pledges this cycle, which is another contributing factor to the low ranking. Virginia is the only program in the ACC within that range with just 11 commitments. Everyone else in the league has at least 15 commits. From an in-state perspective, Virginia Tech has commitments from just three of the state's 25 top prospects (none are among the top 10). Michigan and Penn State each have three, too. Rutgers and Syracuse have two. Virginia Tech has to make up a lot of ground over the next few months because there's not much to celebrate on the trail right now — other than to take solace in how rival Virginia (ranked 77th nationally, next to last in the ACC) isn't far ahead. We've highlighted slow starts from the Tigers in the past. But Missouri generally finishes well enough. The Tigers have signed the 20th-ranked class in the past two cycles. So we're not too worried about Missouri's recruiting, especially after winning 21 games over the past two seasons, but it must climb between now and December. In 2024, the Tigers signed eight blue-chip prospects. They followed that up by signing 11 in 2025. Advertisement Missouri has commitments from just four blue-chip prospects right now, so it's off the pace from its recent efforts. The Tigers' class currently is only 10 members deep. South Carolina owns the same total, but it has seven blue-chip commits. It's not that Missouri hasn't been active recently. It's picked up eight commitments since June. But the Tigers started from such a low point (only two commits entering the summer), they have quite the hole to dig out of. We'll see where they eventually land. With roster limits set at 105 players now, the Cornhuskers have to keep this class relatively small in order to meet the threshold in future years. They're at 126, including players who would have been cut if the roster size was strictly enforced, per The Athletic's Mitch Sherman. Nebraska has 12 commitments presently. That would be fine, but with a small class, a program's margin for error dwindles. The fewer players, the more the misses hurt. Of the Cornhuskers' 12 commitments, nine are ranked outside the top 500. So Nebraska's fan base must trust coach Matt Rhule's evaluations and development because it will have to turn prospects who might be longer-term projects into real contributors. The Cornhuskers' average player rating is just 88.00. Without more high-end talent in the class, the program must walk a thin line to produce winners. The Gamecocks are here mainly because of volume. South Carolina has missed on recruiting targets, but its average player rating is still 91.18. The issue is that the Gamecocks have just 10 commitments. As noted earlier, seven of those prospects are blue-chippers, including two in the top 100. South Carolina has genuine momentum as a program coming off a nine-win season, and expectations are high this year with star quarterback LaNorris Sellers. So it would've been logical to assume the Gamecocks would be higher in team rankings, but we'll see when/if they can make the jump this cycle. Advertisement Coach Shane Beamer has usually been good for some splashes later in the recruiting calendar. If South Carolina can assemble the season its fans hope for, it'll likely get more high-profile pledges. The Gamecocks seem on track to land a commitment from four-star quarterback and top-100 prospect Landon Duckworth. Duckworth was committed to South Carolina before reopening his recruitment, and it seems like the two sides will reunite. That will provide a boost the Gamecocks need. The Sooners have had solid additions this summer, headlined by four-star quarterback Bowe Bentley, who is also a top-100 prospect. Bentley was one of five blue-chip commitments Oklahoma has received since June. The Sooners have been active, landing 15 commitments, but nearly half of the class (seven prospects) is ranked 500th or lower. Their average player rating is 88.72. As noted with Nebraska, that formula is a more difficult path to success. But similar to other programs mentioned, there's uncertainty with the head coach. Brent Venables must display notable improvement this season after having losing records in two of his first three years as the Sooners' coach. It doesn't help that Oklahoma has an extremely difficult schedule. That sort of doubt always makes things tougher when recruiting. Fortunately for the Sooners, they don't have as high to climb as other programs on this list, but it's still a difficult path forward considering the thing that could really boost recruiting — stability — will occur only by winning games. The Buffaloes would deserve more examination under normal circumstances, but this sort of recruiting is what we've come to expect from Deion Sanders. Colorado has clearly emphasized the transfer portal and has been very selective in recruiting. The Buffaloes have just six commitments, with only one blue-chip pledge. Advertisement Sanders has typically landed some high-profile commitments late in the process, so it would not be a shock to see him add some top talent as we get closer to December. But the program will simply never finish too high in the recruiting rankings because of its approach. (Photo of Auburn coach Hugh Freeze (left) and Oklahoma coach Brent Venables: Jake Crandall / USA Today Network via Imagn Images)
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
SEC quarterback rankings: Arch Manning headlines loaded list
How good is this crop of SEC quarterbacks? Consider, the quarterback ranked last on this list owns a victory as a starter against Nick Saban's Alabama. And the No. 1 quarterback on my list? Well, he requires no introduction. Advertisement The SEC became the nation's best conference because of its superiority at the line of scrimmage, punishing running backs and speed on the perimeter. Somewhere along the way, though, this conference began attracting the best quarterback talent, too. That's especially reflected this season. Consider this list as a collection of tiers. The top five quarterbacks compromise the top tier, and each would rank highly on a national list of quarterbacks. The middle tier offers stability and parity, and the quarterbacks ranked Nos. 6 through 9 could be scrambled into a different order. Five projected starters transferred to their new schools this past offseason. Some schools, including Alabama, Georgia, Missouri and Tennessee, have not named a starter. The quarterbacks listed reflect our best estimation of the team's starter. Advertisement Here's how I rank this impressive batch of SEC quarterbacks: 1. Arch Manning (Texas) Manning is far from the most proven quarterback on this list, even if he's got the most famous surname. This ranking is based on Manning's potential for a lofty ceiling after he looked the part of budding star in two spot starts and backup opportunities last season. He should be ready to break out in Year 3 playing for Steve Sarkisian, one of the nation's top quarterback developers. Manning's arm is sharp, and his mobility and size are an X-factor, although he must improve his internal clock of knowing when to scramble when under duress. Texas quarterback Arch Manning (16) reacts after scoring a touchdown during the first half against Texas-San Antonio at Darrell K Royal-Texas Memorial Stadium. 2. Garrett Nussmeier (LSU) If you want to know what scouts mean when they say a quarterback has a 'live arm,' watch Nussmeier sling a pass toward the sideline. He's got zip. He needs to reduce his throws into impossible windows and stop telegraphing to the defense where he's going with the ball. His 12 interceptions tied for the most in the SEC, but his 29 touchdown passes ranked just two off the conference lead. He's an established veteran with a big arm, and he's the SEC's returning leader in passing yards. Plus, he's surrounded by a talented receivers. Advertisement QUARTERBACK RANKINGS: Big Ten | SEC | ACC | Big 12 UNDER RADAR: Five sleeper candidates for Heisman Trophy 3. LaNorris Sellers (South Carolina) Sellers steadily improved throughout his redshirt freshman season, to the point that he threw for 353 yards and five touchdowns in a November triumph over Missouri. He's an excellent runner, too. Ask Clemson about that. His quarterback efficiency rating in conference games leads all SEC returning quarterbacks. He's accurate, but he needs to improve his processing time. Ball security is his other area for improvement after he fumbled 11 times. If he speeds up his decision-making, he should see those fumble numbers reduce. Advertisement 4. DJ Lagway (Florida) Lagway is a big play waiting to happen. He throws a good deep ball and averaged 10 yards per pass attempt as a true freshman. He should make more plays with his legs, too, after a hamstring injury slowed him last season. Injuries are a concern. A throwing shoulder injury limited his spring practice participation. By May, though, he was throwing three times per week. Along with his health, he needs to improve his midrange accuracy and reduce interceptions. He threw nine picks in 192 pass attempts last year, but he oozes upside. 5. John Mateer (Oklahoma) Mateer produced awesome stat lines last season at Washington State. He passed for more than 3,100 yards and rushed for more than 800. He's efficient, as well as tough, strong and incredibly athletic. He can throw on the move and from multiple arm angles. He's got plenty of tools in his belt. Why not rank him higher? He's unproven against SEC competition. Two of his worst passing performances last year came in his two games against Power Four competition. Advertisement 6. Austin Simmons (Mississippi) Rebels coach Lane Kiffin describes Simmons as a 'really talented thrower' with 'a high ceiling." You'd likely hear no argument from Kirby Smart. Simmons looked the part in a relief appearance against Georgia that resulted in a touchdown drive. He threw just 32 passes as a backup last season but looked good doing so. He played college baseball before opting to focus exclusively on football. On the mound, he fired fastballs that topped 90 mph. Is he ready to be the guy in a system that asks a lot of the quarterback? That's the question he must answer. 7. Diego Pavia (Vanderbilt) Vanderbilt's Tasmanian Devil of a quarterback runs on moxie, and he's at his best when facing the state of Alabama. This cocksure sixth-year senior spurred Vanderbilt's upsets of Alabama and Auburn, and he previously beat the Tigers while quarterbacking New Mexico State. Pavia values possession, throwing only four interceptions last year. He's a good runner, but the hits he absorbed took a toll. Pavia passed for fewer than 190 yards in each of his final six games. He lacks top-end arm strength, but he has a nose for playmaking. Advertisement 8. Marcel Reed (Texas A&M) Would the real Reed please stand up? The Aggie ignited in September after giving the offensive keys to Reed but fizzled in November, as Reed threw six interceptions in his final five games. The quick-footed Reed showed an ability to extend plays and knife through defenses. He'll need to improve his consistency from the pocket and polish his deep ball. Texas A&M returned a lot of production. As Reed goes (or doesn't go), so will the Aggies. Texas A&M quarterback Marcel Reed (10) throws during the first quarter against Arkansas Razorbacks at AT&T Stadium. 9. Taylen Green (Arkansas) Green is a mobile, hard-nosed runner with a strong arm. He can challenge defenses with downfield strikes. He became more accurate as the season progressed and flourished in an October upset of Tennessee, despite the Vols boasting one of the SEC's top defenses. His next steps are to improve decision-making, navigating through his progressions and sharpening his midrange throws. Advertisement 10. Gunner Stockton (Georgia) The Bulldogs rallied around Stockton after he took the reins midway through the SEC Championship. It's easy to picture him becoming Georgia's heartbeat. He doesn't match predecessor Carsen Beck's arm talent, but he's more mobile, and there's a certain "Je ne sais quoi" about him that appeals to his teammates. He flashed accuracy when his line protected him, and he's skilled in play-action. Whether he'll stretch defenses downfield remains a question. 11. Ty Simpson (Alabama) Simpson hasn't proven himself yet. A former five-star recruit, he's entering Year 4 at Alabama and he's thrown just 50 career passes, with a 58% completion clip. A natural pocket passer, he possesses some mobility, too, and improvisational skills. Coach Kalen DeBoer desires more consistency from Simpson, the quarterback who's first in line to replace predecessor Jalen Milroe. Advertisement 12. Blake Shapen (Mississippi State) Shapen looked sharp as Mississippi State's quarterback for four games last September before a shoulder injury shelved him for the rest of the season. He's back for a sixth season, and the former Baylor quarterback grasps coach Jeff Lebby's offense. Shapen's return offers the Bulldogs reason for optimism, considering he completed 68.5% of his passes before the injury. 13. Jackson Arnold (Auburn) Arnold struggled as Oklahoma's starter, losing his job before regaining it and starting in the Sooners' upset of Alabama. That result must give Auburn hope that the junior shouldn't be written off after a rough season playing behind a porous Oklahoma offensive line. Arnold struggled to connect consistently on throws beyond about 10 yards. Arm strength and mobility are assets. Maybe, this former five-star recruit will regain his confidence at Auburn, where he'll have a better offensive line and receivers. Advertisement 14. Beau Pribula (Missouri) In Pribula's most extensive playing time as a Penn State backup, he showed a steady hand in relief of injured Drew Allar in a win against Wisconsin. He's a quality pickup for Missouri, which needed to replace starter Brady Cook. Pribula hasn't been named for the job, but he seems like he'd be the front-runner in a competition with Sam Horn, Missouri's seldom-used backup. Pribula is an electrifying runner who pairs athleticism with toughness. His running ability provided Penn State with an effective wrinkle to its system. To become a starter, he must prove himself as a consistent pocket passer. 15. Joey Aguilar (Tennessee) Aguilar showed a fearless streak while starting at Appalachian State. A best-case scenario for Tennessee is that he develops into something like what Pavia became for Vanderbilt. Aguilar can extend plays outside the pocket. Fearless can't mean reckless, though. He led the nation in interceptions at App State. Aguilar previously transferred to UCLA, but he left for Tennessee on the backside of the Bruins plundering Nico Iamaleava from the Vols. Aguilar's preseason checklist must include improving pocket poise, ball security and learning a new offense at warp speed. Advertisement 16. Zach Calzada (Kentucky) Calzada started in Texas A&M's upset of Alabama, way back in 2021, and he now prepares for his seventh season with his fourth program. Calzada never developed enough midrange accuracy at Texas A&M, but he threw a good deep ball, and he's coming off a monster season with Incarnate Word of the Championship Subdivision. He's more intriguing than plenty of past Kentucky quarterbacks. Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network's national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@ and follow him on X @btoppmeyer. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: SEC quarterback rankings: Arch Manning headlines loaded list
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ranking QBs the Chiefs will play in 2025: Kansas City should benefit from this matchup coming late in the season
Ranking QBs the Chiefs will play in 2025: Kansas City should benefit from this matchup coming late in the season originally appeared on A to Z Sports. Welcome to our third installment of ranking the quarterbacks that the Chiefs will face in 2025. Advertisement Today we go from No. 13 to 12, as we order from weakest to best. There is a bit of mystery with this QB, but fortunately it's a late season matchup, which will provide Kansas City with plenty of film to study. Lets take a look. . . No. 12: Tennessee Titans QB Cam Ward The Titans selected Ward with the No. 1 overall pick in the 2025 NFL Draft. He is coming off a dynamic season for the Miami Hurricanes in which he threw for 4,313 yards and 39 touchdowns, also adding 204 rushing yards and four TDs. Ward was the consensus No. 1 pick throughout the entire pre-draft process. He is an accurate passer who possesses a quick release and plenty of arm strength. Ward is also very mobile, able to make throws while scrambling or pull the ball down and run. Advertisement Like many talented QBs, Ward carries the "gunslinger" label, meaning although he can make incredible throws, he's a little reckless with the ball at times, leading to turnovers. He only threw seven interceptions in 2024, but did fumble the ball over 30 times throughout his collegiate career. Ward has drawn plenty of comparisons to the Chiefs' own Patrick Mahomes. While those are obviously huge shoes to fill, they do definitely have stylistic similarities. If Ward comes even half close to the success Mahomes had during his first season as a starter, this could be one of the premier QB matchups of the season. The Chiefs will have a good idea of what Ward brings to the table by the time they meet, which won't be until Week 16 in Tennessee. It's very possible that he's much better than where I'm ranking him, but it's hard to know with rookies. Not to mention, K.C. plays a ton of great QBs in 2025. Related: Ranking QBs the Chiefs will play in 2025: Kansas City should get a layup before a quick turnaround on short week View the original article to see embedded media. This story was originally reported by A to Z Sports on Jun 26, 2025, where it first appeared.
