That's The Way Love Goes: Janet Jackson & Maxwell Are NOT Dating Despite Cozy ‘Cabaret' Outing
The musicians were the talk of social media when they were seen holding hands and looking every bit of a couple! But, according to reports from TMZ , sources with direct knowledge insist Jackson and Maxwell have nothing going on romantically.
The pair have been good friends for years and years, and, according to insiders, that is still where their relationship stands today.
Speculation about Janet and Maxwell possibly being a couple started to skyrocket after they arrived hand-in-hand at the 1,500th performance of Cabaret at the Kit Kat Club on Monday evening in London. The 'That's the Way Love Goes' singer was flashing a big smile as she led Maxwell into the performance, and the friends looked closer than normal during this particular outing.
Jackson has been divorced since 2017, and in the years since, she's kept her love life on the down low. Maxwell isn't publicly dating anyone, either, but unfortunately for hopeful fans, that doesn't mean anything is going on between these two.
These rumors come nearly a decade after Jackson divorced her ex-husband Wissam Al Mana after five years of marriage. Together, the two share son, Eissa, 8.
'[Being a mother is] the most beautiful thing. I'm so thankful God allowed me to have this experience, this journey in my life,' she told the BBC in July 2024. 'And I love every single minute of it.'
In the same interview, Janet joked about her love life, asking, 'How many times have I been married now? Three I think.' Prior to Al Mana, she was previously married to René Elizondo Jr. and James DeBarge.
In another interview with The Guardian a few months later, Jackson revealed she was single, but said she feels like she has broken free of control in her relationships.
'I'm single, so I pray to God that I might have different lenses on these eyes than I did before,' she said. 'I know that if someone were to come along…even if I didn't recognize it, I guarantee you my friends would shake the shit out of me and say, 'What are you doing?!' But I think I'm seeing it through different lenses now. I think I am breaking that pattern.'
The post That's The Way Love Goes: Janet Jackson & Maxwell Are NOT Dating Despite Cozy 'Cabaret' Outing appeared first on Bossip.
SEE ALSO
That's The Way Love Goes: Janet Jackson & Maxwell Are NOT Dating Despite Cozy 'Cabaret' Outing was originally published on bossip.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
4 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Hunter Biden let loose during a profanity-laced YouTube interview. Here are a few takeaways.
Hunter blamed Ambien for his father's disastrous debate performance last year Who could forget Advertisement Hunter Biden blamed the debacle on Ambien that he said his father took amid a demanding schedule. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'I think what happened in that debate, he flew around the world basically, the mileage that he could've flown around the world three times, he's 81 years old,' Hunter said. 'He's tired. You give him Ambien to be able to sleep. He gets up on the stage, and he looks like he's a deer in the headlights. And it feeds into every story that everybody wants to tell.' Hunter had harsh words for a certain Hollywood A-lister who called for his father to drop out George Clooney attends the opening of "Good Night And Good Luck" on Broadway on April 3, 2025, in New York City. Jamie McCarthy/Getty Hunter Biden also tore into actor George Clooney, who Advertisement 'Number one, I agree with [director] Quentin Tarantino,' Hunter huffed. 'George Clooney is not a [expletive] actor. He is a [expletive] like, I don't know what he is. He's a brand. And by the way, and God bless him. You know what? He supposedly treats his friends really well. ... And he's got a really great place in Lake Como, and he's great friends with Barack Obama. [Expletive] you.' Addressing Clooney, he continued, 'What do you have to do with [expletive] anything? Why do I have to [expletive] listen to you? What right do you have to step on a man who's given 52 years of his [expletive] life to the service of this country, and decide that you, George Clooney, are gonna take out basically a full-page ad in the [expletive] New York Times?' Hunter had harsh words for Democratic strategists who followed Clooney's script James Carville (sitting) with Martha Stewart and documentary film director Matt Tyneaur at the Telluride Film Festival in 2024. Handout Skewering a who's who of prominent Democrats who also called on his father to quit the race, Hunter cited Clinton adviser 'James Carville, who hasn't won a race in 40 [expletive] years, and [strategist] David Axelrod who had one success in his political life, and that was Barack Obama.' 'And that was because of Barack Obama, not because of [expletive] David Axelrod. And [former Obama aide] David Plouffe, and all of these guys and the Pod Save America [podcast] guys, who were junior [expletive] speech writers on Barack Obama's senate staff, who've been dining out on their relationship with him for years, making millions of dollars. The [strategist] Anita Dunn's of the world, who's made 40, $50 million dollars off the Democratic party — they're all going to insert their judgment over a man who has figured out, unlike anybody else, how to get elected to the United States Senate over seven times, how to pass more legislation than any president in history, how to have a better midterm election than anybody in history, and how to garner more votes than any president that has ever won.' Advertisement Sen. Barack Obama shares a laugh with his staff and senior campaign advisor David Axelrod, left, during a flight on Feb. 4, 2008. AP/Associated Press Hunter had harsh words for President Trump President Donald Trump speaks at a dinner for Republican senators at the White House on Friday. MUST CREDIT: Allison Robbert/For The Washington Post Allison Robbert/For The Washington Post Biden also ripped President Trump and 'He is a [expletive] dictator thug,' Hunter said. 'He's somehow convinced all of us that these people are the [expletive] criminals? 'People are really upset about illegal immigration,' [expletive] you. How do you think a hotel room gets cleaned? How do you think you've got food on your [expletive] table? Who do you think washes your dishes?' Hunter opened up about his addiction struggles Hunter Biden, joined by his wife Melissa Cohen Biden, arrives at the J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building in Wilmington, Del., on June 3, 2024. RYAN COLLERD/AFP via Getty Images Also during the interview, Hunter discussed 'I was drinking so much alcohol, almost a handle of vodka a day,' he told Callaghan. 'And alcohol is the most destructive drug, not just to your body, but it puts you in more danger than any other drug that I've ever experienced.' He also ingested large amounts of crack cocaine, he said. 'And then you add on top of that, the amount of crack that I was using at the time,' he said. 'And crack cocaine, in terms of your physical health, is not as dangerous as the situation that you put yourself in to be able to obtain it. ... The places that you can go get it are some of the most dangerous places in whatever location you happen to be in. And it's everywhere. Mainly for that reason, I learned how to make my own.' Advertisement Travis Andersen can be reached at
Forbes
9 hours ago
- Forbes
Taking Back Creative Control In The Age Of Generative AI
Ira Belsky, Artlist cofounder and Co-CEO. getty When AI first came into our lives, it did so with a bang, not a whisper. In every creative field—from design to filmmaking to music—we were told AI could do what we do, only faster, cheaper and, often, alarmingly well. The result? A quiet panic. The kind creatives rarely talk about openly. But the real gut punch isn't just that AI can create. It's that suddenly, anyone can call themselves a creator. The tools promise instant expertise, and the market rarely questions it. Creative work is starting to feel like a race, and everyone else seems to have a head start. If you're a creator who has spent years honing your craft, developing your eye and building your instincts, then you understand the feeling of losing control—not just of your tools, but of your profession, your identity, your value. Here's what I've learned: Creativity has never been about speed. It's about vision and turning an idea in your mind into something tangible and meaningful. That's where current AI tools, despite all their promise, still fall short. The technology is impressive. But the control—the ability to direct, shape and fully own the output—is where it's still playing catch-up. Creativity Is A Translation, Not A Shortcut At its core, creativity is the act of control. Whether you're writing a song, directing a film, designing a landing page or editing a reel, it starts in your head, with a deeply personal vision. The work of a creator is the work of translation: from intangible to tangible, from idea to artifact. So far, AI has largely skipped this crucial middle step. It spits out results based on prompts and patterns—often incredible, sometimes uncanny, but rarely fully aligned with what you had in mind. Your role as the creator shifts. You go from making to tweaking, selecting, settling. That's not control, that's compromise. AI breakthroughs are real. But the tools built on them haven't kept pace. Most have been designed to dazzle, not to collaborate. Take video production, where this disconnect is especially clear. Traditionally, shooting a video meant managing tight budgets, complex logistics and precise timelines. Scripts mapped every moment. Storyboards visualized every shot. Shot lists defined camera angles, lighting and movement. Control wasn't optional—it was essential. A single day of shooting could cost thousands, so reshoots could derail entire projects. Creative control became a discipline. Now, AI video tools promise to eliminate those constraints. No crews. No costs. No timelines. Just prompt and generate. But in removing logistical friction, they've introduced creative friction. They've stripped away the very craft that made great video possible. This is where AI disrupts the deeply human process of translating vision into output. The technology can generate stunning visuals, but it still struggles to honor the creative decisions that give meaning. It's not enough to just generate. We need tools that let us direct. Learning From The Old To Build The New This isn't the first time creators have faced constraints and fought to preserve creative authority. The history of every medium is one of working within limits, without compromising vision. Early digital artists developed iconic styles using limited machines. Indie filmmakers made magic on tiny budgets. Game developers turned low memory into immersive worlds. Constraints didn't stifle creativity; they shaped it. The pattern is clear: Embrace limitations, but never surrender control. Consider desktop publishing. When software like Illustrator and Photoshop became widely available, many designers feared their craft would be devalued. Some worried that mass access would lead to amateur work or a drop in quality. But over time, these tools proved empowering, offering professionals greater flexibility, precision and creative freedom. Desktop publishing was the creative tech revolution of its time, and it's a strong analogy for how we can view AI today—not as a threat, but as a tool to evolve the craft. Today, creative technology companies such as Adobe are following a similar trajectory with AI. Features like Generative Fill don't overwrite your process—they extend it. You can define where AI acts, refine results and remain the author of the work. This approach treats AI as a collaborator that enhances creative workflows rather than replacing the creator. This is the blueprint for the future of creative AI. Now is the time to build a 'controllability layer.' AI shouldn't be a black box delivering finished products. It should respect and mirror how creators think and work, opening new possibilities while preserving creative authorship. Now Is The Time To Shape The Future Building that controllability layer is just the start. The choices we make now will determine whether AI becomes a blunt instrument or a precision tool in the creative process. For creators, the path forward is about clarity. Don't get distracted by viral AI content that prioritizes novelty over nuance. Focus on tools that amplify your voice, not replace it. Look for applications that preserve your creative decision-making while handling the technical heavy lifting. Experiment with intention. Stay grounded in your principles. For those building the tools, this is your moment. The foundation exists, but the next phase requires creative partnership. Study how creative professionals work. Understand the micro-decisions that happen throughout the process. Design interfaces that honor those workflows and extend creative reach. The Road Ahead We're at a turning point—a chance to move from fear to fluency, from reacting to leading the charge. AI tools don't just help you create—they collaborate. They enhance creativity and return agency to where it belongs: in the hands of the creator. Every creative revolution has been powered not by tools that replaced artists, but by those that empowered them. AI is no different. The future belongs to those who take back creative control and use these tools to amplify their unique vision. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Anne Burrell's Death Being Investigated as Possible 'Drug Overdose,' Reports Say
A medical examiner will determine the final cause of death for beloved Food Network star Anne Burrell, but a new report has provided a disturbing detail. The New York Times obtained a document that shows the death is being investigated as a "possible overdose." Burrell, 55, was discovered deceased in the shower of her Brooklyn home by her husband Stuart Claxton, according to the Times, which reported that there were many pills found in the vicinity. Burrell had posted on Instagram about attending an improv event the night before she died, and seemed to be in good spirits in her last post. The New York City Police Department is investigating Burrell's death "as a possible drug overdose, according to an internal document," the Times wrote. That document says Burrell was 'discovered in the shower unconscious and unresponsive surrounded by approximately (100) assorted pills," the Times wrote. She was pronounced dead at the scene, and, although an autopsy was completed, the cause and manner of her death remained pending, the Times reported on June 20. Burrell was known for her feisty personality as she mentored chefs on the popular show the Worst Cooks in America TMZ also reported that the possibility of a drug overdose is being investigated by the police. The NYPD "is looking into the possibility the late Food Network star ingested a fatal amount of drugs," TMZ wrote. Burrell's husband saw her alive around 1 a.m. and found her dead in the shower about six or seven hours later, the site Burrell's Death Being Investigated as Possible 'Drug Overdose,' Reports Say first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 21, 2025
